Page 202

Official source

MS 1000 (2) c. Purchased a controlled substance, guns, ammunition, or explosives with benefits. d. Bought or sold SNAP benefits on or after August 22, 1996. e. Made false statements regarding identity or place of residence in order to receive duplicate benefits on or after August 22, 1996. f. Commits any act that violates the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, federal SNAP regulations, or state law for the purpose of using, presenting, transferring, acquiring, possessing, or trafficking Electronic Benefit Transfer cards used as part of an automated benefit delivery system. 2. Intentional Program Violation Court (IPC) – is an IPV as a result of a court’s determination of guilt, due to fraud. D. Suspected Intentional Program Violation (SIPV) – a claim category that occurs when fraud is suspected until a final determination is made. The SIPV claim category is temporary and updated to IHE or IPV, as appropriate. If unsure if a client had intent to commit fraud, an SIPV should be pursued and the outcome will be decided by admission, hearing, or prosecution.]

loading…

Page 202

Official source

MS 1000 (2) c. Purchased a controlled substance, guns, ammunition, or explosives with benefits. d. Bought or sold SNAP benefits on or after August 22, 1996. e. Made false statements regarding identity or place of residence in order to receive duplicate benefits on or after August 22, 1996. f. Commits any act that violates the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, federal SNAP regulations, or state law for the purpose of using, presenting, transferring, acquiring, possessing, or trafficking Electronic Benefit Transfer cards used as part of an automated benefit delivery system. 2. Intentional Program Violation Court (IPC) – is an IPV as a result of a court’s determination of guilt, due to fraud. D. Suspected Intentional Program Violation (SIPV) – a claim category that occurs when fraud is suspected until a final determination is made. The SIPV claim category is temporary and updated to IHE or IPV, as appropriate. If unsure if a client had intent to commit fraud, an SIPV should be pursued and the outcome will be decided by admission, hearing, or prosecution.]