B. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this rule as required by Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review”; E.O. 13132 , “Federalism”; E.O 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review”; E.O. 14192 , “Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation”; the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (Pub. L. 96354); section 1102(b) of the Act; section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 ( Pub. L. 104-4 ); and the Congressional Review Act ( 5 U.S.C. 804(2) ).
E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select those regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts.). Section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 defines a “significant regulatory action” as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, or the President's priorities.
A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for a regulatory action that is significant under section 3(f)(1) of E.O. 12866 . Based on our estimates, this IFC does meet that criterion as the aggregate amount of benefits and costs may exceed the $100 million threshold in at least 1 year. OIRA has determined this rulemaking is significant per section 3(f)(1). Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (also known as the Congressional Review Act), OIRA has also determined that this rule is major as it meets the criteria set forth in 5 U.S.C. 804(2) .