(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA AL-19-0017-RIM PDF#
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Alabama
State Plan Amendments (SPA) #: AL-19-0017-RIM and AL-19-0018-RIM
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) Approved SPA Template 3) State Plan Pages
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop 32-01-1ó Baltirnore, MD 21244-"1850 ctNl¡R:l foß MfDrc Rt & Mf,Dtc tD sERvtcfs CENÍFßcursTON MEDICAID & CHIP SFßVICES Children and Adults Health Prosrams Grouo
SEP | 7 Zltg
Ms. Teela Sanders Acting Director, Children's Health Insurance Program 201 Monroe Street Montgomery, AL36104
Dear Ms. Sanders
Your title XXI Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendments (SPA) AL- 19-0017-RIM and AL-19-0018-RIM have been approved. These SPAs have an effective date of July 1 ,2019.
SPA number AL-19-0017-RIM permits Alabama to implement a health services initiative (HSI) to provide prenatal monitoring, case management and care coordination services to low-income, high-risk pregnant women and their infants in Montgomery, Macon, and Russell counties in order to improve pregnancy outcomes and infant health. Patients will receive services during pregnancy and for up to one year post delivery.
Section 2105(aXlXDXii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and 42 CFR 9457.10 authorize use of title XXI administrative funding for expenditures for HSIs under the plan for improving the health of children, including targeted low-income children and other low-income children. Consistent with section 2105(c)(6)(B) of the Act and 42 CFR 9457.626, title XXI funds used to support an HSI cannot supplant Medicaid or other sources of federal funding.
The state shall ensure that the remaining title XXI funding, within the state's l0 percent administrative limit, is sufficient to continue the proper administration of the CHIP program. If such funds become less than sufficient, the state agrees to redirect title XXI funds from the support of this HSI to the administration of the CHIP program. The state shall report annually to CMS the expenditures funded by the HSI for each federal fiscal year.
SPA number AL-19-0018-RIM permits Alabama to expand coverage for unborn children residing in Montgomery, Macon, and Russell counties with family incomes up to, and including 312 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) whose pregnant mothers are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid. Coverage will include pregnancy-related services including prenatal care for children from conception to birth. A copy of the approved CS9 is attached and is incorporated in section 4.1.9 of the current Alabama CHIP state plan.
Your title XXI project officer is Ms. Cassie Lagorio. She is available to answer questions concerning this amendment and other CHlP-related issues. Ms. Lagorio's contact information is as follows:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
Page2 - Ms. Teela Sanders Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, Mail Stop S2-01-16 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1 850 Telephone: (410) 786-4554 E-mail: Cassandra.Lagoño@cms.hhs.gov
Offrcial communications regarding program matters should be sent simultaneously to Ms. Lagorio and to Ms. Shantrina Roberts, Deputy Director, Division of Medicaid Field Operations South. Ms. Robertsos address is:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Division of Medicaid Field Operations South 6l Forsyth Street, SV/, Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909
V/e look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely,
/signed Anne Marie Costello/
Director
cc: Ms. Shantina Roberts, Deputy Director, Division of Medicaid Field Operations South
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
CHIP Eligibility
State Name: Alabama OMB Control Number: 0938‐1148
Transmittal Number: AL - 19 - 0001 Separate Child Health Insurance Program CS9 Eligibility - Coverage From Conception to Birth
42 CFR 457.10
■ Coverage From Conception to Birth - Coverage from conception to birth when the mother is not eligible for Medicaid.
✔ The CHIP Agency operates this covered group in accordance with the following provisions:
Age Standard
From conception through birth.
Does the state have an additional age definition or other age-related conditions? No
Income Standards
Income standards are applied statewide. No
Select a method of geographic variation:
Standard varies by county or city.
Standard varies in some other geographic way.
In each row of the table, you may enter one county if the county has an income standard that is unique to that county. If multiple counties share the same income standard, enter all the counties first, then enter the income standard that applies to those counties.
Add Counties From zero up to (% FPL) Remove
Montgomery, Macon, and Russell Counties 312 Add Remove
Do you have any cities within your state which have their own separate income standards? No
■ Exempted from requirement of providing or applying for a Social Security Number.
■ Exempted from requirement of verifying citizenship status.
PRA Disclosure Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 50 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. V.20181119
SPA number: AL-19-0018-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Page 1 of 1
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PACWLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: Alabama (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR 457.40(b)) Scott Harris, State Health Officer, Alabama Department of Public Health (Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)):
Name: Teela Sanders Position/Title: CHIP Director Name: Jeffrey Wright Position/Title: Director, ADPH Financial Services Name: Position/Title:
*Disclosure.According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148 (CMS-10398 #34). The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, write to: CMS, 7500 Security Blvd., Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 1 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
Introduction:Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 105-33amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 further modified the program.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the state plan amendments (SPAs). Itreflects the regulatoryrequirements at 42 CFR Part 457as well as the previously approved SPA templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SPA template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is developing regulations to implement the CHIPRA requirements. When final regulations are published in the Federal Register, this template will be modified to reflect those rules and States will be required to submit SPAs illustrating compliance with the new regulations. States are not required to resubmit their State plans based on the updated template. However, States must use the updated template when submitting a State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirementsfor Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. (42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. ASPA is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90 day review period, or clock for CHIP SPAs,that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 2 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
response is received. More information on the SPA review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a “clean” copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101);(42 CFR 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of StateApproach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state’s program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology- The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable.(Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)); (42CFR 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 3 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage; benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary- approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope, and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State’s use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre- existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 2101(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 4 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: • Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SPA process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background) They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • 10 (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 5 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
• Combination of Options-CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes of up to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion of Medicaid, the description provided under “Option to Expand Medicaid” would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in “Option to Create a Separate Program” would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
ProposedState plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Name of Project Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 6 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101)(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101, which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXI.
1.1.1. * Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(1) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SPA to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.2. Providing expanded benefits under the State’s Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI, in conjunction with an expansion in the State’s Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3. A combination of both of the above. (Section 2101(a)(2))
* Until October 1, 2002, Alabama’s CHIP was a combination program. With the mandated gradual increase of Medicaid coverage at higher income levels for children born after September 30, 1983, the Medicaid expansion portion of CHIP was subsumed, on October 1, 2002, by the Alabama Medicaid SOBRA Program for Pregnant Women and Children.
1.1-DS The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template. (Section 2110(b)(5))
1.2. Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 7 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
Alabama has not and will not claim expenditures for child health assistance prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS.
1.3. Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. (42CFR 457.130)
Assurances are on file with DHHS. The Alabama Department of Public Health continues to assure that compliance with all applicable civil rights requirements.L
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA(42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
Original Plan Effective Date:February 1, 1998 Amendment 1 – Establishment of ALL Kids Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 2 – Establishment of ALL Kids PLUS Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1999 Amendment 3 – Disregards Effective/Implementation Date: June 1, 2001 Amendment 4 - Compliance Effective/Implementation Date: August 24, 2001 Amendment 5 – Waiting List, Cost Sharing, Benefit Changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2003 Amendment 6 – Discontinuance of the Waiting List and other Clean-Up changes SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 8 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Effective/Implementation Date: November 23, 2004 Amendment 7 – Raise the upper income eligibility limit to 300% of FPL and other minor changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009 Amendment 8 – Include a private foundation grant as an additional source of state funding Effective/Implementation Date: October 27, 2009 Amendment 9 – Establishment of a Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009; Addendum on Dental Benefits Under Title XXI: Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 10 – Eligibility for children of employees of a public agency (state employees and public education employees) Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2011 Amendment 11 – Provisions for Implementing Temporary Adjustments to Enrollment Determination and/or Redetermination Policies and Cost Sharing Requirements for Applicants/Renewals living in and/or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event. In the event of a disaster, the State will notify CMS of the intent to provide temporary adjustments to its enrollment and/or redetermination policies, the effective dates of such adjustments and the counties/areas impacted by the disaster. Effective/Implementation Date: April 15, 2011 Amendment 12 – Increase premiums, increase co-pays and revise the methodology for determining annual aggregate cost-sharing Effective/Implementation Date: May 1, 2012 Amendment 13 – Establishment of copayments for therapy services (physical, occupational, and speech), vision services and chiropractic services; and cleanup changes Effective/Implementation Date: August 1, 2013 Amendment 14 – Alignment of ALL Kids fee groups with provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other editorial changes to comply with previously approved ACA SPAs. Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2014 Amendment 15 - AL-16-0015-MEXP – CHIP Medicaid expansion to cover Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 18% FPL through 141% FPL. Effective Date: October 1, 2015 Implementation Date: January 1, 2016 Amendment 16 – AL-18-0016-PAR - Attestation and documentation of Mental SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 9 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
Health Parity and Addiction Equity. Submission Date: July 10, 2018 Proposed Effective Date: October 1, 2017* Implementation Date: October 1, 2017* *Note: Benefits were adjusted in October 2010 to be compliant with mental health parity; this amendment did not require any benefit changes Amendment 17 – AL-19-0017-RIM - Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Service Initiative Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Proposed Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 18 – AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Eligibility – Coverage From Conception to Birth Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Proposed Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 10 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) AL-14-0016 MAGI CS7 Eligibility – Targeted Low Supersedes the Eligibility Income Children current & sections Effective/Implementati Methods Geographic on Date: January 1, Children With Access to Area 4.1.1; Age 2014 CS10 Public Employee Coverage 4.1.2; and Income 4.1.3 Section 4.4.1: Supersedes only the MAGI-Based Income information on CS15 Methodologies dependents of public employees in this section; supporting documentation should be incorporated as an appendix to the current state plan
Incorporate within a separate subsection under section 4.3
AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Coverage from Conception Effective Date: July 1, to Birth 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 11 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) (Original: AL-14-0014 XXI CS3 Eligibility for Medicaid Supersedes the Effective/Implementatio Medicaid Expansion Program current n Date: January 1, 2014) Expansio Medicaid n expansion AL-16-0015-MEXP CHIP Medicaid expansion section 4.0 to cover Medicaid Effective/Implementati enrollees ages 14 years to on Date: October 1, 19 years with incomes 2015 above 18% FPL through 141% FPL AL-14-0015 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible for Incorporate 2101(f) Medicaid as a Result of the within a Effective/Implementati Group Elimination of Income separate on Date: January 1, Disregards subsection 2014 under section 4.1 AL-14-0018 Eligibility CS24 Single, Streamlined Supersedes the Process Application current Effective/Implementati Screen and Enroll Process sections 4.3 on Date: January 1, Renewals and 4.4 2014 AL-14-0017 Non- CS17 Non-Financial Eligibility – Supersedes the Financial Residency current section Effective/Implementati Eligibility 4.1.5 on Date: January 1, CS18 Non-Financial – Citizenship 2014 Supersedes the CS19 Non-Financial – Social current Security Number sections 4.1.0; 4.1.1-LR; 4.1.1- CS20 Substitution of Coverage LR
CS21 Non-Payment of Premiums Supersedes the current section CS27 Continuous Eligibility 4.1.9.1
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 12 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s)
Supersedes the current section 4.4.4
Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current section 4.1.8
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 13 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
1.4- TC Tribal Consultation(Section 2107(e)(1)(C))Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved. TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: October 1, 2015 In accordance with approved policies, on January 10, 2019, a certified letter explaining the changes proposed in AL-19-0017-RIM and AL-19-0018-RIM was mailed to the Tribal Chairman of the one federally recognized Native American tribe in Alabama, the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. The letter included the purpose for the proposed changes and a description of the changes. In the letter, the Tribal Chairman was also reminded that she had the opportunity to respond to the proposed changes within 30 days and was given contact information for any such response. The certified letter was signed by the CHIP Director. TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: February 10, 2019
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children’s Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability, and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified , by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 14 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
requirements). (Section 2102(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.80(a)) Prior to CHIP, the only two programs offering health insurance to low-income children were Medicaid and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF). Medicaid served children at the minimum income levels required by federal law. This meant that Medicaid coverage was available to children at three different levels of income and age: - Those under the age of six (6) years with incomes up to 133% FPL; - Those children six (6) through 14 years of age who were born after September 30, 1983 with incomes up to 100%FPL; and, - Those remaining children through the age of 18 years (middle and older teens) with incomes at the TANF assistance level (below approximately 13% FPL). The ACCF served children (birth through 18 years) with incomes from the Medicaid levels up to 200% FPL.
From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CHIP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama’s CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. Beginning October 1, 2015, however, children in this category (ages 14 to 19 with incomes between 13% FPL and 141% FPL) will again be enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion.
Originally, CHIP used a baseline number of uninsured children derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS). This baseline including the following chart was derived from a study by Winterbottom et.al. based on a three year merged Current Population Survey, or CPS, (1990-92), which showed over 200,000 children, in Alabama, under 18 years to be uninsured.
Employer Medicaid Other Uninsured Coverage Percent 59.3 17.2 5.1 18.4 Number 652,300 189,200 110,000 202,400
However, due to concerns about the CPS regarding potential problems with subjects’ abilities to recall information, Alabama changed its baseline estimate to reflect data from the 1997 round of the Urban Institute’s National Survey of America’s Families (NSAF). The NSAF indicated that there were 173,012 uninsured children in Alabama. Of these, 91,209 were < 100% Federal Poverty Level (FPL), 49,579 were above 100 up to 200% FPL and 32,223 were >200% FPL.
In its first 4 years of implementation (October 1, 1998 – September 30, 2002), Phase II, ALL Kids, enrolled over 80,000 children. It is estimated that 52,000 children have current enrollment in ALL Kids at the end of FY 2002.
ALL Kids PLUS, added as a third amendment to the CHIP State Plan (October, 1999), serves SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 15 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
as a mechanism by which children with special health care needs/conditions (CSHCN/C), who are enrolled in ALL Kids, may receive health and health related services which are beyond the scope of the basic ALL Kids package. ALL Kids PLUS was designed so that it serves as a funding source for CHIP state match and as a funding mechanism for state agencies who serve CSHCN/C with state funds. State agencies participating in ALL Kids PLUS supply the state match, provide the service, and receive full reimbursement. It was originally estimated that approximately 9% of these enrollees would also receive at least one service under ALL Kids PLUS. However because the basic benefit package is so comprehensive, a much lower percentage of children are receiving PLUS services. It is expected that this percentage will increase as more state agencies contract with CHIP to become ALL Kids PLUS providers. With the advent of ALL Kids, the ACCF has changed its income eligibility criteria to serve children who are not eligible for Medicaid or ALL Kids and who have incomes up to 235% FPL. Because, the ACCF has no enrollment restriction regarding immigrants, this program has seen a dramatic increase in its Hispanic enrollment.
Guidance: Section 2.2allows states to request to use the funds available under the 10 percent limit on administrative expenditures in order to fund services not otherwise allowable. The health services initiatives must meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.10.
2.2. Health Services Initiatives-Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10) As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Services Initiative. The aim of this initiative is to reduce the infant mortality rate in selected counties within Alabama through the provision of a variety of evidence-based case management services for pregnant women and children. These case management services will target health, social, and behavioral health related high-risk factors which have been shown to impact pregnancy outcomes and infant health. Case Management services will connect patients, with high-risk factors, to appropriate services and case managers will follow-up to ensure that risk factors are being addressed satisfactorily. It is anticipated that the case manager will make a total of 6 face to face visits. Three visits would occur during the prenatal care, and three visits would be provided post delivery.
The care coordination services provided postpartum including services to the infant include:
i. Make home visit within one month following delivery to complete the following: 1. Encourage patient to keep postpartum appointment including providing appointment SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 16 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
reminders to help ensure completion of the postpartum appointment. 2. Encourage patient to choose a reliable birth control method. If the patient has chosen sterilization as her method, follow-up with the patient to ensure the procedure is completed. 3. Ensure patient is established with a PMP for the infant. 4. Ensure infant has enrolled in WIC, if eligible. 5. Educate the patient on the importance of immunizations for the infant. ii. Assist in scheduling appointments with infant’s PMP up to the first year to ensure that well baby checkups are made and immunizations are up to date. Follow up after the appointments to verify that appointments were kept. Well Baby checkups are scheduled at: a. 1 month b. 2 months c. 4 months d. 6 months e. 9 months f. 12 months iii. Promote the child’s overall physical, cognitive, and emotional development through educating parents/caregivers about developmental milestones according to the child’s age and developmental abilities. iv. Complete an ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition, a developmental screening tool) as appropriate at face to face appointments. v. Educate the parents about the importance of reading to the infant to promote cognitive development. vi. Make referrals for the child, as appropriate, such as Early Intervention, Children’s Rehabilitation Services, etc. vii. Prior to the child’s first birthday, ensure he/she is established with a dentist. viii. Screen the mother for post-partum depression at each face to face visit and make referrals and follow up (as needed)
With the exception of providing necessary prenatal monitoring by a nurse in the home or health department setting, no HSI funds will be spent on direct care.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 17 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
The high-risk factors that HSI will address include the following: ACEs Score of >4 Depression1 Diabetes Mellitus Current multiple births Substance Abuse2 Maternal age3 Hypertension Interpersonal safety Transportation needs Housing Instability Food Insecurity Utility needs Abuse4 Enrollment in CHIP unborn coverage Prior poor pregnancy outcome5
To be eligible for the HSI, pregnant women and/or their infants in selected counties must have at least one of the high-risk factors cited above and have an income no greater than the upper CHIP limit (currently 312% FPL). HSI services will be offered whether or not the patient has health insurance coverage and regardless of the type of insurance. Case management services for individuals enrolled in Medicaid will be time-limited until the implementation of the case management services provided in the Alabama Coordinated Health Network (ACHN) scheduled to begin October 1, 2019. Individuals with other insurance that are provided case management services will not be provided case management services using HSI funds.
Patients will be enrolled in the HSI initiative during pregnancy, during the post-partum period, or by referral. Once enrolled, HSI services will continue, as appropriate, for one-year post delivery with the exceptions noted in the paragraph above.
The HSI will be coordinated by the Alabama Department of Public Health and delivered through designated county health departments. Depending upon the needs of those participating in the initiative, services may be provided by public health nurses, public health social workers, community health workers, etc.
The proposed counties for initial implementation of the HSI include Montgomery, Macon and Russell counties. Services supported through this HSI will not supplant other federal, state or local funds allocated for similar services.
Outreach activities for the RIM HSI include providing education and information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
1 Depression noted at anytime during the pregnancy or postpartum period (90 days postpartum) 2 History of use or current substance use 3 <21 or >35 4 Emotional, physical, or sexual 5 Fetal Death – Stillbirth after 20 weeks; Infant death -first year of life; Preterm birth - <37 weeks gestation; Low Birthweight - <2500 grams; Very Low Birthweight - <1500 grams; Other serious chronic conditions (ex: heart disease, renal disease, chronic medical illnesses, etc.); and, Maternal Death (death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes). SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 18 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
In monitoring/evaluating the progress and success of this program, the total number of women and children served will be captured and reported to ALL Kids on an agreed upon schedule but no less than a quarterly basis. Tracking and reporting of visits and birth outcomes (birth weight, mortality within the first year of life and maternal health indices) will also be included in reports to ALL Kids.
The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $753,625 for FY 2019 (July –Sept).
Case Management Costs: Initially, within the proposed three county area, approximately 500 women/families could be served in FY 2019. The number of case management hours per person/family is estimated to be 10 hours/quarter at an average cost of $135/hour. This hourly rate would account for salary cost of those providing/coordinating services. Additionally, it is estimated that staff will travel 25 miles per home visit and there will be two home visits/patient/quarter at the state mileage reimbursement rate of $0.545/mile.
Annual 1st Quarter Case Management: Enrollees X case management hours $2,700,000 $675,000 X $135.00/hour Travel: # enrollees X miles/round trip X 2 trips/quarter X mileage $ 54,500 $ 13,625 reimbursement rate
Start Up/Outreach Costs: As the HSI is being developed, costs are being allocated for personnel support to include up to two FTEs (one full-time project manager and other ancillary support staff as needed). Additionally, costs are included for the development of materials to promote and educate health care providers and community organizations throughout the implementation counties about the initiative and to garner support and participation of agencies/providers. Education and awareness materials to outreach to women will also be prepared. Expenses to conduct (as well as attend) meetings, conferences and/or trainings to share information about the program and generate participation are also included as part of the startup and implementation costs.
Annual 1st Quarter Personnel Costs (Salary, Fringe, Indirect costs) $200,000 $50,000 Educational/training materials $ 10,000 $10,000 (providers/organizations and participants) Costs for meetings (transportation/meeting fees) $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Grand Total: $2,969,500 $753,625 (Personnel, Materials, Meeting costs, Case Management)
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements-(Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(1)(C)); SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 19 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-24)Page 24#
(ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009)Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a State in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(1)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice.
ALL Kids provides a certified letter to the federally recognized tribe in the state when considering amendments to the State Plan or other program changes requiring CMS approval. The tribe is given 30 days to respond. In the event of an emergency, ALL Kids will submit a faxed letter to the tribe and give 10 days for response.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4. Guidance: In Section 3.1., discussion may include, but is not limited to: contracts with managed health care plans (including fully and partially capitated plans); contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; and other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography, as well as the State methods for establishing and defining the delivery systems.
Should the State choose to cover unborn children under the Title XXI State plan, the State must describe how services are paid. For example, some states make a global payment for all unborn children while other states pay for services on fee-for-services basis. The State’s payment mechanism and delivery mechanism should be briefly described here.
Section 2103(f)(3) of the Act, as amended by section 403 of CHIPRA, requires separate or combination CHIP programs that operate a managed care delivery system to apply several provisions of section 1932 of the Act in the same manner as these SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 20 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-25)Page 25#
provisions apply under title XIX of the Act. Specific provisions include: section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. If the State CHIP program operates a managed care delivery system, provide an assurance that the State CHIP managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant sections of section 1932 of the Act. States must submit the managed care contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office servicing them for review and approval.
In addition, states may use up to 10 percent of actual or estimated Federal expenditures for targeted low-income children to fund other forms of child health assistance, including contracts with providers for a limited range of direct services; other health services initiatives to improve children’s health; outreach expenditures; and administrative costs (See 2105(c)(2)(A)). Describe which, if any, of these methods will be used.
Examples of the above may include, but are not limited to: direct contracting with school-based health services; direct contracting to provide enabling services; contracts with health centers receiving funds under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; contracts with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under section 1886(d)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Act; contracts with other hospitals; and contracts with public health clinics receiving Title V funding. If applicable, address how the new arrangements under Title XXI will work with existing service delivery methods, such as regional networks for chronic illness and disability; neonatal care units, or early-intervention programs for at-risk infants, in the delivery and utilization of services. (42CFR 457.490(a))
3.1. Delivery StandardsDescribe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(a))
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CHIP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama’s CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. As of October 1, 2015, CHIP will again expand Medicaid by covering Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 13% FPL through 141% FPL.
ALL Kids: SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 21 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-26)Page 26#
Program Operation–Administration From inception of the program in 1998 through May, 2001, ALL Kids contracted with the State Employee’s Insurance Board (SEIB) to serve as its enrollment and premium billing/receiving office. As enrollment grew, ALL Kids staff increased, and the need for data management grew, the ADPH CHIP unit and SEIB jointly decided to move the enrollment and premium billing/receiving functions to the CHIP unit. The Alabama Department of Public Health (Department) now manages all enrollment aspects of the ALL Kids program and utilizes other contractors to administer certain aspects of the ALL Kids program including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Providing all eligible persons involved in ALL Kids an individual policy or certificate that states the insurance protection provided, the method and place of filing claims, and to whom benefits are payable. The policy or certificate indicates that coverage was obtained through CHIP; 2. Maintenance of a claims database for the purpose of program management. 3. Management of evaluation surveillance procedures. 4. Consultation for actuarial services 5. Consultation for development of data systems 6. Consultation for development of specialized outreach plans
Program Operation-Benefits and Services The ALL Kids program is a self-funded, discounted fee-for-service*, PPO, delivery system. In order to assure delivery of the insurance product(s), the Department utilizes a private health care delivery organization(s) to provide benefits and services. Both indemnity plan(s) and or managed care plans(s) are acceptable and have been used. The selected vendor(s) is required to perform, including but not limited to, the following:
1. Furnishing coverage information and ID cards; 2. Member service responses to claims inquiries; 3. Claims certification, investigation, adjudication, and internal appeals process; 4. Processing and distribution of benefit payments to providers; 5. Appropriate and accurate fee administration; 6. Strict financial accounting and reconciliation; 7. Effective management of networks (if applicable); 8. Demonstrated capability to serve Alabama membership; 9. Effective medical, pharmacy and dental management including medical review of claims decisions; 10. Production of claims, contract, and other legal forms as required; 11. Establishment and maintenance of appropriate banking arrangements; 12. Continuous and accurate electronic transmission of all data; 13. Production of reports that capture claim and utilization experience and trends; 14. Other special services as may be requested from time to time 15. Have a network of physicians, dentists, pharmacies, and other providers capable of meeting SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 22 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-27)Page 27#
the demands of the ALL Kids Program. 16. Facilitation of a medical home for each enrollee.
*The exception to the fee-for-service payment system is the method of reimbursement to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) based on a prospective payment system (PPS). This is in compliance with section 503 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). In accordance with this provision of CHIPRA, ALL Kids has elected to adopt the Medicaid PPS Rates effective October 1, 2009. This method of payment will be implemented August 25, 2010 for all qualifying services rendered on or after October 1, 2009.
In the past, ALL Kids has used three (3) insurance venders, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama (statewide), Prime Health (in 10 southwestern counties from 10/98-9/00) and United Healthcare (14 counties from 10/01-7/02) for the above services. However, due to low enrollment in Prime Health and United Healthcare (which was due to patient choice), each of those programs elected, with the mutual consent of the ALL Kids program, to discontinue serving as an ALL Kids vendor. Currently, the only ALL Kids vendor for the above services is Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama. This vendor provides services statewide.
CHIP makes health care coverage available to all individuals eligible for ALL Kids on a “guaranteed issue” basis with no exclusions of coverage for pre-existing conditions, and on a “guaranteed renewable” basis for those eligible.
ALL Kids PLUS Program Operation-Administration For this addition to the program, the Alabama Department of Public Health has partnered (and seeks to partner) with other governmental agencies (which serve special needs children) to provide the state match, provide or provide for covered ALL Kids PLUS services, to authorize case by case reimbursement for ALL Kids PLUS services, to notify ALL Kids PLUS families of their approval for services, and select one case manager per child so as to minimize duplication and gaps in services. PLUS services became available through CRS as of October 1, 2000. An ALL Kids PLUS contract was signed with the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation effective October 1, 2002.
Several state agencies, other provider entities, and advocates within the state have met to develop the concept and plan of operation for ALL Kids PLUS.
At the present time, the list of ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies is restricted to those governmental agencies supplying the state match money. If other state or appropriated matching funds become available, this restriction may be modified or eliminated. A child must be enrolled in ALL Kids to qualify for PLUS services. When a child is identified with a special condition or need that a participating agency serves, he/she is referred to that agency based on that special condition/need. This agency will, based on the availability of funds, assign a case manager to the SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 23 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-28)Page 28#
child, authorize needed services within the agency, and make referrals to other authorizing agencies for additional services if needed. All agencies authorizing PLUS services for a child notify the child’s case manager and referral site (if different) for approval of services. Each child will only have one ALL Kids PLUS case manager. The decision as to which agency will provide the case management will be determined by the agencies involved in the child’s care and will be based on what makes the best practice sense and is in the best interest of the child.
Authorizing agencies bill the insurance vendor(s) for any authorized PLUS services that the agencies have provided directly or indirectly. The Alabama Department of Public Health reimburses the insurance vendor(s) in the same manner that reimbursement for the basic ALL Kids program is handled. At this time, the participating PLUS agencies do not utilize a central integrated data system. However, their day-to-day practice involves coordination through the case manager with other agencies to avoid duplication. Each agency submits all claims/data to the insurance vendor (BCBS) for adjudication and reimbursement. While a child may have claims submitted by more than one agency, only one agency may be reimbursed for case management services.
Check here if the State child health program delivers services using a managed care delivery model. The State provides an assurance that its managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant provisions of section 1932 of the Act, including section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. The State also assures that it will submit the contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office for review and approval. (Section 2103(f)(3))
Guidance: In Section 3.2., note that utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: requirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after- hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review, coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. (42CFR 457.490(b))
3.2. Describe the utilization controls under the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children. Describe the systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 24 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-29)Page 29#
the approved State plan. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(b))
Utilization control mechanisms are in place for the ALL Kids program to ensure that children use only health care that is appropriate, medically necessary, and/or approved by the State or the participating health plan. In addition, policies are in place to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner according to the vendors’ medical necessity definition. The current Blue Cross Blue Shield policies are available upon request.
Before being approved for participation in the ALL Kids program, health plan vendors must develop and have in place utilization review policies and procedures, demand management, and disease state management mechanisms. Provider networks approved for the ALL Kids program are accepted based on evidence of the vendors’ provider credentialing policies, provider accessibility, cost- effectiveness, and efficiency.
Each ALL Kids PLUS authorizing state agency has a utilization review mechanism particular to that agency. Services approved for ALL Kids PLUS are those which are developmentally necessary and/or physically necessary. Reviewing the appropriate use of services is part of the case manager’s duties.
The Alabama Medicaid Agency applies the same utilization controls to the CHIP Medicaid expansion enrollees as it does to the entire Medicaid child book of business. Section 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology
Guidance: States electing to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan or combination plan should check the appropriate box and provide the ages and income level for each eligibility group. If the State is electing to take up the option to expand Medicaid eligibility as allowed under section 214 of CHIPRA regarding lawfully residing, complete section 4.1-LR as well as update the budget to reflect the additional costs if the state will claim title XXI match for these children until and if the time comes that the children are eligible for Medicaid.
4.0. Medicaid Expansion
4.0.1. Ages of each eligibility group and the income standard for that group:
4.1. Separate Program Check all standards that will apply to the State plan. (42CFR 457.305(a) and 457.320(a))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 25 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-30)Page 30#
4.1.0 Describe how the State meets the citizenship verification requirements. Include whether or not State has opted to use SSA verification option.
4.1.1 Geographic area served by the Plan if less than Statewide:
4.1.2 Ages of each eligibility group, including unborn children and pregnantwomen (if applicable) and the income standard for that group:
4.1.2.1-PC Age: through birth (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002)
4.1.3 Income of each separate eligibility group (if applicable):
4.1.3.1-PC 0% of the FPL (and not eligible for Medicaid) through % of the FPL (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) 4.1.4 Resources of each separate eligibility group (including any standards relating to spend downs and disposition of resources):
4.1.5 Residency (so long as residency requirement is not based on length oftime in state):
4.1.6 Disability Status (so long as any standard relating to disability status does not restrict eligibility): Children will be eligible for ALL Kids regardless of disability. ALL Kids PLUS is available to children with special conditions/needs who are enrolled in ALL Kids. ALL Kids PLUS enrollment is restricted to services authorized and financed by PLUS participating agencies. However, if access to additional matching funds becomes available and/or the health needs of CSHCC/N change, authorized services will be revised to reflect these changes.
4.1.7 Access to or coverage under other health coverage:
A child is not eligible for ALL Kids if s/he has any other health insurance coverage or is eligible for Medicaid.
4.1.8 Duration of eligibility, not to exceed 12 months:
4.1.9 Other Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility,includingthose standards in 42 CFR 457.310 and 457.320 that are notaddressed above. For instance: Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 26 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-31)Page 31#
comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in Alabama (initially Montgomery, Macon and Russell). Full coverage will be provided to this population from the date of enrollment through delivery. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package would end on August 31. Only bundled services will be covered after delivery; coverage for other benefits will cease upon delivery. Coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. Obstetric coverage for current ALL Kids members includes all prenatal care through 90 days postpartum and is billed as a bundled payment. Social Security numbers for the babies will not be required unless and until the child is born and applies for renewal.
Guidance: States may only require the SSN of the child who is applying for coverage. If SSNs are required and the State covers unborn children, indicate that the unborn children are exempt from providing a SSN. Other standards include, but are not limited to presumptive eligibility and deemed newborns.
4.1.9.1 States should specify whether Social Security Numbers (SSN) are required.
Guidance: States should describe theircontinuous eligibility process and populations that can be continuously eligible.
4.1.9.2 Continuous eligibility
4.1-PW Pregnant Women Option (section 2112)- The State includes eligibility for one or more populations of targeted low-income pregnant women under the plan. Describe the population of pregnant women that the State proposes to cover in this section. Include all eligibility criteria, such as those described in the above categories (for instance, income and resources) that will be applied to this population. Use the same reference number system for those criteria (for example, 4.1.1-P for a geographic restriction). Please remember to update sections 8.1.1-PW, 8.1.2-PW, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: States have the option to cover groups of “lawfully residing” children and/or pregnant women. States may elect to cover (1)“lawfully residing” children described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; (2) “lawfully residing” pregnant women described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; or (3) both. A state electing to cover children and/or pregnant women who are considered lawfully residing in the U.S. must offer coverage to all SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 27 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-32)Page 32#
such individuals who meet the definition of lawfully residing, and may not cover a subgroup or only certain groups. In addition, states may not cover these new groups only in CHIP, but must also extend the coverage option to Medicaid. States will need to update their budget to reflect the additional costs for coverage of these children. If a State has been covering these children with State only funds, it is helpful to indicate that so CMS understands the basis for the enrollment estimates and the projected cost of providing coverage. Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option.
4.1- LR Lawfully Residing Option(Sections 2107(e)(1)(J) and 1903(v)(4)(A); (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006 issued July 1, 2010) Check if the State is electing the option under section 214 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) regarding lawfully residing to provide coverage to the following otherwise eligible pregnant women and children as specified below who are lawfully residing in the United States including the following: A child or pregnant woman shall be considered lawfully present if he or she is: (1) A qualified alien as defined in section 431 of PRWORA (8 U.S.C. §1641); (2) An alien in nonimmigrant status who has not violated the terms of the status under which he or she was admitted or to which he or she has changed after admission; (3) An alien who has been paroled into the United States pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. §1182(d)(5)) for less than 1 year, except for an alien paroled for prosecution, for deferred inspection or pending removal proceedings; (4) An alien who belongs to one of the following classes: (i) Aliens currently in temporary resident status pursuant to section 210 or 245A of the INA (8 U.S.C. §§1160 or 1255a, respectively); (ii) Aliens currently under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) pursuant to section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1254a), and pending applicants for TPS who have been granted employment authorization; (iii) Aliens who have been granted employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), (10), (16), (18), (20), (22), or (24); (iv) Family Unity beneficiaries pursuant to section 301 of Pub. L. 101- 649, as amended; (v) Aliens currently under Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) pursuant to a decision made by the President; (vi) Aliens currently in deferred action status; or (vii) Aliens whose visa petition has been approved and who have a pending application for adjustment of status; (5) A pending applicant for asylum under section 208(a) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1158) or for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 28 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-33)Page 33#
of the INA (8U.S.C. § 1231) or under the Convention Against Torture who has been granted employment authorization, and such an applicant under the age of 14 whohas had an application pending for at least180 days; (6) An alien who has been granted withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture; (7) A child who has a pending application for Special Immigrant Juvenile status as described in section 101(a)(27)(J) of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(27)(J)); (8) An alien who is lawfully present in the Commonwealth of the NorthernMariana Islands under 48 U.S.C. § 1806(e); or (9) An alien who is lawfully present in American Samoa under theimmigration laws of American Samoa.
Elected for pregnant women. Elected for children under age
4.1.1-LR The State provides assurance that for an individual whom it enrolls in Medicaid under the CHIPRA Lawfully Residing option, it has verified, at the time of the individual’s initial eligibility determination and at the time of the eligibility redetermination, that the individual continues to be lawfully residing in the United States. The State must first attempt to verify this status using information provided at the time of initial application. If the State cannot do so from the information readily available, it must require the individual to provide documentation or further evidence to verify satisfactory immigration status in the same manner as it would for anyone else claiming satisfactory immigration status under section 1137(d) of the Act.
4.1-DS Supplemental Dental(Section 2103(c)(5)-A child who is eligible to enroll in dental- only supplemental coverage, effective January 1, 2009. Eligibility is limited to only targeted low-income children who are otherwise eligible for CHIP but for the fact that they are enrolled in a group health plan or health insurance offered through an employer. The State’s CHIP plan income eligibility level is at least the highest income eligibility standard under its approved State child health plan (or under a waiver) as of January 1, 2009. All who meet the eligibility standards and apply for dental-only supplemental coverage shall be provided benefits. States choosing this option must report these children separately in SEDS. Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
4.2. AssurancesThe State assures by checking the box below that it has made the following findings with respect to the eligibility standards in its plan:(Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 29 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-34)Page 34#
4.2.1. These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2. Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. This applies to pregnant women included in the State plan as well as targeted low-income children. 4.2.3. These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre-existing medical condition. This applies to pregnant women as well as targeted low- income children.
4.2-DS Supplemental Dental -Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option. For dental-only supplemental coverage, the State assures that it has made the following findings with standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) 4.2.1-DS These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2-DS Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. 4.2.3-DS These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre- existing medical condition.
4.3. Methodology. Describe the methods of establishing and continuing eligibility and enrollment. The description should address the procedures for applying the eligibility standards, the organization and infrastructure responsible for making and reviewing eligibility determinations, and the process for enrollment of individuals receiving covered services, and whether the State uses the same application form for Medicaid and/or other public benefit programs. (Section 2102)(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.350) Superseded by ACA SPA Guidance: The box below should be checked as related to children and pregnant women.Please note: A State providing dental-only supplemental coverage may not have a waiting list or limit eligibility in any way.
4.3.1. Limitation on EnrollmentDescribe the processes, if any, that a State will use for instituting enrollment caps, establishing waiting lists, and deciding which children will be given priority for enrollment. If this section does not apply to your state, check the box below. (Section 2102(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.305(b))
There are no public notice state laws regarding enrollment caps and waiting lists in CHIP. Due to insufficient state funds, ALL Kids initiated a waiting list beginning with all new enrollees who would have had an effective date October 1, 2003. Public and enrollee notices about the waiting list were issued during the month of September 2003 prior to the impact of the waiting list. On August 23, 2004, ALL Kids reopened enrollment and discontinued use of the waiting list.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 30 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-35)Page 35#
If during the year funds are not available at sufficient levels for coverage of children and funding is projected to be depleted before the end of the fiscal year, it is the State’s intent to place eligible children on a waiting list until adequate funding becomes available to resume enrollment. Alabama will provide public notice through press releases, written communication with stakeholders and stakeholder groups, presentations, and written communication from the program to all applicant families whose child(ren) is/are placed on the waiting list.
When a waiting list is implemented, the program has and will continue to receive new applications. These applications will be screened for Medicaid eligibility and then reviewed for ALL Kids eligibility. If a child is eligible for Medicaid, the child will be enrolled in Medicaid. Each family whose child is placed on the ALL Kids waiting list will be notified, by letter, of this placement. The notification letter will also contain information stating that the parent may wish to contact Medicaid if his situation changes and he believes that his child may be eligible for Medicaid. If the child remains on the waiting list for longer than three (3) months, the family will be periodically notified via letter that the child’s name is still on the waiting list.
If the State is using a waiting list, children will be enrolled on ALL Kids from the waiting list on a first on–first off basis as funding permits. When attrition has lowered program enrollment to a level at which there are sufficient state funds to re-open enrollment, children will be removed from the waiting list ( on a first on first off basis) and enrolled in ALL Kids. Children who are removed from the waiting list whose application information is greater than 90 days old will be asked to complete a form updating changes in information on their family size, income, and other points of eligibility. Upon receipt of the form, ALL Kids enrollment staff will evaluate the child’s eligibility for ALL Kids. Then, if eligible, either the child will be enrolled in ALL Kids or Medicaid and the family will be notified.
Children who have current enrollment in ALL Kids will be allowed to continue to renew their enrollment as long as they continue to meet all points of eligibility and have their renewal forms submitted and premium balances paid in full within 90 days after the date of termination. Check here if this section does not apply to your State.
Guidance: Note that for purposes of presumptive eligibility, States do not need to verify the citizenship status of the child. States electing this option should indicate so in the State plan.(42 CFR 457.355)
4.3.2. Check if the State elects to provide presumptive eligibility for children that meets the requirements of section 1920A of the Act. (Section 2107(e)(1)(L)); (42 CFR 457.355) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 31 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-36)Page 36#
Guidance: Describe how the State intends to implement the Express Lane option. Include information on the identified Express Lane agency or agencies, and whether the State will be using the Express Lane eligibility option for the initial eligibility determinations, redeterminations, or both.
4.3.3-EL Express Lane Eligibility Check here if the state elects the option to rely on a finding from an Express Lane agency when determining whether a child satisfies one or more components of CHIP eligibility. The state agrees to comply with the requirements of sections 2107(e)(1)(E) and 1902(e)(13) of the Act for this option. Please update sections 4.4-EL, 5.2-EL, 9.10, and 12.1 when electing this option. This authority may not apply to eligibility determinations made before February 4, 2009, or after September 30, 2013. (Section 2107(e)(1)(E)) 4.3.3.1-ELAlso indicate whether the Express Lane option is applied to (1) initial eligibility determination, (2) redetermination, or (3) both.
4.3.3.2-ELList the public agencies approved by the State asExpress Lane agencies.
4.3.3.3-ELList the components/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane. In this section, specify any differences in budget unit, deeming, income exclusions, income disregards, or other methodology between CHIP eligibility determinations for such children and the determination under the Express Lane option.
4.3.3.3-ELList the component/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane.
4.3.3.4-ELDescribe the option used to satisfy the screen and enrollment requirements before a child may be enrolled under title XXI.
Guidance: States should describe the process they use to screen and enroll children required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 457.80(c). Describe the screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by an Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated. Describe whether the SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 32 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-37)Page 37#
State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from an Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
In this section, states should describe their eligibility screening process in a way that addresses the five assurances specified below. The State should consider including important definitions, the relationship with affected Federal, State and local agencies, and other applicable criteria that will describe the State’s ability to make assurances. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A) and 2110(b)(2)(B)), (42 CFR 457.310(b)(2), 42CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 457.80(c)(3))
4.4. Eligibility screening and coordination with other health coverage programs States must describe how they will assure that:
4.4.1. only targeted low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid or notcovered under a group health plan or health insurance (including access to a State health benefits plan) are furnished child health assistance under the plan.(Sections 2102(b)(3)(A), 2110(b)(2)(B)) (42 CFR 457.310(b), 42CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.80(c)(3)) Confirm that the State does not apply a waiting period for pregnant women.
The State of Alabama assures that through enrollment screening processes, children whose applications are considered to be eligible for medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan will be referred for assistance under the appropriate plan. Additionally, ALL Kids eligibility staff query the Medicaid eligibility system to ensure applicants are not currently on any Medicaid program. All applications request the parent/guardian to provide the names and addresses of their employers. Eligibility staff screen all applications to ensure applicant children are not currently covered under group health insurance and have not voluntarily terminated group coverage within the last three months. In an effort to further minimize crowd-out, ALL Kids receives a daily “error report” which indicates children who have current BCBS health insurance or have terminated a BCBS policy within the last three months. In addition, quality assurance reviews are conducted on a sample of ALL Kids enrollees. Redetermination is completed every 12 months.
4.4.2. children found through the screening process to be potentially eligible formedical assistance under the State Medicaid plan are enrolled for assistance under such plan; (Section 2102(b)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.350(a)(2)).
When a child’s application is reviewed by ALL Kids and determined to be eligible for Medicaid, ALL Kids enrolls the child in Medicaid. Because a joint application is used, no additional form is required to be completed. Parents are notified by ALL regarding this determination
4.4.3. children found through the screening process to be ineligible for Medicaid are SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 33 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-38)Page 38#
enrolled in CHIP.(Sections 2102(a)(1) and (2) and 2102(c)(2)) (42CFR 431.636(b)(4)) ALL Kids and Medicaid have a joint eligibility and enrollment system. When a Medicaid enrollment worker determines that a child is ineligible for Medicaid and eligible for ALL Kids, the worker enrolls the child in ALL Kids. Coverage is based on the application receipt date at the Medicaid office or the child’s last date of Medicaid or ALL Kids coverage. ALL Kids staff work very closely with the Medicaid central office and Medicaid enrollment workers to ensure that the policies and procedures of both agencies reflect the agencies’ desires for seamless transitions between the two agencies.
4.4.4. the insurance provided under the State child health plan does not substitute for coverage under group health plans. (Section 2102(b)(3)(C)) (42CFR, 457.805) This section is superseded by ACA SPA 4.4.4.1. (formerly 4.4.4.4) If the State provides coverage under a premiumassistance program, describe: 1) the minimum period without coverage under a group health plan. This should include any allowable exceptions to the waiting period; 2) the expected minimum level of contribution employers will make; and 3) how cost-effectiveness is determined. (42CFR 457.810(a)-(c))
4.4.5. Child health assistance is provided to targeted low-income children in the Statewho are American Indian and Alaska Native. (Section2102(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.125(a))
The State of Alabama assures the provision of child health assistance to targeted low-income children in the State who are American Indians (as defined in section 4(c) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 25 U.S.C. 1603(c)). As Stated in section 4.1, the ALL Kids program will provide Statewide coverage. No ALL Kids enrollee identified as being an American Indian will be charged a premium or co-pay. This policy extends to all children who identify themselves as an American Indian children whether they are a member of a federally recognized tribe or one of the eight state-only recognized tribes. Representatives from the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (the only federally recognized Tribe in Alabama) have assisted in the development of ALL Kids PLUS. Tribal children will have access to PLUS services.
CHIP staff meet and coordinate regularly with the Alabama Commission on Indian Affairs to ensure that Native American Children are identified and enrolled in ALL Kids. Additionally, a Native American was hired under a one-year contract to consult with ALL Kids staff and develop a comprehensive strategy to outreach to Native American children. Guidance: When the State is using an income finding from an Express Lane agency, the State must still comply with screen and enroll requirements before enrolling children in CHIP. The State may either continue its current screen and enroll process, or elect one of two new options to fulfill these requirements. SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 34 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-39)Page 39#
4.4-EL The State should designate the option it will be using to carry out screen and enroll requirements:
The State will continue to use the screen and enroll procedures required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 42 CFR 457.80(c). Describe this process.
The State is establishing a screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by the Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated. The State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from the Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
Section 5. Outreach and Coordination
5.1. (formerly 2.2)Describe the current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children by addressing sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2.(Section 2102)(a)(2) (42CFR 457.80(b))
Guidance: The information below may include whether the state elects express lane eligibility a description of the State’s outreach efforts through Medicaid and state-only programs.
5.1.1. (formerly 2.2.1.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs (i.e., Medicaid and state-only child health insurance):
In Alabama, thanks to outreach efforts of a variety of public and private agencies and organizations, there is a high awareness level of children’s health insurance programs and their eligibility requirements. Over one-fourth of children under the age of 19 in Alabama are covered by Medicaid or ALL Kids. The programs are reaching children who might not otherwise have access to the health care they need.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 35 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-40)Page 40#
Prior to CHIP, the Medicaid Program was the only public health insurance program for children in Alabama. Health services are provided in Alabama to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children by private physicians, the 67 Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) county health departments, 16 primary care centers (including Federally Qualified Health Centers), two children’s hospitals (The Children’s Hospital of Alabama and Women’s and Children’s Hospital at the University of South Alabama) school health nurses, and one Indian Health Service Clinic. In addition to the two children’s hospitals, Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services, Children’s Rehabilitation Services (CRS) provides specialty care to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children with special health care needs. As lead agency for Alabama’s Early Intervention System, this agency coordinates services for infants and toddlers eligible for IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), part C. This section describes the current efforts made by the ADPH to provide health care services, and to identify and enroll uncovered children in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs. This section also describes the efforts made by CRS, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to identify and enroll all uncovered children who are eligible to participate in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs.
Alabama Department of Public Health As the CHIP lead agency, the ADPH is actively involved in all aspects of identification and enrollment of children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs and health insurance programs that involve public-private partnerships. Activities include the creation, publication, and distribution of marketing materials, management of the ALL Kids enrollment process, and targeted outreach activities for specific populations such as faith-based organizations, etc. The Alabama Department of Public Health provides some direct as well as support patient care for uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children and adolescents. Direct services for this population include: preventive child health services (well-child check-ups), prenatal services, Women Infants and Children Supplemental Nutrition [WIC] program services, preventive health education, immunizations, and Family Planning program services. Support services include case management services, the provision of information and referral via toll-free telephone lines, and laboratory services. These services are funded through federal Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant funds, federal Title X Family Planning program funds, federal WIC Program funds, Medicaid program reimbursements, federal immunization funds, state legislative appropriations, some local government appropriations, and a small amount of patient fee revenue. A variety of the above direct and support services are provided within ADPH county health departments. In fiscal year 2001, 34,664 children (birth through age 18 years) received health services in local county health departments. (This number excludes single service patients [STD-only, Immunization-only, WIC-only].) The Alabama Department of Public Health is the state’s Title V agency. Additionally, there are approximately 512 school health nurses, R.N.s and L.P.N.s, (working under the auspices of the ADPH, private hospitals, the Alabama State Department of Education, and/or local education agencies) in the state who provide a variety of health screening services, primary care and SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 36 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-41)Page 41#
emergency services, Medicaid/ALL Kids enrollment facilitation, etc.
Income assessments are performed on all patients enrolled in ADPH clinics. The income assessments are reviewed for possible Medicaid eligibility. Beginning in FY 1991, Medicaid eligibility workers were out-stationed in health departments and other health care facilities to accept applications and complete Medicaid eligibility determinations at the time of health visits. A streamlined, four-page expanded Medicaid eligibility form, which was implemented in FY 1991, has been revised into a joint application with CHIP and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is available at county health departments. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility personnel currently assist patients in completing the forms and data is put into an automated Medicaid system on-site. Final determination for Medicaid can then be made immediately. If the children appear to be ALL Kids or ACCF eligible the application is forwarded to the appropriate program.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by ADPH intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility workers are based in many ADPH clinics, hospitals, and primary care centers across the state. Additionally, two Medicaid outstationed workers and a clerk are now located in the CHIP office who process many ALL Kids referrals. A third worker will be added in FY 2003.
Cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level.
In order to provide additional outreach, the ADPH operates two toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. The toll-free telephone lines (established prior to the implementation of CHIP and continued to the present) are known as Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection. Two integral parts of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, are information on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referrals to health providers who accept Medicaid-eligible children and Medicaid-eligible pregnant women. Referral services provided by the Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection staff members are expanded through consultation supplied by a host of additional professionals located within the ADPH. The toll-free number for Healthy Beginnings is 1-800-654-1385. The Info Connection number is 1-800-545-1098. Both lines are operational 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week; office hours are from 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. each week day. The Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection lines are publicized statewide through newspapers, television, posters, and pamphlets. Presentations regarding the lines are conducted statewide to various organizations and agencies. The numbers are also published in Alabama South Central Bell telephone books. Additionally, with the implementation of CHIP, the CHIP unit maintains two toll-free telephone lines (888-373-5437 for enrollment and eligibility issues and 877-774-9521 for administrative issues). Finally, in addition to the above efforts, ALL Kids, Medicaid, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed a joint application and renewal form for SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 37 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-42)Page 42#
use by all three programs. This enables families to be screened for eligibility for all three programs and facilitates referrals and timely enrollment in the appropriate program.
Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA) ADECA notifies the ALL Kids regional staff when a plant or large business plans to close in the near future. ALL Kids regional staff present ALL Kids information and materials at employee meetings prior to the plant/business closing. In order to prevent gaps in health insurance coverage for the children of the employees of the plant/business, an ALL Kids policy was developed which provides for beginning ALL Kids coverage (for eligible children) the day after employer sponsored coverage ends if an application is received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit within 30 days after the plant/business closing.
Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services Children’s Rehabilitation Service Children’s Rehabilitation Service (CRS) also has coordination agreements with the Alabama Medicaid Agency. (These contracts existed prior to CHIP and have continued to be in effect.) The Alabama Medicaid Agency contracted with CRS for the provision of specialty medical services, specialized therapy (such as physical, occupational, speech, etc) services, and case management services to children with special health care needs. With the implementation of ALL Kids, CRS clinics were added as preferred providers under the ALL Kids basic benefits package and the ALL Kids PLUS package.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by CRS intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ALL Kids, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Joint Medicaid/ALL Kids/ACCF eligibility forms are available in all CRS offices and clinics. As in the ADPH, cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level. Medicaid and ALL Kids information and outreach brochures and posters are available in every CRS office throughout the state.
Additionally, like the ADPH, CRS operates toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. One line is operated at the state level in Montgomery and additional lines are located in each CRS district office. An integral part of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, is Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referral information. CRS and Early Intervention (EI) have both completed database matches with ALL Kids files to identify children known to both programs. CHIP staff have participated in many staff trainings throughout the state to assist CRS and EI staff in outreach for ALL Kids, Medicaid, and ACCF.
Division of Early Intervention As the lead agency for Alabama’s early intervention system for infants and toddlers with SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 38 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-43)Page 43#
developmental disabilities and their families, this unit provides a toll free Child Find telephone number for use by the general public and primary referral sources. Additional efforts for coordination are described in the PLUS sections of this document.
Medicaid Agency The Alabama Medicaid Agency has 135 eligibility workers in over 170 locations to enroll children eligible for SOBRA Medicaid whose the family’s income is at or below 100 percent of FPL (for children born after September 30, 1983) or 133 percent of the FPL (for children through age five). With the implementation of CHIP, 23 workers were added throughout the state. In March, 2002, two eligibility workers and a clerk were housed in the ALL Kids central office to review applications referred from the ALL Kids eligibility workers. In addition to the CHIP office, these workers are located in places children are likely to go to receive health care - - county health departments, Federally Qualified Health Centers and hospitals. Because workers are in the community, they can and do establish working relationships with public and private providers, social service agencies and others. For example, supervisors provide in- service training and education on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility to physicians, Head Start workers, day care centers, Human Resources staff and others. The Alabama Medicaid Agency also has 10 district offices located throughout the state that process applications for the elderly and the disabled population. The 80 eligibility workers and 20 supervisors advise applicants about other programs and refer the applicants to the proper office when they do not qualify for a disabled program. They also advise about programs for which other family members may be eligible. These district offices work closely with providers to keep them informed of all programs available through the Medicaid Agency.
Applications for Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF are easily available to anyone who needs one. Applications are available not only from Medicaid workers but also at physicians’ offices, county offices of the Department of Human Resources and hospitals. All sources of the joint application (i.e., ADPH, CRS, etc.) allow a “mail-in” application process thereby allowing Medicaid to complete a phone interview instead of a face-to-face interview. Medicaid has a toll- free number for anyone to call to ask questions about Medicaid eligibility and find out where and how to apply. The number is 1-800-362-1504. Medicaid’s Web site contains information on Medicaid eligibility and is used by advocates to assist people who want to apply for Medicaid.
Through its Medical Care Advisory Committee and its Physicians Task Force, Medicaid receives guidance on ways to reach potential Medicaid eligibles. Medicaid staff regularly brief these groups, who represent both providers and consumers, on all facets of the Medicaid program, including eligibility. Both groups are kept informed of upcoming changes in the Medicaid program and encouraged to provide comments and suggestions. With welfare reform and the separation of Medicaid eligibility from eligibility for public assistance, the Alabama Medicaid Agency and the Department of Human Resources have developed new cooperative arrangements to assure that children in the state’s lowest income SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 39 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-44)Page 44#
families have access to Medicaid. Applications may be completed through the mail with a telephone interview, thus eliminating the need for a face-to-face contact. Currently DHR workers assess their clients to determine whether they might be eligible for any Medicaid, ALL Kids, or ACCF program. Workers help to complete forms, gather information and make appointments as necessary. However, the enrollment function for this Medicaid program will be transferred from DHR to the Medicaid Agency within the coming year.
Outreach occurs after the birth of an infant to a Medicaid recipient. Following the birth of each newborn whose mother is a Medicaid recipient, the Alabama Medicaid Agency sends the infant's parent or guardian a pamphlet on the Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program as well as a pamphlet on immunizations. When children are enrolled in the SSI Program, they are automatically enrolled in the Medicaid Program. Additionally, a brochure is sent to parents/guardians of all new SSI eligible children encouraging them to participate in the EPSDT program. In addition to these efforts, social workers within the ADPH conduct patient recruitment as a part of their case management activities. These recruitment efforts are conducted through community presentations and professional relationships with other State and local agencies which serve mothers and children.
The Alabama Department of Human Resources and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation also provide case management services for Medicaid children known to their agencies, in order to facilitate their enrollment in health services particularly mental health services through the Rehabilitation Option.
Through CHIP Phase I, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, working with the Alabama Department of Public Health, took several major steps to identify and enroll all uncovered children who were eligible to participate in this public health insurance program. New eligibility workers were hired and they, plus existing eligibility workers, were trained in CHIP eligibility criteria as well as other Medicaid eligibility criteria. These eligibility workers are outstationed in health departments, hospitals, community health centers, CHIP office, etc.
In order to streamline the CHIP/Medicaid enrollment process, the Alabama Medicaid Agency initiated continuous eligibility for all Medicaid children under the age of 19 years, on April 1, 1998. Continuous eligibility means that Medicaid enrolled children maintain their Medicaid coverage continuously for one year from enrollment or re-determination.
Additionally, numerous presentations, regarding CHIP, have been made by knowledgeable professionals who are members of the broad based CHIP Workgroup and CHIP staff. These presentations include addresses to education professionals, rural health groups, child care management agencies, parents of children with special health care needs, Indian Health Service staff, the general public, etc. Some specific activities include:
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 40 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-45)Page 45#
Notice to all Medicaid providers News releases and camera-ready materials for newspapers Articles published in newsletters of health care provider associations–Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Dental Association, and others Television commercials Radio spots Brochures have been distributed to date for outstationed Medicaid workers, public health workers, county human resources workers, Early Intervention Coordinating Councils, Mental Health Centers, family services centers, primary health care centers, hospitals, advocacy and professional organization, and in the school system, principles and guidance counselors. Brochures distributed at state meetings of Alabama Conference of Social Work, Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-Alabama Chapter, Alabama Dental Association, Family Practice doctors, and others Satellite conferences to provide information about the basic ALL Kids Program and instruction in completing the application. Distribution of applications and brochures to all public school systems, local health departments, welfare offices, hospitals, community health centers, physician and dentist offices, pharmacies, WIC clinics, and family law attorneys, etc. Public forums for parents and advocates of CSHCC/N (Children with Special Health Care Conditions/Needs)
With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion and the RIM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
In addition to the above, the state has engaged in the following particular activities to promote ALL Kids PLUS. Originally, it was anticipated that ALL Kids PLUS would involve four state programs, Children’s Rehabilitation Service, Early Intervention, Mental Health/Mental Retardation, and Civitan International Research Center Sparks Clinics. After conducting database matches, reviews of Pediatric Health History information, claims data, through mutual agreement, Sparks determined that their services were being adequately reimbursed through the ALL Kids basic benefit package. Therefore, attention was focused on the remaining three agencies. Since that time, CHIP has entered into discussions with the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind with regard to becoming an ALL Kids PLUS provider. CRS has had an active contract for the provision of PLUS services since October, 2000 and has served as a valuable partner in establishing protocols for the identification of ALL Kids enrollees in need of PLUS services and the identification of current clients in need of insurance coverage.
Initially it was anticipated that children would be identified for the PLUS program through an in-depth analysis of the Pediatric Health History and chart reviews. Practical experience has SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 41 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-46)Page 46#
shown that this was not the most productive method of identification. Database matches were necessary as a first action to even identify ALL Kids enrollees who were being served by CRS. After this baseline was established, claims reviews were shown to be a more valuable mechanism in identifying children eligible for PLUS services than were chart reviews. This claims review revealed that a much smaller percentage of ALL Kids enrollees, than originally projected, were in need of services beyond those available in the basic benefits package. Program staff continually monitor feedback from providers and families regarding the need for additional services. This type of feedback and analysis has influenced the approaches that have been used with the other potential ALL Kids PLUS agencies. Through the activities of the regional ALL Kids staff, central office social work consultant, and customer service staff, ALL
Kids enrollees in need of these specialized services provided by ALL Kids PLUS agencies have been identified and referred as appropriate.
In August of 1999, the ADPH broadcasted a nationwide satellite conference to educate the provider community and other concerned individuals regarding ALL Kids PLUS. In addition, CHIP staff provided training on the PLUS program to CRS staff at regional meetings.
Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) The DHR has continued to partner with the ADPH to communicate ALL Kids information to their county staffs. They have provided initial and continuing updates to county DHR staff as well as provided periodic shipments of applications, posters, etc. The DHR has also assisted with outreach efforts through its childcare management agencies and facilitated communication with licensed child day-care homes and centers.
Guidance: The State may address the coordination between the public-private outreach and the public health programs that is occurring statewide. This section will provide a historic record of the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children from the time the State’s plan was initially approved. States do not have to rewrite his section but may instead update this section as appropriate.
5.1.2. (formerly 2.2.2.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in health insurance programs that involve a public-private partnership:
There is only one health insurance program for children in Alabama that resembles a public- private partnership. This program is known as the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is a part of Blue Cross Blue Shield. The Alabama Child Caring Foundation provides limited ambulatory health insurance to low income, non-Medicaid/non-ALL Kids, uninsured children under the age of 19 years who remain full-time students through grade 12. The SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 42 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-47)Page 47#
program is funded through private donations and matching funds from Blue Cross Blue Shield. Outreach for this program is conducted through articles in Blue Cross Blue Shield publications and public service announcements in local newspapers, via television, and radio stations. The University of Alabama and Auburn University coaches’ television shows expressly advertise the Foundation. Case finding is conducted by school administrators, school nurses, day care operators, and others. Additionally referrals to the Foundation are received from the ALL Kids program, local offices of the ADPH, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Dislocated Workers program, individual health care providers, civic organizations, churches, Sunday School classes, other religious organizations, and from Foundation participants.
Guidance: The State should describe below how it’s Title XXI program will closely coordinate the enrollment with Medicaid because under Title XXI, children identified as Medicaid-eligible are required to be enrolled in Medicaid. Specific information related to Medicaid screen and enroll procedures is requested in Section 4.4. (42CFR 457.80(c))
5.2. (formerly 2.3)Describe how CHIP coordinates with other public and private health insurance programs, other sources of health benefits coverage for children, other relevant child health programs, (such as title V), that provide health care services for low-income children to increase the number of children with creditable health coverage.(Section 2102(a)(3),2102(b)(3)(E)and 2102(c)(2))(42CFR 457.80(c)).This item requires a brief overview of how Title XXI efforts – particularly new enrollment outreach efforts – will be coordinated with and improve upon existing State efforts.
The State of Alabama assures coordination with other public and private programs providing creditable coverage for low-income children. The SOBRA Medicaid program, ALL Kids, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed and use joint application and renewal forms.
All applications received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit are screened for Medicaid eligibility. When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as potentially eligible for Medicaid, the family’s application is sent to a Medicaid enrollment worker. Medicaid then processes it. As stated previously, two Medicaid enrollment workers and one clerical worker are physically located within the ALL Kids enrollment unit. This process also works in the reverse (applications are sent from Medicaid to ALL Kids).
When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as not potentially eligible for the Medicaid or ALL Kids but potentially eligible for the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF), the family’s application is sent to ACCF which then processes it and the opposite is also true.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 43 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-48)Page 48#
Because it is recognized that the eligibility and enrollment systems of these three programs are not as seamless as needed, ALL Kids employs a full time MSW staff person. This staff person has responsibility to assist families in overcoming obstacles related to eligibility, enrollment, claims, and referral for specialty services as needed. Additional responsibilities include development and maintenance of the ALL Kids policy manual.
In addition, the State coordinates with the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. See the previous section for a broader description of the collaboration.
5.2-EL The State should include a description of its election of the Express Lane eligibility option to provide a simplified eligibility determination process and expedited enrollment of eligible children into Medicaid or CHIP.
Guidance: Outreach strategies may include, but are not limited to, community outreach workers, outstationed eligibility workers, translation and transportation services, assistance with enrollment forms, case management and other targeting activities to inform families of low-income children of the availability of the health insurance program under the plan or other private or public health coverage.
The description should include information on how the State will inform the target of the availability of the programs, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, and assist them in enrolling in the appropriate program.
5.3. StrategiesDescribe the procedures used by the State to accomplish outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance or other public or private health coverage to inform them of the availability of the programs, and to assist them in enrolling their children in such a program.(Section 2102(c)(1)) (42CFR 457.90)
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion This portion of the outreach section, as it pertains to Phase I of Alabama’s Title XXI program, consists solely of efforts that were targeted toward Medicaid eligibles who were born after September 30, 1983 and who are under 19 years of age. There were four primary avenues through which outreach was conducted. These avenues were (1) the use of existing outreach approaches, (2) an initiative to improve communication with and services for the state’s rapidly expanding Hispanic population, (3) an increase in the number of Medicaid eligibility workers, and (4) coordination with the State Medical Association and physicians to educate physicians and their potentially eligible patients. Detailed information regarding these efforts is available from CHIP upon request.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 44 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-49)Page 49#
Phase II - ALL Kids Outreach for ALL Kids is conducted through coordinated Statewide and regional efforts and in each county through partnerships, contracts, and regional CHIP coordinators. These efforts consist of a three-pronged approach: (1) Statewide media campaigns and initiatives; (2) outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants; and, (3) outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies. The purposes of all of these activities is to build networks and coalitions of persons who can inform individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what it has to offer, and assist individuals in completing application forms. Outreach is conducted by a variety of individuals and in a variety of settings. Each feature of the three-pronged outreach approach is described below:
• Statewide media campaigns and initiatives - The media campaigns focus on informing individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what they have to offer as well as providing information regarding where applications or other information may be obtained. Additionally, ALL Kids staff attend a wide variety of association meetings and conferences to inform memberships of the availability of children’s health insurance. The staff have developed specialized outreach materials (from videos to informational brochures and flyers to specific handouts) for specific groups to meet their needs.
Staff have exhibited at booths and presentations to the Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Family Practice Physicians, Dentists, Social Workers, Department of Human Resources staff, Mental Health staff, Family Law Judges, Hospitals, Hospital auxiliaries, WIC staff, Public Health Staff, etc.
• Outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants – since the Spring of 2002, ALL Kids consultants have been and/are employed throughout the state, to disseminate information about the program to develop coalitions and networks of local residents to assist individuals in completing and submitting applications. These regional coordinators, their supervisory directors, and consultants are many times based in the county health departments but also utilize numerous off-site locales and alternative working hours. • Outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies - Information about CHIP, applications, and application assistance are available through existing child-related programs such as the Child Care Management Agencies and their targeted child day care centers, Food Stamps, Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Program clinics, WIC clinics, community health centers, Indian Health Services, school nurse programs, school counselor programs, Early Intervention programs, other social service agencies, etc. These programs and agencies have successful histories of serving the target population and the CHIP program utilizes their contact with this population to broaden outreach efforts. Dissemination of CHIP information to these entities has been facilitated since representatives of these agencies and programs served on the CHIP Advisory Council and
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 45 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-50)Page 50#
continue to be in contact with CHIP as stakeholders. • With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion and the RIM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
Phase III - ALL Kids PLUS Outreach for this special population is conducted primarily by the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. Outreach includes educating primary and specialty care physicians regarding ALL Kids PLUS, identifying and contacting children who may need PLUS services through reviews of agency rolls and possible reviews of the pediatric health histories (part of the application process), contact with community health centers, etc. Information about ALL Kids PLUS is incorporated into all publications and presentations.
In an effort to continually improve the ALL Kids PLUS, CHIP staff continue to meet with the ALL Kids PLUS participating agencies to identify and resolve any problematic areas and to recruit additional participating agencies. PLUS agencies assist the CHIP staff in developing contracts, performance standards, and procedures for ongoing monitoring and oversight of the ALL Kids PLUS program.
NOTE: The application form and other materials have been translated into Spanish. Additionally, the ALL Kids enrollment unit employs a Spanish-speaking staff member and a Hispanic consultant has been hired to develop a Hispanic outreach plan.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 46 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-51)Page 51#
Section 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan and proceed to Section 7 since children covered under a Medicaid expansion program will receive all Medicaid covered services including EPSDT.
6.1. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply.) (Section 2103(c)); (42CFR 457.410(a))
Guidance: Benchmark coverage is substantially equal to the benefits coverage in a benchmark benefit package (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, and/or the HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the state). If box below is checked, either 6.1.1.1., 6.1.1.2., or 6.1.1.3. must also be checked. (Section 2103(a)(1))
6.1.1. Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.420)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan, as described in and offered under Section 8903(1) of Title 5, United States Code. (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(b))
6.1.1.1. FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(a)) (If checked, attach copy of the plan.)
Guidance: Checkbox below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is State employee coverage, meaning a coverage plan that is offered and generally available to State employees in the state. (Section 2103(b)(2))
6.1.1.2. State employee coverage; (Section 2103(b)(2)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is offered by a health maintenance organization (as defined in Section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Services Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives of such coverage plans offered by an HMO in the state. (Section 2103(b)(3) (42 CFR 457.420(c)))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 47 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-52)Page 52#
6.1.1.3. HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(b)(3)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
The benefit package offered by the health maintenance organization with the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives was selected after several well attended public meetings where the benefits of the three benchmark plans were compared with the assistance of the insurers/administrators for the three plans. The benefit plan was altered slightly to make it more appropriate for children’s needs.
In addition to the ALL Kids basic benefits package, additional benefits may be available for enrollees who have special needs. These additional benefits are known as ALL Kids PLUS benefits and are only available as prescribed by ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. These decisions regarding what benefits are provided, the requirements for their receipt, and the provision of the benefits is under the auspices of the PLUS authorizing state agencies. These state agencies are those with which CHIP has a contract for the provision of ALL Kids PLUS services, those agencies that ordinarily serve children with special health care conditions and needs, and which provide the matching funds for federal CHIP funding
The ALL Kids benefits plan is described in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD), which is available upon request.The benefit package for enrollees in the CHIP Medicaid expansion will be identical to other children enrolled in comprehensive Medicaid categories.
Guidance: States choosing Benchmark-equivalent coverage must check the box below and ensure that the coverage meets the following requirements: the coverage includes benefits for items and services within each of the categories of basic services described in 42 CFR 457.430: • dental services • inpatient and outpatient hospital services, • physicians’ services, • surgical and medical services, • laboratory and x-ray services, • well-baby and well-child care, including age-appropriate immunizations, and • emergency services; the coverage has an aggregate actuarial value that is at least actuarially equivalent to one of the benchmark benefit packages (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, or coverage offered through an HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial enrollment in the state); and the coverage has an actuarial value that is equal to at least 75 percent of the actuarial value of the additional categories in such package, if offered, as SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 48 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-53)Page 53#
described in 42 CFR 457.430: • coverage of prescription drugs, • mental health services, • vision services and • hearing services.
If 6.1.2. is checked, a signed actuarial memorandum must be attached. The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 42 CFR 457.431. The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State results.
The actuarial report must be prepared by an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. This report must be prepared in accordance with the principles and standards of the American Academy of Actuaries. In preparing the report, the actuary must use generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, use a standardized set of utilization and price factors, use a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of children who are expected to be covered under the State child health plan, apply the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services), without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used, and take into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by taking into account the increase in actuarial value of benefits coverage offered under the State child health plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing under such coverage. (Section 2103(a)(2))
6.1.2. Benchmark-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(a)(2) and 42 CFR 457.430) Specify the coverage, including the amount, scope and duration of each service, as well as any exclusions or limitations. Attach a signed actuarial report that meets the requirements specified in 42 CFR 457.431.
Guidance: A State approved under the provision below, may modify its program from time to time so long as it continues to provide coverage at least equal to the lower of the actuarial value of the coverage under the program as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark programs. If “existing comprehensive state- based coverage” is modified, an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans must be attached. Also, the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” must be described in the space provided for all states. (Section 2103(a)(3))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 49 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-54)Page 54#
6.1.3. Existing Comprehensive State-Based Coverage; (Section 2103(a)(3) and 42 CFR 457.440) This option is only applicable to New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania.Attach a description of the benefits package, administration, and date of enactment. If existing comprehensive State-based coverage is modified, provide an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997 or one of the benchmark plans. Describe the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for existing comprehensive state-based coverage.
Guidance: Secretary-approved coverage refers to any other health benefits coverage deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Secretary upon application by a state. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.250)
6.1.4. Secretary-approved Coverage. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.450) Guidance: Section 1905(r) of the Act defines EPSDT to require coverage of (1) any medically necessary screening, and diagnostic services, including vision, hearing, and dental screening and diagnostic services, consistent with a periodicity schedule based on current and reasonable medical practice standards or the health needs of an individualchild to determine if a suspected condition or illness exists; and (2) all services listed in section 1905(a) of the Act that are necessary to correct or ameliorate any defects and mental and physical illnesses or conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. Section 1902(a)(43) of the Act requires that the State (1) provide and arrange for all necessary services, including supportive services, such as transportation, needed to receive medical care included within the scope of the EPSDT benefit and (2) inform eligible beneficiaries about the services available under the EPSDT benefit.
If the coverage provided does not meet all of the statutory requirements for EPSDT contained in sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, do not check this box.
6.1.4.1. Coverageof all benefits that are provided to childrenthat is the same as the benefits provided under the Medicaid State plan,including Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT).
6.1.4.2. Comprehensive coverage for children under a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 50 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-55)Page 55#
6.1.4.3. Coverage that the State has extended to the entire Medicaid population.
Guidance: Check below if the coverage offered includes benchmark coverage, as specified in §457.420, plus additional coverage. Under this option, the State must clearly demonstrate that the coverage it provides includes the same coverage as the benchmark package, and also describes the services that are being added to the benchmark package.
6.1.4.4. Coverage that includes benchmark coverage plus additional coverage. In the second amendment to the Alabama CHIP State Plan, ALL Kids PLUS was established which provided additional benefits for children with special health care conditions/needs. Attachment A contains a detailed description of the ALL Kids PLUS component of CHIP.
6.1.4.5. Coverage that is the same as defined by existing comprehensive state- based coverageapplicable only in New York, Pennsylvania or Florida.(under 42 CFR 457.440)
Guidance: Check below if the State is purchasing coverage through a group health plan, and intends to demonstrate that the group health plan is substantially equivalent to or greater than coverage under one of the benchmark plans specified in 457.420, through the use of a benefit-by- benefit comparison of the coverage. Provide a sample of the comparison format that will be used. Under this option, if coverage for any benefit does not meet or exceed the coverage for that benefit under the benchmark, the State must provide an actuarial analysis as described in457.431 to determine actuarial equivalence.
6.1.4.6. Coverage under a group health plan that is substantially equivalent to or greater than benchmark coverage through a benefit by benefit comparison (Provide a sample of how the comparison will be done).
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7. Other. (Describe) Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in Alabama (beginning in Montgomery, Macon and Russell). Coverage begins upon enrollment and extends only through delivery with the exception of bundled obstetrical benefits. Coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 51 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-56)Page 56#
pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity- related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. The definition of comprehensive coverage includes coverage for obstetrical benefits. If a pregnant woman has other coverage but the other coverage does not include obstetrical benefits, then the other coverage would be considered non- comprehensive, regardless of any other benefits it insures. In this circumstance, the pregnant woman would meet the criterion for not having comprehensive coverage.
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women, but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR 457.490) A description of the scope, amount and duration of services covered under ALL Kids and ALL Kids PLUS, as well as any exclusions and limitations can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. Health insurance benefits provided to conception to birth enrollees will be identical to the health insurance benefits provided to any pregnant ALL Kids enrollee. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Comprehensive coverage will end upon the end of the pregnancy. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment which extends into the postpartum period. In geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available, coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 52 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-57)Page 57#
6.2.1. Inpatient services (Section 2110(a)(1))
6.2.2. Outpatient services (Section 2110(a)(2))
6.2.3. Physician services (Section 2110(a)(3))
6.2.4. Surgical services (Section 2110(a)(4))
6.2.5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. (Section 2110(a)(5))
6.2.6. Prescription drugs (Section 2110(a)(6))
6.2.7. Over-the-counter medications (Section 2110(a)(7))
6.2.8. Laboratory and radiological services (Section 2110(a)(8))
6.2.9. Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family services and supplies (Section 2110(a)(9))
6.2.10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.18., but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structural services (Section 2110(a)(10))
6.2.11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.19, but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including community-based services (Section 2110(a)(11)
6.2.12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices) (Section 2110(a)(12))
6.2.13. Disposable medical supplies (Section 2110(a)(13))
Guidance: Home and community based services may include supportive services such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home.
6.2.14. Home and community-based health care services (Section 2110(a)(14))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 53 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-58)Page 58#
Guidance: Nursing services may include nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services in a home, school or other setting.
6.2.15. Nursing care services (Section 2110(a)(15))
6.2.16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest (Section 2110(a)(16)
6.2.17. Dental services (Section 2110(a)(17)) States updating their dental benefits must complete 6.2-DC (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)
6.2.18. Vision screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.19. Hearing screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.20. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(18))
6.2.21. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(19))
6.2.22. Case management services (Section 2110(a)(20))
6.2.23. Care coordination services (Section 2110(a)(21))
6.2.24. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders (Section 2110(a)(22))
6.2.25. Hospice care (Section 2110(a)(23))
Guidance: See guidance for Section 6.1.4.1 for guidance on the statutory requirements for EPSDT under sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act. If the benefit being provided does not meet the EPSDT statutory requirements, do not check the box below.
6.2.26. EPSDT consistent with requirements of sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act
Guidance: Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic or rehabilitative service may be provided, whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting, if recognized by State law and only if the service is: 1) prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as prescribed by State law; SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 54 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-59)Page 59#
2) performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician; or 3) furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license.
6.2.27. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services. (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.28. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage (Section 2110(a)(25))
6.2.29. Medical transportation (Section 2110(a)(26))
Guidance: Enabling services, such as transportation, translation, and outreach services, may be offered only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals.
6.2.30. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) (Section 2110(a)(27))
6.2.31. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not included under this Section (Section 2110(a)(28)) Transplantation Services Emergency and Urgent Care Services Skilled Nursing Services Vision Services 6.2-DC Dental Coverage(CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) The State will provide dental coverage to children through one of the following. Please update Sections 9.10 and 10.3-DC when electing this option. Dental services provided to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2103(a)(5)):
6.2.1-DC State Specific Dental Benefit Package. The State assures dental services represented by the following categories of common dental terminology (CDT6) codes are included in the dental benefits: 1. Diagnostic (i.e., clinical exams, x-rays) (CDT codes: D0100-D0999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 2. Preventive (i.e., dental prophylaxis, topical fluoride treatments, sealants) (CDT codes: D1000-D1999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 3. Restorative (i.e., fillings, crowns) (CDT codes: D2000-D2999) 4. Endodontic (i.e., root canals) (CDT codes: D3000-D3999) 5. Periodontic (treatment of gum disease) (CDT codes: D4000-D4999)
Current Dental Terminology,© 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 55 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-60)Page 60#
6. Prosthodontic (dentures) (CDT codes: D5000-D5899, D5900-D5999, and D6200-D6999) 7. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (i.e., extractions of teeth and other oral surgical procedures) (CDT codes: D7000-D7999) 8. Orthodontics (i.e., braces) (CDT codes: D8000-D8999) 9. Emergency Dental Services
ALL Kids utilizes the BCBS of Alabama preferred Dental Network. Reimbursement for services delivered to ALL Kids' enrollees is paid based on the preferred dental network fee schedule. All network dentists agree to accept this as payment in full, with the exception of enrollee co-pays (no copayments on preventive or diagnostic services).
When costs are expected to exceed $1500 for a calendar year, ALL Kids utilizes a prior authorization process to ensure medically necessary services are provided. Costs associated with diagnostic and preventive services are excluded from this $1500 threshold. The amount is calculated by totaling the amount paid in dental claims minus the amount paid for preventive and diagnostic dental services.
If an enrollee is in need of dental services beyond $1500 in a calendar year, providers are instructed to submit a predetermination request to BCBS. BCBS reviews all provider requests to determine dental necessity of services and ALL Kids provides final approval to pay for services exceeding $1500. Providers are familiar with this process and dentally necessary services are provided in a timely manner regardless of the time of year. There is no unnecessary carry-over of services that need immediate attention.
If a family would like to appeal the BCBS/ALL Kids decision regarding the application of “medically necessary,” there is an appeals process which is consistent with the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1160 (b) and in compliance with state laws, the Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and all other applicable regulations of the Department of Labor Procedures. 6.2.1.1-DC Periodicity Schedule. The State has adopted the following periodicity schedule: State-developed Medicaid-specific American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Other Nationally recognized periodicity schedule Other (description attached)
6.2.2-DC Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5), 42 CFR 457.410, and 42 CFR 457.420)
6.2.2.1-DC FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(i)) (If checked, attach copy of the dental supplemental plan benefits description and the applicable CDT7 codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 56 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-61)Page 61#
services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.2-DC State employee coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(ii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.3-DC HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(iii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2-DS Supplemental Dental Coverage- The State will provide dental coverage to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services. Children eligible for this option must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2110(b)(5)(C)(ii)). Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: Under Title XXI, pre-existing condition exclusions are not allowed, with the only exception being in relation to another law in existence (HIPAA/ERISA). Indicate that the plan adheres to this requirement by checking the applicable description.
In the event that the State provides benefits through a group health plan or group health coverage, or provides family coverage through a group health plan under a waiver (see Section 6.4.2.), pre-existing condition limits are allowed to the extent permitted by HIPAA/ERISA. If the State is contracting with a group health plan or provides benefits through group health coverage, describe briefly any limitations on pre-existing conditions. (Formerly 8.6.)
6.2- MHPAEASection 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Social Security Act requires that, to the extent that it provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits, a State child health plan ensures that financial requirements and treatment limitations applicable to mental health and substance use disorder benefits comply with the mental health parity requirements of section 2705(a) of the Public Health Service Act in the same manner that such requirements apply to a group health plan.If the state child health plan provides for delivery of services through a managed care arrangement, this requirement applies to both the state and managed care plans. These requirements are also applicable to any additional benefits provided voluntarily to the child health plan population by managed care entities and will be considered as part of CMS’s contract review process at 42 CFR 457.1201(l).
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 57 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-62)Page 62#
6.2.1- MHPAEA Before completing a parity analysis, the State must determine whether each covered benefit is a medical/surgical, mental health, or substance use disorder benefit based on a standard that is consistent with state and federal law and generally recognized independent standards of medical practice. (42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)(i))
6.2.1.1- MHPAEA Please choose the standard(s) the state uses to determine whether a covered benefit is a medical/surgical benefit, mental health benefit, or substance use disorder benefit. The most current version of the standard elected must be used. If different standards are used for different benefit types, please specify the benefit type(s) to which each standard is applied. If “Other” is selected, please provide a description of that standard.
International Classification of Disease (ICD)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
State guidelines (Describe: )
Other (Describe: )
6.2.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State provide mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not provideany mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the mental health parity requirements do not apply ((42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)). Continue on to Section 6.3.
6.2.2- MHPAEA Section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act)provides that to the extent a State child health plan includes coverage of early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services (EPSDT) defined in section 1905(r) of the Act and provided in accordance with section 1902(a)(43) of the Act, the plan shall be deemed to satisfy the parity requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Act.
6.2.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State child health plan provide coverage of EPSDT? The State must provide for coverage of EPSDT benefits, consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements, as indicated in section 6.2.26 of the State child health plan in order to answer “yes.”
Yes
No SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 58 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-63)Page 63#
Guidance: If the State child health plan does not provide EPSDT consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements at sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, please go to Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA to complete the required parity analysis of the State child health plan.
If the state does provide EPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid requirements, please continue this section to demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Act and the mental health parity regulations of 42 CFR 457.496(b) related to deemed compliance.Please provide supporting documentation, such as contract language, provider manuals, and/or member handbooks describing the state’s provision of EPSDT.
6.2.2.2- MHPAEA EPSDT benefits are provided to the following:
All children covered under the State child health plan.
A subset of children covered under the State child health plan.
Please describe the different populations (if applicable) covered under the State child health plan that are providedEPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements.
Guidance: If only a subset of children are provided EPSDT benefits under the State child health plan, 42 CFR 457.496(b)(3) limits deemed compliance to those children only and Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA must becompleted as well as the required parity analysis for the other children.
6.2.2.3- MHPAEA To be deemed compliant with the MHPAEA parity requirements, States must provide EPSDT in accordance with sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act (42 CFR 457.496(b)). The State assures each of the following for children eligible for EPSDT under the separate State child health plan:
All screening services, including screenings for mental health and substance use disorder conditions, are provided at intervals that align with a periodicity schedule that meets reasonable standards of medical or dental practice as well as when medically necessary to determine the existence of suspected illness or conditions. (Section 1905(r))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 59 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-64)Page 64#
All diagnostic services described in 1905(a) of the Act are provided as needed to diagnose suspected conditions or illnesses discovered through screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. (Section 1905(r))
All items and services described in section 1905(a) of the Act are provided when needed to correct or ameliorate a defect or any physical or mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the Medicaid State plan. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Treatment limitations applied to services provided under the EPSDT benefit are not limited based on a monetary cap or budgetary constraints and may be exceeded as medically necessary to correct or ameliorate a medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Non-quantitative treatment limitations, such as definitions of medical necessity or criteria for medical necessity, are applied in an individualized manner that does not preclude coverage of any items or services necessary to correct or ameliorate any medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
EPSDT benefits are not excluded on the basis of any condition, disorder, or diagnosis. (Section 1905(r)(5))
The provision of all requested EPSDT screening services, as well as any corrective treatments needed based on those screening services, are provided or arranged for as necessary. (Section 1902(a)(43))
All families with children eligible for the EPSDT benefit under the separate State child health plan are provided information and informed about the full range of services available to them. (Section 1902(a)(43)(A))
Guidance: For states seeking deemed compliance for their entire State child health plan population, please continue to Section 6.3. If not all of the covered populations are offered EPSDT,the State must conduct a parity analysis of the benefit packages provided to those populations. Please continue to 6.2.3- SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 60 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-65)Page 65#
MHPAEA.
Mental Health Parity Analysis Requirements for States Not Providing EPSDT to All Covered Populations
Guidance: The State must complete a parity analysis for each population under the State child health plan that is not providedthe EPSDT benefit consistent with the requirements 42 CFR 457.496(b). If the State provides benefits or limitations that vary within the child or pregnant woman populations, states should perform a parity analysis for each of the benefit packages. For example, if different financial requirements are applied according to a beneficiary’s income, a separate parity analysis is needed for the benefit package provided at each income level.
Please ensure that changes made to benefitlimitations under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 6.2.
6.2.3- MHPAEAIn order to conduct the parity analysis, the State must place all medical/surgical and mental health and substance use disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan into one of four classifications: Inpatient, outpatient, emergency care, and prescription drugs. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii);42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(B))
6.2.3.1 MHPAEA Please describe below the standard(s) used to place covered benefits into one of the four classifications.
Benefit Classification Standards Used Inpatient Inpatient benefits are applied per the benefit plan to a registered inpatient bed patient in a hospital. Outpatient Outpatient benefits are applied per the benefit plan to a patient who is not a registered inpatient bed patient of a hospital. Pharmacy Pharmacy benefits are applied per the benefit plan and evidence based clinical criteria for use of medication, regardless of behavioral health or medical diagnosis. Emergency Services covered in connection with a medical condition that occur suddenly and without warning with symptoms which are so acute and severe as to require immediate medical attention.
6.2.3.1.1 MHPAEAThe State assures that:
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 61 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-66)Page 66#
The State has classified all benefits covered under the State plan into one of the four classifications.
The same reasonable standards are used for determining the classification for a mental health or substance use disorder benefit as are used for determining the classification of medical/surgical benefits.
6.2.3.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State use sub-classifications to distinguish between office visits and other outpatient services?
Yes
No
6.2.3.1.2.1- MHPAEA If the State uses sub-classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits and other outpatient services, the State assures the following:
The sub-classifications are only used to distinguish office visits from other outpatient items and services, and are not used to distinguish between similar services on other bases (ex: generalist vs. specialist visits).
Guidance: For purposes of this section, any reference to “classification(s)” includes sub-classification(s) in states using sub- classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits from other outpatient services.
6.2.3.2 MHPAEA The State assures that:
Mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are provided in all classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are provided under the State child health plan.
Guidance:States are not required to cover mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(f)(2)). However if a state does provide any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, those mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be provided in all the same classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are covered under the State child health plan (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii).
Annual and Aggregate Lifetime Dollar Limits
6.2.4- MHPAEA A State that provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and/or SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 62 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-67)Page 67#
substance use disorder benefits must comply with parity requirements related to annual and aggregate lifetime dollar limits for benefits covered under the State child health plan. (42 CFR 457.496(c))
6.2.4.1- MHPAEA Please indicate whether the State applies an aggregate lifetime dollar limit and/or an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance abuse disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan.
Aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied
Aggregate annual dollar limit is applied
No dollar limit is applied
Guidance: A monetary coverage limit that applies toall CHIP services provided under the State child health plan is not subject to parity requirements.
If there are no aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to section 6.2.5- MHPAEA.
6.2.4.2- MHPAEA Are there any medical/surgical benefits covered under the State child health plan that have either an aggregate lifetime dollar limit or an annual dollar limit? If yes, please specify what type of limits apply.
Yes (Type(s) of limit:) No
Guidance: If no aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied to medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If no aggregate annual dollar limit is applied to medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.(42 CFR 457.496(c)(1))
6.2.4.3 – MHPAEA. States applying an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits must determine whether the portion of the medical/surgical benefits to which the limit applies is less than one- third, at least one-third but less than two-thirds, or at least two-thirds of all medical/surgical benefits covered under the State plan (42 CFR 457.496(c)).The portion of medical/surgical benefits subject to the limit is based on the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical/surgical benefits under the State plan for the State plan year or portion of the plan year after a change in benefits that affects the applicability of the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits. (42 CFR 457.496(c)(3))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 63 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-68)Page 68#
The State assures that it has developed a reasonable methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit, as applicable.
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit and the results as anattachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.1- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to a lifetime dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
6.2.4.3.2- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to an annual dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
Guidance: If an aggregate lifetime limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If an annual dollar limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical surgical benefits, the State may not impose an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(c)(1)).Skip to section 6.2.5-MHPAEA.
If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least one-third of all medical/surgical benefits,please continue below to provide the assurances related to the determination of the portion of total costs for medical/surgical benefits that are subject to either anannual or lifetime SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 64 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-69)Page 69#
limit.
6.2.4.3.2.1- MHPAEA If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least1/3 and less than 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits, the State assures the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii)):
The State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on mental health or substance use disorder benefits that is no more restrictive than an average limit calculated for medical/surgical benefits.
Guidance: The state’s methodology for calculating the average limit for medical/surgical benefits must be consistent with42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B) and 42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii). Please include the state’s methodology and results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.2.2- MHPAEA If at least 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits are subject to an annual or lifetime limit, the State assures either of the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(i)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(ii)):
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit is applied to both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits in a manner that does not distinguish between medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits; or
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit placed on mental health and substance use disorder benefits is no more restrictive than the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits.
Quantitative Treatment Limitations
6.2.5- MHPAEADoes the State apply quantitative treatment limitations (QTLs) on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification of benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies one or more QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
Yes (Specify: )
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 65 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-70)Page 70#
No
Guidance: If the state does not apply any type of QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification, the state meets parity requirements for QTLs and should continue to Section 6.2.6 - MHPAEA. If the state does apply QTLsto any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue.
6.2.5.1- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of QTL on any medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance:If the State does not apply QTLs on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose quantitative treatment limitations on mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to Section 6.2.6- MHPAEA related to non-quantitative treatment limitations.
6.2.5.2- MHPAEAWithin each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of QTL on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, theState must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the classification which are subject to the limitation. More specifically, the State must determine the ratio of (a) the dollar amount of all payments expected to be paid under the State plan for medical and surgical benefits within a classification which are subject to the type of quantitative treatment limitation for the plan year (or portion of the plan year after a mid-year change affecting the applicability of a type of quantitative treatment limitation to any medical/surgical benefits in the class) to (b) the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical and surgical benefits within the classification for the plan year. For purposes of this paragraph, all payments expected to be paid under the State plan includes payments expected to be made directly by the State and payments which are expected to be made by MCEs contracting with the State. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C))
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above for each classification within which the State applies QTLs to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and resultsas anattachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.5.3- MHPAEAFor each type of QTL applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification,does the Stateapply the same type of QTL to “substantially all”(defined as at least two-thirds) of the medical/surgical benefits within the SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 66 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-71)Page 71#
same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of QTL to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits,the State may not impose that type of QTL on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
6.2.5.3.1- MHPAEAFor each type of QTL applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the predominant level of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. The “predominant level” of a type of QTL in a classification is the level (or least restrictive of a combination of levels) that applies to more than one-half of the medical/surgical benefits in that classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B).The portion of medical/surgical benefits in a classification to which a given level of a QTL type is applied is based on the dollar amount of payments expected to be paid for medical/surgical benefits subject to that level as compared to all medical/surgical benefits in the classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C). For each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of quantitative treatment limitation also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
The level of each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of QTL that exceeds the one- half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of QTL such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 67 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-72)Page 72#
CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations
6.2.6- MHPAEAThe State may utilize non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for mental health or substance use disorder benefits, but the State must ensure that those NQTLs comply with all the mental health parity requirements. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(4));(42 CFR 457.496(d)(5)) 6.2.6.1 – MHPAEA If the State imposes any NQTLs, complete this subsection. If the State does not impose NQTLs, please go to Section 6.2.7-MHPAEA.
The State assures that the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of any NQTL to mental health or substance use disorder benefits are no more stringent than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of NQTLs to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification.
Guidance: Examples of NQTLs include medical management standards to limit or exclude benefits based on medical necessity, restrictions based on geographic location, provider specialty, or other criteria to limit the scope or duration of benefits and provider network design (ex: preferred providers vs. participating providers). Additional examples of possible NQTLs are provided in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(4)(ii). States will need to provide a summary of its NQTL analysis, as well as supporting documentation as requested.
6.2.6.2 – MHPAEAThe State or MCE contracting with the State must comply with parity if they provide coverage of medical or surgical benefits furnished by out-of-network providers.
6.2.6.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State or MCE contracting with the State provide coverage of medical or surgicalbenefits provided by out-of-network providers?
Yes
No
Guidance: The State can answer no if the State or MCE only provides out of network services in specific circumstances, such as emergency care, or when the network is unable to provide a necessary service covered under the contract.
6.2.6.2.2- MHPAEA If yes, the State must provide access to out-of-network providers for mental health or substance use disorder benefits. Please assure the following:
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 68 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-73)Page 73#
The State attests that when determining access to out-of-network providers within a benefit classification, the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors used to determine access to those providers for mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are comparable to and applied no more stringently than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used to determine access for out- of-network providers for medical/surgical benefits.
Availability of Plan Information 6.2.7- MHPAEA The State must provide beneficiaries, potential enrollees, and providers with information related to medical necessity criteria and denials of payment or reimbursement for mental health or substance use disorder services (42 CFR 457.496(e)) in addition to existing notice requirements at 42 CFR 457.1180.
6.2.7.1- MHPAEA Medical necessity criteria determinations must be made available to any current or potential enrollee or contracting provider, upon request. The state attests that the following entities provide this information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Other Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama; New Directions (Behavioral Health Benefits Manager for BCBS); Prime Therapeutics (Pharmacy Benefits Manager for BCBS)
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.2.7.2- MHPAEA Reason for any denial for reimbursement or payment for mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be made available to the enrollee by the health plan or the State. The state attests that the following entities provide denial information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Other SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 69 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-74)Page 74#
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama; New Directions (Behavioral Health Benefits Manager for BCBS); Prime Therapeutics (Pharmacy Benefits Manager for BCBS)
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.3. The State assures that, with respect to pre-existing medical conditions, one of the following two statements applies to its plan: (42CFR 457.480)
6.3.1. The State shall not permit the imposition of any pre-existing medical condition exclusion for covered services (Section 2102(b)(1)(B)(ii)); OR 6.3.2. The State contracts with a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, or contracts with a group health plan to provide family coverage under a waiver (see Section 6.6.2. (formerly 6.4.2) of the template). Pre- existing medical conditions are permitted to the extent allowed by HIPAA/ERISA.(Formerly 8.6.) (Section 2103(f))Describe:
Guidance: States may request two additional purchase options in Title XXI: cost effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system and for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4. Additional Purchase Options-If the State wishes to provide services under the plan through cost effective alternatives or the purchase of family coverage, it must request the appropriate option. To be approved, the State must address the following: (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4.1. Cost Effective Coverage- Payment may be made to a State in excess of the 10 percent limitation on use of funds for payments for: 1) other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; 2) expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); 3) expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and 4) other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan, if it demonstrates the following (42CFR 457.1005(a)):
6.4.1.1. Coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures must meet the coverage requirements above; Describe the coverage provided by the alternative delivery system. The State may cross reference Section 6.2.1 - 6.2.28. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(i)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
6.4.1.2. The cost of such coverage must not be greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided for SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 70 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-75)Page 75#
the coverage described above; Describe the cost of such coverage on an average per child basis. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(ii)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
Guidance: Check below if the State is requesting to provide cost-effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system. This allows the State to waive the 10 percent limitation on expenditures not used for Medicaid or health insurance assistance if coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures meets the requirements of Section 2103; the cost of such coverage is not greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided under Section 2103; and such coverage is provided through the use of a community-based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Services Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923.
If the cost-effective alternative waiver is requested, the State must demonstrate that payments in excess of the 10 percent limitation will be used for other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan. (42CFR, 457.1005(a))
6.4.1.3. The coverage must be provided through the use of a community based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Social Security Act. Describe the community-based delivery system. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(iii)) (42CFR 457.1005(a))
Guidance: Check 6.4.2.if the State is requesting to purchase family coverage. Any State requesting to purchase such coverage will need to include information that establishes to the Secretary’s satisfaction that: 1) when compared to the amount of money that would have been paid to cover only the children involved with a comparable package, the purchase of family coverage is cost effective; and 2) the purchase of family coverage is not a substitution for coverage already being provided to the child. (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 71 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-76)Page 76#
457.1010)
6.4.2. Purchase of Family Coverage- Describe the plan to purchase family coverage. Payment may be made to a State for the purpose of family coverage under a group health plan or health insurance coverage that includes coverage of targeted low-income children, if it demonstrates the following: (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2.1. Purchase of family coverage is cost-effective. The State’s cost of purchasing family coverage, including administrative expenditures, that includes coverage for the targeted low-income children involved or the family involved (as applicable) under premium assistance programs must not be greater than the cost of obtaining coverage under the State plan for all eligible targeted low-income children or families involved; and (2) The State may base its demonstration of cost effectiveness on an assessment of the cost of coverage, including administrative costs, for children or families under premium assistance programs to the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children or families, done on a case- by-case basis, or on the cost of premium assisted coverage in the aggregate.
6.4.2.2. The State assures that the family coverage would not otherwise substitute for health insurance coverage that would be provided to such children but for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.1010(b))
6.4.2.3. The State assures that the coverage for the family otherwise meets title XXI requirements. (42CFR 457.1010(c))
6.4.3-PA: Additional State Options for Providing Premium Assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002issued February, 2, 2010)A State may elect to offer a premium assistance subsidy for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), to all targeted low-income children who are eligible for child health assistance under the plan and have access to such coverage. No subsidy shall be provided to a targeted low-income child (or the child’s parent) unless the child voluntarily elects to receive such a subsidy. (Section 2105(c)(10)(A)).Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option. Does the State provide this option to targeted low-income children? Yes No
6.4.3.1-PA Qualified Employer-Sponsored Coverage and Premium Assistance Subsidy
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 72 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-77)Page 77#
6.4.3.1.1-PAProvide an assurance that the qualified employer- sponsoredinsurance meets the definition of qualified employer-sponsored coverage as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), and that the premium assistance subsidy meets the definition of premium assistance subsidy as defined in 2105(c)(10)(C).
6.4.3.1.2-PADescribe whether the State is providing the premium assistance subsidy as reimbursement to an employee or for out-of-pocket expenditures or directly to the employee’s employer.
6.4.3.2-PA: Supplemental Coverage for Benefits and Cost Sharing Protections Provided under the Child Health Plan.
6.4.3.2.1-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(E)(i), provide an assurance that the State is providing for each targeted low-income child enrolled in such coverage, supplemental coverage consisting of all items or services that are not covered or are only partially covered, under the qualified employer-sponsored coverage consistent with 2103(a) and cost sharing protections consistent with Section 2103(e).
6.4.3.2.2-PADescribe whether these benefits are being provided through the employer or by the State providing wraparound benefits.
6.4.3.2.3-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage, the State ensures that such group health plans or health insurance coverage offered through an employer will be certified by an actuary as coverage that is equivalent to a benchmark benefit package described in Section 2103(b) or benchmark equivalent coverage that meets the requirements of Section 2103(a)(2).
6.4.3.3-PA: Application of Waiting Period Imposed Under State Plan:States are required to apply the same waiting period to premium assistance as is applied to direct coverage for children under their CHIP State plan, as specified in Section 2105(c)(10)(F).
6.4.3.3.1-PAProvide an assurance that the waiting period for children in premium assistance is the same as for those children in direct coverage (if State has a waiting period in place for children in direct CHIP coverage).
6.4.3.4-PA: Opt-Out and Outreach, Education, and Enrollment Assistance
6.4.3.4.1-PADescribe the State’s process for ensuring parents are permitted to SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 73 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-78)Page 78#
disenroll their child from qualified employer-sponsored coverage and to enroll in CHIP effective on the first day of any month for which the child is eligible for such assistance and in a manner that ensures continuity of coverage for the child (Section 2105(c)(10)(G)).
6.4.3.4.2-PADescribe the State’s outreach, education, and enrollment efforts related to premium assistance programs, as required under Section 2102(c)(3). How does the State inform families of the availability of premium assistance, and assist them in obtaining such subsidies? What are the specific significant resources the State intends to apply to educate employers about the availability of premium assistance subsidies under the State child health plan? (Section 2102(c))
6.4.3.5-PA Purchasing Pool-A State may establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool and may provide a premium assistance subsidy for enrollment in coverage made available through this pool (Section 2105(c)(10)(I)). Does the State provide this option? Yes No
6.6.3.5.1-PADescribe the plan to establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool.
6.6.3.5.2-PAProvide an assurance that employers who are eligible to participate: 1) have less than 250 employees; 2) have at least one employee who is a pregnant woman eligible for CHIP or a member of a family that has at least one child eligible under the State’s CHIP plan.
6.6.3.5.3-PAProvide an assurance that the State will not claim for any administrative expenditures attributable to the establishment or operation of such a pool except to the extent such payment would otherwise be permitted under this title.
6.4.3.6-PA Notice of Availability of Premium Assistance-Describe the procedures that assure that if a State provides premium assistance subsidies under this Section, it must: 1) provide as part of the application and enrollment process, information describing the availability of premium assistance and how to elect to obtain a subsidy; and 2) establish other procedures to ensure that parents are fully informed of the choices for child health assistance or through the receipt of premium assistance subsidies (Section 2105(c)(10)(K)).
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 74 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-79)Page 79#
6.4.3.6.1-PAProvide an assurance that the State includes information about premium assistance on the CHIP application or enrollment form.
Section 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care
Guidance: Methods for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Methods to assure quality include the application of performance measures, quality standards consumer information strategies, and other quality improvement strategies.
Performance measurement strategies could include using measurements for external reporting either to the State or to consumers and for internal quality improvement purposes. They could be based on existing measurement sets that have undergone rigorous evaluation for their appropriateness (e.g., HEDIS). They may include the use of standardized member satisfaction surveys (e.g., CAHPS) to assess members’ experience of care along key dimensions such as access, satisfaction, and system performance.
Quality standards are often used to assure the presence of structural and process measures that promote quality and could include such approaches as: the use of external and periodic review of health plans by groups such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance; the establishment of standards related to consumer protection and quality such as those developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; and the formation of an advisory group to the State or plan to facilitate consumer and community participation in the plan.
Information strategies could include: the disclosure of information to beneficiaries about their benefits under the plan and their rights and responsibilities; the provision of comparative information to consumers on the performance of available health plans and providers; and consumer education strategies on how to access and effectively use health insurance coverage to maximize quality of care.
Quality improvement strategies should include the establishment of quantified quality improvement goals for the plan or the State and provider education. Other strategies include specific purchasing specifications, ongoing contract monitoring mechanisms, focus groups, etc.
Where States use managed care organizations to deliver CHIP care, recent legal changes require the State to use managed care quality standards and quality strategies similar to those used in Medicaid managed care.
Tools for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Tools and types of information available include, HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) measures, CAHPS (Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study) measures, vital statistics data, and SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 75 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-80)Page 80#
State health registries (e.g., immunization registries).
Quality monitoring may be done by external quality review organizations, or, if the State wishes, internally by a State board or agency independent of the State CHIP Agency. Establishing grievance measures is also an important aspect of monitoring.
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 8.
Guidance: The State must specify the qualifications of entities that will provide coverage and the conditions of participation. States should also define the quality standard they are using, for example, NCQA Standards or other professional standards. Any description of the information strategies used should be linked to Section 9. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.495)
7.1. Describe the methods (including external and internal monitoring) used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care, particularly with respect to well-baby care, well- child care, and immunizations provided under the plan. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.495(a)) Will the State utilize any of the following tools to assure quality? (Check all that apply and describe the activities for any categories utilized.) The State utilizes the expertise within the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Public Health in the implementation of the assessment of the ALL Kids program. Quality and appropriateness of care is assessed through the use of surveys such as a new enrollee survey, a continuous enrollee survey, and a disenrollee survey. Both process measures as well as outcome measures are considered when assessing the quality and appropriateness of care. CHIP also reviews claims data for quality assessment. Among the items used in tracking are the use of several claims data indicators such as whether or not children truly have a "medical home"; how well they are adhering to the recommended scheduled well-child exams; whether or not they are appropriately immunized; whether or not non-trauma based emergency room use is going down; how referrals are being made and if specialty care and related services are being received; and, patterns of prescription drug use. The State is also considering using other databases that can provide general indicators of child health and well-being such as the State’s immunization registry, adolescent pregnancy rates and health care utilization patterns identifiable off birth certificates, and the results of child death review efforts. Alabama monitors customer/patient/provider satisfaction through the use of surveys and informal communications with families, advocacy groups, and providers.
In addition to these monitoring strategies, the State assures access to care through monitoring of the provider network and benefit package design. Program staff are actively involved in identifying new providers for the ALL Kids network and have been particularly involved in the addition of pediatric dentists, primary care nurse practitioners, community mental health centers and emergency transportation providers. Geographic distribution of providers is SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 76 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-81)Page 81#
monitored and is crucial when decisions regarding vendor choice are made.
The ALL Kids benefits package requires preauthorization only for hospitalization services. Therefore, access to all primary care providers and specialists is open to all enrollees without referral. Claims data are monitored by program staff to ensure quality and appropriateness of care. In addition, the State employs a masters level social worker to assist families who are experiencing difficulties accessing necessary services due to benefit structure or provider geographic availability. This staff member works closely with case managers at the vendor to identify areas in need of attention and provides the State with recommendations for benefit plan adjustment and/or provider network issues.
The ALL Kids PLUS program coordinates the evaluation of quality and appropriateness of care with the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies and CSHCC/N advocacy groups through collaboration with stakeholders. It is also anticipated that an evaluation of ALL Kids PLUS may become part of the UAB evaluation in the future.
7.1.1. Quality standards . Performance measurement
7.1.2 (a) CHIPRA Quality Core Set
7.1.2 (b) Other The State ensures quality through contracted performance measures. These measures have been adapted in conjunction with the standards recommended by the AAP.
7.1.3. Information strategies Vendors are required to provide key health indicators information.
7.1.4. Quality improvement strategies
The performance guarantees and provider recoupment policy were included in the RFP and are included in the contract with the health plan.
Guidance: Provide a brief description of methods to be used to assure access to covered services, including a description of how the State will assure the quality and appropriateness of the care provided. The State should consider whether there are sufficient providers of care for the newly enrolled populations and whether there is reasonable access to care. (Section 2102(a)(7)(B))
7.2. Describe the methods used, including monitoring, to assure: (Section 2102(a)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.495) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 77 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-82)Page 82#
7.2.1. Access to well-baby care, well-child care, well-adolescent care and childhood and adolescent immunizations. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(a)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Periodic review of the number and types of providers by county Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and postal service mail Feedback from providers
Further, the state uses claims data to monitor well-baby care as is described in 7.1.
7.2.2. Access to covered services, including emergency services as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. (Section 2102(a)(7)) 42CFR 457.495(b)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and postal service mail Feedback from providers Feedback from the CHIP Social Work Consultant
Further, the state uses claims data to monitor emergency room use as is described in 7.1.
7.2.3. Appropriate and timely procedures to monitor and treat enrollees with chronic, complex, or serious medical conditions, including access to an adequate number of visits to specialists experienced in treating the specific medical condition and access to out-of-network providers when the network is not adequate for the enrollee’s medical condition. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(c)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Periodic review of the number and types of providers by county Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and post service mail Feedback from providers Feedback from CSHCC/N advocates and ALL Kids PLUS providers
The ALL Kids PLUS network includes State agencies that serve children with special health care needs/conditions and that contract with CHIP to provide state matching funds for ALL Kids enrollees who use PLUS services. Currently, Children Rehabilitation Services is the only active PLUS program. The PLUS agency provides ALL Kids children with an individual case manager who will monitor access to specialists and treatment.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 78 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-83)Page 83#
In general, the Medicaid standards will be used to establish qualifications for ALL Kids PLUS case management staff. All case management staff will meet specific qualifications, including education, training and appropriate credentialing which will be established by the participating agencies.
In most circumstances, the agencies’ delivery systems are discrete and clear which program provides services for specific conditions. However, where there is potential for overlap in responsibilities, the determination of which agency will provide case management will be done based on the needs of the child with input from the family and by determining what is in the best interest of the child. The agencies using the case management process, will coordinate with each other, the child, the family, and the care providers in determining if a change in case management is needed.
7.2.4. Decisions related to the prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with State law or, in accordance with the medical needs of the patient, within 14 days after the receipt of a request for services. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(d)) Exigent medical circumstances may require more rapid response according to the medical needs of the patient. The health plan vendor has policies in place to assure that prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with state law or regulations promulgated by the Department of Labor. CHIP staff receive feedback from providers and enrollee families if time periods are exceeded. All prior authorization of health services is in accordance with state laws. Children enrolled in a Medicaid expansion are subject to the same prior authorization policies to which children enrolled in Medicaid’s other full service children’s programs are subject.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 79 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-84)Page 84#
Section 8. Cost-Sharing and Payment
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 9.
8.1. Is cost-sharing imposed on any of the children covered under the plan? (42CFR 457.505)Indicate if this also applies for pregnant women. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09- 006, issued May 11, 2009)
8.1.1. Yes 8.1.2. No, skip to question 8.8.
8.1.1-PW Yes 8.1.2-PW No, skip to question 8.8.
Guidance: It is important to note that for families below 150 percent of poverty, the same limitations on cost sharing that are under the Medicaid program apply. (These cost- sharing limitations have been set forth in Section 1916 of the Social Security Act, as implemented by regulations at 42 CFR 447.50- 447.59). For families with incomes of 150 percent of poverty and above, cost sharing for all children in the family cannot exceed 5 percent of a family's income per year. Include a statement that no cost sharing will be charged for pregnancy-related services.(CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2. Describe the amount of cost-sharing, any sliding scale based on income, the group or groups of enrollees that may be subject to the charge by age and income (if applicable) and the service for which the charge is imposed or time period for the charge, as appropriate.(Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c)) There will not be any cost sharing of any type for families who are Native Americans or Alaskan Natives. There will also not be any cost sharing of any type for families whose children are enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion. For all other families cost sharing will be as follows in 8.2.1. and 8.2.3.:
8.2.1. Premiums:
There are three (3) categories of enrollees: No Fee (Native Americans and Alaskan Natives). Low-Fee (children with family incomes from the base (above 141% FPL) up to and including 156% FPL), and Fee (children with family incomes greater than 156% FPL up to and including 312% FPL). There is no cost sharing for children in the No Fee group. There is a $52 premium per child, per year for children in the Low-Fee group. There is a $104 premium per child, per year for children in the Fee group. Premiums can be paid in one payment or in SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 80 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-85)Page 85#
periodic payments (weekly, monthly, quarterly…) throughout the year. A family’s total premium payments are limited to three times the individual premium rate (i.e. $156 or $312 depending upon the income level of the family). Enrollment data systems do not allow for a family to be billed in excess of these amounts. Outstanding premium balances may be waived at the State’s discretion for applicants/enrollees living or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas.
Premiums will not be charged to those enrolled in the Conception to Birth expansion.
8.2.2. Deductibles: None 8.2.3. Coinsurance or copayments:
There are no copayments for preventive services. The only permitted copayments are:
Fee Group Low Fee Group Copayments Copayments (for (for Children Children with with Incomes Incomes up to and >156% FPL up including 156% to and including Service FPL) 312%)
Dental $5/visit $20.00/visit
Doctor’s office visits $3/visit $13.00/visit
Behavioral Health office visits $3/visit $13.00/visit
ER Services $6/facility charge $60.00/facility charge
Inpatient Services (Hospital) $200/confinement $200/confinement
Non-Emergency ER Services $6/visit $60.00/visit
Allergy Testing $6/lab visit $17.00/lab visit
Allergy Treatment $3/visit $12/visit
Ambulance $6/occurrence $100/occurrence
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 81 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-86)Page 86#
Mental and Nervous (Inpatient) $200/confinement $200/confinement
Outpatient Surgical Facility $6/visit $100/visit
Substance Abuse (Inpatient) $200/confinement $200/confinement
X-ray (Outpatient Facility) $6/total x-rays in 1 visit $65/total x-rays in 1 visit
Therapies (Physical, Occupational, Speech) $3/visit $13/visit
Routine Eye Exam $3/visit $13/visit
$3/frames Eye Glasses and/or lenses $13/ frames and/or lenses
Chiropractic visits $2/visit $5/visit
In addition, a Generic Plus pharmacy benefit became effective October 1, 2012 for children in both the low fee and fee groups. Prescription drugs are divided into two groups: generic and preferred brands. The designation “preferred” is assigned by the third party administrator. The copayment schedule is as follows: Fee Group Copayments (for Children Low Fee Group with Incomes Copayments (for Children >156% FPL up with Incomes up to and to and including including 156% FPL) 312%) Generic $1.00 $5.00 Preferred Brands $5.00 $25.00
For those enrolled in the Conception to Birth expansion, copayments will be assessed for the services and pharmacy as indicated in the above tables. Copayment amounts will be based on family income as noted below:
0% FPL up to and including 146% FPL - No copayment requirements From >147% FPL up to and including 156% FPL - assigned to the Low Fee copayment structure From >156% FPL up to and including 312% FPL – assigned to the Fee Group copayment structure 8.2.4. Other:
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 82 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-87)Page 87#
8.2-DS Supplemental Dental(CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)For children enrolled in the dental-only supplemental coverage, describe the amount of cost-sharing, specifying any sliding scale based on income. Also describe how the State will track that the cost sharing does not exceed 5 percent of gross family income. The 5 percent of income calculation shall include all cost-sharing for health insurance and dental insurance. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b), and (c), 457.515(a) and (c), and 457.560(a)) Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2- DS, 6.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
8.2.1-DS Premiums:
8.2.2-DS Deductibles:
8.2.3-DS Coinsurance or copayments:
8.2.4-DS Other:
8.3. Describe how the public will be notified, including the public schedule, of this cost sharing (including the cumulative maximum) and changes to these amounts and any differences based on income. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(b)) All enrollees are provided with coverage and cost-sharing information at initial enrollment through mailed documents. Additionally, this information is available online. All enrollees are notified of cost-sharing changes through letters mailed directly to the residence addresses on file with CHIP. In addition all stakeholders, including provider organizations/associations and state agencies, are notified by letter or other appropriate means of communication (i.e. email, fax notifications, and/or meetings) when changes are made to cost-sharing requirements. CHIP staff and customer service representatives are trained to discuss cost-sharing requirements with families, including premiums, copayments, and the annual out of pocket expenses limit.
Guidance: The State should be able to demonstrate upon request its rationale and justification regarding these assurances. This section also addresses limitations on payments for certain expenditures and requirements for maintenance of effort.
8.4. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the cost sharing in its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.4.1. Cost-sharing does not favor children from higher income families over lower income families. (Section 2103(e)(1)(B)) (42CFR 457.530) 8.4.2. No cost-sharing applies to well-baby and well-child care, including age- appropriate immunizations. (Section 2103(e)(2)) (42CFR 457.520) 8.4.3 No additional cost-sharing applies to the costs of emergency medical services delivered outside the network. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.515(f)) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 83 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-88)Page 88#
8.4.1- MHPAEA There is no separate accumulation of cumulative financial requirements, as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(a), for mental health and substance abuse disorder benefits compared to medical/surgical benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(iii))
8.4.2- MHPAEA If applicable, any different levels of financial requirements that are applied to different tiers of prescription drugs are determined based on reasonable factors, regardless of whether a drug is generally prescribed for medical/surgical benefits or mental health/substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(A))
8.4.3- MHPAEA Cost sharing applied to benefits provided under the State child health plan will remain capped at five percent of the beneficiary’s income as required by 42 CFR 457.560 (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(D)).
8.4.4- MHPAEA Does the State apply financial requirements to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
Yes (Specify: inpatient, outpatient, prescription drugs, emergency room) Inpatient, outpatient, prescription drugs and emergency room
No
Guidance:For the purposes of parity, financial requirements include deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and out of pocket maximums; premiums are excluded from the definition. If the state does not apply financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state meets parity requirements for financial requirements. If the state does apply financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue below.
Please ensure that changes made to financial requirements under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 8.2.
8.4.5- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 84 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-89)Page 89#
mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
8.4.6- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of financial requirement on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, theState must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the class which are subject to the limitation.
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above (Section 6.2.5.2-MHPAEA) for each classification or within which the State applies financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results of the parity analysis as anattachment to the State child health plan.
8.4.7- MHPAEAFor each type of financial requirement applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification,does the Stateapply the same type of financial requirement to at least two-thirds (“substantially all”) of all the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of financial requirement to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits,the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
8.4.8- MHPAEAFor each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State must determine the predominant level (as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)) of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used in determining whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of financial requirement also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of financial requirement applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 85 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-90)Page 90#
The level of each type of financial requirement applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of financial requirement that exceeds the one-half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of financial requirement such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
8.5. Describe how the State will ensure that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of such family’s income for the length of the child’s eligibility period in the State. Include a description of the procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the State for overpayment by an enrollee: (Section 2103(e)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.560(b) and 457.505(e))
Alabama ensures that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed five percent (5%) of a family’s income as is required by Section 2103(3)(B) of Title XXI. In addition, cost sharing, both premiums and copayments are in compliance with CHIP regulations.
There is minimal cost sharing for families, other than Native Americans and Alaskan Natives who have no cost sharing. No family is charged for more than three (3) premiums even if the family has more than three children.
To protect families against excessive medical expenses and comply with the statutory limit of no more than five percent of family income being expended on cost sharing expenses, families will be notified in writing, at initial enrollment and renewal, of the annual out of pocket maximum. Families are informed of this policy through educational literature. Also, CHIP staff and partners are trained to educate families about the limit on out of pocket expenses. Families are encouraged to keep receipts for all copayments and premiums so that once the out of pocket maximum is reached they will have the necessary documentation to stop cost-sharing. If a family reaches this limit and notifies the ALL Kids program, ALL Kids will review the case and if the limit has been reached new insurance cards will be issued stating that the child(ren) are not subject to further co-pays for the coverage period.
8.6. Describe the procedures the State will use to ensure American Indian (as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) and Alaska Native children will be excluded from cost-sharing. (Section 2103(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.535) If a child is identified on an application as an American Indian, the enrollment worker SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 86 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-91)Page 91#
automatically places the child in the no-fee category if the child becomes enrolled. Therefore the insurance vendor sends an insurance card, to the family, which indicates that the child is not subject to any co-pays.
8.7. Provide a description of the consequences for an enrollee or applicant who does not pay a charge. (42CFR 457.570 and 457.505(c)) Superseded by ACA SPA Guidance: Section 8.7.1is based on Section 2101(a) of the Act provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner that is coordinated with other sources of health benefits coverage for children.
8.7.1. Provide an assurance that the following disenrollment protections are being applied:
Guidance: Provide a description belowof the State’s premium grace period process and how the State notifies families of their rights and responsibilities with respect to payment of premiums. (Section 2103(e)(3)(C))
8.7.1.1. State has established a process that gives enrollees reasonable notice of and an opportunity to pay past due premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees prior to disenrollment.(42CFR 457.570(a))
ALL Kids has an annual premium for those in cost sharing categories. Upon enrollment, families are notified, by letter, that premiums are due. Enrollees have the entire 12-month coverage period to pay premium balances and receipt of benefits is not contingent upon payment of premiums. Current enrollees are not terminated for non-payment of premium during the 12-month coverage period. At one month, four months, seven months, and 10 months, families are notified of outstanding premium balances. They are notified, every notice for past-due premiums and cost-sharing, that, in most circumstances, premiums must be paid in full for ALL Kids coverage to be renewed. If a renewal application is received within 90 days past the coverage end date (and the premium is paid no later than 90 days past the coverage end date), enrollees may renew with no lapse in coverage.
8.7.1.2. The disenrollment process affords the enrollee an opportunity to show that the enrollee’s family income has declined prior to disenrollment for non-payment of cost-sharing charges. (42CFR 457.570(b))
The amount of family income written on the renewal form is reviewed by enrollment workers at the time of renewal. If it is known to ALL Kids that a family is experiencing financial difficulty, the ALL Kids Social Work Consultant and/or ALL Kids Regional staff may assist
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 87 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-92)Page 92#
the family in locating assistance for premium payment. Non-payment of premiums is forgiven if the family provides proof of bankruptcy status during the enrollment period or if the family has been affected by disaster events (living or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event).
8.7.1.3. In the instance mentioned above, that the State will facilitate enrolling the child in Medicaid or adjust the child’s cost-sharing category as appropriate. (42CFR 457.570(b)) At the time of renewal, if the family’s income has dropped but is still above the Medicaid eligibility level, if the decision is made to forgive the unpaid premium(s), the child is renewed and placed in the appropriate ALL Kids category. If a family’s income has dropped below the ALL Kids eligibility, the child’s application is reviewed for Medicaid eligibility and, if the child meets all eligibility requirements, s/he is enrolled in Medicaid.
8.7.1.4 The State provides the enrollee with an opportunity for an impartial review to address disenrollment from the program. (42CFR 457.570(c))
This type of grievance is handled in the same impartial manner in which other grievances are handled as described in Attachment A.
8.8. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the payment aspects of its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.8.1. No Federal funds will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(4)) (42CFR 457.220) 8.8.2. No cost-sharing (including premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and all other types) will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(5) (42CFR 457.224) (Previously 8.4.5) 8.8.3. No funds under this title will be used for coverage if a private insurer would have been obligated to provide such assistance except for a provision limiting this obligation because the child is eligible under the this title. (Section 2105(c)(6)(A)) (42CFR 457.626(a)(1)) 8.8.4. Income and resource standards and methodologies for determining Medicaid eligibility are not more restrictive than those applied as of June 1, 1997. (Section 2105(d)(1)) (42CFR 457.622(b)(5)) 8.8.5. No funds provided under this title or coverage funded by this title will include coverage of abortion except if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Section 2105)(c)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.475) 8.8.6. No funds provided under this title will be used to pay for any abortion or to assist in the purchase, in whole or in part, for coverage that includes abortion (except as described above). (Section 2105)(c)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.475) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 88 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-93)Page 93#
Section 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration
Guidance: States should consider aligning its strategic objectives with those discussed in Section II of the CHIP Annual Report.
9.1. Describe strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health coverage among targeted low-income children and other low-income children: (Section 2107(a)(2)) (42CFR 457.710(b))
1. The number of low-income (<200% FPL), uninsured children in AL will be reduced each year.
2. Given available funding, the number of low income (between the Medicaid eligibility upper income levels and 200% FPL), children enrolled in ALL Kids will be maintained at at least 50,000 (current enrollment) at any given time.
3. The number of low-income children (incomes in the Medicaid income eligibility ranges) enrolled in SOBRA Medicaid will be maintained at at least 300,000.
4. Enrollment in ALL Kids will result in more children having a medical home.
5. Enrollment in ALL Kids will result in a higher usage of preventive care.
6. Specialty services beyond the basic ALL Kids coverage package will be available for ALL Kids enrolled children with special health care needs.
Guidance: Goals should be measurable, quantifiable and convey a target the State is working towards.
9.2. Specify one or more performance goals for each strategic objective identified: (Section 2107(a)(3)) (42CFR 457.710(c)) 1. Performance Goals for Objective 1: a. The number of low-income uninsured children in AL will be reduced by 1% each year until the number of low-income uninsured children is no larger than 10% of the children in the state. b. A tracking system will be established by April 2004, which will track applicants referred among ALL Kids, SOBRA Medicaid, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation.
2. Performance Goals for Objective 2
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 89 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-94)Page 94#
a. The percentage of families who do not renew their children’s ALL Kids coverage due to a financial barrier (owing past premiums) will not be more than 3% annually. b. A higher percentage of families with ALL Kids enrolled child(ren), report that financial barriers to accessing care have been reduced since enrollment in ALL Kids in comparison to the time before enrollment in ALL Kids. c. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations: (adolescents, Native Americans, and faith-based organizations) will be developed by October, 2002. d. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations: (adolescents, Native Americans, and faith-based organizations) will be implemented each year beginning with FY 2003. e. Plans which target outreach activities toward Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans will be developed by January 1, 2004. f. Plans which target outreach activities toward Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans will be implemented each year beginning with FY 2005. g. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations (other than adolescents, faith-based organizations, Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans) will be developed and implemented as data or other information indicate. h. Language and culture will not be barriers to enrollment or renewal as evidenced by the availability of telephone assistance in the customers’ preferred languages, brochures and forms in both English and Spanish, and the availability of Spanish speaking, culturally competent customer service staff. i. There will be an incremental reduction from year to year, in the percentage of children canceling ALL Kids coverage due to nonparticipation in the renewal process.
3. Performance Goal for Objective 3: There will be maintenance of effort or an increase, on the part of CHIP, to decrease the number of uninsured low-income (Medicaid eligible) children as evidenced by at least the following: i. Continued use of a joint application form. ii. Continued use of a joint renewal form iii. Continued referral, without any barriers, of applications and renewals between ALL Kids and SOBRA Medicaid iv. Continued outreach efforts by CHIP staff for network building with community groups, professionals (individually and in groups), child care providers, schools, etc.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 90 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-95)Page 95#
v. Continued evaluation and monitoring of the application transfer/referral process between ALL Kids and Medicaid. vi. Continued computer enhancements to improve the communication with other agencies and current and potential ALL Kids enrollees.
4. Performance Goals for Objective 4: a. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have a usual source of care since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. b. A lower percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have used a hospital emergency room since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids.
5. Performance Goals for Objective 5 a. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a well child check-up in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. b. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a dental visit in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. c. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a vision screening in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids.
6. Performance Goal for Objective 6: a. Contracts with state agencies which serve children with special health care needs will be maintained for the purpose of providing specialty services beyond the basic ALL Kids coverage package for these children. b. Exploration of the feasibility of establishing contracts with other state agencies that serve children with special health care needs. c. Continued monitoring of access to specialty care for children with special health care needs.
Guidance: The State should include data sources to be used to assess each performance goal. In addition, check all appropriate measures from 9.3.1 to 9.3.8 that the State will be utilizing to measure performance, even if doing so duplicates what the State has already discussed in Section 9.
It is acceptable for the State to include performance measures for population subgroups chosen by the State for special emphasis, such as racial or ethnic minorities, particular high-risk or hard to reach populations, children with special needs, etc.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 91 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-96)Page 96#
HEDIS (Health Employer Data and Information Set) 2008 contains performance measures relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. In addition, HEDIS 3.0 contains measures for the general population, for which breakouts by children’s age bands (e.g., ages < 1, 1-9, 10-19) are required. Full definitions, explanations of data sources, and other important guidance on the use of HEDIS measures can be found in the HEDIS 2008 manual published by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. So that State HEDIS results are consistent and comparable with national and regional data, states should check the HEDIS 2008 manual for detailed definitions of each measure, including definitions of the numerator and denominator to be used. For states that do not plan to offer managed care plans, HEDIS measures may also be able to be adapted to organizations of care other than managed care.
9.3. Describe how performance under the plan will be measured through objective, independently verifiable means and compared against performance goals in order to determine the State’s performance, taking into account suggested performance indicators as specified below or other indicators the State develops: (Section 2107(a)(4)(A),(B)) (42CFR 457.710(d)) Assurance of an Objective Means for Measuring Performance To ensure an objective evaluation which can be independently verified, the evaluation will be based upon data bases which contain quantifiable information. These databases will, to the extent possible, contain numeric data. The ADPH will develop and/or direct the development of needed databases which do not currently exist. Since evaluation of some performance measures does not lend itself to numeric summation, measurement of these aspects of the plan will be based on review of a completed work plan which requires conclusive documentation. All data and documentation will be auditable. At periodic intervals, a formal comparison of program performance to the goals and measures set forth in this document or its subsequent amendments will be conducted. The CHIP staff directly responsible for the implementation of the program will conduct information comparisons of performance to these goals and measures on an ongoing basis. In this way, the program will be continuously monitored and activities may be adjusted so that the program may achieve its objectives.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 92 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-97)Page 97#
Measure of Performance: MEASURE ROUGH DEFINITION OF MEASURE
Reducing the Number of Uninsured Number of Uninsured CPS and/or NSAF and state data survey Tracking System Documentation that a tracking system exists and is used for 100% of the applications that are referred among ALL Kids, Medicaid, and Alabama Child Caring Foundation Related to SCHIP Enrollment Percentage of families not renewing due Renewal database – comparison of number of non- to owing past premiums renewals who owed premiums to the number who were due to renew. Percentage of families reporting a New enrollee survey database – comparison of percentage reduction in financial barriers to of reports indicating a reduction in financial barriers to accessing health care obtaining health care post-ALL Kids to pre-ALL Kids Development of plans to target outreach Documentation of development of these plans on file to adolescents, faith-based organizations Implementation of plans to target Documentation of implementation of these plans on file outreach to adolescents, faith-based organizations Development of plans to target outreach Documentation of development of these plans on file to Hispanics, Native Americans, and birth-to-five providers
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 93 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-98)Page 98#
Implementation of plans to target Documentation of implementation of these plans on file outreach to Hispanics Native Americans, and birth-to-five providers Development and implementation of Documentation of development and implementation of plans to target outreach to other these plans on file groups Elimination of language and culture Spanish and English brochures and applications forms on barriers file
Employment of bi-lingual customer service staff
ALL Kids Customer service telephone operators are aware of and know how to use a telephone translating service. Reduction in percentage of children Enrollment Data Management system – Comparison of canceling ALL Kids due to number of enrollees who did not participate in the renewal nonparticipation in the renewal process to those due to renew. process Related to increasing Medicaid Enrollment Maintenance of effort with regard to: Use of a joint application form A joint SOBRA Medicaid and ALL Kids application form is in use Use of a joint renewal form A joint SOBRA Medicaid and ALL Kids renewal form is in use
Seamless referral between ALL Seamless referral policy in place Kids and SOBRA Medicaid SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 94 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-99)Page 99#
Continued outreach effort Outreach/Marketing files reflect outreach conducted by central office staff, regional staff, and federal program office. Evaluation of application transfer Evaluation on files of meeting minutes and referral process Continued computer Computer enhancements will be in place. enhancements Related to increasing access to care Reported usual source of care New Enrollees Survey Reported ER use New Enrollees Survey Related to use of preventive care Reported use of well-child check-up New Enrollees Survey Reported dental visit New Enrollees Survey Reported vision screening New Enrollees Survey Other
Specialty service availability Contract(s) on file
Exploration of feasibility for Documentation on file (central office files and/or establishing contracts with other regional coordinator files) CSHCN state agencies
Monitoring access to care for CSHCN New Enrollees Survey
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 95 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-100)Page 100#
Check the applicable suggested performance measurements listed below that the State plans to use: (Section 2107(a)(4)) 9.3.1. The increase in the percentage of Medicaid-eligible children enrolled in Medicaid. 9.3.2. The reduction in the percentage of uninsured children. 9.3.3. The increase in the percentage of children with a usual source of care. 9.3.4. The extent to which outcome measures show progress on one or more of the health problems identified by the state. 9.3.5. HEDIS Measurement Set relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. 9.3.6. Other child appropriate measurement set. List or describe the set used.
9.3.7. If not utilizing the entire HEDIS Measurement Set, specify which measures will be collected, such as: 9.3.7.1. Immunizations 9.3.7.2. Well childcare 9.3.7.3. Adolescent well visits 9.3.7.4. Satisfaction with care 9.3.7.5. Mental health 9.3.7.6. Dental care 9.3.7.7. Other, list:
9.3.8. Performance measures for special targeted populations.
9.4. The State assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires. (Section 2107(b)(1)) (42CFR 457.720)Alabama assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires.
Guidance: The State should include an assurance of compliance with the annual reporting requirements, including an assessment of reducing the number of low-income uninsured children. The State should also discuss any annual activities to be undertaken that relate to assessment and evaluation of the program.
9.5. The State assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. Briefly describe the State’s plan for these annual assessments and reports. (Section 2107(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.750) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 96 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-101)Page 101#
Alabama assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. On an annual basis, the Alabama will review its operations, progress made in reducing the number of uncovered low-income children, progress made in meeting the goals and objectives stated in 9.1 and 9.2 of this document, and its compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations. Section 9.3 states how Alabama will measure the goals and objectives in sections 9.1 and 9.2. Examples of data sources are: Census data, private foundation garnered data, data gathered via special surveys, utilization data from claims reports, enrollee family feedback from surveys, etc. The assessment will occur during the three months after the end of the fiscal year and a report of this assessment will be submitted to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year.
9.6. The State assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review or audit.(Section 2107(b)(3)) (42CFR 457.720) Alabama assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review of audit.
Guidance: The State should verify that they will participate in the collection and evaluation of data as new measures are developed or existing measures are revised as deemed necessary by CMS, the states, advocates, and other interested parties.
9.7. The State assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e)) Alabama assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed
9.8. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.135)
9.8.1. Section 1902(a)(4)(C) (relating to conflict of interest standards) 9.8.2. Paragraphs (2), (16) and (17) of Section 1903(i) (relating to limitations on payment) 9.8.3. Section 1903(w) (relating to limitations on provider donations and taxes) 9.8.4. Section 1132 (relating to periods within which claims must be filed)
Guidance: Section 9.9 can include discussion of community-based providers and consumer representatives in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. Issues to address include a listing of public meetings or announcements made to the public concerning the development of the children's health SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 97 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-102)Page 102#
insurance program or public forums used to discuss changes to the State plan.
9.9. Describe the process used by the State to accomplish involvement of the public in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. (Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(a) and (b))
Efforts were made to make the process of developing the design and implementation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program inclusive. News coverage about the advocacy of the Children’s Health Insurance Program was provided regularly starting at the time that the issue came before the Alabama Legislature.
Formalized CHIP development groups were the CHIP Commission and the CHIP Task Force Work Groups. The CHIP Commission met three times, October 7, November 12 and December 17, 1998. The CHIP Task Force Work Groups met twelve times beginning August 6, 1998, and split into subcommittees to develop proposals in the following areas: (1) benefits, (2) eligibility, outreach and enrollment, and (3) funding. These subcommittee meetings were open to interested individuals and groups. At least three news conferences were held by the State Health Officer and/or the Medicaid Commissioner.
Public awareness was promoted through means such as television programs. Interested organizations such as Alabama ARISE, the Alabama Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, and Voices for Alabama’s Children were provided information for their membership about CHIP. Media coverage was provided and CHIP information has been made available on the Internet at: http://www.adph.org/allkids (formerly: http://www.alapubhealth.org) since October 2, 1998. During the first six and one-half month period of October 4 through April 21, 1998, 1,247 hits were made on this site specifically requesting CHIP information. This website includes a description of the program, a calendar of scheduled events, and an opportunity for interested persons to express their opinions about the program’s development. Order forms are available at every presentation. These forms enable participants to fax orders to the ALL Kids office and receive printed materials at no charge. The largest number of requests for information (312) came during the month of January. Newspaper editorials have praised the value of this program for our State’s children.
The CHIP Task Force Work Groups were comprised of employees of the Alabama Medicaid Agency, Public Health Department employees, and other interested parties including representatives of the Alabama Primary Care Association, Alabama ARISE, the Alabama Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, Voices for Alabama’s Children, the Alabama Child Caring Foundation, Alabama Dental Association, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-Alabama Chapter, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Children First, Children’s Health System, Children’s Hospital of Alabama, Family Voices, Health Maintenance Organization Association, Legislative Fiscal Office, Legislative Reference SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 98 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-103)Page 103#
Service, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of South Alabama, University of South Alabama Children’s and Women’s Hospital, United Health Care, as well as other State agencies including the Department of Education, the Department of Human Resources, the Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation, State Employees’ Insurance Board, State Insurance Department, and the Department of Rehabilitation Services. These entities are now referred to as stakeholders and they continue to be involved as program changes are developed.
The Alabama program will continue to inform the general public about CHIP through the news media, to announce planning meetings, and to invite additional groups with an interest in being involved or informed as they become identified. There was extensive public involvement in the preparation of a comprehensive 133-page report which was released to the Alabama Legislature on January 12, 1998. In relation to the Governor’s Task Force on Children’s Health Insurance, periodic reports on the progress of recommendations contained the report are made. 9.9.1. Describe the process used by the State to ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the State on the development and implementation of the procedures required in 42 CFR 457.125. States should provide notice and consultation with Tribes on proposed pregnant women expansions.(Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(c)) A meeting was held with representatives of the 2,176 member Poarch Band of Creek Indians, the only federally recognized Native American group in Alabama. Six other tribes are recognized by the State. The CHIP Program was explained and discussion centered on ways to coordinate CHIP and Indian Health Service-funded care, the role of traditional Native American healing, outreach methods for children and some demographics of the Poarch Band. Several presentations have been made to the Alabama Commission on Indian Affairs and CHIP staff meet and coordinate regularly with staff of the Commission. Other forms of outreach have included numerous presentations to the tribes, presence at Native American festivals throughout the state and the employment of a Native American consultant whose specific task was to develop a regionally- based outreach plan to the Native American population in Alabama.
9.9.2. For an amendment relating to eligibility or benefits (including cost sharing and enrollment procedures), describe how and when prior public notice was provided as required in 42 CFR457.65(b) through (d).
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 99 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-104)Page 104#
Alabama has no state law applicable to public notice of either cost sharing changes or waiting list implementations in CHIP.
Public Notice of Cost Sharing Changes: Specific public notice was given via a meeting of CHIP stakeholders in August 2003 and letters to enrollees’ families informing them of the changes in cost sharing. This meeting and the mailings followed much publicity in the state regarding the state’s financial situation and the possible impact on CHIP if a statewide referendum to raise taxes on (September 9, 2003) did not pass.
Public Notice of the Waiting List: ALL Kids initiated a waiting list beginning with all new enrollees who would have had an effective date October 1, 2003. Once the decision had been made to establish a waiting list, a press statement was released and letters were sent to stakeholders and other interested parties informing them of the institution of a waiting list and stressing the importance of returning renewal forms on time. Additionally, a letter to this effect was sent to every enrollee family along with a new insurance card(s). All of these notices were issued during the month of September 2003 prior to the impact of the waiting list.
On August 23, 2004, ALL Kids reopened enrollment and discontinued use of the waiting list.
If the State determines that it is again necessary to implement a waiting list, it will provide prior, appropriate public notice.
There are no public notice state laws regarding enrollment caps and waiting lists in SCHIP. 9.9.3. Describe the State’s interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 100 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-105)Page 105#
limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residingeligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
CHIP Budget STATE: AL FFY Budget Federal Fiscal Year 2019 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 100%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments 229,609,117 Managed care per member/per month rate 220 Fee for Service Total Benefit Costs 229,609,117 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) -6,500,000
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit 3,300,000 Net Benefit Costs 226,409,117
Administration Costs Personnel 5348138 General administration 2485677 Contractors/Brokers SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 101 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-106)Page 106#
STATE: AL FFY Budget Claims Processing Outreach/marketing costs 174000 Health Services Initiatives $753,625 Other 1,283,553 Total Administration Costs 10,044,993 10% Administrative Cap 25,156,569
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes 4,053,625
Federal Share 236,454,110 State Share 0 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan 236,454,110
NOTE: Include the costs associated with the current SPA. Costs associated with the two changes contained within SPAs AL-19- 0017-RIM And AL-19-0018-RIM total $4,053,625. The entire cost would be paid for through Federal funds in FY 2019. For the expansion of benefits to provide coverage from conception to birth in select counties (AL-19-0018-RIM), costs are estimated to be $3,300,000 and are reflected within the line item “benefits.” The other budget item addressed in these SPAs includes costs for implementing a health service initiative (HSI) (AL-19-0017-RIM). HSI costs are projected to be $753,625 for the remaining of FY2019.
The Source of State Share Funds: No state funds will be used.
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP’s website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 102 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-107)Page 107#
under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(1),(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
10.1.1. The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
10.2. The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e))
10.3. The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity (Section 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1. The State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.935(b))(The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1. 42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2. Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3. Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4. Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5. Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6. Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 103 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-108)Page 108#
Section 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections(Sections 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan.
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes and procedures that are unique to the applicant’s rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility. Alabama’s appeals process meets the requirements of the Program Specific Review as outlined in CFR.457.1120 – 457.1180. The ALL Kids appeals and grievance process can be found in Attachment A. The individuals involved in the Information review (first level) are not involved in the Administrative Review (second level) thus impartiality in the appeals process is provided. The individuals who conduct the Administrative Review are not involved in the Information Review process not in the original determination process. The review process for children enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children’s programs Guidance: “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120.
The State assures that the State laws or regulations are consistent with the intent of 42 CFR 457,1130(b). This grievance process for health service matters is provided by the insurance vendor and is in compliance with state laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and all other applicable regulations of the Department of Labor Procedures. A copy of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama appeals process can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. The grievance process for children enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children’s programs.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs-If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 104 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-109)Page 109#
ATTACHMENT A
GRIEVANCE POLICY
General Information
Applicants and enrollees of the ALL Kids Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have a right to discuss and question how eligibility for enrollment was determined. In particular they have the right to request review of program decisions concerning:
• Denial of eligibility • Failure to make a timely determination of eligibility • Suspension or termination of enrollment, including disenrollment for failure to pay premiums.
The ALL Kids Review Process has three levels of review--Information Review, Administrative Review and Formal Review. Requests for an Administrative Review and Formal Appeal must be submitted in writing. All correspondence with the applicant /enrollee concerning Administrative Review or Formal Review will be in writing.
ALL Kids Plus Services Requests for review of decisions made regarding eligibility for the ALL Kids Plus services must first be made to the ALL Kids Plus participating agency’s appropriate appeals process. This is necessary since eligibility for ALL Kids Plus is dependent on the participating agency’s eligibility criteria for services. Once the appeals process through the ALL Kids Plus participating agency has been exhausted, an appeal request may be made to the Children’s Health Insurance Program as described in ADPH ALL Kids Review Process.
Information Review In many cases problems can be handled informally through the Information Review Process without the need for a Administrative or Formal Review. CHIP staff is committed to using the Information Review process to provide a speedy and fair resolution when possible and appropriate.
Parents/designated representatives can initiate an Information Review via contact (telephone, e-mail or letter) with the Enrollment Unit supervisory staff, CHIP administrative staff, the CHIP social work consultant, CHIP regional staff, or interested agencies. Once the problem has been received, the appropriate staff will review the situation and initiate immediate action to resolve the problem and SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 105 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-110)Page 110#
communicate the decision or resolution. If additional information is needed, the enrollee/applicant will be given the opportunity to provide clarification or submit additional information. Decisions made in the Information Review are usually provided within two working days. Notification to the applicant/enrollee will be communicated in the manner in which the request was made. Summation of the inquiry, review and resolution will be maintained on file and noted with the appropriate applicant/enrollee information.
If the problem remains unresolved in the eyes of the applicant/enrollee, they will be provided detailed information regarding their right to a Administrative Review, right to continued enrollment during the review process and provided copies of all forms and the procedures necessary to move forward through the review process. Appropriate notation will be kept in the applicant’s/enrollee’s electronic file noting the initial complaint, any information gathered during the Information Review, the decision reached through Information Review, the date of such decision and the applicant/enrollees intent to go forward with the Administrative Review Process.
Administrative Review In order to be considered, an Administrative Review Request Form must be received within ten (10) days of the final decision from the Information Review. The CHIP social work consultant will assist in gathering information that may clarify the request. All information on file from the Information Review and any information gathered by the CHIP Social Work consultant will be circulated to a three person Administrative Review Committee whose members were not involved in the Information Review process nor in the original determination process.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the Administrative Review Committee will be hearing information regarding their situation. They have the right to speak in person or have a representative of their choosing present during the review. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under grievance.
The Committee’s decision and the Program Director’s review of the decision must be completed within thirty-days (30) of receiving the Administrative Review Request Form. Applicant/enrollees will be notified in writing of the Administrative Review Committee’s decision within three working days of the decision. Additionally this notification will include the applicant/enrollee’s rights to continued review and the policy regarding a request for Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
If the grievance remains unresolved in the applicant/enrollee’s eyes, the applicant/enrollee may file a request for a Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 106 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-111)Page 111#
Formal Review In order to be considered by the State Health Officer, a Request for Formal Review must be submitted to the CHIP office within ten (10) days of the final decision of the Administrative Review Committee. This request must be submitted on the Formal Review Request Form.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the State Health Officer will be hearing information regarding their case. Applicants/enrollees may appear in person or have a representative of their choosing to present information the State Health Officer. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under grievance.
Generally a decision will be issued within thirty-days (30) following receipt of the Request for Formal Review. Applicants/enrollees will be notified of the decision of the State Health Officer within three (3) working days of the decision.
The decision made by the State Health Officer is the final step in the administrative proceedings and will exhaust all administrative remedies.
Expedited Review If the enrollment or eligibility matter under review would worsen health conditions of the applicant/enrollee or jeopardize lives, an expedited CHIP review may be provided. An Expedited Review will be made within seventy-two (72) hours by quickly obtaining and reviewing information so as not to cause unnecessary harm to the applicant/enrollee.
Right for Continued Benefits During Appeals Process When the eligibility decision under review concerns renewal or re-determination of coverage, and the enrollee files a Request for Administrative Review, CHIP staff will ensure that coverage for that enrollee is continued until the review process is completed. The enrollee will be notified in writing of this continuation of coverage and their responsibility regarding any health services costs incurred if the resulting review decision supports termination of coverage. The enrollee will be issued a temporary health plan identification card with a coverage end date equal to the maximum length of time allowed for both the Administrative and Formal Review processes.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 107 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-112)Page 112#
Key for Newly Incorporated Templates The newly incorporated templates are indicated with the following letters after the numerical section throughout the template.
• PC- Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • PW- Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • TC- Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • DC- Dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • DS- Supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • PA- Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • EL- Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • LR- Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010)
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 108 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-113)Page 113#
CMS Regional Offices CMSRegion Associate Regional States Regional Office Address al Offices Administrator Region 1- Connecticut New Hampshire Richard R. McGreal John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg. Boston Massachuset Rhode Island richard.mcgreal@cms.hhs.gov Room 2275 ts Vermont Boston, MA 02203-0003 Maine Region 2- New York New Jersey Michael Melendez 26 Federal Plaza New York Virgin Puerto Rico michael.melendez@cms.hhs.gov Room 3811 Islands New York, NY 10278-0063 Region 3- Delaware Pennsylvania Ted Gallagher The Public Ledger Building Philadelphia District of Virginia ted.gallagher@cms.hhs.gov 150 South Independence Mall Columbia West Virginia West Maryland Suite 216 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Region 4- Alabama Mississippi Jackie Glaze Atlanta Federal Center Atlanta Florida North Carolina jackie.glaze@cms.hhs.gov 4th Floor Georgia South Carolina 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Kentucky Tennessee Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909 Region 5- Illinois Minnesota Verlon Johnson 233 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago Indiana Ohio verlon.johnson@cms.hhs.gov Suite 600 Michigan Wisconsin Chicago, IL 60601 Region 6- Arkansas Oklahoma Bill Brooks 1301 Young Street, 8th Floor Dallas Louisiana Texas bill.brooks@cms.hhs.gov Dallas, TX 75202 New Mexico Region 7- Iowa Missouri James G. Scott Richard Bulling Federal Bldg. Kansas City Kansas Nebraska james.scott1@cms.hhs.gov 601 East 12 Street, Room 235 Kansas City, MO 64106-2808 Region 8- Colorado South Dakota Richard Allen Federal Office Building, Room Denver Montana Utah richard.allen@cms.hhs.gov 522 1961 Stout Street North Wyoming Denver, CO 80294-3538 Dakota Region 9- Arizona American Gloria Nagle 90 Seventh Street Suite 5-300 San California Samoa gloria.nagle@cms.hhs.gov San Francisco Federal Building Francisco Hawaii Guam San Francisco, CA 94103 Nevada Northern Mariana Islands
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 109 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-114)Page 114#
Region 10- Idaho Alaska Carol Peverly 2001 Sixth Avenue Seattle Washington Oregon carol.peverly@cms.hhs.gov MS RX-43 Seattle, WA 98121
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 110 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-115)Page 115#
GLOSSARY Adapted directly fromSec. 2110. DEFINITIONS. CHILD HEALTH ASSISTANCE- For purposes of this title, the term ‘child health assistance’ means payment for part or all of the cost of health benefits coverage for targeted low-income children that includes any of the following (and includes, in the case described in Section 2105(a)(2)(A), payment for part or all of the cost of providing any of the following), as specified under the State plan: 1. Inpatient hospital services. 2. Outpatient hospital services. 3. Physician services. 4. Surgical services. 5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. 6. Prescription drugs and biologicals and the administration of such drugs and biologicals, only if such drugs and biologicals are not furnished for the purpose of causing, or assisting in causing, the death, suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person. 7. Over-the-counter medications. 8. Laboratory and radiological services. 9. Prenatal care and prepregnancy family planning services and supplies. 10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (18) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structured services. 11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (19) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including community-based services. 12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices). 13. Disposable medical supplies. 14. Home and community-based health care services and related supportive services (such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home). 15. Nursing care services (such as nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services) in a home, school, or other setting. 16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 17. Dental services. 18. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services. 19. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services. 20. Case management services. 21. Care coordination services. 22. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 111 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-116)Page 116#
language disorders. 23. Hospice care. 24. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services (whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting) if recognized by State law and only if the service is-- a. prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as defined by State law, b. performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician, or c. furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license. 25. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage. 26. Medical transportation. 27. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals. 28. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not excluded under this section.
TARGETED LOW-INCOME CHILD DEFINED- For purposes of this title-- 1. IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), the term ‘targeted low-income child’ means a child-- a. who has been determined eligible by the State for child health assistance under the State plan; b. (i) who is a low-income child, or (ii) is a child whose family income (as determined under the State child health plan) exceeds the Medicaid applicable income level (as defined in paragraph (4)), but does not exceed 50 percentage points above the Medicaid applicable income level; and c. who is not found to be eligible for medical assistance under title XIX or covered under a group health plan or under health insurance coverage (as such terms are defined in Section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act). 2. CHILDREN EXCLUDED- Such term does not include-- a. a child who is a resident of a public institution or a patient in an institution for mental diseases; or b. a child who is a member of a family that is eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits plan on the basis of a family member's employment with a public agency in the State. 3. SPECIAL RULE- A child shall not be considered to be described in paragraph (1)(C) notwithstanding that the child is covered under a health insurance coverage program that has been in operation since before July 1, 1997, and that is offered by a State which receives no Federal funds for the program's operation. 4. MEDICAID APPLICABLE INCOME LEVEL- The term ‘Medicaid applicable income level’ means, with respect to a child, the effective income level (expressed as a percent of the poverty line) SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 112 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(pdf)(page-117)Page 117#
that has been specified under the State plan under title XIX (including under a waiver authorized by the Secretary or under Section 1902(r)(2)), as of June 1, 1997, for the child to be eligible for medical assistance under Section 1902(l)(2) for the age of such child. 5. TARGETED LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMAN.—The term ‘targeted low-income pregnant woman’ means an individual— (A) during pregnancy and through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of her pregnancy) ends; (B) whose family income exceeds 185 percent (or, if higher, the percent applied under subsection (b)(1)(A)) of the poverty line applicable to a family of the size involved, but does not exceed the income eligibility level established under the State child health plan under this title for a targeted low-income child; and(C) who satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(C), (2), and (3) of Section 2110(b) in the same manner as a child applying for child health assistance would have to satisfy such requirements.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this title: 1. CHILD- The term ‘child’ means an individual under 19 years of age. 2. CREDITABLE HEALTH COVERAGE- The term ‘creditable health coverage’ has the meaning given the term ‘creditable coverage’ under Section 2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(c)) and includes coverage that meets the requirements of section 2103 provided to a targeted low-income child under this title or under a waiver approved under section 2105(c)(2)(B) (relating to a direct service waiver). 3. GROUP HEALTH PLAN; HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ETC- The terms ‘group health plan’, ‘group health insurance coverage’, and ‘health insurance coverage’ have the meanings given such terms in Section 2191 of the Public Health Service Act. 4. LOW-INCOME CHILD - The term ‘low-income child’ means a child whose family income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved. 5. POVERTY LINE DEFINED- The term ‘poverty line’ has the meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by such section. 6. PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSION- The term ‘preexisting condition exclusion’ has the meaning given such term in section 2701(b)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(1)(A)). 7. STATE CHILD HEALTH PLAN; PLAN- Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms ‘State child health plan’ and ‘plan’ mean a State child health plan approved under Section 2106. 8. UNINSURED CHILD- The term ‘uninsured child’ means a child that does not have creditable health coverage.
SPA number: AL-19-0017-RIM Approval Date: September 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019
Effective Date: July 1, 2019 113 Approval Date:
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA AL-19-0017-RIM Summary#
(al)(al-19-0017-rim)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
Implements a health services initiative (HSI) to provide prenatal monitoring, case management and care coordination services to pregnant women and their infants in Montgomery, Macon, and Russell counties. AL-19-AL-19-0018-RIM expands coverage for unborn children residing in Montgomery, Macon, and Russell counties.
Approval Package
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA AL-21-0022 PDF#
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Alabama
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: AL-21-0022
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
July 2, 2021
Scott Harris, MD, MPH State Health Officer Alabama Department of Public Health Post Office Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017
Dear Dr. Harris:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendment (SPA) AL- 21-0022, submitted on May 14, 2021 has been approved. This amendment implements a health services initiative (HSI) to provide comprehensive health coverage during the 60-day postpartum period to individuals whose pregnancies were covered under the Reducing Infant Mortality Conception to Birth program known as ALL Babies. This amendment has an effective date of July 1, 2021.
Section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and 42 CFR §457.10 authorize use of title XXI administrative funding for expenditures for HSIs under the plan for improving the health of children, including targeted low-income children and other low-income children. Consistent with section 2105(c)(6)(B) of the Act and 42 CFR §457.626, title XXI funds used to support an HSI cannot supplant Medicaid or other sources of federal funding.
The state shall ensure that the remaining title XXI administrative funding, within the state's 10 percent limit, is sufficient to continue the proper administration of the CHIP program. If such funds become less than sufficient, the state agrees to redirect title XXI funds from the support of this HSI to the administration of the CHIP program. The state shall report annually to CMS the expenditures funded by the HSI for each federal fiscal year.
Your title XXI project officer is Jack Mirabella. They are available to answer questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related issues. Their contact information is as follows:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop: S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: (410) 786-2424 E-mail: jack.mirabella@cms.hhs.gov
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PACWLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: Alabama (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR 457.40(b)) Scott Harris, State Health Officer, Alabama Department of Public Health (Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)):
Name: Teela Sanders Position/Title: CHIP Director Name: Shaundra Morris Position/Title: Director, ADPH Financial Services
*Disclosure According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148 (CMS-10398 #34). The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, write to: CMS, 7500 Security Blvd., Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 1 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
Introduction: Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 105-33amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 further modified the program.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the state plan amendments (SPAs). It reflects the regulatory requirements at 42 CFR Part 457as well as the previously approved SPA templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SPA template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is developing regulations to implement the CHIPRA requirements. When final regulations are published in the Federal Register, this template will be modified to reflect those rules and States will be required to submit SPAs illustrating compliance with the new regulations. States are not required to resubmit their State plans based on the updated template. However, States must use the updated template when submitting a State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirements for Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. (42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. ASPA is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90-day review period, or clock for CHIP SPAs that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 2 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
response is received. More information on the SPA review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a “clean” copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101);(42 CFR 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of State Approach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state’s program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology- The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable (Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)); (42CFR 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 3 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage; benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary- approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope, and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State’s use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre- existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 2101(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 4 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: • Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SPA process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background) They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • 10 (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 5 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
• Combination of Options-CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes of up to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion of Medicaid, the description provided under “Option to Expand Medicaid” would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in “Option to Create a Separate Program” would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
Proposed State plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Name of Project Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 6 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101)(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101, which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXI.
1.1.1. * Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(1) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SPA to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.2. Providing expanded benefits under the State’s Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI, in conjunction with an expansion in the State’s Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3. A combination of both of the above. (Section 2101(a)(2))
* Until October 1, 2002, Alabama’s CHIP was a combination program. With the mandated gradual increase of Medicaid coverage at higher income levels for children born after September 30, 1983, the Medicaid expansion portion of CHIP was subsumed, on October 1, 2002, by the Alabama Medicaid SOBRA Program for Pregnant Women and Children.
1.1-DS The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template. (Section 2110(b)(5))
1.2. Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 7 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
Alabama has not and will not claim expenditures for child health assistance prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS.
1.3. Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. (42CFR 457.130)
Assurances are on file with DHHS. The Alabama Department of Public Health continues to assure that compliance with all applicable civil rights requirements.
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA(42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
Original Plan Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Amendment 1 – Establishment of ALL Kids Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 2 – Establishment of ALL Kids PLUS Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1999 Amendment 3 – Disregards Effective/Implementation Date: June 1, 2001 Amendment 4 - Compliance Effective/Implementation Date: August 24, 2001 Amendment 5 – Waiting List, Cost Sharing, Benefit Changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2003 Amendment 6 – Discontinuance of the Waiting List and other Clean-Up changes Effective/Implementation Date: November 23, 2004
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 8 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
Amendment 7 – Raise the upper income eligibility limit to 300% of FPL and other minor changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009 Amendment 8 – Include a private foundation grant as an additional source of state funding Effective/Implementation Date: October 27, 2009 Amendment 9 – Establishment of a Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009; Addendum on Dental Benefits Under Title XXI: Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 10 – Eligibility for children of employees of a public agency (state employees and public education employees) Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2011 Amendment 11 – Provisions for Implementing Temporary Adjustments to Enrollment Determination and/or Redetermination Policies and Cost Sharing Requirements for Applicants/Renewals living in and/or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event. In the event of a disaster, the State will notify CMS of the intent to provide temporary adjustments to its enrollment and/or redetermination policies, the effective dates of such adjustments and the counties/areas impacted by the disaster. Effective/Implementation Date: April 15, 2011 Amendment 12 – Increase premiums, increase co-pays and revise the methodology for determining annual aggregate cost-sharing Effective/Implementation Date: May 1, 2012 Amendment 13 – Establishment of copayments for therapy services (physical, occupational, and speech), vision services and chiropractic services; and cleanup changes Effective/Implementation Date: August 1, 2013 Amendment 14 – Alignment of ALL Kids fee groups with provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other editorial changes to comply with previously approved ACA SPAs. Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2014 Amendment 15 - AL-16-0015-MEXP – CHIP Medicaid expansion to cover Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 18% FPL through 141% FPL. Effective Date: October 1, 2015 Implementation Date: January 1, 2016 Amendment 16 – AL-18-0016-PAR - Attestation and documentation of Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 9 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Submission Date: July 10, 2018 Proposed Effective Date: October 1, 2017* Implementation Date: October 1, 2017* *Note: Benefits were adjusted in October 2010 to be compliant with mental health parity; this amendment did not require any benefit changes Amendment 17 – AL-19-0017-RIM - Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Service Initiative Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Proposed Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 18 – AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Eligibility – Coverage From Conception to Birth Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Proposed Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 19 – AL-20-0019-CEN CS15 MAGI-Based Income Methodologies – Temporary Income Submission Date: February 26, 2020 Proposed Effective Date: March 1, 2020 Implementation Date March 1, 2020 Amendment 20 – AL-20-0020-COVI Allowing for Temporary Waiving of cost sharing requirements for enrollees who reside and/or work in a State or Federally declared disaster area. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Implementation Date: March 1, 2020 Effective Date: March 1, 2020 Amendment 21 - AL-20-0021-BH Documentation of AL CHIP compliance with the SUPPORT Act. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Implementation Date: October 24, 2018
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 10 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
Amendment 22 – AL-21-0022-PP Postpartum coverage Health Services Initiative for ALL Babies Submission Date: May 13, 2021 Proposed Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Implementation Date:
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 11 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) AL-14-0016 MAGI CS7 Eligibility – Targeted Low Supersedes the (Original: AL-14-0016 Eligibility Income Children current Effective/Implementatio & sections n Date: January 1, 2014) Methods Geographic Children With Access to Area 4.1.1; Age CS10 Public Employee Coverage 4.1.2; and AL-19-2020-CEN Income 4.1.3 (affects only CS15) Section 4.4.1: Effective/Implementati Supersedes on Date: March 1, 2020 only the MAGI-Based Income information on CS15 Methodologies dependents of public employees in this section; supporting documentation should be incorporated as an appendix to the current state plan
Incorporate within a separate subsection under section 4.3
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 12 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Coverage from Effective Date: July 1, Conception to Birth 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019)
(Original: AL-14-0014 XXI CS3 Eligibility for Medicaid Supersedes the Effective/Implementatio Medicaid Expansion Program current n Date: January 1, 2014) Expansio Medicaid n expansion AL-16-0015-MEXP CHIP Medicaid expansion section 4.0 to cover Medicaid Effective/Implementati enrollees ages 14 years to on Date: October 1, 19 years with incomes 2015 above 18% FPL through 141% FPL AL-14-0015 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible for Incorporate 2101(f) Medicaid as a Result of the within a Effective/Implementati Group Elimination of Income separate on Date: January 1, Disregards subsection 2014 under section 4.1 AL-14-0018 Eligibility CS24 Single, Streamlined Supersedes the Process Application current Effective/Implementati Screen and Enroll Process sections 4.3 on Date: January 1, Renewals and 4.4 2014 AL-14-0017 Non- CS17 Non-Financial Eligibility – Supersedes the Financial Residency current section Effective/Implementati Eligibility 4.1.5 on Date: January 1, CS18 Non-Financial – Citizenship 2014 Supersedes the CS19 Non-Financial – Social current Security Number sections 4.1.0; 4.1.1-LR; 4.1.1- CS20 Substitution of Coverage LR
CS21 Non-Payment of Premiums Supersedes the
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 13 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
current section CS27 Continuous Eligibility 4.1.9.1
Supersedes the current section 4.4.4
Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current section 4.1.8
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 14 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
1.4- TC Tribal Consultation(Section 2107(e)(1)(C))Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved. In accordance with approved policies, on April 12, 2021, a certified letter explaining the changes proposed AL-21-0022 was mailed to the Tribal Chair of the one federally recognized Native American tribe in Alabama, the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. The letter included the purpose for the proposed changes and a description of the changes. In the letter, the Tribal Chairman was also reminded that she had the opportunity to respond to the proposed changes within 30 days and was given contact information for any such response. The certified letter was signed by the CHIP Director. TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: May 12, 2021
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children’s Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability, and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified , by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report requirements). (Section 2102(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.80(a))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 15 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
Prior to CHIP, the only two programs offering health insurance to low-income children were Medicaid and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF). Medicaid served children at the minimum income levels required by federal law. This meant that Medicaid coverage was available to children at three different levels of income and age: - Those under the age of six (6) years with incomes up to 133% FPL; - Those children six (6) through 14 years of age who were born after September 30, 1983 with incomes up to 100%FPL; and, - Those remaining children through the age of 18 years (middle and older teens) with incomes at the TANF assistance level (below approximately 13% FPL). The ACCF served children (birth through 18 years) with incomes from the Medicaid levels up to 200% FPL.
From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CHIP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama’s CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. Beginning October 1, 2015, however, children in this category (ages 14 to 19 with incomes between 13% FPL and 141% FPL) will again be enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion.
Originally, CHIP used a baseline number of uninsured children derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS). This baseline including the following chart was derived from a study by Winterbottom et.al. based on a three year merged Current Population Survey, or CPS, (1990-92), which showed over 200,000 children, in Alabama, under 18 years to be uninsured.
Employer Medicaid Other Uninsured Coverage Percent 59.3 17.2 5.1 18.4 Number 652,300 189,200 110,000 202,400
However, due to concerns about the CPS regarding potential problems with subjects’ abilities to recall information, Alabama changed its baseline estimate to reflect data from the 1997 round of the Urban Institute’s National Survey of America’s Families (NSAF). The NSAF indicated that there were 173,012 uninsured children in Alabama. Of these, 91,209 were < 100% Federal Poverty Level (FPL), 49,579 were above 100 up to 200% FPL and 32,223 were >200% FPL.
In its first 4 years of implementation (October 1, 1998 – September 30, 2002), Phase II, ALL Kids, enrolled over 80,000 children. It is estimated that 52,000 children have current enrollment in ALL Kids at the end of FY 2002.
ALL Kids PLUS, added as a third amendment to the CHIP State Plan (October, 1999), serves as a mechanism by which children with special health care needs/conditions (CSHCN/C), who
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 16 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
are enrolled in ALL Kids, may receive health and health related services which are beyond the scope of the basic ALL Kids package. ALL Kids PLUS was designed so that it serves as a funding source for CHIP state match and as a funding mechanism for state agencies who serve CSHCN/C with state funds. State agencies participating in ALL Kids PLUS supply the state match, provide the service, and receive full reimbursement. It was originally estimated that approximately 9% of these enrollees would also receive at least one service under ALL Kids PLUS. However because the basic benefit package is so comprehensive, a much lower percentage of children are receiving PLUS services. It is expected that this percentage will increase as more state agencies contract with CHIP to become ALL Kids PLUS providers. With the advent of ALL Kids, the ACCF has changed its income eligibility criteria to serve children who are not eligible for Medicaid or ALL Kids and who have incomes up to 235% FPL. Because, the ACCF has no enrollment restriction regarding immigrants, this program has seen a dramatic increase in its Hispanic enrollment.
Guidance: Section 2.2allows states to request to use the funds available under the 10 percent limit on administrative expenditures in order to fund services not otherwise allowable. The health services initiatives must meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.10.
2.2. Health Services Initiatives-Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10) HSI I: ALL Babies Case Management: As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Services Initiative. The aim of this initiative is to reduce the infant mortality rate in selected counties within Alabama through the provision of a variety of evidence-based case management services for pregnant women and children. These case management services will target health, social, and behavioral health related high-risk factors which have been shown to impact pregnancy outcomes and infant health. Case Management services will connect patients, with high-risk factors, to appropriate services and case managers will follow-up to ensure that risk factors are being addressed satisfactorily. It is anticipated that the case manager will make a total of 6 face to face visits. Three visits would occur during the prenatal care, and three visits would be provided post delivery.
The care coordination services provided postpartum including services to the infant include:
i. Make home visit within one month following delivery to complete the following: 1. Encourage patient to keep postpartum appointment including providing appointment reminders to help ensure completion of the postpartum appointment.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 17 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
2. Encourage patient to choose a reliable birth control method. If the patient has chosen sterilization as her method, follow-up with the patient to ensure the procedure is completed. 3. Ensure patient is established with a PMP for the infant. 4. Ensure infant has enrolled in WIC, if eligible. 5. Educate the patient on the importance of immunizations for the infant. ii. Assist in scheduling appointments with infant’s PMP up to the first year to ensure that well baby checkups are made and immunizations are up to date. Follow up after the appointments to verify that appointments were kept. Well Baby checkups are scheduled at: a. 1 month b. 2 months c. 4 months d. 6 months e. 9 months f. 12 months iii. Promote the child’s overall physical, cognitive, and emotional development through educating parents/caregivers about developmental milestones according to the child’s age and developmental abilities. iv. Complete an ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition, a developmental screening tool) as appropriate at face to face appointments. v. Educate the parents about the importance of reading to the infant to promote cognitive development. vi. Make referrals for the child, as appropriate, such as Early Intervention, Children’s Rehabilitation Services, etc. vii. Prior to the child’s first birthday, ensure he/she is established with a dentist. viii. Screen the mother for post-partum depression at each face to face visit and make referrals and follow up (as needed)
With the exception of providing necessary prenatal monitoring by a nurse in the home or health department setting, no HSI funds will be spent on direct care.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 18 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
The high-risk factors that HSI will address include the following: ACEs Score of >4 Depression1 Diabetes Mellitus Current multiple births Substance Abuse2 Maternal age3 Hypertension Interpersonal safety Transportation needs Housing Instability Food Insecurity Utility needs Abuse4 Enrollment in CHIP unborn coverage Prior poor pregnancy outcome5
To be eligible for the HSI, pregnant women and/or their infants in selected counties must have at least one of the high-risk factors cited above and have an income no greater than the upper CHIP limit (currently 312% FPL). HSI services will be offered whether or not the patient has health insurance coverage and regardless of the type of insurance. Case management services for individuals enrolled in Medicaid will be time-limited until the implementation of the case management services provided in the Alabama Coordinated Health Network (ACHN) scheduled to begin October 1, 2019. Individuals with other insurance that are provided case management services will not be provided case management services using HSI funds.
Patients will be enrolled in the HSI initiative during pregnancy, during the post-partum period, or by referral. Once enrolled, HSI services will continue, as appropriate, for one-year post delivery with the exceptions noted in the paragraph above.
The HSI will be coordinated by the Alabama Department of Public Health and delivered through designated county health departments. Depending upon the needs of those participating in the initiative, services may be provided by public health nurses, public health social workers, community health workers, etc.
The proposed counties for initial implementation of the HSI include Montgomery, Macon and Russell counties. Services supported through this HSI will not supplant other federal, state or local funds allocated for similar services.
Outreach activities for the RIM HSI include providing education and information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
1 Depression noted at anytime during the pregnancy or postpartum period (90 days postpartum) 2 History of use or current substance use 3 <21 or >35 4 Emotional, physical, or sexual 5 Fetal Death – Stillbirth after 20 weeks; Infant death -first year of life; Preterm birth - <37 weeks gestation; Low Birthweight - <2500 grams; Very Low Birthweight - <1500 grams; Other serious chronic conditions (ex: heart disease, renal disease, chronic medical illnesses, etc.); and, Maternal Death (death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes).
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 19 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
In monitoring/evaluating the progress and success of this program, the total number of women and children served will be captured and reported to ALL Kids on an agreed upon schedule but no less than a quarterly basis. Tracking and reporting of visits and birth outcomes (birth weight, mortality within the first year of life and maternal health indices) will also be included in reports to ALL Kids.
The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $753,625 for FY 2019 (July –Sept).
Case Management Costs: Initially, within the proposed three county area, approximately 500 women/families could be served in FY 2019. The number of case management hours per person/family is estimated to be 10 hours/quarter at an average cost of $135/hour. This hourly rate would account for salary cost of those providing/coordinating services. Additionally, it is estimated that staff will travel 25 miles per home visit and there will be two home visits/patient/quarter at the state mileage reimbursement rate of $0.545/mile.
Annual 1st Quarter Case Management: Enrollees X case management hours $2,700,000 $675,000 X $135.00/hour Travel: # enrollees X miles/round trip X 2 trips/quarter X mileage $ 54,500 $ 13,625 reimbursement rate
Start Up/Outreach Costs: As the HSI is being developed, costs are being allocated for personnel support to include up to two FTEs (one full-time project manager and other ancillary support staff as needed). Additionally, costs are included for the development of materials to promote and educate health care providers and community organizations throughout the implementation counties about the initiative and to garner support and participation of agencies/providers. Education and awareness materials to outreach to women will also be prepared. Expenses to conduct (as well as attend) meetings, conferences and/or trainings to share information about the program and generate participation are also included as part of the startup and implementation costs.
Annual 1st Quarter Personnel Costs (Salary, Fringe, Indirect costs) $200,000 $50,000 Educational/training materials $ 10,000 $10,000 (providers/organizations and participants) Costs for meetings (transportation/meeting fees) $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Grand Total: $2,969,500 $753,625 (Personnel, Materials, Meeting costs, Case Management)
HSI II: ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative: As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 20 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-24)Page 24#
implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative. This HSI will assist in improving the health of children by ensuring their mothers have access to healthcare services during their postpartum period. The aim of this initiative is to provide full health insurance coverage during the postpartum period to enrollees who have been prenatally covered in the Reducing Infant Mortality Conception to Birth program known as ALL Babies. The length of the ALL Babies postpartum period is equivalent to Alabama Medicaid’s current definition of the length of postpartum period “From delivery through the end of the month in which the 60th day postpartum falls, counting from the date the pregnancy ends either as a full term or as a miscarriage.” ALL Babies participants will be enrolled automatically in the postpartum HSI initiative. Metrics used to measure the impact of the state’s HSI program on the health of low-income children and their mothers will be included in the state’s CHIP Annual Report.
Cost: The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $301,250 for FY 2021. This figure is based on anticipated enrollment (500 enrollees), an average enrollment time period of 2.5 months, and a per member per month (PMPM) cost equal to the projected ALL Kids pmpm for 2021 ($241.00).
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements-(Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(1)(C)); (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009)Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a State in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(1)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice.
ALL Kids provides a certified letter to the federally recognized tribe in the state when considering amendments to the State Plan or other program changes requiring CMS
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 21 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-25)Page 25#
approval. The tribe is given 30 days to respond. In the event of an emergency, ALL Kids will submit a faxed letter to the tribe and give 10 days for response.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4. Guidance: In Section 3.1., discussion may include, but is not limited to: contracts with managed health care plans (including fully and partially capitated plans); contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; and other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography, as well as the State methods for establishing and defining the delivery systems.
Should the State choose to cover unborn children under the Title XXI State plan, the State must describe how services are paid. For example, some states make a global payment for all unborn children while other states pay for services on fee-for-services basis. The State’s payment mechanism and delivery mechanism should be briefly described here.
Section 2103(f)(3) of the Act, as amended by section 403 of CHIPRA, requires separate or combination CHIP programs that operate a managed care delivery system to apply several provisions of section 1932 of the Act in the same manner as these provisions apply under title XIX of the Act. Specific provisions include: section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. If the State CHIP program operates a managed care delivery system, provide an assurance that the State CHIP managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant sections of section 1932 of the Act. States must submit the managed care contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office servicing them for review and approval.
In addition, states may use up to 10 percent of actual or estimated Federal expenditures for targeted low-income children to fund other forms of child health assistance, including contracts with providers for a limited range of direct services; other health services initiatives to improve children’s health; outreach expenditures; and administrative costs (See 2105(c)(2)(A)). Describe which, if any, of these methods will be used.
Examples of the above may include, but are not limited to: direct contracting with school-based health services; direct contracting to provide enabling services; contracts with health centers receiving funds under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; contracts with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under section 1886(d)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Act; contracts with other
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 22 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-26)Page 26#
hospitals; and contracts with public health clinics receiving Title V funding. If applicable, address how the new arrangements under Title XXI will work with existing service delivery methods, such as regional networks for chronic illness and disability; neonatal care units, or early-intervention programs for at-risk infants, in the delivery and utilization of services. (42CFR 457.490(a))
3.1. Delivery Standards Describe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(a))
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CHIP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama’s CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. As of October 1, 2015, CHIP will again expand Medicaid by covering Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 13% FPL through 141% FPL.
ALL Kids: Program Operation–Administration From inception of the program in 1998 through May, 2001, ALL Kids contracted with the State Employee’s Insurance Board (SEIB) to serve as its enrollment and premium billing/receiving office. As enrollment grew, ALL Kids staff increased, and the need for data management grew, the ADPH CHIP unit and SEIB jointly decided to move the enrollment and premium billing/receiving functions to the CHIP unit. The Alabama Department of Public Health (Department) now manages all enrollment aspects of the ALL Kids program and utilizes other contractors to administer certain aspects of the ALL Kids program including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Providing all eligible persons involved in ALL Kids an individual policy or certificate that states the insurance protection provided, the method and place of filing claims, and to whom benefits are payable. The policy or certificate indicates that coverage was obtained through CHIP; 2. Maintenance of a claims database for the purpose of program management. 3. Management of evaluation surveillance procedures. 4. Consultation for actuarial services 5. Consultation for development of data systems 6. Consultation for development of specialized outreach plans
Program Operation-Benefits and Services The ALL Kids program is a self-funded, discounted fee-for-service*, PPO, delivery system. In order
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 23 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-27)Page 27#
to assure delivery of the insurance product(s), the Department utilizes a private health care delivery organization(s) to provide benefits and services. Both indemnity plan(s) and or managed care plans(s) are acceptable and have been used. The selected vendor(s) is required to perform, including but not limited to, the following:
1. Furnishing coverage information and ID cards; 2. Member service responses to claims inquiries; 3. Claims certification, investigation, adjudication, and internal appeals process; 4. Processing and distribution of benefit payments to providers; 5. Appropriate and accurate fee administration; 6. Strict financial accounting and reconciliation; 7. Effective management of networks (if applicable); 8. Demonstrated capability to serve Alabama membership; 9. Effective medical, pharmacy and dental management including medical review of claims decisions; 10. Production of claims, contract, and other legal forms as required; 11. Establishment and maintenance of appropriate banking arrangements; 12. Continuous and accurate electronic transmission of all data; 13. Production of reports that capture claim and utilization experience and trends; 14. Other special services as may be requested from time to time 15. Have a network of physicians, dentists, pharmacies, and other providers capable of meeting the demands of the ALL Kids Program. 16. Facilitation of a medical home for each enrollee.
*The exception to the fee-for-service payment system is the method of reimbursement to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) based on a prospective payment system (PPS). This is in compliance with section 503 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). In accordance with this provision of CHIPRA, ALL Kids has elected to adopt the Medicaid PPS Rates effective October 1, 2009. This method of payment will be implemented August 25, 2010 for all qualifying services rendered on or after October 1, 2009.
In the past, ALL Kids has used three (3) insurance venders, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama (statewide), Prime Health (in 10 southwestern counties from 10/98-9/00) and United Healthcare (14 counties from 10/01-7/02) for the above services. However, due to low enrollment in Prime Health and United Healthcare (which was due to patient choice), each of those programs elected, with the mutual consent of the ALL Kids program, to discontinue serving as an ALL Kids vendor. Currently, the only ALL Kids vendor for the above services is Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama. This vendor provides services statewide.
CHIP makes health care coverage available to all individuals eligible for ALL Kids on a “guaranteed issue” basis with no exclusions of coverage for pre-existing conditions, and on a “guaranteed
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 24 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-28)Page 28#
renewable” basis for those eligible.
ALL Kids PLUS Program Operation-Administration For this addition to the program, the Alabama Department of Public Health has partnered (and seeks to partner) with other governmental agencies (which serve special needs children) to provide the state match, provide or provide for covered ALL Kids PLUS services, to authorize case by case reimbursement for ALL Kids PLUS services, to notify ALL Kids PLUS families of their approval for services, and select one case manager per child so as to minimize duplication and gaps in services. PLUS services became available through CRS as of October 1, 2000. An ALL Kids PLUS contract was signed with the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation effective October 1, 2002.
Several state agencies, other provider entities, and advocates within the state have met to develop the concept and plan of operation for ALL Kids PLUS.
At the present time, the list of ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies is restricted to those governmental agencies supplying the state match money. If other state or appropriated matching funds become available, this restriction may be modified or eliminated. A child must be enrolled in ALL Kids to qualify for PLUS services. When a child is identified with a special condition or need that a participating agency serves, he/she is referred to that agency based on that special condition/need. This agency will, based on the availability of funds, assign a case manager to the child, authorize needed services within the agency, and make referrals to other authorizing agencies for additional services if needed. All agencies authorizing PLUS services for a child notify the child’s case manager and referral site (if different) for approval of services. Each child will only have one ALL Kids PLUS case manager. The decision as to which agency will provide the case management will be determined by the agencies involved in the child’s care and will be based on what makes the best practice sense and is in the best interest of the child.
Authorizing agencies bill the insurance vendor(s) for any authorized PLUS services that the agencies have provided directly or indirectly. The Alabama Department of Public Health reimburses the insurance vendor(s) in the same manner that reimbursement for the basic ALL Kids program is handled. At this time, the participating PLUS agencies do not utilize a central integrated data system. However, their day-to-day practice involves coordination through the case manager with other agencies to avoid duplication. Each agency submits all claims/data to the insurance vendor (BCBS) for adjudication and reimbursement. While a child may have claims submitted by more than one agency, only one agency may be reimbursed for case management services.
Check here if the State child health program delivers services using a managed care delivery model. The State provides an assurance that its managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant provisions of section 1932 of the Act, including section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 25 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-29)Page 29#
Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. The State also assures that it will submit the contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office for review and approval. (Section 2103(f)(3))
Guidance: In Section 3.2., note that utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: requirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after- hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review, coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. (42CFR 457.490(b))
3.2. Describe the utilization controls under the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children. Describe the systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(b))
Utilization control mechanisms are in place for the ALL Kids program to ensure that children use only health care that is appropriate, medically necessary, and/or approved by the State or the participating health plan. In addition, policies are in place to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner according to the vendors’ medical necessity definition. The current Blue Cross Blue Shield policies are available upon request.
Before being approved for participation in the ALL Kids program, health plan vendors must develop and have in place utilization review policies and procedures, demand management, and disease state management mechanisms. Provider networks approved for the ALL Kids program are accepted based on evidence of the vendors’ provider credentialing policies, provider accessibility, cost- effectiveness, and efficiency.
Each ALL Kids PLUS authorizing state agency has a utilization review mechanism particular to that agency. Services approved for ALL Kids PLUS are those which are developmentally necessary and/or physically necessary. Reviewing the appropriate use of services is part of the case manager’s duties.
The Alabama Medicaid Agency applies the same utilization controls to the CHIP Medicaid expansion
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 26 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-30)Page 30#
enrollees as it does to the entire Medicaid child book of business. Section 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology
Guidance: States electing to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan or combination plan should check the appropriate box and provide the ages and income level for each eligibility group. If the State is electing to take up the option to expand Medicaid eligibility as allowed under section 214 of CHIPRA regarding lawfully residing, complete section 4.1-LR as well as update the budget to reflect the additional costs if the state will claim title XXI match for these children until and if the time comes that the children are eligible for Medicaid.
4.0. Medicaid Expansion
4.0.1. Ages of each eligibility group and the income standard for that group:
4.1. Separate Program Check all standards that will apply to the State plan. (42CFR 457.305(a) and 457.320(a))
4.1.0 Describe how the State meets the citizenship verification requirements. Include whether or not State has opted to use SSA verification option.
4.1.1 Geographic area served by the Plan if less than Statewide:
4.1.2 Ages of each eligibility group, including unborn children and pregnant women (if applicable) and the income standard for that group:
4.1.2.1-PC Age: through birth (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002)
4.1.3 Income of each separate eligibility group (if applicable):
4.1.3.1-PC 0% of the FPL (and not eligible for Medicaid) through % of the FPL (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) 4.1.4 Resources of each separate eligibility group (including any standards relating to spend downs and disposition of resources):
4.1.5 Residency (so long as residency requirement is not based on length of time in state):
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 27 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-31)Page 31#
4.1.6 Disability Status (so long as any standard relating to disability status does not restrict eligibility): Children will be eligible for ALL Kids regardless of disability. ALL Kids PLUS is available to children with special conditions/needs who are enrolled in ALL Kids. ALL Kids PLUS enrollment is restricted to services authorized and financed by PLUS participating agencies. However, if access to additional matching funds becomes available and/or the health needs of CSHCC/N change, authorized services will be revised to reflect these changes.
4.1.7 Access to or coverage under other health coverage:
A child is not eligible for ALL Kids if s/he has any other health insurance coverage or is eligible for Medicaid.
4.1.8 Duration of eligibility, not to exceed 12 months:
4.1.9 Other Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility, including those standards in 42 CFR 457.310 and 457.320 that are not addressed above. For instance: Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in Alabama (initially Montgomery, Macon and Russell). Comprehensive coverage will be provided to this population from the date of enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. Obstetric coverage for current ALL Kids members includes all prenatal care through 90 days postpartum and is billed as a bundled payment. Social Security numbers for the babies will not be required unless and until the child is born and applies for renewal.
Guidance: States may only require the SSN of the child who is applying for coverage. If SSNs are required and the State covers unborn children, indicate that the unborn children are exempt from providing a SSN. Other standards include, but are not limited to presumptive eligibility and deemed newborns.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 28 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-32)Page 32#
4.1.9.1 States should specify whether Social Security Numbers (SSN) are required.
Guidance: States should describe their continuous eligibility process and populations that can be continuously eligible.
4.1.9.2 Continuous eligibility
4.1-PW Pregnant Women Option (section 2112)- The State includes eligibility for one or more populations of targeted low-income pregnant women under the plan. Describe the population of pregnant women that the State proposes to cover in this section. Include all eligibility criteria, such as those described in the above categories (for instance, income and resources) that will be applied to this population. Use the same reference number system for those criteria (for example, 4.1.1-P for a geographic restriction). Please remember to update sections 8.1.1-PW, 8.1.2-PW, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: States have the option to cover groups of “lawfully residing” children and/or pregnant women. States may elect to cover (1)“lawfully residing” children described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; (2) “lawfully residing” pregnant women described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; or (3) both. A state electing to cover children and/or pregnant women who are considered lawfully residing in the U.S. must offer coverage to all such individuals who meet the definition of lawfully residing, and may not cover a subgroup or only certain groups. In addition, states may not cover these new groups only in CHIP, but must also extend the coverage option to Medicaid. States will need to update their budget to reflect the additional costs for coverage of these children. If a State has been covering these children with State only funds, it is helpful to indicate that so CMS understands the basis for the enrollment estimates and the projected cost of providing coverage. Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option.
4.1- LR Lawfully Residing Option(Sections 2107(e)(1)(J) and 1903(v)(4)(A); (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006 issued July 1, 2010) Check if the State is electing the option under section 214 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) regarding lawfully residing to provide coverage to the following otherwise eligible pregnant women and children as specified below who are lawfully residing in the United States including the following: A child or pregnant woman shall be considered lawfully present if he or she is: (1) A qualified alien as defined in section 431 of PRWORA (8 U.S.C. §1641); (2) An alien in nonimmigrant status who has not violated the terms of the status under which he or she was admitted or to which he or she has changed after admission;
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 29 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-33)Page 33#
(3) An alien who has been paroled into the United States pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. §1182(d)(5)) for less than 1 year, except for an alien paroled for prosecution, for deferred inspection or pending removal proceedings; (4) An alien who belongs to one of the following classes: (i) Aliens currently in temporary resident status pursuant to section 210 or 245A of the INA (8 U.S.C. §§1160 or 1255a, respectively); (ii) Aliens currently under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) pursuant to section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1254a), and pending applicants for TPS who have been granted employment authorization; (iii) Aliens who have been granted employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), (10), (16), (18), (20), (22), or (24); (iv) Family Unity beneficiaries pursuant to section 301 of Pub. L. 101- 649, as amended; (v) Aliens currently under Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) pursuant to a decision made by the President; (vi) Aliens currently in deferred action status; or (vii) Aliens whose visa petition has been approved and who have a pending application for adjustment of status; (5) A pending applicant for asylum under section 208(a) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1158) or for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8U.S.C. § 1231) or under the Convention Against Torture who has been granted employment authorization, and such an applicant under the age of 14 who has had an application pending for at least180 days; (6) An alien who has been granted withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture; (7) A child who has a pending application for Special Immigrant Juvenile status as described in section 101(a)(27)(J) of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(27)(J)); (8) An alien who is lawfully present in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands under 48 U.S.C. § 1806(e); or (9) An alien who is lawfully present in American Samoa under the immigration laws of American Samoa.
Elected for pregnant women. Elected for children under age
4.1.1-LR The State provides assurance that for an individual whom it enrolls in Medicaid under the CHIPRA Lawfully Residing option, it has verified, at the time of the individual’s initial eligibility determination and at the time of the eligibility redetermination, that the individual continues to
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 30 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-34)Page 34#
be lawfully residing in the United States. The State must first attempt to verify this status using information provided at the time of initial application. If the State cannot do so from the information readily available, it must require the individual to provide documentation or further evidence to verify satisfactory immigration status in the same manner as it would for anyone else claiming satisfactory immigration status under section 1137(d) of the Act.
4.1-DS Supplemental Dental(Section 2103(c)(5)-A child who is eligible to enroll in dental- only supplemental coverage, effective January 1, 2009. Eligibility is limited to only targeted low-income children who are otherwise eligible for CHIP but for the fact that they are enrolled in a group health plan or health insurance offered through an employer. The State’s CHIP plan income eligibility level is at least the highest income eligibility standard under its approved State child health plan (or under a waiver) as of January 1, 2009. All who meet the eligibility standards and apply for dental-only supplemental coverage shall be provided benefits. States choosing this option must report these children separately in SEDS. Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
4.2. Assurances The State assures by checking the box below that it has made the following findings with respect to the eligibility standards in its plan:(Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) 4.2.1. These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2. Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. This applies to pregnant women included in the State plan as well as targeted low-income children. 4.2.3. These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre-existing medical condition. This applies to pregnant women as well as targeted low- income children.
4.2-DS Supplemental Dental -Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option. For dental-only supplemental coverage, the State assures that it has made the following findings with standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) 4.2.1-DS These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2-DS Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. 4.2.3-DS These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre- existing medical condition.
4.3. Methodology. Describe the methods of establishing and continuing eligibility and
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 31 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-35)Page 35#
enrollment. The description should address the procedures for applying the eligibility standards, the organization and infrastructure responsible for making and reviewing eligibility determinations, and the process for enrollment of individuals receiving covered services, and whether the State uses the same application form for Medicaid and/or other public benefit programs. (Section 2102)(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.350) Superseded by ACA SPA Guidance: The box below should be checked as related to children and pregnant women. Please note: A State providing dental-only supplemental coverage may not have a waiting list or limit eligibility in any way.
4.3.1. Limitation on Enrollment Describe the processes, if any, that a State will use for instituting enrollment caps, establishing waiting lists, and deciding which children will be given priority for enrollment. If this section does not apply to your state, check the box below. (Section 2102(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.305(b))
There are no public notice state laws regarding enrollment caps and waiting lists in CHIP. Due to insufficient state funds, ALL Kids initiated a waiting list beginning with all new enrollees who would have had an effective date October 1, 2003. Public and enrollee notices about the waiting list were issued during the month of September 2003 prior to the impact of the waiting list. On August 23, 2004, ALL Kids reopened enrollment and discontinued use of the waiting list.
If during the year funds are not available at sufficient levels for coverage of children and funding is projected to be depleted before the end of the fiscal year, it is the State’s intent to place eligible children on a waiting list until adequate funding becomes available to resume enrollment. Alabama will provide public notice through press releases, written communication with stakeholders and stakeholder groups, presentations, and written communication from the program to all applicant families whose child(ren) is/are placed on the waiting list.
When a waiting list is implemented, the program has and will continue to receive new applications. These applications will be screened for Medicaid eligibility and then reviewed for ALL Kids eligibility. If a child is eligible for Medicaid, the child will be enrolled in Medicaid. Each family whose child is placed on the ALL Kids waiting list will be notified, by letter, of this placement. The notification letter will also contain information stating that the parent may wish to contact Medicaid if his situation changes and he believes that his child may be eligible for Medicaid. If the child remains on the waiting list for longer than three (3) months, the family will be periodically notified via letter that the child’s name is still on the waiting list.
If the State is using a waiting list, children will be enrolled on ALL Kids from the waiting list on a first on–first off basis as funding permits. When attrition has lowered program enrollment to a level at which there are sufficient state funds to re-open enrollment,
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 32 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-36)Page 36#
children will be removed from the waiting list ( on a first on first off basis) and enrolled in ALL Kids. Children who are removed from the waiting list whose application information is greater than 90 days old will be asked to complete a form updating changes in information on their family size, income, and other points of eligibility. Upon receipt of the form, ALL Kids enrollment staff will evaluate the child’s eligibility for ALL Kids. Then, if eligible, either the child will be enrolled in ALL Kids or Medicaid and the family will be notified.
Children who have current enrollment in ALL Kids will be allowed to continue to renew their enrollment as long as they continue to meet all points of eligibility and have their renewal forms submitted and premium balances paid in full within 90 days after the date of termination. Check here if this section does not apply to your State.
Guidance: Note that for purposes of presumptive eligibility, States do not need to verify the citizenship status of the child. States electing this option should indicate so in the State plan.(42 CFR 457.355)
4.3.2. Check if the State elects to provide presumptive eligibility for children that meets the requirements of section 1920A of the Act. (Section 2107(e)(1)(L)); (42 CFR 457.355)
Guidance: Describe how the State intends to implement the Express Lane option. Include information on the identified Express Lane agency or agencies, and whether the State will be using the Express Lane eligibility option for the initial eligibility determinations, redeterminations, or both.
4.3.3-EL Express Lane Eligibility Check here if the state elects the option to rely on a finding from an Express Lane agency when determining whether a child satisfies one or more components of CHIP eligibility. The state agrees to comply with the requirements of sections 2107(e)(1)(E) and 1902(e)(13) of the Act for this option. Please update sections 4.4-EL, 5.2-EL, 9.10, and 12.1 when electing this option. This authority may not apply to eligibility determinations made before February 4, 2009, or after September 30, 2013. (Section 2107(e)(1)(E)) 4.3.3.1-ELAlso indicate whether the Express Lane option is applied to (1) initial eligibility determination, (2) redetermination, or (3) both.
4.3.3.2-ELList the public agencies approved by the State as Express Lane agencies.
4.3.3.3-ELList the components/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane. In this section, specify any differences in
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 33 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-37)Page 37#
budget unit, deeming, income exclusions, income disregards, or other methodology between CHIP eligibility determinations for such children and the determination under the Express Lane option.
4.3.3.3-ELList the component/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane.
4.3.3.4-ELDescribe the option used to satisfy the screen and enrollment requirements before a child may be enrolled under title XXI.
Guidance: States should describe the process they use to screen and enroll children required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 457.80(c). Describe the screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by an Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated. Describe whether the State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from an Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
In this section, states should describe their eligibility screening process in a way that addresses the five assurances specified below. The State should consider including important definitions, the relationship with affected Federal, State and local agencies, and other applicable criteria that will describe the State’s ability to make assurances. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A) and 2110(b)(2)(B)), (42 CFR 457.310(b)(2), 42CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 457.80(c)(3))
4.4. Eligibility screening and coordination with other health coverage programs States must describe how they will assure that:
4.4.1. only targeted low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid or not covered under a group health plan or health insurance (including access to a State health benefits plan) are furnished child health assistance under the plan.(Sections 2102(b)(3)(A), 2110(b)(2)(B)) (42 CFR 457.310(b), 42CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.80(c)(3)) Confirm that the State does not apply a waiting period for pregnant women.
The State of Alabama assures that through enrollment screening processes, children whose
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 34 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-38)Page 38#
applications are considered to be eligible for medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan will be referred for assistance under the appropriate plan. Additionally, ALL Kids eligibility staff query the Medicaid eligibility system to ensure applicants are not currently on any Medicaid program. All applications request the parent/guardian to provide the names and addresses of their employers. Eligibility staff screen all applications to ensure applicant children are not currently covered under group health insurance and have not voluntarily terminated group coverage within the last three months. In an effort to further minimize crowd-out, ALL Kids receives a daily “error report” which indicates children who have current BCBS health insurance or have terminated a BCBS policy within the last three months. In addition, quality assurance reviews are conducted on a sample of ALL Kids enrollees. Redetermination is completed every 12 months.
4.4.2. children found through the screening process to be potentially eligible for medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan are enrolled for assistance under such plan; (Section 2102(b)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.350(a)(2)).
When a child’s application is reviewed by ALL Kids and determined to be eligible for Medicaid, ALL Kids enrolls the child in Medicaid. Because a joint application is used, no additional form is required to be completed. Parents are notified by ALL regarding this determination
4.4.3. children found through the screening process to be ineligible for Medicaid are enrolled in CHIP.(Sections 2102(a)(1) and (2) and 2102(c)(2)) (42CFR 431.636(b)(4))
ALL Kids and Medicaid have a joint eligibility and enrollment system. When a Medicaid enrollment worker determines that a child is ineligible for Medicaid and eligible for ALL Kids, the worker enrolls the child in ALL Kids. Coverage is based on the application receipt date at the Medicaid office or the child’s last date of Medicaid or ALL Kids coverage. ALL Kids staff work very closely with the Medicaid central office and Medicaid enrollment workers to ensure that the policies and procedures of both agencies reflect the agencies’ desires for seamless transitions between the two agencies.
4.4.4. the insurance provided under the State child health plan does not substitute for coverage under group health plans. (Section 2102(b)(3)(C)) (42CFR, 457.805) This section is superseded by ACA SPA 4.4.4.1. (formerly 4.4.4.4) If the State provides coverage under a premium assistance program, describe: 1) the minimum period without coverage under a group health plan. This should include any allowable exceptions to the waiting period; 2) the expected minimum level of contribution employers will make; and 3) how cost-effectiveness is determined. (42CFR 457.810(a)-(c))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 35 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-39)Page 39#
4.4.5. Child health assistance is provided to targeted low-income children in the State who are American Indian and Alaska Native. (Section2102(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.125(a))
The State of Alabama assures the provision of child health assistance to targeted low-income children in the State who are American Indians (as defined in section 4(c) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 25 U.S.C. 1603(c)). As Stated in section 4.1, the ALL Kids program will provide Statewide coverage. No ALL Kids enrollee identified as being an American Indian will be charged a premium or co-pay. This policy extends to all children who identify themselves as an American Indian children whether they are a member of a federally recognized tribe or one of the eight state-only recognized tribes. Representatives from the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (the only federally recognized Tribe in Alabama) have assisted in the development of ALL Kids PLUS. Tribal children will have access to PLUS services.
CHIP staff meet and coordinate regularly with the Alabama Commission on Indian Affairs to ensure that Native American Children are identified and enrolled in ALL Kids. Additionally, a Native American was hired under a one-year contract to consult with ALL Kids staff and develop a comprehensive strategy to outreach to Native American children.
Guidance: When the State is using an income finding from an Express Lane agency, the State must still comply with screen and enroll requirements before enrolling children in CHIP. The State may either continue its current screen and enroll process, or elect one of two new options to fulfill these requirements.
4.4-EL The State should designate the option it will be using to carry out screen and enroll requirements:
The State will continue to use the screen and enroll procedures required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 42 CFR 457.80(c). Describe this process.
The State is establishing a screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by the Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 36 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-40)Page 40#
The State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from the Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
Section 5. Outreach and Coordination
5.1. (formerly 2.2)Describe the current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children by addressing sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2.(Section 2102)(a)(2) (42CFR 457.80(b))
Guidance: The information below may include whether the state elects express lane eligibility a description of the State’s outreach efforts through Medicaid and state-only programs.
5.1.1. (formerly 2.2.1.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs (i.e., Medicaid and state-only child health insurance):
In Alabama, thanks to outreach efforts of a variety of public and private agencies and organizations, there is a high awareness level of children’s health insurance programs and their eligibility requirements. Over one-fourth of children under the age of 19 in Alabama are covered by Medicaid or ALL Kids. The programs are reaching children who might not otherwise have access to the health care they need.
Prior to CHIP, the Medicaid Program was the only public health insurance program for children in Alabama. Health services are provided in Alabama to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children by private physicians, the 67 Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) county health departments, 16 primary care centers (including Federally Qualified Health Centers), two children’s hospitals (The Children’s Hospital of Alabama and Women’s and Children’s Hospital at the University of South Alabama) school health nurses, and one Indian Health Service Clinic. In addition to the two children’s hospitals, Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services, Children’s Rehabilitation Services (CRS) provides specialty care to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children with special health care needs. As lead agency for Alabama’s Early Intervention System, this agency coordinates services for infants and toddlers eligible for IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), part C. This section describes the current efforts made by the ADPH to provide health care services, and to identify and enroll uncovered children in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs. This section also describes the efforts made by CRS, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to identify and enroll all uncovered children who are eligible to participate in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs.
Alabama Department of Public Health
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 37 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-41)Page 41#
As the CHIP lead agency, the ADPH is actively involved in all aspects of identification and enrollment of children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs and health insurance programs that involve public-private partnerships. Activities include the creation, publication, and distribution of marketing materials, management of the ALL Kids enrollment process, and targeted outreach activities for specific populations such as faith-based organizations, etc. The Alabama Department of Public Health provides some direct as well as support patient care for uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children and adolescents. Direct services for this population include: preventive child health services (well-child check-ups), prenatal services, Women Infants and Children Supplemental Nutrition [WIC] program services, preventive health education, immunizations, and Family Planning program services. Support services include case management services, the provision of information and referral via toll-free telephone lines, and laboratory services. These services are funded through federal Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant funds, federal Title X Family Planning program funds, federal WIC Program funds, Medicaid program reimbursements, federal immunization funds, state legislative appropriations, some local government appropriations, and a small amount of patient fee revenue. A variety of the above direct and support services are provided within ADPH county health departments. In fiscal year 2001, 34,664 children (birth through age 18 years) received health services in local county health departments. (This number excludes single service patients [STD-only, Immunization-only, WIC-only].) The Alabama Department of Public Health is the state’s Title V agency. Additionally, there are approximately 512 school health nurses, R.N.s and L.P.N.s, (working under the auspices of the ADPH, private hospitals, the Alabama State Department of Education, and/or local education agencies) in the state who provide a variety of health screening services, primary care and emergency services, Medicaid/ALL Kids enrollment facilitation, etc.
Income assessments are performed on all patients enrolled in ADPH clinics. The income assessments are reviewed for possible Medicaid eligibility. Beginning in FY 1991, Medicaid eligibility workers were out-stationed in health departments and other health care facilities to accept applications and complete Medicaid eligibility determinations at the time of health visits. A streamlined, four-page expanded Medicaid eligibility form, which was implemented in FY 1991, has been revised into a joint application with CHIP and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is available at county health departments. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility personnel currently assist patients in completing the forms and data is put into an automated Medicaid system on-site. Final determination for Medicaid can then be made immediately. If the children appear to be ALL Kids or ACCF eligible the application is forwarded to the appropriate program.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by ADPH intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility workers are based in many ADPH clinics, hospitals, and primary care centers across
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 38 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-42)Page 42#
the state. Additionally, two Medicaid outstationed workers and a clerk are now located in the CHIP office who process many ALL Kids referrals. A third worker will be added in FY 2003.
Cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level.
In order to provide additional outreach, the ADPH operates two toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. The toll-free telephone lines (established prior to the implementation of CHIP and continued to the present) are known as Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection. Two integral parts of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, are information on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referrals to health providers who accept Medicaid-eligible children and Medicaid-eligible pregnant women. Referral services provided by the Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection staff members are expanded through consultation supplied by a host of additional professionals located within the ADPH. The toll-free number for Healthy Beginnings is 1-800-654-1385. The Info Connection number is 1-800-545-1098. Both lines are operational 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week; office hours are from 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. each week day. The Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection lines are publicized statewide through newspapers, television, posters, and pamphlets. Presentations regarding the lines are conducted statewide to various organizations and agencies. The numbers are also published in Alabama South Central Bell telephone books. Additionally, with the implementation of CHIP, the CHIP unit maintains two toll-free telephone lines (888-373-5437 for enrollment and eligibility issues and 877-774-9521 for administrative issues). Finally, in addition to the above efforts, ALL Kids, Medicaid, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed a joint application and renewal form for use by all three programs. This enables families to be screened for eligibility for all three programs and facilitates referrals and timely enrollment in the appropriate program.
Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA) ADECA notifies the ALL Kids regional staff when a plant or large business plans to close in the near future. ALL Kids regional staff present ALL Kids information and materials at employee meetings prior to the plant/business closing. In order to prevent gaps in health insurance coverage for the children of the employees of the plant/business, an ALL Kids policy was developed which provides for beginning ALL Kids coverage (for eligible children) the day after employer sponsored coverage ends if an application is received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit within 30 days after the plant/business closing.
Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services Children’s Rehabilitation Service Children’s Rehabilitation Service (CRS) also has coordination agreements with the Alabama Medicaid Agency. (These contracts existed prior to CHIP and have continued to be in effect.) The Alabama Medicaid Agency contracted with CRS for the provision of specialty medical services, specialized therapy (such as physical, occupational, speech, etc) services, and case
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 39 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-43)Page 43#
management services to children with special health care needs. With the implementation of ALL Kids, CRS clinics were added as preferred providers under the ALL Kids basic benefits package and the ALL Kids PLUS package.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by CRS intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ALL Kids, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Joint Medicaid/ALL Kids/ACCF eligibility forms are available in all CRS offices and clinics. As in the ADPH, cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level. Medicaid and ALL Kids information and outreach brochures and posters are available in every CRS office throughout the state.
Additionally, like the ADPH, CRS operates toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. One line is operated at the state level in Montgomery and additional lines are located in each CRS district office. An integral part of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, is Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referral information. CRS and Early Intervention (EI) have both completed database matches with ALL Kids files to identify children known to both programs. CHIP staff have participated in many staff trainings throughout the state to assist CRS and EI staff in outreach for ALL Kids, Medicaid, and ACCF.
Division of Early Intervention As the lead agency for Alabama’s early intervention system for infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities and their families, this unit provides a toll free Child Find telephone number for use by the general public and primary referral sources. Additional efforts for coordination are described in the PLUS sections of this document.
Medicaid Agency The Alabama Medicaid Agency has 135 eligibility workers in over 170 locations to enroll children eligible for SOBRA Medicaid whose the family’s income is at or below 100 percent of FPL (for children born after September 30, 1983) or 133 percent of the FPL (for children through age five). With the implementation of CHIP, 23 workers were added throughout the state. In March, 2002, two eligibility workers and a clerk were housed in the ALL Kids central office to review applications referred from the ALL Kids eligibility workers. In addition to the CHIP office, these workers are located in places children are likely to go to receive health care - - county health departments, Federally Qualified Health Centers and hospitals. Because workers are in the community, they can and do establish working relationships with public and private providers, social service agencies and others. For example, supervisors provide in- service training and education on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility to physicians, Head Start workers, day care centers, Human Resources staff and others. The Alabama Medicaid Agency also has 10 district offices located throughout the state that process
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 40 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-44)Page 44#
applications for the elderly and the disabled population. The 80 eligibility workers and 20 supervisors advise applicants about other programs and refer the applicants to the proper office when they do not qualify for a disabled program. They also advise about programs for which other family members may be eligible. These district offices work closely with providers to keep them informed of all programs available through the Medicaid Agency.
Applications for Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF are easily available to anyone who needs one. Applications are available not only from Medicaid workers but also at physicians’ offices, county offices of the Department of Human Resources and hospitals. All sources of the joint application (i.e., ADPH, CRS, etc.) allow a “mail-in” application process thereby allowing Medicaid to complete a phone interview instead of a face-to-face interview. Medicaid has a toll- free number for anyone to call to ask questions about Medicaid eligibility and find out where and how to apply. The number is 1-800-362-1504. Medicaid’s Web site contains information on Medicaid eligibility and is used by advocates to assist people who want to apply for Medicaid.
Through its Medical Care Advisory Committee and its Physicians Task Force, Medicaid receives guidance on ways to reach potential Medicaid eligibles. Medicaid staff regularly brief these groups, who represent both providers and consumers, on all facets of the Medicaid program, including eligibility. Both groups are kept informed of upcoming changes in the Medicaid program and encouraged to provide comments and suggestions. With welfare reform and the separation of Medicaid eligibility from eligibility for public assistance, the Alabama Medicaid Agency and the Department of Human Resources have developed new cooperative arrangements to assure that children in the state’s lowest income families have access to Medicaid. Applications may be completed through the mail with a telephone interview, thus eliminating the need for a face-to-face contact. Currently DHR workers assess their clients to determine whether they might be eligible for any Medicaid, ALL Kids, or ACCF program. Workers help to complete forms, gather information and make appointments as necessary. However, the enrollment function for this Medicaid program will be transferred from DHR to the Medicaid Agency within the coming year.
Outreach occurs after the birth of an infant to a Medicaid recipient. Following the birth of each newborn whose mother is a Medicaid recipient, the Alabama Medicaid Agency sends the infant's parent or guardian a pamphlet on the Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program as well as a pamphlet on immunizations. When children are enrolled in the SSI Program, they are automatically enrolled in the Medicaid Program. Additionally, a brochure is sent to parents/guardians of all new SSI eligible children encouraging them to participate in the EPSDT program. In addition to these efforts, social workers within the ADPH conduct patient recruitment as a part of their case management activities. These recruitment efforts are conducted through community presentations and professional relationships with other State and local agencies which serve mothers and children.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 41 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-45)Page 45#
The Alabama Department of Human Resources and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation also provide case management services for Medicaid children known to their agencies, in order to facilitate their enrollment in health services particularly mental health services through the Rehabilitation Option.
Through CHIP Phase I, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, working with the Alabama Department of Public Health, took several major steps to identify and enroll all uncovered children who were eligible to participate in this public health insurance program. New eligibility workers were hired and they, plus existing eligibility workers, were trained in CHIP eligibility criteria as well as other Medicaid eligibility criteria. These eligibility workers are outstationed in health departments, hospitals, community health centers, CHIP office, etc.
In order to streamline the CHIP/Medicaid enrollment process, the Alabama Medicaid Agency initiated continuous eligibility for all Medicaid children under the age of 19 years, on April 1, 1998. Continuous eligibility means that Medicaid enrolled children maintain their Medicaid coverage continuously for one year from enrollment or re-determination.
Additionally, numerous presentations, regarding CHIP, have been made by knowledgeable professionals who are members of the broad based CHIP Workgroup and CHIP staff. These presentations include addresses to education professionals, rural health groups, child care management agencies, parents of children with special health care needs, Indian Health Service staff, the general public, etc. Some specific activities include:
Notice to all Medicaid providers News releases and camera-ready materials for newspapers Articles published in newsletters of health care provider associations–Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Dental Association, and others Television commercials Radio spots Brochures have been distributed to date for outstationed Medicaid workers, public health workers, county human resources workers, Early Intervention Coordinating Councils, Mental Health Centers, family services centers, primary health care centers, hospitals, advocacy and professional organization, and in the school system, principles and guidance counselors. Brochures distributed at state meetings of Alabama Conference of Social Work, Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-Alabama Chapter, Alabama Dental Association, Family Practice doctors, and others Satellite conferences to provide information about the basic ALL Kids Program and instruction in completing the application. Distribution of applications and brochures to all public school systems, local health departments, welfare offices, hospitals, community health centers, physician and dentist offices, pharmacies, WIC clinics, and family law attorneys, etc.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 42 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-46)Page 46#
Public forums for parents and advocates of CSHCC/N (Children with Special Health Care Conditions/Needs)
With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion and the RIM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
In addition to the above, the state has engaged in the following particular activities to promote ALL Kids PLUS. Originally, it was anticipated that ALL Kids PLUS would involve four state programs, Children’s Rehabilitation Service, Early Intervention, Mental Health/Mental Retardation, and Civitan International Research Center Sparks Clinics. After conducting database matches, reviews of Pediatric Health History information, claims data, through mutual agreement, Sparks determined that their services were being adequately reimbursed through the ALL Kids basic benefit package. Therefore, attention was focused on the remaining three agencies. Since that time, CHIP has entered into discussions with the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind with regard to becoming an ALL Kids PLUS provider. CRS has had an active contract for the provision of PLUS services since October, 2000 and has served as a valuable partner in establishing protocols for the identification of ALL Kids enrollees in need of PLUS services and the identification of current clients in need of insurance coverage.
Initially it was anticipated that children would be identified for the PLUS program through an in-depth analysis of the Pediatric Health History and chart reviews. Practical experience has shown that this was not the most productive method of identification. Database matches were necessary as a first action to even identify ALL Kids enrollees who were being served by CRS. After this baseline was established, claims reviews were shown to be a more valuable mechanism in identifying children eligible for PLUS services than were chart reviews. This claims review revealed that a much smaller percentage of ALL Kids enrollees, than originally projected, were in need of services beyond those available in the basic benefits package. Program staff continually monitor feedback from providers and families regarding the need for additional services. This type of feedback and analysis has influenced the approaches that have been used with the other potential ALL Kids PLUS agencies. Through the activities of the regional ALL Kids staff, central office social work consultant, and customer service staff, ALL
Kids enrollees in need of these specialized services provided by ALL Kids PLUS agencies have been identified and referred as appropriate.
In August of 1999, the ADPH broadcasted a nationwide satellite conference to educate the provider community and other concerned individuals regarding ALL Kids PLUS. In addition, CHIP staff provided training on the PLUS program to CRS staff at regional meetings.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 43 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-47)Page 47#
Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) The DHR has continued to partner with the ADPH to communicate ALL Kids information to their county staffs. They have provided initial and continuing updates to county DHR staff as well as provided periodic shipments of applications, posters, etc. The DHR has also assisted with outreach efforts through its childcare management agencies and facilitated communication with licensed child day-care homes and centers.
Guidance: The State may address the coordination between the public-private outreach and the public health programs that is occurring statewide. This section will provide a historic record of the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children from the time the State’s plan was initially approved. States do not have to rewrite his section but may instead update this section as appropriate.
5.1.2. (formerly 2.2.2.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in health insurance programs that involve a public-private partnership:
There is only one health insurance program for children in Alabama that resembles a public- private partnership. This program is known as the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is a part of Blue Cross Blue Shield. The Alabama Child Caring Foundation provides limited ambulatory health insurance to low income, non-Medicaid/non-ALL Kids, uninsured children under the age of 19 years who remain full-time students through grade 12. The program is funded through private donations and matching funds from Blue Cross Blue Shield. Outreach for this program is conducted through articles in Blue Cross Blue Shield publications and public service announcements in local newspapers, via television, and radio stations. The University of Alabama and Auburn University coaches’ television shows expressly advertise the Foundation. Case finding is conducted by school administrators, school nurses, day care operators, and others. Additionally referrals to the Foundation are received from the ALL Kids program, local offices of the ADPH, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Dislocated Workers program, individual health care providers, civic organizations, churches, Sunday School classes, other religious organizations, and from Foundation participants.
Guidance: The State should describe below how it’s Title XXI program will closely coordinate the enrollment with Medicaid because under Title XXI, children identified as Medicaid-eligible are required to be enrolled in Medicaid. Specific information related to Medicaid screen and enroll procedures is requested in Section 4.4. (42CFR 457.80(c))
5.2. (formerly 2.3)Describe how CHIP coordinates with other public and private health insurance programs, other sources of health benefits coverage for children, other
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 44 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-48)Page 48#
relevant child health programs, (such as title V), that provide health care services for low-income children to increase the number of children with creditable health coverage.(Section 2102(a)(3),2102(b)(3)(E)and 2102(c)(2))(42CFR 457.80(c)).This item requires a brief overview of how Title XXI efforts – particularly new enrollment outreach efforts – will be coordinated with and improve upon existing State efforts.
The State of Alabama assures coordination with other public and private programs providing creditable coverage for low-income children. The SOBRA Medicaid program, ALL Kids, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed and use joint application and renewal forms.
All applications received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit are screened for Medicaid eligibility. When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as potentially eligible for Medicaid, the family’s application is sent to a Medicaid enrollment worker. Medicaid then processes it. As stated previously, two Medicaid enrollment workers and one clerical worker are physically located within the ALL Kids enrollment unit. This process also works in the reverse (applications are sent from Medicaid to ALL Kids).
When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as not potentially eligible for the Medicaid or ALL Kids but potentially eligible for the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF), the family’s application is sent to ACCF which then processes it and the opposite is also true.
Because it is recognized that the eligibility and enrollment systems of these three programs are not as seamless as needed, ALL Kids employs a full time MSW staff person. This staff person has responsibility to assist families in overcoming obstacles related to eligibility, enrollment, claims, and referral for specialty services as needed. Additional responsibilities include development and maintenance of the ALL Kids policy manual.
In addition, the State coordinates with the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. See the previous section for a broader description of the collaboration.
5.2-EL The State should include a description of its election of the Express Lane eligibility option to provide a simplified eligibility determination process and expedited enrollment of eligible children into Medicaid or CHIP.
Guidance: Outreach strategies may include, but are not limited to, community outreach workers, outstationed eligibility workers, translation and transportation services, assistance with enrollment forms, case management and other targeting activities to inform families of low-income children of the availability of the health insurance program under the plan or other private or public health coverage.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 45 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-49)Page 49#
The description should include information on how the State will inform the target of the availability of the programs, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, and assist them in enrolling in the appropriate program.
5.3. Strategies Describe the procedures used by the State to accomplish outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance or other public or private health coverage to inform them of the availability of the programs, and to assist them in enrolling their children in such a program.(Section 2102(c)(1)) (42CFR 457.90)
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion This portion of the outreach section, as it pertains to Phase I of Alabama’s Title XXI program, consists solely of efforts that were targeted toward Medicaid eligibles who were born after September 30, 1983 and who are under 19 years of age. There were four primary avenues through which outreach was conducted. These avenues were (1) the use of existing outreach approaches, (2) an initiative to improve communication with and services for the state’s rapidly expanding Hispanic population, (3) an increase in the number of Medicaid eligibility workers, and (4) coordination with the State Medical Association and physicians to educate physicians and their potentially eligible patients. Detailed information regarding these efforts is available from CHIP upon request.
Phase II - ALL Kids Outreach for ALL Kids is conducted through coordinated Statewide and regional efforts and in each county through partnerships, contracts, and regional CHIP coordinators. These efforts consist of a three-pronged approach: (1) Statewide media campaigns and initiatives; (2) outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants; and, (3) outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies. The purposes of all of these activities is to build networks and coalitions of persons who can inform individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what it has to offer, and assist individuals in completing application forms. Outreach is conducted by a variety of individuals and in a variety of settings. Each feature of the three-pronged outreach approach is described below:
• Statewide media campaigns and initiatives - The media campaigns focus on informing individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what they have to offer as well as providing information regarding where applications or other information may be obtained. Additionally, ALL Kids staff attend a wide variety of association meetings and conferences to inform memberships of the availability of children’s health insurance. The staff have developed specialized outreach materials (from videos to informational brochures and flyers to specific handouts) for specific groups to meet their needs.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 46 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-50)Page 50#
Staff have exhibited at booths and presentations to the Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Family Practice Physicians, Dentists, Social Workers, Department of Human Resources staff, Mental Health staff, Family Law Judges, Hospitals, Hospital auxiliaries, WIC staff, Public Health Staff, etc.
• Outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants – since the Spring of 2002, ALL Kids consultants have been and/are employed throughout the state, to disseminate information about the program to develop coalitions and networks of local residents to assist individuals in completing and submitting applications. These regional coordinators, their supervisory directors, and consultants are many times based in the county health departments but also utilize numerous off-site locales and alternative working hours. • Outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies - Information about CHIP, applications, and application assistance are available through existing child-related programs such as the Child Care Management Agencies and their targeted child day care centers, Food Stamps, Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Program clinics, WIC clinics, community health centers, Indian Health Services, school nurse programs, school counselor programs, Early Intervention programs, other social service agencies, etc. These programs and agencies have successful histories of serving the target population and the CHIP program utilizes their contact with this population to broaden outreach efforts. Dissemination of CHIP information to these entities has been facilitated since representatives of these agencies and programs served on the CHIP Advisory Council and continue to be in contact with CHIP as stakeholders. • With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion and the RIM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
Phase III - ALL Kids PLUS Outreach for this special population is conducted primarily by the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. Outreach includes educating primary and specialty care physicians regarding ALL Kids PLUS, identifying and contacting children who may need PLUS services through reviews of agency rolls and possible reviews of the pediatric health histories (part of the application process), contact with community health centers, etc. Information about ALL Kids PLUS is incorporated into all publications and presentations.
In an effort to continually improve the ALL Kids PLUS, CHIP staff continue to meet with the ALL Kids PLUS participating agencies to identify and resolve any problematic areas and to recruit additional participating agencies. PLUS agencies assist the CHIP staff in developing contracts, performance standards, and procedures for ongoing monitoring and oversight of the ALL Kids PLUS program.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 47 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-51)Page 51#
NOTE: The application form and other materials have been translated into Spanish. Additionally, the ALL Kids enrollment unit employs a Spanish-speaking staff member and a Hispanic consultant has been hired to develop a Hispanic outreach plan.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 48 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-52)Page 52#
Section 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan and proceed to Section 7 since children covered under a Medicaid expansion program will receive all Medicaid covered services including EPSDT.
6.1. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply.) (Section 2103(c)); (42CFR 457.410(a))
Guidance: Benchmark coverage is substantially equal to the benefits coverage in a benchmark benefit package (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, and/or the HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the state). If box below is checked, either 6.1.1.1., 6.1.1.2., or 6.1.1.3. must also be checked. (Section 2103(a)(1))
6.1.1. Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.420)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan, as described in and offered under Section 8903(1) of Title 5, United States Code. (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(b))
6.1.1.1. FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(a)) (If checked, attach copy of the plan.)
Guidance: Checkbox below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is State employee coverage, meaning a coverage plan that is offered and generally available to State employees in the state. (Section 2103(b)(2))
6.1.1.2. State employee coverage; (Section 2103(b)(2)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is offered by a health maintenance organization (as defined in Section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Services Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives of such coverage plans offered by an HMO in the state. (Section 2103(b)(3) (42 CFR 457.420(c)))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 49 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-53)Page 53#
6.1.1.3. HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(b)(3)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
The benefit package offered by the health maintenance organization with the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives was selected after several well attended public meetings where the benefits of the three benchmark plans were compared with the assistance of the insurers/administrators for the three plans. The benefit plan was altered slightly to make it more appropriate for children’s needs.
In addition to the ALL Kids basic benefits package, additional benefits may be available for enrollees who have special needs. These additional benefits are known as ALL Kids PLUS benefits and are only available as prescribed by ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. These decisions regarding what benefits are provided, the requirements for their receipt, and the provision of the benefits is under the auspices of the PLUS authorizing state agencies. These state agencies are those with which CHIP has a contract for the provision of ALL Kids PLUS services, those agencies that ordinarily serve children with special health care conditions and needs, and which provide the matching funds for federal CHIP funding
The ALL Kids benefits plan is described in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD), which is available upon request. The benefit package for enrollees in the CHIP Medicaid expansion will be identical to other children enrolled in comprehensive Medicaid categories.
Guidance: States choosing Benchmark-equivalent coverage must check the box below and ensure that the coverage meets the following requirements: the coverage includes benefits for items and services within each of the categories of basic services described in 42 CFR 457.430: • dental services • inpatient and outpatient hospital services, • physicians’ services, • surgical and medical services, • laboratory and x-ray services, • well-baby and well-child care, including age-appropriate immunizations, and • emergency services; the coverage has an aggregate actuarial value that is at least actuarially equivalent to one of the benchmark benefit packages (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, or coverage offered through an HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial enrollment in the state); and the coverage has an actuarial value that is equal to at least 75 percent of the actuarial value of the additional categories in such package, if offered, as
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 50 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-54)Page 54#
described in 42 CFR 457.430: • coverage of prescription drugs, • mental health services, • vision services and • hearing services.
If 6.1.2. is checked, a signed actuarial memorandum must be attached. The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 42 CFR 457.431. The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State results.
The actuarial report must be prepared by an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. This report must be prepared in accordance with the principles and standards of the American Academy of Actuaries. In preparing the report, the actuary must use generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, use a standardized set of utilization and price factors, use a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of children who are expected to be covered under the State child health plan, apply the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services), without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used, and take into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by taking into account the increase in actuarial value of benefits coverage offered under the State child health plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing under such coverage. (Section 2103(a)(2))
6.1.2. Benchmark-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(a)(2) and 42 CFR 457.430) Specify the coverage, including the amount, scope and duration of each service, as well as any exclusions or limitations. Attach a signed actuarial report that meets the requirements specified in 42 CFR 457.431.
Guidance: A State approved under the provision below, may modify its program from time to time so long as it continues to provide coverage at least equal to the lower of the actuarial value of the coverage under the program as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark programs. If “existing comprehensive state- based coverage” is modified, an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans must be attached. Also, the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” must be described in the space provided for all states. (Section 2103(a)(3))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 51 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-55)Page 55#
6.1.3. Existing Comprehensive State-Based Coverage; (Section 2103(a)(3) and 42 CFR 457.440) This option is only applicable to New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania. Attach a description of the benefits package, administration, and date of enactment. If existing comprehensive State-based coverage is modified, provide an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997 or one of the benchmark plans. Describe the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for existing comprehensive state-based coverage.
Guidance: Secretary-approved coverage refers to any other health benefits coverage deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Secretary upon application by a state. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.250)
6.1.4. Secretary-approved Coverage. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.450) Guidance: Section 1905(r) of the Act defines EPSDT to require coverage of (1) any medically necessary screening, and diagnostic services, including vision, hearing, and dental screening and diagnostic services, consistent with a periodicity schedule based on current and reasonable medical practice standards or the health needs of an individual child to determine if a suspected condition or illness exists; and (2) all services listed in section 1905(a) of the Act that are necessary to correct or ameliorate any defects and mental and physical illnesses or conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. Section 1902(a)(43) of the Act requires that the State (1) provide and arrange for all necessary services, including supportive services, such as transportation, needed to receive medical care included within the scope of the EPSDT benefit and (2) inform eligible beneficiaries about the services available under the EPSDT benefit.
If the coverage provided does not meet all of the statutory requirements for EPSDT contained in sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, do not check this box.
6.1.4.1. Coverage of all benefits that are provided to children that is the same as the benefits provided under the Medicaid State plan including Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT).
6.1.4.2. Comprehensive coverage for children under a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 52 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-56)Page 56#
6.1.4.3. Coverage that the State has extended to the entire Medicaid population.
Guidance: Check below if the coverage offered includes benchmark coverage, as specified in §457.420, plus additional coverage. Under this option, the State must clearly demonstrate that the coverage it provides includes the same coverage as the benchmark package, and also describes the services that are being added to the benchmark package.
6.1.4.4. Coverage that includes benchmark coverage plus additional coverage. In the second amendment to the Alabama CHIP State Plan, ALL Kids PLUS was established which provided additional benefits for children with special health care conditions/needs. Attachment A contains a detailed description of the ALL Kids PLUS component of CHIP.
6.1.4.5. Coverage that is the same as defined by existing comprehensive state- based coverage applicable only in New York, Pennsylvania, or Florida (under 42 CFR 457.440)
Guidance: Check below if the State is purchasing coverage through a group health plan, and intends to demonstrate that the group health plan is substantially equivalent to or greater than coverage under one of the benchmark plans specified in 457.420, through the use of a benefit-by- benefit comparison of the coverage. Provide a sample of the comparison format that will be used. Under this option, if coverage for any benefit does not meet or exceed the coverage for that benefit under the benchmark, the State must provide an actuarial analysis as described in457.431 to determine actuarial equivalence.
6.1.4.6. Coverage under a group health plan that is substantially equivalent to or greater than benchmark coverage through a benefit by benefit comparison (Provide a sample of how the comparison will be done).
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7. Other. (Describe) Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. Coverage begins upon enrollment and will continue
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 53 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-57)Page 57#
until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. The definition of comprehensive coverage includes coverage for obstetrical benefits. If a pregnant woman has other coverage but the other coverage does not include obstetrical benefits, then the other coverage would be considered non-comprehensive, regardless of any other benefits it insures. In this circumstance, the pregnant woman would meet the criterion for not having comprehensive coverage.
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women, but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR 457.490) A description of the scope, amount and duration of services covered under ALL Kids and ALL Kids PLUS, as well as any exclusions and limitations can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. Health insurance benefits provided to conception to birth enrollees will be identical to the health insurance benefits provided to any pregnant ALL Kids enrollee. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. In geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available, coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 54 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-58)Page 58#
bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1.
6.2.1. Inpatient services (Section 2110(a)(1))
6.2.2. Outpatient services (Section 2110(a)(2))
6.2.3. Physician services (Section 2110(a)(3))
6.2.4. Surgical services (Section 2110(a)(4))
6.2.5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. (Section 2110(a)(5))
6.2.6. Prescription drugs (Section 2110(a)(6))
6.2.7. Over-the-counter medications (Section 2110(a)(7))
6.2.8. Laboratory and radiological services (Section 2110(a)(8))
6.2.9. Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family services and supplies (Section 2110(a)(9))
6.2.10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.18., but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structural services (Section 2110(a)(10))
6.2.11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.19, but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including community-based services (Section 2110(a)(11)
6.2.12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices) (Section 2110(a)(12))
6.2.13. Disposable medical supplies (Section 2110(a)(13))
Guidance: Home and community based services may include supportive services such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 55 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-59)Page 59#
6.2.14. Home and community-based health care services (Section 2110(a)(14))
Guidance: Nursing services may include nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services in a home, school or other setting.
6.2.15. Nursing care services (Section 2110(a)(15))
6.2.16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest (Section 2110(a)(16)
6.2.17. Dental services (Section 2110(a)(17)) States updating their dental benefits must complete 6.2-DC (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)
6.2.18. Vision screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.19. Hearing screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.20. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(18))
6.2.21. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(19))
6.2.22. Case management services (Section 2110(a)(20))
6.2.23. Care coordination services (Section 2110(a)(21))
6.2.24. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders (Section 2110(a)(22))
6.2.25. Hospice care (Section 2110(a)(23))
Guidance: See guidance for Section 6.1.4.1 for guidance on the statutory requirements for EPSDT under sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act. If the benefit being provided does not meet the EPSDT statutory requirements, do not check the box below.
6.2.26. EPSDT consistent with requirements of sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act
Guidance: Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic or rehabilitative service may be provided, whether in a facility,
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 56 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-60)Page 60#
home, school, or other setting, if recognized by State law and only if the service is: 1) prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as prescribed by State law; 2) performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician; or 3) furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license.
6.2.27. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services. (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.28. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage (Section 2110(a)(25))
6.2.29. Medical transportation (Section 2110(a)(26))
Guidance: Enabling services, such as transportation, translation, and outreach services, may be offered only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals.
6.2.30. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) (Section 2110(a)(27))
6.2.31. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not included under this Section (Section 2110(a)(28)) Transplantation Services Emergency and Urgent Care Services Skilled Nursing Services Vision Services 6.2-DC Dental Coverage(CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) The State will provide dental coverage to children through one of the following. Please update Sections 9.10 and 10.3-DC when electing this option. Dental services provided to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2103(a)(5)):
6.2.1-DC State Specific Dental Benefit Package. The State assures dental services represented by the following categories of common dental terminology (CDT6) codes are included in the dental benefits: 1. Diagnostic (i.e., clinical exams, x-rays) (CDT codes: D0100-D0999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 2. Preventive (i.e., dental prophylaxis, topical fluoride treatments, sealants) (CDT codes: D1000-D1999) (must follow periodicity schedule)
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 57 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-61)Page 61#
3. Restorative (i.e., fillings, crowns) (CDT codes: D2000-D2999) 4. Endodontic (i.e., root canals) (CDT codes: D3000-D3999) 5. Periodontic (treatment of gum disease) (CDT codes: D4000-D4999) 6. Prosthodontic (dentures) (CDT codes: D5000-D5899, D5900-D5999, and D6200-D6999) 7. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (i.e., extractions of teeth and other oral surgical procedures) (CDT codes: D7000-D7999) 8. Orthodontics (i.e., braces) (CDT codes: D8000-D8999) 9. Emergency Dental Services
ALL Kids utilizes the BCBS of Alabama preferred Dental Network. Reimbursement for services delivered to ALL Kids' enrollees is paid based on the preferred dental network fee schedule. All network dentists agree to accept this as payment in full, with the exception of enrollee co-pays (no copayments on preventive or diagnostic services).
When costs are expected to exceed $1500 for a calendar year, ALL Kids utilizes a prior authorization process to ensure medically necessary services are provided. Costs associated with diagnostic and preventive services are excluded from this $1500 threshold. The amount is calculated by totaling the amount paid in dental claims minus the amount paid for preventive and diagnostic dental services.
If an enrollee is in need of dental services beyond $1500 in a calendar year, providers are instructed to submit a predetermination request to BCBS. BCBS reviews all provider requests to determine dental necessity of services and ALL Kids provides final approval to pay for services exceeding $1500. Providers are familiar with this process and dentally necessary services are provided in a timely manner regardless of the time of year. There is no unnecessary carry-over of services that need immediate attention.
If a family would like to appeal the BCBS/ALL Kids decision regarding the application of “medically necessary,” there is an appeals process which is consistent with the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1160 (b) and in compliance with state laws, the Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and all other applicable regulations of the Department of Labor Procedures. 6.2.1.1-DC Periodicity Schedule. The State has adopted the following periodicity schedule: State-developed Medicaid-specific American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Other Nationally recognized periodicity schedule Other (description attached)
6.2.2-DC Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5), 42 CFR 457.410, and 42 CFR 457.420)
6.2.2.1-DC FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(i)) (If checked, attach copy of the dental supplemental plan benefits description and the
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 58 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-62)Page 62#
applicable CDT7 codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.2-DC State employee coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(ii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.3-DC HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(iii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2-DS Supplemental Dental Coverage- The State will provide dental coverage to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services. Children eligible for this option must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2110(b)(5)(C)(ii)). Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: Under Title XXI, pre-existing condition exclusions are not allowed, with the only exception being in relation to another law in existence (HIPAA/ERISA). Indicate that the plan adheres to this requirement by checking the applicable description.
In the event that the State provides benefits through a group health plan or group health coverage, or provides family coverage through a group health plan under a waiver (see Section 6.4.2.), pre-existing condition limits are allowed to the extent permitted by HIPAA/ERISA. If the State is contracting with a group health plan or provides benefits through group health coverage, describe briefly any limitations on pre-existing conditions. (Formerly 8.6.)
6.2- MHPAEA Section 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Social Security Act requires that, to the extent that it provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits, a State child health plan ensures that financial requirements and treatment limitations applicable to mental health and substance use disorder benefits comply with the mental health parity requirements of section 2705(a) of the Public Health Service Act in the same manner that such requirements apply to a group health plan. If the state child health plan provides for delivery of services through a managed care arrangement, this requirement applies to both the state and managed care plans. These requirements are also applicable to any additional benefits provided voluntarily to the child health
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 59 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-63)Page 63#
plan population by managed care entities and will be considered as part of CMS’s contract review process at 42 CFR 457.1201(l).
6.2.1- MHPAEA Before completing a parity analysis, the State must determine whether each covered benefit is a medical/surgical, mental health, or substance use disorder benefit based on a standard that is consistent with state and federal law and generally recognized independent standards of medical practice. (42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)(i))
6.2.1.1- MHPAEA Please choose the standard(s) the state uses to determine whether a covered benefit is a medical/surgical benefit, mental health benefit, or substance use disorder benefit. The most current version of the standard elected must be used. If different standards are used for different benefit types, please specify the benefit type(s) to which each standard is applied. If “Other” is selected, please provide a description of that standard.
International Classification of Disease (ICD)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
State guidelines (Describe: )
Other (Describe: )
6.2.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State provide mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not provide any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the mental health parity requirements do not apply ((42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)). Continue on to Section 6.3.
6.2.2- MHPAEA Section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act)provides that to the extent a State child health plan includes coverage of early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services (EPSDT) defined in section 1905(r) of the Act and provided in accordance with section 1902(a)(43) of the Act, the plan shall be deemed to satisfy the parity requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Act.
6.2.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State child health plan provide coverage of EPSDT? The State must provide for coverage of EPSDT benefits, consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements, as indicated in section 6.2.26 of the State child health plan in order to answer “yes.”
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 60 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-64)Page 64#
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State child health plan does not provide EPSDT consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements at sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, please go to Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA to complete the required parity analysis of the State child health plan.
If the state does provide EPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid requirements, please continue this section to demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Act and the mental health parity regulations of 42 CFR 457.496(b) related to deemed compliance. Please provide supporting documentation, such as contract language, provider manuals, and/or member handbooks describing the state’s provision of EPSDT.
6.2.2.2- MHPAEA EPSDT benefits are provided to the following:
All children covered under the State child health plan.
A subset of children covered under the State child health plan.
Please describe the different populations (if applicable) covered under the State child health plan that are provided EPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements.
Guidance: If only a subset of children are provided EPSDT benefits under the State child health plan, 42 CFR 457.496(b)(3) limits deemed compliance to those children only and Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA must be completed as well as the required parity analysis for the other children.
6.2.2.3- MHPAEA To be deemed compliant with the MHPAEA parity requirements, States must provide EPSDT in accordance with sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act (42 CFR 457.496(b)). The State assures each of the following for children eligible for EPSDT under the separate State child health plan:
All screening services, including screenings for mental health and substance use disorder conditions, are provided at intervals that align with a periodicity schedule that meets reasonable standards of medical or dental practice as well as when medically
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 61 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-65)Page 65#
necessary to determine the existence of suspected illness or conditions. (Section 1905(r))
All diagnostic services described in 1905(a) of the Act are provided as needed to diagnose suspected conditions or illnesses discovered through screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. (Section 1905(r))
All items and services described in section 1905(a) of the Act are provided when needed to correct or ameliorate a defect or any physical or mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the Medicaid State plan. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Treatment limitations applied to services provided under the EPSDT benefit are not limited based on a monetary cap or budgetary constraints and may be exceeded as medically necessary to correct or ameliorate a medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Non-quantitative treatment limitations, such as definitions of medical necessity or criteria for medical necessity, are applied in an individualized manner that does not preclude coverage of any items or services necessary to correct or ameliorate any medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
EPSDT benefits are not excluded on the basis of any condition, disorder, or diagnosis. (Section 1905(r)(5))
The provision of all requested EPSDT screening services, as well as any corrective treatments needed based on those screening services, are provided or arranged for as necessary. (Section 1902(a)(43))
All families with children eligible for the EPSDT benefit under the separate State child health plan are provided information and informed about the full range of services available to them. (Section 1902(a)(43)(A))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 62 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-66)Page 66#
Guidance: For states seeking deemed compliance for their entire State child health plan population, please continue to Section 6.3. If not all of the covered populations are offered EPSDT, the State must conduct a parity analysis of the benefit packages provided to those populations. Please continue to 6.2.3- MHPAEA.
Mental Health Parity Analysis Requirements for States Not Providing EPSDT to All Covered Populations
Guidance: The State must complete a parity analysis for each population under the State child health plan that is not provided the EPSDT benefit consistent with the requirements 42 CFR 457.496(b). If the State provides benefits or limitations that vary within the child or pregnant woman populations, states should perform a parity analysis for each of the benefit packages. For example, if different financial requirements are applied according to a beneficiary’s income, a separate parity analysis is needed for the benefit package provided at each income level.
Please ensure that changes made to benefit limitations under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 6.2.
6.2.3- MHPAEA In order to conduct the parity analysis, the State must place all medical/surgical and mental health and substance use disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan into one of four classifications: Inpatient, outpatient, emergency care, and prescription drugs. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii);42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(B))
6.2.3.1 MHPAEA Please describe below the standard(s) used to place covered benefits into one of the four classifications.
Benefit Classification Standards Used Inpatient Inpatient benefits are applied per the benefit plan to a registered inpatient bed patient in a hospital. Outpatient Outpatient benefits are applied per the benefit plan to a patient who is not a registered inpatient bed patient of a hospital. Pharmacy Pharmacy benefits are applied per the benefit plan and evidence based clinical criteria for use of medication, regardless of behavioral health or medical diagnosis. Emergency Services covered in connection with a medical condition that occur suddenly and without warning with symptoms which are so acute and severe as to require immediate medical attention.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 63 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-67)Page 67#
6.2.3.1.1 MHPAEA The State assures that:
The State has classified all benefits covered under the State plan into one of the four classifications.
The same reasonable standards are used for determining the classification for a mental health or substance use disorder benefit as are used for determining the classification of medical/surgical benefits.
6.2.3.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State use sub-classifications to distinguish between office visits and other outpatient services?
Yes
No
6.2.3.1.2.1- MHPAEA If the State uses sub-classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits and other outpatient services, the State assures the following:
The sub-classifications are only used to distinguish office visits from other outpatient items and services, and are not used to distinguish between similar services on other bases (ex: generalist vs. specialist visits).
Guidance: For purposes of this section, any reference to “classification(s)” includes sub-classification(s) in states using sub- classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits from other outpatient services.
6.2.3.2 MHPAEA The State assures that:
Mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are provided in all classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are provided under the State child health plan.
Guidance: States are not required to cover mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(f)(2)). However if a state does provide any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, those mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be provided in all the same classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are covered under the State child health plan (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii).
Annual and Aggregate Lifetime Dollar Limits
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 64 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-68)Page 68#
6.2.4- MHPAEA A State that provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits must comply with parity requirements related to annual and aggregate lifetime dollar limits for benefits covered under the State child health plan. (42 CFR 457.496(c))
6.2.4.1- MHPAEA Please indicate whether the State applies an aggregate lifetime dollar limit and/or an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance abuse disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan.
Aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied
Aggregate annual dollar limit is applied
No dollar limit is applied
Guidance: A monetary coverage limit that applies to all CHIP services provided under the State child health plan is not subject to parity requirements.
If there are no aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to section 6.2.5- MHPAEA.
6.2.4.2- MHPAEA Are there any medical/surgical benefits covered under the State child health plan that have either an aggregate lifetime dollar limit or an annual dollar limit? If yes, please specify what type of limits apply.
Yes (Type(s) of limit:) No
Guidance: If no aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied to medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If no aggregate annual dollar limit is applied to medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.(42 CFR 457.496(c)(1))
6.2.4.3 – MHPAEA. States applying an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits must determine whether the portion of the medical/surgical benefits to which the limit applies is less than one- third, at least one-third but less than two-thirds, or at least two-thirds of all medical/surgical benefits covered under the State plan (42 CFR 457.496(c)).The portion of medical/surgical benefits subject to the limit is based on the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical/surgical benefits under the State plan for the State plan year or portion of the plan
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 65 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-69)Page 69#
year after a change in benefits that affects the applicability of the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits. (42 CFR 457.496(c)(3))
The State assures that it has developed a reasonable methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit, as applicable.
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit and the results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.1- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to a lifetime dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
6.2.4.3.2- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to an annual dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
Guidance: If an aggregate lifetime limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If an annual dollar limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical surgical benefits, the State may not impose an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(c)(1)).Skip to section 6.2.5-MHPAEA.
If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least one-third of all medical/surgical benefits, please continue below to provide
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 66 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-70)Page 70#
the assurances related to the determination of the portion of total costs for medical/surgical benefits that are subject to either an annual or lifetime limit.
6.2.4.3.2.1- MHPAEA If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least1/3 and less than 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits, the State assures the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii)):
The State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on mental health or substance use disorder benefits that is no more restrictive than an average limit calculated for medical/surgical benefits.
Guidance: The state’s methodology for calculating the average limit for medical/surgical benefits must be consistent with42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B) and 42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii). Please include the state’s methodology and results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.2.2- MHPAEA If at least 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits are subject to an annual or lifetime limit, the State assures either of the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(i)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(ii)):
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit is applied to both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits in a manner that does not distinguish between medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits; or
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit placed on mental health and substance use disorder benefits is no more restrictive than the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits.
Quantitative Treatment Limitations
6.2.5- MHPAEA Does the State apply quantitative treatment limitations (QTLs) on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification of benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies one or more QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 67 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-71)Page 71#
Yes (Specify: )
No
Guidance: If the state does not apply any type of QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification, the state meets parity requirements for QTLs and should continue to Section 6.2.6 - MHPAEA. If the state does apply QTLs to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue.
6.2.5.1- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of QTL on any medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply QTLs on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose quantitative treatment limitations on mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to Section 6.2.6- MHPAEA related to non-quantitative treatment limitations.
6.2.5.2- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of QTL on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the classification which are subject to the limitation. More specifically, the State must determine the ratio of (a) the dollar amount of all payments expected to be paid under the State plan for medical and surgical benefits within a classification which are subject to the type of quantitative treatment limitation for the plan year (or portion of the plan year after a mid-year change affecting the applicability of a type of quantitative treatment limitation to any medical/surgical benefits in the class) to (b) the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical and surgical benefits within the classification for the plan year. For purposes of this paragraph, all payments expected to be paid under the State plan includes payments expected to be made directly by the State and payments which are expected to be made by MCEs contracting with the State. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C))
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above for each classification within which the State applies QTLs to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.5.3- MHPAEA For each type of QTL applied to any mental health or substance use
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 68 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-72)Page 72#
disorder benefits within a given classification does the State apply the same type of QTL to “substantially all”(defined as at least two-thirds) of the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of QTL to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits, the State may not impose that type of QTL on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
6.2.5.3.1- MHPAEA For each type of QTL applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the predominant level of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. The “predominant level” of a type of QTL in a classification is the level (or least restrictive of a combination of levels) that applies to more than one-half of the medical/surgical benefits in that classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B).The portion of medical/surgical benefits in a classification to which a given level of a QTL type is applied is based on the dollar amount of payments expected to be paid for medical/surgical benefits subject to that level as compared to all medical/surgical benefits in the classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C). For each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of quantitative treatment limitation also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
The level of each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of QTL that exceeds the one- half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of QTL such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 69 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-73)Page 73#
benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations
6.2.6- MHPAEA The State may utilize non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for mental health or substance use disorder benefits, but the State must ensure that those NQTLs comply with all the mental health parity requirements. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(4));(42 CFR 457.496(d)(5)) 6.2.6.1 – MHPAEA If the State imposes any NQTLs, complete this subsection. If the State does not impose NQTLs, please go to Section 6.2.7-MHPAEA.
The State assures that the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of any NQTL to mental health or substance use disorder benefits are no more stringent than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of NQTLs to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification.
Guidance: Examples of NQTLs include medical management standards to limit or exclude benefits based on medical necessity, restrictions based on geographic location, provider specialty, or other criteria to limit the scope or duration of benefits and provider network design (ex: preferred providers vs. participating providers). Additional examples of possible NQTLs are provided in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(4)(ii). States will need to provide a summary of its NQTL analysis, as well as supporting documentation as requested.
6.2.6.2 – MHPAEA The State or MCE contracting with the State must comply with parity if they provide coverage of medical or surgical benefits furnished by out-of-network providers.
6.2.6.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State or MCE contracting with the State provide coverage of medical or surgical benefits provided by out-of-network providers?
Yes
No
Guidance: The State can answer no if the State or MCE only provides out of network services in specific circumstances, such as emergency care, or when the network is unable to provide a necessary service covered under the contract.
6.2.6.2.2- MHPAEA If yes, the State must provide access to out-of-network providers for mental health or substance use disorder benefits. Please assure the
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 70 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-74)Page 74#
following:
The State attests that when determining access to out-of-network providers within a benefit classification, the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors used to determine access to those providers for mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are comparable to and applied no more stringently than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used to determine access for out- of-network providers for medical/surgical benefits.
Availability of Plan Information 6.2.7- MHPAEA The State must provide beneficiaries, potential enrollees, and providers with information related to medical necessity criteria and denials of payment or reimbursement for mental health or substance use disorder services (42 CFR 457.496(e)) in addition to existing notice requirements at 42 CFR 457.1180.
6.2.7.1- MHPAEA Medical necessity criteria determinations must be made available to any current or potential enrollee or contracting provider, upon request. The state attests that the following entities provide this information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Other Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama; New Directions (Behavioral Health Benefits Manager for BCBS); Prime Therapeutics (Pharmacy Benefits Manager for BCBS)
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.2.7.2- MHPAEA Reason for any denial for reimbursement or payment for mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be made available to the enrollee by the health plan or the State. The state attests that the following entities provide denial information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 71 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-75)Page 75#
Other Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama; New Directions (Behavioral Health Benefits Manager for BCBS); Prime Therapeutics (Pharmacy Benefits Manager for BCBS)
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.3. The State assures that, with respect to pre-existing medical conditions, one of the following two statements applies to its plan: (42CFR 457.480)
6.3.1. The State shall not permit the imposition of any pre-existing medical condition exclusion for covered services (Section 2102(b)(1)(B)(ii)); OR 6.3.2. The State contracts with a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, or contracts with a group health plan to provide family coverage under a waiver (see Section 6.6.2. (formerly 6.4.2) of the template). Pre- existing medical conditions are permitted to the extent allowed by HIPAA/ERISA.(Formerly 8.6.) (Section 2103(f))Describe:
Guidance: States may request two additional purchase options in Title XXI: cost effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system and for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4. Additional Purchase Options-If the State wishes to provide services under the plan through cost effective alternatives or the purchase of family coverage, it must request the appropriate option. To be approved, the State must address the following: (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4.1. Cost Effective Coverage- Payment may be made to a State in excess of the 10 percent limitation on use of funds for payments for: 1) other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; 2) expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); 3) expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and 4) other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan, if it demonstrates the following (42CFR 457.1005(a)):
6.4.1.1. Coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures must meet the coverage requirements above; Describe the coverage provided by the alternative delivery system. The State may cross reference Section 6.2.1 - 6.2.28. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(i)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 72 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-76)Page 76#
6.4.1.2. The cost of such coverage must not be greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided for the coverage described above; Describe the cost of such coverage on an average per child basis. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(ii)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
Guidance: Check below if the State is requesting to provide cost-effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system. This allows the State to waive the 10 percent limitation on expenditures not used for Medicaid or health insurance assistance if coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures meets the requirements of Section 2103; the cost of such coverage is not greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided under Section 2103; and such coverage is provided through the use of a community-based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Services Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923.
If the cost-effective alternative waiver is requested, the State must demonstrate that payments in excess of the 10 percent limitation will be used for other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan. (42CFR, 457.1005(a))
6.4.1.3. The coverage must be provided through the use of a community based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Social Security Act. Describe the community-based delivery system. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(iii)) (42CFR 457.1005(a))
Guidance: Check 6.4.2.if the State is requesting to purchase family coverage. Any State requesting to purchase such coverage will need to include information that establishes to the Secretary’s satisfaction that: 1) when compared to the amount of money that would have been paid to cover only the children involved with a comparable package, the purchase of family coverage is cost
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 73 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-77)Page 77#
effective; and 2) the purchase of family coverage is not a substitution for coverage already being provided to the child. (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2. Purchase of Family Coverage- Describe the plan to purchase family coverage. Payment may be made to a State for the purpose of family coverage under a group health plan or health insurance coverage that includes coverage of targeted low-income children, if it demonstrates the following: (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2.1. Purchase of family coverage is cost-effective. The State’s cost of purchasing family coverage, including administrative expenditures, that includes coverage for the targeted low-income children involved or the family involved (as applicable) under premium assistance programs must not be greater than the cost of obtaining coverage under the State plan for all eligible targeted low-income children or families involved; and (2) The State may base its demonstration of cost effectiveness on an assessment of the cost of coverage, including administrative costs, for children or families under premium assistance programs to the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children or families, done on a case- by-case basis, or on the cost of premium assisted coverage in the aggregate.
6.4.2.2. The State assures that the family coverage would not otherwise substitute for health insurance coverage that would be provided to such children but for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.1010(b))
6.4.2.3. The State assures that the coverage for the family otherwise meets title XXI requirements. (42CFR 457.1010(c))
6.4.3-PA: Additional State Options for Providing Premium Assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002issued February, 2, 2010)A State may elect to offer a premium assistance subsidy for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), to all targeted low-income children who are eligible for child health assistance under the plan and have access to such coverage. No subsidy shall be provided to a targeted low-income child (or the child’s parent) unless the child voluntarily elects to receive such a subsidy. (Section 2105(c)(10)(A)).Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option. Does the State provide this option to targeted low-income children? Yes No
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 74 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-78)Page 78#
6.4.3.1-PA Qualified Employer-Sponsored Coverage and Premium Assistance Subsidy
6.4.3.1.1-PAProvide an assurance that the qualified employer-sponsored insurance meets the definition of qualified employer-sponsored coverage as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), and that the premium assistance subsidy meets the definition of premium assistance subsidy as defined in 2105(c)(10)(C).
6.4.3.1.2-PADescribe whether the State is providing the premium assistance subsidy as reimbursement to an employee or for out-of-pocket expenditures or directly to the employee’s employer.
6.4.3.2-PA: Supplemental Coverage for Benefits and Cost Sharing Protections Provided under the Child Health Plan.
6.4.3.2.1-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(E)(i), provide an assurance that the State is providing for each targeted low-income child enrolled in such coverage, supplemental coverage consisting of all items or services that are not covered or are only partially covered, under the qualified employer-sponsored coverage consistent with 2103(a) and cost sharing protections consistent with Section 2103(e).
6.4.3.2.2-PADescribe whether these benefits are being provided through the employer or by the State providing wraparound benefits.
6.4.3.2.3-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage, the State ensures that such group health plans or health insurance coverage offered through an employer will be certified by an actuary as coverage that is equivalent to a benchmark benefit package described in Section 2103(b) or benchmark equivalent coverage that meets the requirements of Section 2103(a)(2).
6.4.3.3-PA: Application of Waiting Period Imposed Under State Plan: States are required to apply the same waiting period to premium assistance as is applied to direct coverage for children under their CHIP State plan, as specified in Section 2105(c)(10)(F).
6.4.3.3.1-PAProvide an assurance that the waiting period for children in premium assistance is the same as for those children in direct coverage (if State has a waiting period in place for children in direct CHIP coverage).
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 75 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-79)Page 79#
6.4.3.4-PA: Opt-Out and Outreach, Education, and Enrollment Assistance
6.4.3.4.1-PADescribe the State’s process for ensuring parents are permitted to disenroll their child from qualified employer-sponsored coverage and to enroll in CHIP effective on the first day of any month for which the child is eligible for such assistance and in a manner that ensures continuity of coverage for the child (Section 2105(c)(10)(G)).
6.4.3.4.2-PADescribe the State’s outreach, education, and enrollment efforts related to premium assistance programs, as required under Section 2102(c)(3). How does the State inform families of the availability of premium assistance, and assist them in obtaining such subsidies? What are the specific significant resources the State intends to apply to educate employers about the availability of premium assistance subsidies under the State child health plan? (Section 2102(c))
6.4.3.5-PA Purchasing Pool-A State may establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool and may provide a premium assistance subsidy for enrollment in coverage made available through this pool (Section 2105(c)(10)(I)). Does the State provide this option? Yes No
6.6.3.5.1-PADescribe the plan to establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool.
6.6.3.5.2-PAProvide an assurance that employers who are eligible to participate: 1) have less than 250 employees; 2) have at least one employee who is a pregnant woman eligible for CHIP or a member of a family that has at least one child eligible under the State’s CHIP plan.
6.6.3.5.3-PAProvide an assurance that the State will not claim for any administrative expenditures attributable to the establishment or operation of such a pool except to the extent such payment would otherwise be permitted under this title.
6.4.3.6-PA Notice of Availability of Premium Assistance-Describe the procedures that assure that if a State provides premium assistance subsidies under this Section, it must: 1) provide as part of the application and enrollment process, information describing the availability of premium assistance and how to elect to obtain a subsidy; and 2) establish other procedures to ensure that parents are fully
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 76 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-80)Page 80#
informed of the choices for child health assistance or through the receipt of premium assistance subsidies (Section 2105(c)(10)(K)).
6.4.3.6.1-PAProvide an assurance that the State includes information about premium assistance on the CHIP application or enrollment form.
Section 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care
Guidance: Methods for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Methods to assure quality include the application of performance measures, quality standards consumer information strategies, and other quality improvement strategies.
Performance measurement strategies could include using measurements for external reporting either to the State or to consumers and for internal quality improvement purposes. They could be based on existing measurement sets that have undergone rigorous evaluation for their appropriateness (e.g., HEDIS). They may include the use of standardized member satisfaction surveys (e.g., CAHPS) to assess members’ experience of care along key dimensions such as access, satisfaction, and system performance.
Quality standards are often used to assure the presence of structural and process measures that promote quality and could include such approaches as: the use of external and periodic review of health plans by groups such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance; the establishment of standards related to consumer protection and quality such as those developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; and the formation of an advisory group to the State or plan to facilitate consumer and community participation in the plan.
Information strategies could include: the disclosure of information to beneficiaries about their benefits under the plan and their rights and responsibilities; the provision of comparative information to consumers on the performance of available health plans and providers; and consumer education strategies on how to access and effectively use health insurance coverage to maximize quality of care.
Quality improvement strategies should include the establishment of quantified quality improvement goals for the plan or the State and provider education. Other strategies include specific purchasing specifications, ongoing contract monitoring mechanisms, focus groups, etc.
Where States use managed care organizations to deliver CHIP care, recent legal changes require the State to use managed care quality standards and quality strategies similar to those used in Medicaid managed care.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 77 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-81)Page 81#
Tools for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Tools and types of information available include, HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) measures, CAHPS (Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study) measures, vital statistics data, and State health registries (e.g., immunization registries).
Quality monitoring may be done by external quality review organizations, or, if the State wishes, internally by a State board or agency independent of the State CHIP Agency. Establishing grievance measures is also an important aspect of monitoring.
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 8.
Guidance: The State must specify the qualifications of entities that will provide coverage and the conditions of participation. States should also define the quality standard they are using, for example, NCQA Standards or other professional standards. Any description of the information strategies used should be linked to Section 9. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.495)
7.1. Describe the methods (including external and internal monitoring) used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care, particularly with respect to well-baby care, well- child care, and immunizations provided under the plan. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.495(a)) Will the State utilize any of the following tools to assure quality? (Check all that apply and describe the activities for any categories utilized.) The State utilizes the expertise within the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Public Health in the implementation of the assessment of the ALL Kids program. Quality and appropriateness of care is assessed through the use of surveys such as a new enrollee survey, a continuous enrollee survey, and a disenrollee survey. Both process measures as well as outcome measures are considered when assessing the quality and appropriateness of care. CHIP also reviews claims data for quality assessment. Among the items used in tracking are the use of several claims data indicators such as whether or not children truly have a "medical home"; how well they are adhering to the recommended scheduled well-child exams; whether or not they are appropriately immunized; whether or not non-trauma based emergency room use is going down; how referrals are being made and if specialty care and related services are being received; and, patterns of prescription drug use. The State is also considering using other databases that can provide general indicators of child health and well-being such as the State’s immunization registry, adolescent pregnancy rates and health care utilization patterns identifiable off birth certificates, and the results of child death review efforts. Alabama monitors customer/patient/provider satisfaction through the use of surveys and informal communications with families, advocacy groups, and providers.
In addition to these monitoring strategies, the State assures access to care through monitoring of the provider network and benefit package design. Program staff are actively involved in
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 78 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-82)Page 82#
identifying new providers for the ALL Kids network and have been particularly involved in the addition of pediatric dentists, primary care nurse practitioners, community mental health centers and emergency transportation providers. Geographic distribution of providers is monitored and is crucial when decisions regarding vendor choice are made.
The ALL Kids benefits package requires preauthorization only for hospitalization services. Therefore, access to all primary care providers and specialists is open to all enrollees without referral. Claims data are monitored by program staff to ensure quality and appropriateness of care. In addition, the State employs a masters level social worker to assist families who are experiencing difficulties accessing necessary services due to benefit structure or provider geographic availability. This staff member works closely with case managers at the vendor to identify areas in need of attention and provides the State with recommendations for benefit plan adjustment and/or provider network issues.
The ALL Kids PLUS program coordinates the evaluation of quality and appropriateness of care with the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies and CSHCC/N advocacy groups through collaboration with stakeholders. It is also anticipated that an evaluation of ALL Kids PLUS may become part of the UAB evaluation in the future.
7.1.1. Quality standards . Performance measurement
7.1.2 (a) CHIPRA Quality Core Set
7.1.2 (b) Other The State ensures quality through contracted performance measures. These measures have been adapted in conjunction with the standards recommended by the AAP.
7.1.3. Information strategies Vendors are required to provide key health indicators information.
7.1.4. Quality improvement strategies
The performance guarantees and provider recoupment policy were included in the RFP and are included in the contract with the health plan.
Guidance: Provide a brief description of methods to be used to assure access to covered services, including a description of how the State will assure the quality and appropriateness of the care provided. The State should consider whether there are sufficient providers of care for the newly enrolled populations and whether there is reasonable access to care. (Section 2102(a)(7)(B))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 79 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-83)Page 83#
7.2. Describe the methods used, including monitoring, to assure: (Section 2102(a)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.495)
7.2.1. Access to well-baby care, well-child care, well-adolescent care and childhood and adolescent immunizations. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(a)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Periodic review of the number and types of providers by county Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and postal service mail Feedback from providers
Further, the state uses claims data to monitor well-baby care as is described in 7.1.
7.2.2. Access to covered services, including emergency services as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. (Section 2102(a)(7)) 42CFR 457.495(b)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and postal service mail Feedback from providers Feedback from the CHIP Social Work Consultant
Further, the state uses claims data to monitor emergency room use as is described in 7.1.
7.2.3. Appropriate and timely procedures to monitor and treat enrollees with chronic, complex, or serious medical conditions, including access to an adequate number of visits to specialists experienced in treating the specific medical condition and access to out-of-network providers when the network is not adequate for the enrollee’s medical condition. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(c)) Access is monitored through a number of methods including the following: Periodic review of the number and types of providers by county Quarterly review of claims data Quarterly review of new enrollee, continuous enrollee, and disenrollee survey data Feedback from families via telephone, e-mail, and post service mail Feedback from providers Feedback from CSHCC/N advocates and ALL Kids PLUS providers
The ALL Kids PLUS network includes State agencies that serve children with special health care needs/conditions and that contract with CHIP to provide state matching funds for ALL
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 80 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-84)Page 84#
Kids enrollees who use PLUS services. Currently, Children Rehabilitation Services is the only active PLUS program. The PLUS agency provides ALL Kids children with an individual case manager who will monitor access to specialists and treatment.
In general, the Medicaid standards will be used to establish qualifications for ALL Kids PLUS case management staff. All case management staff will meet specific qualifications, including education, training and appropriate credentialing which will be established by the participating agencies.
In most circumstances, the agencies’ delivery systems are discrete and clear which program provides services for specific conditions. However, where there is potential for overlap in responsibilities, the determination of which agency will provide case management will be done based on the needs of the child with input from the family and by determining what is in the best interest of the child. The agencies using the case management process, will coordinate with each other, the child, the family, and the care providers in determining if a change in case management is needed.
7.2.4. Decisions related to the prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with State law or, in accordance with the medical needs of the patient, within 14 days after the receipt of a request for services. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(d)) Exigent medical circumstances may require more rapid response according to the medical needs of the patient. The health plan vendor has policies in place to assure that prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with state law or regulations promulgated by the Department of Labor. CHIP staff receive feedback from providers and enrollee families if time periods are exceeded. All prior authorization of health services is in accordance with state laws. Children enrolled in a Medicaid expansion are subject to the same prior authorization policies to which children enrolled in Medicaid’s other full service children’s programs are subject.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 81 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-85)Page 85#
Section 8. Cost-Sharing and Payment
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 9.
8.1. Is cost-sharing imposed on any of the children covered under the plan? (42CFR 457.505)Indicate if this also applies for pregnant women. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09- 006, issued May 11, 2009)
8.1.1. Yes 8.1.2. No, skip to question 8.8.
8.1.1-PW Yes 8.1.2-PW No, skip to question 8.8.
Guidance: It is important to note that for families below 150 percent of poverty, the same limitations on cost sharing that are under the Medicaid program apply. (These cost- sharing limitations have been set forth in Section 1916 of the Social Security Act, as implemented by regulations at 42 CFR 447.50- 447.59). For families with incomes of 150 percent of poverty and above, cost sharing for all children in the family cannot exceed 5 percent of a family's income per year. Include a statement that no cost sharing will be charged for pregnancy-related services.(CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2. Describe the amount of cost-sharing, any sliding scale based on income, the group or groups of enrollees that may be subject to the charge by age and income (if applicable) and the service for which the charge is imposed or time period for the charge, as appropriate.(Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c)) There will not be any cost sharing of any type for families who are Native Americans or Alaskan Natives. There will also not be any cost sharing of any type for families whose children are enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion. For all other families cost sharing will be as follows in 8.2.1. and 8.2.3.:
8.2.1. Premiums:
There are three (3) categories of enrollees: No Fee (Native Americans and Alaskan Natives). Low-Fee (children with family incomes from the base (above 141% FPL) up to and including 156% FPL), and Fee (children with family incomes greater than 156% FPL up to and including 312% FPL). There is no cost sharing for children in the No Fee group. There is a $52 premium per child, per year for children in the Low-Fee group. There is a $104 premium per child, per year for children in the Fee group. Premiums can be paid in one payment or in
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 82 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-86)Page 86#
periodic payments (weekly, monthly, quarterly…) throughout the year. A family’s total premium payments are limited to three times the individual premium rate (i.e. $156 or $312 depending upon the income level of the family). Enrollment data systems do not allow for a family to be billed in excess of these amounts. Outstanding premium balances may be waived at the State’s discretion for applicants/enrollees living or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas.
Premiums will not be charged to those enrolled in the Conception to Birth expansion.
8.2.2. Deductibles: None 8.2.3. Coinsurance or copayments:
There are no copayments for preventive services. The only permitted copayments are:
Fee Group Low Fee Group Copayments Copayments (for (for Children Children with with Incomes Incomes up to and >156% FPL up including 156% to and including Service FPL) 312%)
Dental $5/visit $20.00/visit
Doctor’s office visits $3/visit $13.00/visit
Behavioral Health office visits $3/visit $13.00/visit
ER Services $6/facility charge $60.00/facility charge
Inpatient Services (Hospital) $200/confinement $200/confinement
Non-Emergency ER Services $6/visit $60.00/visit
Allergy Testing $6/lab visit $17.00/lab visit
Allergy Treatment $3/visit $12/visit
Ambulance $6/occurrence $100/occurrence
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 83 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-87)Page 87#
Mental and Nervous (Inpatient) $200/confinement $200/confinement
Outpatient Surgical Facility $6/visit $100/visit
Substance Abuse (Inpatient) $200/confinement $200/confinement
X-ray (Outpatient Facility) $6/total x-rays in 1 visit $65/total x-rays in 1 visit
Therapies (Physical, Occupational, Speech) $3/visit $13/visit
Routine Eye Exam $3/visit $13/visit
$3/frames Eye Glasses and/or lenses $13/ frames and/or lenses
Chiropractic visits $2/visit $5/visit
In addition, a Generic Plus pharmacy benefit became effective October 1, 2012 for children in both the low fee and fee groups. Prescription drugs are divided into two groups: generic and preferred brands. The designation “preferred” is assigned by the third party administrator. The copayment schedule is as follows: Fee Group Copayments (for Children Low Fee Group with Incomes Copayments (for Children >156% FPL up with Incomes up to and to and including including 156% FPL) 312%) Generic $1.00 $5.00 Preferred Brands $5.00 $25.00
For those enrolled in the Conception to Birth expansion, copayments will be assessed for the services and pharmacy as indicated in the above tables. Copayment amounts will be based on family income as noted below:
0% FPL up to and including 146% FPL - No copayment requirements From >147% FPL up to and including 156% FPL - assigned to the Low Fee copayment structure From >156% FPL up to and including 312% FPL – assigned to the Fee Group copayment structure 8.2.4. Other:
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 84 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-88)Page 88#
8.2-DS Supplemental Dental(CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)For children enrolled in the dental-only supplemental coverage, describe the amount of cost-sharing, specifying any sliding scale based on income. Also describe how the State will track that the cost sharing does not exceed 5 percent of gross family income. The 5 percent of income calculation shall include all cost-sharing for health insurance and dental insurance. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b), and (c), 457.515(a) and (c), and 457.560(a)) Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2- DS, 6.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
8.2.1-DS Premiums:
8.2.2-DS Deductibles:
8.2.3-DS Coinsurance or copayments:
8.2.4-DS Other:
8.3. Describe how the public will be notified, including the public schedule, of this cost sharing (including the cumulative maximum) and changes to these amounts and any differences based on income. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(b)) All enrollees are provided with coverage and cost-sharing information at initial enrollment through mailed documents. Additionally, this information is available online. All enrollees are notified of cost-sharing changes through letters mailed directly to the residence addresses on file with CHIP. In addition all stakeholders, including provider organizations/associations and state agencies, are notified by letter or other appropriate means of communication (i.e. email, fax notifications, and/or meetings) when changes are made to cost-sharing requirements. CHIP staff and customer service representatives are trained to discuss cost-sharing requirements with families, including premiums, copayments, and the annual out of pocket expenses limit.
Guidance: The State should be able to demonstrate upon request its rationale and justification regarding these assurances. This section also addresses limitations on payments for certain expenditures and requirements for maintenance of effort.
8.4. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the cost sharing in its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.4.1. Cost-sharing does not favor children from higher income families over lower income families. (Section 2103(e)(1)(B)) (42CFR 457.530) 8.4.2. No cost-sharing applies to well-baby and well-child care, including age- appropriate immunizations. (Section 2103(e)(2)) (42CFR 457.520) 8.4.3 No additional cost-sharing applies to the costs of emergency medical services delivered outside the network. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.515(f))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 85 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-89)Page 89#
8.4.1- MHPAEA There is no separate accumulation of cumulative financial requirements, as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(a), for mental health and substance abuse disorder benefits compared to medical/surgical benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(iii))
8.4.2- MHPAEA If applicable, any different levels of financial requirements that are applied to different tiers of prescription drugs are determined based on reasonable factors, regardless of whether a drug is generally prescribed for medical/surgical benefits or mental health/substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(A))
8.4.3- MHPAEA Cost sharing applied to benefits provided under the State child health plan will remain capped at five percent of the beneficiary’s income as required by 42 CFR 457.560 (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(D)).
8.4.4- MHPAEA Does the State apply financial requirements to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
Yes (Specify: inpatient, outpatient, prescription drugs, emergency room) Inpatient, outpatient, prescription drugs and emergency room
No
Guidance: For the purposes of parity, financial requirements include deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and out of pocket maximums; premiums are excluded from the definition. If the state does not apply financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state meets parity requirements for financial requirements. If the state does apply financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue below.
Please ensure that changes made to financial requirements under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 8.2.
8.4.5- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 86 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-90)Page 90#
mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
8.4.6- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of financial requirement on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the class which are subject to the limitation.
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above (Section 6.2.5.2-MHPAEA) for each classification or within which the State applies financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results of the parity analysis as an attachment to the State child health plan.
8.4.7- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification, does the State apply the same type of financial requirement to at least two-thirds (“substantially all”) of all the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of financial requirement to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
8.4.8- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State must determine the predominant level (as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)) of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used in determining whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of financial requirement also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of financial requirement applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 87 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-91)Page 91#
The level of each type of financial requirement applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of financial requirement that exceeds the one-half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of financial requirement such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
8.5. Describe how the State will ensure that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of such family’s income for the length of the child’s eligibility period in the State. Include a description of the procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the State for overpayment by an enrollee: (Section 2103(e)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.560(b) and 457.505(e))
Alabama ensures that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed five percent (5%) of a family’s income as is required by Section 2103(3)(B) of Title XXI. In addition, cost sharing, both premiums and copayments are in compliance with CHIP regulations.
There is minimal cost sharing for families, other than Native Americans and Alaskan Natives who have no cost sharing. No family is charged for more than three (3) premiums even if the family has more than three children.
To protect families against excessive medical expenses and comply with the statutory limit of no more than five percent of family income being expended on cost sharing expenses, families will be notified in writing, at initial enrollment and renewal, of the annual out of pocket maximum. Families are informed of this policy through educational literature. Also, CHIP staff and partners are trained to educate families about the limit on out of pocket expenses. Families are encouraged to keep receipts for all copayments and premiums so that once the out of pocket maximum is reached they will have the necessary documentation to stop cost-sharing. If a family reaches this limit and notifies the ALL Kids program, ALL Kids will review the case and if the limit has been reached new insurance cards will be issued stating that the child(ren) are not subject to further co-pays for the coverage period.
8.6. Describe the procedures the State will use to ensure American Indian (as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) and Alaska Native children will be excluded from cost-sharing. (Section 2103(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.535) If a child is identified on an application as an American Indian, the enrollment worker
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 88 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-92)Page 92#
automatically places the child in the no-fee category if the child becomes enrolled. Therefore the insurance vendor sends an insurance card, to the family, which indicates that the child is not subject to any co-pays.
8.7. Provide a description of the consequences for an enrollee or applicant who does not pay a charge. (42CFR 457.570 and 457.505(c)) Superseded by ACA SPA Guidance: Section 8.7.1is based on Section 2101(a) of the Act provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner that is coordinated with other sources of health benefits coverage for children.
8.7.1. Provide an assurance that the following disenrollment protections are being applied:
Guidance: Provide a description below of the State’s premium grace period process and how the State notifies families of their rights and responsibilities with respect to payment of premiums. (Section 2103(e)(3)(C))
8.7.1.1. State has established a process that gives enrollees reasonable notice of and an opportunity to pay past due premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees prior to disenrollment.(42CFR 457.570(a))
ALL Kids has an annual premium for those in cost sharing categories. Upon enrollment, families are notified, by letter, that premiums are due. Enrollees have the entire 12-month coverage period to pay premium balances and receipt of benefits is not contingent upon payment of premiums. Current enrollees are not terminated for non-payment of premium during the 12-month coverage period. At one month, four months, seven months, and 10 months, families are notified of outstanding premium balances. They are notified, every notice for past-due premiums and cost-sharing, that, in most circumstances, premiums must be paid in full for ALL Kids coverage to be renewed. If a renewal application is received within 90 days past the coverage end date (and the premium is paid no later than 90 days past the coverage end date), enrollees may renew with no lapse in coverage.
8.7.1.2. The disenrollment process affords the enrollee an opportunity to show that the enrollee’s family income has declined prior to disenrollment for non-payment of cost-sharing charges. (42CFR 457.570(b))
The amount of family income written on the renewal form is reviewed by enrollment workers at the time of renewal. If it is known to ALL Kids that a family is experiencing financial difficulty, the ALL Kids Social Work Consultant and/or ALL Kids Regional staff may assist
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 89 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-93)Page 93#
the family in locating assistance for premium payment. Non-payment of premiums is forgiven if the family provides proof of bankruptcy status during the enrollment period or if the family has been affected by disaster events (living or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event).
8.7.1.3. In the instance mentioned above, that the State will facilitate enrolling the child in Medicaid or adjust the child’s cost-sharing category as appropriate. (42CFR 457.570(b)) At the time of renewal, if the family’s income has dropped but is still above the Medicaid eligibility level, if the decision is made to forgive the unpaid premium(s), the child is renewed and placed in the appropriate ALL Kids category. If a family’s income has dropped below the ALL Kids eligibility, the child’s application is reviewed for Medicaid eligibility and, if the child meets all eligibility requirements, s/he is enrolled in Medicaid.
8.7.1.4 The State provides the enrollee with an opportunity for an impartial review to address disenrollment from the program. (42CFR 457.570(c))
This type of grievance is handled in the same impartial manner in which other grievances are handled as described in Attachment A.
8.8. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the payment aspects of its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.8.1. No Federal funds will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(4)) (42CFR 457.220) 8.8.2. No cost-sharing (including premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and all other types) will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(5) (42CFR 457.224) (Previously 8.4.5) 8.8.3. No funds under this title will be used for coverage if a private insurer would have been obligated to provide such assistance except for a provision limiting this obligation because the child is eligible under the this title. (Section 2105(c)(6)(A)) (42CFR 457.626(a)(1)) 8.8.4. Income and resource standards and methodologies for determining Medicaid eligibility are not more restrictive than those applied as of June 1, 1997. (Section 2105(d)(1)) (42CFR 457.622(b)(5)) 8.8.5. No funds provided under this title or coverage funded by this title will include coverage of abortion except if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Section 2105)(c)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.475) 8.8.6. No funds provided under this title will be used to pay for any abortion or to assist in the purchase, in whole or in part, for coverage that includes abortion (except as described above). (Section 2105)(c)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.475)
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 90 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-94)Page 94#
Section 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration
Guidance: States should consider aligning its strategic objectives with those discussed in Section II of the CHIP Annual Report.
9.1. Describe strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health coverage among targeted low-income children and other low-income children: (Section 2107(a)(2)) (42CFR 457.710(b))
1. The number of low-income (<200% FPL), uninsured children in AL will be reduced each year.
2. Given available funding, the number of low income (between the Medicaid eligibility upper income levels and 200% FPL), children enrolled in ALL Kids will be maintained at at least 50,000 (current enrollment) at any given time.
3. The number of low-income children (incomes in the Medicaid income eligibility ranges) enrolled in SOBRA Medicaid will be maintained at at least 300,000.
4. Enrollment in ALL Kids will result in more children having a medical home.
5. Enrollment in ALL Kids will result in a higher usage of preventive care.
6. Specialty services beyond the basic ALL Kids coverage package will be available for ALL Kids enrolled children with special health care needs.
Guidance: Goals should be measurable, quantifiable and convey a target the State is working towards.
9.2. Specify one or more performance goals for each strategic objective identified: (Section 2107(a)(3)) (42CFR 457.710(c)) 1. Performance Goals for Objective 1: a. The number of low-income uninsured children in AL will be reduced by 1% each year until the number of low-income uninsured children is no larger than 10% of the children in the state. b. A tracking system will be established by April 2004, which will track applicants referred among ALL Kids, SOBRA Medicaid, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation.
2. Performance Goals for Objective 2
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 91 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-95)Page 95#
a. The percentage of families who do not renew their children’s ALL Kids coverage due to a financial barrier (owing past premiums) will not be more than 3% annually. b. A higher percentage of families with ALL Kids enrolled child(ren), report that financial barriers to accessing care have been reduced since enrollment in ALL Kids in comparison to the time before enrollment in ALL Kids. c. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations: (adolescents, Native Americans, and faith-based organizations) will be developed by October, 2002. d. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations: (adolescents, Native Americans, and faith-based organizations) will be implemented each year beginning with FY 2003. e. Plans which target outreach activities toward Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans will be developed by January 1, 2004. f. Plans which target outreach activities toward Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans will be implemented each year beginning with FY 2005. g. Plans which target outreach activities toward specific populations (other than adolescents, faith-based organizations, Hispanics, birth-to-five care providers, and Native Americans) will be developed and implemented as data or other information indicate. h. Language and culture will not be barriers to enrollment or renewal as evidenced by the availability of telephone assistance in the customers’ preferred languages, brochures and forms in both English and Spanish, and the availability of Spanish speaking, culturally competent customer service staff. i. There will be an incremental reduction from year to year, in the percentage of children canceling ALL Kids coverage due to nonparticipation in the renewal process.
3. Performance Goal for Objective 3: There will be maintenance of effort or an increase, on the part of CHIP, to decrease the number of uninsured low-income (Medicaid eligible) children as evidenced by at least the following: i. Continued use of a joint application form. ii. Continued use of a joint renewal form iii. Continued referral, without any barriers, of applications and renewals between ALL Kids and SOBRA Medicaid iv. Continued outreach efforts by CHIP staff for network building with community groups, professionals (individually and in groups), child care providers, schools, etc.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 92 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-96)Page 96#
v. Continued evaluation and monitoring of the application transfer/referral process between ALL Kids and Medicaid. vi. Continued computer enhancements to improve the communication with other agencies and current and potential ALL Kids enrollees.
4. Performance Goals for Objective 4: a. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have a usual source of care since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. b. A lower percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have used a hospital emergency room since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids.
5. Performance Goals for Objective 5 a. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a well child check-up in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. b. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a dental visit in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids. c. A higher percentage of families report that their ALL Kids enrolled child(ren) have had a vision screening in the past year since enrollment in ALL Kids than before enrollment in ALL Kids.
6. Performance Goal for Objective 6: a. Contracts with state agencies which serve children with special health care needs will be maintained for the purpose of providing specialty services beyond the basic ALL Kids coverage package for these children. b. Exploration of the feasibility of establishing contracts with other state agencies that serve children with special health care needs. c. Continued monitoring of access to specialty care for children with special health care needs.
Guidance: The State should include data sources to be used to assess each performance goal. In addition, check all appropriate measures from 9.3.1 to 9.3.8 that the State will be utilizing to measure performance, even if doing so duplicates what the State has already discussed in Section 9.
It is acceptable for the State to include performance measures for population subgroups chosen by the State for special emphasis, such as racial or ethnic minorities, particular high-risk or hard to reach populations, children with special needs, etc.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 93 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-97)Page 97#
HEDIS (Health Employer Data and Information Set) 2008 contains performance measures relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. In addition, HEDIS 3.0 contains measures for the general population, for which breakouts by children’s age bands (e.g., ages < 1, 1-9, 10-19) are required. Full definitions, explanations of data sources, and other important guidance on the use of HEDIS measures can be found in the HEDIS 2008 manual published by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. So that State HEDIS results are consistent and comparable with national and regional data, states should check the HEDIS 2008 manual for detailed definitions of each measure, including definitions of the numerator and denominator to be used. For states that do not plan to offer managed care plans, HEDIS measures may also be able to be adapted to organizations of care other than managed care.
9.3. Describe how performance under the plan will be measured through objective, independently verifiable means and compared against performance goals in order to determine the State’s performance, taking into account suggested performance indicators as specified below or other indicators the State develops: (Section 2107(a)(4)(A),(B)) (42CFR 457.710(d)) Assurance of an Objective Means for Measuring Performance To ensure an objective evaluation which can be independently verified, the evaluation will be based upon data bases which contain quantifiable information. These databases will, to the extent possible, contain numeric data. The ADPH will develop and/or direct the development of needed databases which do not currently exist. Since evaluation of some performance measures does not lend itself to numeric summation, measurement of these aspects of the plan will be based on review of a completed work plan which requires conclusive documentation. All data and documentation will be auditable. At periodic intervals, a formal comparison of program performance to the goals and measures set forth in this document or its subsequent amendments will be conducted. The CHIP staff directly responsible for the implementation of the program will conduct information comparisons of performance to these goals and measures on an ongoing basis. In this way, the program will be continuously monitored and activities may be adjusted so that the program may achieve its objectives.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 94 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-98)Page 98#
Measure of Performance: MEASURE ROUGH DEFINITION OF MEASURE
Reducing the Number of Uninsured Number of Uninsured CPS and/or NSAF and state data survey Tracking System Documentation that a tracking system exists and is used for 100% of the applications that are referred among ALL Kids, Medicaid, and Alabama Child Caring Foundation Related to SCHIP Enrollment Percentage of families not renewing due Renewal database – comparison of number of non- to owing past premiums renewals who owed premiums to the number who were due to renew. Percentage of families reporting a New enrollee survey database – comparison of percentage reduction in financial barriers to of reports indicating a reduction in financial barriers to accessing health care obtaining health care post-ALL Kids to pre-ALL Kids Development of plans to target outreach Documentation of development of these plans on file to adolescents, faith-based organizations Implementation of plans to target Documentation of implementation of these plans on file outreach to adolescents, faith-based organizations Development of plans to target outreach Documentation of development of these plans on file to Hispanics, Native Americans, and birth-to-five providers
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 95 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-99)Page 99#
Implementation of plans to target Documentation of implementation of these plans on file outreach to Hispanics Native Americans, and birth-to-five providers Development and implementation of Documentation of development and implementation of plans to target outreach to other these plans on file groups Elimination of language and culture Spanish and English brochures and applications forms on barriers file
Employment of bi-lingual customer service staff
ALL Kids Customer service telephone operators are aware of and know how to use a telephone translating service. Reduction in percentage of children Enrollment Data Management system – Comparison of canceling ALL Kids due to number of enrollees who did not participate in the renewal nonparticipation in the renewal process to those due to renew. process Related to increasing Medicaid Enrollment Maintenance of effort with regard to: Use of a joint application form A joint SOBRA Medicaid and ALL Kids application form is in use Use of a joint renewal form A joint SOBRA Medicaid and ALL Kids renewal form is in use
Seamless referral between ALL Seamless referral policy in place Kids and SOBRA Medicaid
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 96 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-100)Page 100#
Continued outreach effort Outreach/Marketing files reflect outreach conducted by central office staff, regional staff, and federal program office. Evaluation of application transfer Evaluation on files of meeting minutes and referral process Continued computer Computer enhancements will be in place. enhancements Related to increasing access to care Reported usual source of care New Enrollees Survey Reported ER use New Enrollees Survey Related to use of preventive care Reported use of well-child check-up New Enrollees Survey Reported dental visit New Enrollees Survey Reported vision screening New Enrollees Survey Other
Specialty service availability Contract(s) on file
Exploration of feasibility for Documentation on file (central office files and/or establishing contracts with other regional coordinator files) CSHCN state agencies
Monitoring access to care for CSHCN New Enrollees Survey
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 97 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-101)Page 101#
Check the applicable suggested performance measurements listed below that the State plans to use: (Section 2107(a)(4)) 9.3.1. The increase in the percentage of Medicaid-eligible children enrolled in Medicaid. 9.3.2. The reduction in the percentage of uninsured children. 9.3.3. The increase in the percentage of children with a usual source of care. 9.3.4. The extent to which outcome measures show progress on one or more of the health problems identified by the state. 9.3.5. HEDIS Measurement Set relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. 9.3.6. Other child appropriate measurement set. List or describe the set used.
9.3.7. If not utilizing the entire HEDIS Measurement Set, specify which measures will be collected, such as: 9.3.7.1. Immunizations 9.3.7.2. Well childcare 9.3.7.3. Adolescent well visits 9.3.7.4. Satisfaction with care 9.3.7.5. Mental health 9.3.7.6. Dental care 9.3.7.7. Other, list:
9.3.8. Performance measures for special targeted populations.
9.4. The State assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires. (Section 2107(b)(1)) (42CFR 457.720)Alabama assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires.
Guidance: The State should include an assurance of compliance with the annual reporting requirements, including an assessment of reducing the number of low-income uninsured children. The State should also discuss any annual activities to be undertaken that relate to assessment and evaluation of the program.
9.5. The State assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. Briefly describe the State’s plan for these annual assessments and reports. (Section 2107(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 98 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-102)Page 102#
Alabama assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. On an annual basis, the Alabama will review its operations, progress made in reducing the number of uncovered low-income children, progress made in meeting the goals and objectives stated in 9.1 and 9.2 of this document, and its compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations. Section 9.3 states how Alabama will measure the goals and objectives in sections 9.1 and 9.2. Examples of data sources are: Census data, private foundation garnered data, data gathered via special surveys, utilization data from claims reports, enrollee family feedback from surveys, etc. The assessment will occur during the three months after the end of the fiscal year and a report of this assessment will be submitted to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year.
9.6. The State assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review or audit.(Section 2107(b)(3)) (42CFR 457.720) Alabama assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review of audit.
Guidance: The State should verify that they will participate in the collection and evaluation of data as new measures are developed or existing measures are revised as deemed necessary by CMS, the states, advocates, and other interested parties.
9.7. The State assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e)) Alabama assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed
9.8. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.135)
9.8.1. Section 1902(a)(4)(C) (relating to conflict of interest standards) 9.8.2. Paragraphs (2), (16) and (17) of Section 1903(i) (relating to limitations on payment) 9.8.3. Section 1903(w) (relating to limitations on provider donations and taxes) 9.8.4. Section 1132 (relating to periods within which claims must be filed)
Guidance: Section 9.9 can include discussion of community-based providers and consumer representatives in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. Issues to address include a listing of public meetings or announcements made to the public concerning the development of the children's health
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 99 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-103)Page 103#
insurance program or public forums used to discuss changes to the State plan.
9.9. Describe the process used by the State to accomplish involvement of the public in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. (Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(a) and (b))
Efforts were made to make the process of developing the design and implementation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program inclusive. News coverage about the advocacy of the Children’s Health Insurance Program was provided regularly starting at the time that the issue came before the Alabama Legislature.
Formalized CHIP development groups were the CHIP Commission and the CHIP Task Force Work Groups. The CHIP Commission met three times, October 7, November 12 and December 17, 1998. The CHIP Task Force Work Groups met twelve times beginning August 6, 1998, and split into subcommittees to develop proposals in the following areas: (1) benefits, (2) eligibility, outreach and enrollment, and (3) funding. These subcommittee meetings were open to interested individuals and groups. At least three news conferences were held by the State Health Officer and/or the Medicaid Commissioner.
Public awareness was promoted through means such as television programs. Interested organizations such as Alabama ARISE, the Alabama Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, and Voices for Alabama’s Children were provided information for their membership about CHIP. Media coverage was provided and CHIP information has been made available on the Internet at: http://www.adph.org/allkids (formerly: http://www.alapubhealth.org) since October 2, 1998. During the first six and one-half month period of October 4 through April 21, 1998, 1,247 hits were made on this site specifically requesting CHIP information. This website includes a description of the program, a calendar of scheduled events, and an opportunity for interested persons to express their opinions about the program’s development. Order forms are available at every presentation. These forms enable participants to fax orders to the ALL Kids office and receive printed materials at no charge. The largest number of requests for information (312) came during the month of January. Newspaper editorials have praised the value of this program for our State’s children.
The CHIP Task Force Work Groups were comprised of employees of the Alabama Medicaid Agency, Public Health Department employees, and other interested parties including representatives of the Alabama Primary Care Association, Alabama ARISE, the Alabama Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, Voices for Alabama’s Children, the Alabama Child Caring Foundation, Alabama Dental Association, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-Alabama Chapter, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Children First, Children’s Health System, Children’s Hospital of Alabama, Family Voices, Health Maintenance Organization Association, Legislative Fiscal Office, Legislative Reference
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 100 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-104)Page 104#
Service, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of South Alabama, University of South Alabama Children’s and Women’s Hospital, United Health Care, as well as other State agencies including the Department of Education, the Department of Human Resources, the Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation, State Employees’ Insurance Board, State Insurance Department, and the Department of Rehabilitation Services. These entities are now referred to as stakeholders and they continue to be involved as program changes are developed.
The Alabama program will continue to inform the general public about CHIP through the news media, to announce planning meetings, and to invite additional groups with an interest in being involved or informed as they become identified. There was extensive public involvement in the preparation of a comprehensive 133-page report which was released to the Alabama Legislature on January 12, 1998. In relation to the Governor’s Task Force on Children’s Health Insurance, periodic reports on the progress of recommendations contained the report are made. 9.9.1. Describe the process used by the State to ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the State on the development and implementation of the procedures required in 42 CFR 457.125. States should provide notice and consultation with Tribes on proposed pregnant women expansions.(Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(c)) A meeting was held with representatives of the 2,176 member Poarch Band of Creek Indians, the only federally recognized Native American group in Alabama. Six other tribes are recognized by the State. The CHIP Program was explained and discussion centered on ways to coordinate CHIP and Indian Health Service-funded care, the role of traditional Native American healing, outreach methods for children and some demographics of the Poarch Band. Several presentations have been made to the Alabama Commission on Indian Affairs and CHIP staff meet and coordinate regularly with staff of the Commission. Other forms of outreach have included numerous presentations to the tribes, presence at Native American festivals throughout the state and the employment of a Native American consultant whose specific task was to develop a regionally- based outreach plan to the Native American population in Alabama.
9.9.2. For an amendment relating to eligibility or benefits (including cost sharing and enrollment procedures), describe how and when prior public notice was provided as required in 42 CFR457.65(b) through (d).
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 101 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-105)Page 105#
Alabama has no state law applicable to public notice of either cost sharing changes or waiting list implementations in CHIP.
Public Notice of Cost Sharing Changes: Specific public notice was given via a meeting of CHIP stakeholders in August 2003 and letters to enrollees’ families informing them of the changes in cost sharing. This meeting and the mailings followed much publicity in the state regarding the state’s financial situation and the possible impact on CHIP if a statewide referendum to raise taxes on (September 9, 2003) did not pass.
Public Notice of the Waiting List: ALL Kids initiated a waiting list beginning with all new enrollees who would have had an effective date October 1, 2003. Once the decision had been made to establish a waiting list, a press statement was released and letters were sent to stakeholders and other interested parties informing them of the institution of a waiting list and stressing the importance of returning renewal forms on time. Additionally, a letter to this effect was sent to every enrollee family along with a new insurance card(s). All of these notices were issued during the month of September 2003 prior to the impact of the waiting list.
On August 23, 2004, ALL Kids reopened enrollment and discontinued use of the waiting list.
If the State determines that it is again necessary to implement a waiting list, it will provide prior, appropriate public notice.
There are no public notice state laws regarding enrollment caps and waiting lists in SCHIP. 9.9.3. Describe the State’s interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 102 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-106)Page 106#
limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
CHIP Budget STATE: AL FFY Budget Federal Fiscal Year 2021 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 80.81%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments 411,883,043 Managed care per member/per month rate 241 Fee for Service 411,883,043 Total Benefit Costs 418,883,043 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) 7,000,000
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit 0 Net Benefit Costs 411,883,043
Administration Costs Personnel 5,716,281
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 103 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-107)Page 107#
STATE: AL FFY Budget General administration 6,923,267 Contractors/Brokers Claims Processing Outreach/marketing costs 500,000 Health Services Initiatives 501,250 Other 1,371,907 Total Administration Costs 15,012,705 10% Administrative Cap 44,987,005
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes 301,250
Federal Share 344,974,454 State Share 81,921,294 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan 426,895,748
NOTE: Include the costs associated with the current SPA.
The Source of State Share Funds: No state funds will be used.
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP’s website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(1),(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
10.1.1. The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 104 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-108)Page 108#
10.2. The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e))
10.3. The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity (Section 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1. The State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.935(b))(The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1. 42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2. Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3. Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4. Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5. Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6. Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program)
Section 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections(Sections 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 105 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-109)Page 109#
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes and procedures that are unique to the applicant’s rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility. Alabama’s appeals process meets the requirements of the Program Specific Review as outlined in CFR.457.1120 – 457.1180. The ALL Kids appeals and grievance process can be found in Attachment A. The individuals involved in the Information review (first level) are not involved in the Administrative Review (second level) thus impartiality in the appeals process is provided. The individuals who conduct the Administrative Review are not involved in the Information Review process not in the original determination process. The review process for children enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children’s programs Guidance: “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120.
The State assures that the State laws or regulations are consistent with the intent of 42 CFR 457,1130(b). This grievance process for health service matters is provided by the insurance vendor and is in compliance with state laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and all other applicable regulations of the Department of Labor Procedures. A copy of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama appeals process can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. The grievance process for children enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children’s programs.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs-If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 106 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-110)Page 110#
ATTACHMENT A
GRIEVANCE POLICY General Information
Applicants and enrollees of the ALL Kids Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have a right to discuss and question how eligibility for enrollment was determined. In particular they have the right to request review of program decisions concerning:
• Denial of eligibility • Failure to make a timely determination of eligibility • Suspension or termination of enrollment, including disenrollment for failure to pay premiums.
The ALL Kids Review Process has three levels of review--Information Review, Administrative Review and Formal Review. Requests for an Administrative Review and Formal Appeal must be submitted in writing. All correspondence with the applicant /enrollee concerning Administrative Review or Formal Review will be in writing.
ALL Kids Plus Services Requests for review of decisions made regarding eligibility for the ALL Kids Plus services must first be made to the ALL Kids Plus participating agency’s appropriate appeals process. This is necessary since eligibility for ALL Kids Plus is dependent on the participating agency’s eligibility criteria for services. Once the appeals process through the ALL Kids Plus participating agency has been exhausted, an appeal request may be made to the Children’s Health Insurance Program as described in ADPH ALL Kids Review Process.
Information Review In many cases problems can be handled informally through the Information Review Process without the need for a Administrative or Formal Review. CHIP staff is committed to using the Information Review process to provide a speedy and fair resolution when possible and appropriate.
Parents/designated representatives can initiate an Information Review via contact (telephone, e-mail or letter) with the Enrollment Unit supervisory staff, CHIP administrative staff, the CHIP social work consultant, CHIP regional staff, or interested agencies. Once the problem has been received, the appropriate staff will review the situation and initiate immediate action to resolve the problem and
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 107 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-111)Page 111#
communicate the decision or resolution. If additional information is needed, the enrollee/applicant will be given the opportunity to provide clarification or submit additional information. Decisions made in the Information Review are usually provided within two working days. Notification to the applicant/enrollee will be communicated in the manner in which the request was made. Summation of the inquiry, review and resolution will be maintained on file and noted with the appropriate applicant/enrollee information.
If the problem remains unresolved in the eyes of the applicant/enrollee, they will be provided detailed information regarding their right to a Administrative Review, right to continued enrollment during the review process and provided copies of all forms and the procedures necessary to move forward through the review process. Appropriate notation will be kept in the applicant’s/enrollee’s electronic file noting the initial complaint, any information gathered during the Information Review, the decision reached through Information Review, the date of such decision and the applicant/enrollees intent to go forward with the Administrative Review Process.
Administrative Review In order to be considered, an Administrative Review Request Form must be received within ten (10) days of the final decision from the Information Review. The CHIP social work consultant will assist in gathering information that may clarify the request. All information on file from the Information Review and any information gathered by the CHIP Social Work consultant will be circulated to a three person Administrative Review Committee whose members were not involved in the Information Review process nor in the original determination process.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the Administrative Review Committee will be hearing information regarding their situation. They have the right to speak in person or have a representative of their choosing present during the review. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under grievance.
The Committee’s decision and the Program Director’s review of the decision must be completed within thirty-days (30) of receiving the Administrative Review Request Form. Applicant/enrollees will be notified in writing of the Administrative Review Committee’s decision within three working days of the decision. Additionally this notification will include the applicant/enrollee’s rights to continued review and the policy regarding a request for Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
If the grievance remains unresolved in the applicant/enrollee’s eyes, the applicant/enrollee may file a request for a Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 108 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-112)Page 112#
Formal Review In order to be considered by the State Health Officer, a Request for Formal Review must be submitted to the CHIP office within ten (10) days of the final decision of the Administrative Review Committee. This request must be submitted on the Formal Review Request Form.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the State Health Officer will be hearing information regarding their case. Applicants/enrollees may appear in person or have a representative of their choosing to present information the State Health Officer. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under grievance.
Generally a decision will be issued within thirty-days (30) following receipt of the Request for Formal Review. Applicants/enrollees will be notified of the decision of the State Health Officer within three (3) working days of the decision.
The decision made by the State Health Officer is the final step in the administrative proceedings and will exhaust all administrative remedies.
Expedited Review If the enrollment or eligibility matter under review would worsen health conditions of the applicant/enrollee or jeopardize lives, an expedited CHIP review may be provided. An Expedited Review will be made within seventy-two (72) hours by quickly obtaining and reviewing information so as not to cause unnecessary harm to the applicant/enrollee.
Right for Continued Benefits During Appeals Process When the eligibility decision under review concerns renewal or re-determination of coverage, and the enrollee files a Request for Administrative Review, CHIP staff will ensure that coverage for that enrollee is continued until the review process is completed. The enrollee will be notified in writing of this continuation of coverage and their responsibility regarding any health services costs incurred if the resulting review decision supports termination of coverage. The enrollee will be issued a temporary health plan identification card with a coverage end date equal to the maximum length of time allowed for both the Administrative and Formal Review processes.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 109 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-113)Page 113#
Key for Newly Incorporated Templates The newly incorporated templates are indicated with the following letters after the numerical section throughout the template.
• PC- Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • PW- Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • TC- Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • DC- Dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • DS- Supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • PA- Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • EL- Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • LR- Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010)
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 110 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-114)Page 114#
CMS Regional Offices CMSRegion Associate Regional States Regional Office Address al Offices Administrator Region 1- Connecticut New Hampshire Richard R. McGreal John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg. Boston Massachuset Rhode Island richard.mcgreal@cms.hhs.gov Room 2275 ts Vermont Boston, MA 02203-0003 Maine Region 2- New York New Jersey Michael Melendez 26 Federal Plaza New York Virgin Puerto Rico michael.melendez@cms.hhs.gov Room 3811 Islands New York, NY 10278-0063 Region 3- Delaware Pennsylvania Ted Gallagher The Public Ledger Building Philadelphia District of Virginia ted.gallagher@cms.hhs.gov 150 South Independence Mall Columbia West Virginia West Maryland Suite 216 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Region 4- Alabama Mississippi Jackie Glaze Atlanta Federal Center Atlanta Florida North Carolina jackie.glaze@cms.hhs.gov 4th Floor Georgia South Carolina 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Kentucky Tennessee Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909 Region 5- Illinois Minnesota Verlon Johnson 233 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago Indiana Ohio verlon.johnson@cms.hhs.gov Suite 600 Michigan Wisconsin Chicago, IL 60601 Region 6- Arkansas Oklahoma Bill Brooks 1301 Young Street, 8th Floor Dallas Louisiana Texas bill.brooks@cms.hhs.gov Dallas, TX 75202 New Mexico Region 7- Iowa Missouri James G. Scott Richard Bulling Federal Bldg. Kansas City Kansas Nebraska james.scott1@cms.hhs.gov 601 East 12 Street, Room 235 Kansas City, MO 64106-2808 Region 8- Colorado South Dakota Richard Allen Federal Office Building, Room Denver Montana Utah richard.allen@cms.hhs.gov 522 1961 Stout Street North Wyoming Denver, CO 80294-3538 Dakota Region 9- Arizona American Gloria Nagle 90 Seventh Street Suite 5-300 San California Samoa gloria.nagle@cms.hhs.gov San Francisco Federal Building Francisco Hawaii Guam San Francisco, CA 94103 Nevada Northern Mariana Islands
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 111 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-115)Page 115#
Region 10- Idaho Alaska Carol Peverly 2001 Sixth Avenue Seattle Washington Oregon carol.peverly@cms.hhs.gov MS RX-43 Seattle, WA 98121
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 112 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-116)Page 116#
GLOSSARY Adapted directly from Sec. 2110. DEFINITIONS. CHILD HEALTH ASSISTANCE- For purposes of this title, the term ‘child health assistance’ means payment for part or all of the cost of health benefits coverage for targeted low-income children that includes any of the following (and includes, in the case described in Section 2105(a)(2)(A), payment for part or all of the cost of providing any of the following), as specified under the State plan: 1. Inpatient hospital services. 2. Outpatient hospital services. 3. Physician services. 4. Surgical services. 5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. 6. Prescription drugs and biologicals and the administration of such drugs and biologicals, only if such drugs and biologicals are not furnished for the purpose of causing, or assisting in causing, the death, suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person. 7. Over-the-counter medications. 8. Laboratory and radiological services. 9. Prenatal care and prepregnancy family planning services and supplies. 10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (18) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structured services. 11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (19) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including community-based services. 12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices). 13. Disposable medical supplies. 14. Home and community-based health care services and related supportive services (such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home). 15. Nursing care services (such as nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services) in a home, school, or other setting. 16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 17. Dental services. 18. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services. 19. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services. 20. Case management services. 21. Care coordination services. 22. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 113 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-117)Page 117#
language disorders. 23. Hospice care. 24. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services (whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting) if recognized by State law and only if the service is-- a. prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as defined by State law, b. performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician, or c. furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license. 25. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage. 26. Medical transportation. 27. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals. 28. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not excluded under this section.
TARGETED LOW-INCOME CHILD DEFINED- For purposes of this title-- 1. IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), the term ‘targeted low-income child’ means a child-- a. who has been determined eligible by the State for child health assistance under the State plan; b. (i) who is a low-income child, or (ii) is a child whose family income (as determined under the State child health plan) exceeds the Medicaid applicable income level (as defined in paragraph (4)), but does not exceed 50 percentage points above the Medicaid applicable income level; and c. who is not found to be eligible for medical assistance under title XIX or covered under a group health plan or under health insurance coverage (as such terms are defined in Section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act). 2. CHILDREN EXCLUDED- Such term does not include-- a. a child who is a resident of a public institution or a patient in an institution for mental diseases; or b. a child who is a member of a family that is eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits plan on the basis of a family member's employment with a public agency in the State. 3. SPECIAL RULE- A child shall not be considered to be described in paragraph (1)(C) notwithstanding that the child is covered under a health insurance coverage program that has been in operation since before July 1, 1997, and that is offered by a State which receives no Federal funds for the program's operation. 4. MEDICAID APPLICABLE INCOME LEVEL- The term ‘Medicaid applicable income level’ means, with respect to a child, the effective income level (expressed as a percent of the poverty line)
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 114 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(pdf)(page-118)Page 118#
that has been specified under the State plan under title XIX (including under a waiver authorized by the Secretary or under Section 1902(r)(2)), as of June 1, 1997, for the child to be eligible for medical assistance under Section 1902(l)(2) for the age of such child. 5. TARGETED LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMAN.—The term ‘targeted low-income pregnant woman’ means an individual— (A) during pregnancy and through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of her pregnancy) ends; (B) whose family income exceeds 185 percent (or, if higher, the percent applied under subsection (b)(1)(A)) of the poverty line applicable to a family of the size involved, but does not exceed the income eligibility level established under the State child health plan under this title for a targeted low-income child; and(C) who satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(C), (2), and (3) of Section 2110(b) in the same manner as a child applying for child health assistance would have to satisfy such requirements.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this title: 1. CHILD- The term ‘child’ means an individual under 19 years of age. 2. CREDITABLE HEALTH COVERAGE- The term ‘creditable health coverage’ has the meaning given the term ‘creditable coverage’ under Section 2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(c)) and includes coverage that meets the requirements of section 2103 provided to a targeted low-income child under this title or under a waiver approved under section 2105(c)(2)(B) (relating to a direct service waiver). 3. GROUP HEALTH PLAN; HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ETC- The terms ‘group health plan’, ‘group health insurance coverage’, and ‘health insurance coverage’ have the meanings given such terms in Section 2191 of the Public Health Service Act. 4. LOW-INCOME CHILD - The term ‘low-income child’ means a child whose family income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved. 5. POVERTY LINE DEFINED- The term ‘poverty line’ has the meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by such section. 6. PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSION- The term ‘preexisting condition exclusion’ has the meaning given such term in section 2701(b)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(1)(A)). 7. STATE CHILD HEALTH PLAN; PLAN- Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms ‘State child health plan’ and ‘plan’ mean a State child health plan approved under Section 2106. 8. UNINSURED CHILD- The term ‘uninsured child’ means a child that does not have creditable health coverage.
Effective Date: March 1, 2020 115 Approval Date:
(al)(al-21-0022)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA AL-21-0022 Summary#
(al)(al-21-0022)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
This amendment implements a health services initiative (HSI) to provide comprehensive health coverage during the 60-day postpartum period to individuals whose pregnancies were covered under the Reducing Infant Mortality Conception to Birth program known as ALL Babies.
Approval Package
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA AL-23-0026-RIM2 PDF#
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Alabama
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: AL-23-0026-RIM2
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
April 20, 2023
Ms. Wanda Davis Deputy Director, Children's Health Insurance Program 201 Monroe Street Montgomery, AL 36104
Dear Ms. Davis:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) State Plan Amendment (SPA) number, AL- 23-0026-RIM2, submitted on February 1, 2023, has been approved. This SPA has an effective date of May 1, 2023.
Through this SPA, Alabama expands its ALL Babies coverage to an additional 33 counties (for a total of 36 counties). ALL Babies provides CHIP eligibility for children from conception to the end of pregnancy (also known as the “unborn” option) with family incomes up to and including 312 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) whose pregnant parents are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid or CHIP. Coverage will include pregnancy-related services including prenatal care for children from conception to the end of pregnancy. A copy of the approved CS9 state plan page is attached to be incorporated into the state's approved CHIP state plan. This page supersedes the previous CS9 that was approved on September 17, 2019.
Also through this SPA, Alabama expands its health services initiative (HSI), the ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative, to the same additional 33 counties (for a total of 36 counties) to provide 60 days of postpartum coverage for birth parents previously covered under the ALL Babies program.
The HSI approval is based on section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and 42 CFR §§ 457.10 and 457.618, which authorize use of title XXI administrative funding for HSIs that improve the health of children, including targeted low-income children and other low-income children. Consistent with section 2105(c)(6)(B) of the Act and 42 CFR § 457.626, title XXI funds used to support an HSI cannot supplant Medicaid or other sources of federal funding.
The state shall ensure that the remaining title XXI administrative funding, within the state's 10 percent limit, is sufficient to continue the proper administration of the CHIP program. If such funds become less than sufficient, the state agrees to redirect title XXI funds from the support of this HSI to the administration of the CHIP program. The state shall report annually to CMS the expenditures funded by the HSI for each federal fiscal year.
Your Project Officer is Joshua Bougie. He is available to answer your questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related matters. His contact information is as follows:
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
Page 2 – Ms. Wanda Davis
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: (410) 786-8117 E-mail: joshua.bougie@cms.hhs.gov
If you have additional questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs, at (443) 934-2064. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely, /Signed by Sarah deLone/
Sarah deLone Director
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PACWLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN'S HEAL TH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: Alabama (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR 457.40(b)) Scott Harris, State Health Officer, Alabama Department of Public Health (Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children's Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)):
N,ame: Catherine Donald Position/Title: Acting CHIP Director Name: Shaundra B. Morris Position/Title: Director, ADPH Financial Services Name: Position/Title:
*Disclosure. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid 0MB control number. The valid 0MB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148 (CMS-10398 #34). The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, write to: CMS, 7500 Security Blvd., Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 1 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
Introduction: Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 105-33amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of2010 further modified the program.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the state plan amendments (SPAs). It reflects the regulatory requirements at 42 CFR Part 457as well as the previously approved SP A templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SP A template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is developing regulations to implement the CHIPRA requirements. When final regulations are published in the Federal Register, this template will be modified to reflect those rules and States will be required to submit SP As illustrating compliance with the new regulations. States are not required to resubmit their State plans based on the updated template. However, States must use the updated template when submitting a State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirements for Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. ( 42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. ASP A is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90-day review period, or clock for CHIP Spas, that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 2 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
response is received. More information on the SP A review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a "clean" copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children's Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101) ;(42 CFR 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of State Approach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state's program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology-The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable. (Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(l)); (42CFR 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children's Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 3 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage; benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope, and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State's use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); ( 42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children's Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 210l(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health
Effective Date: October I, 2022 4 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: • Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SP A process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background) They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • IO (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children's Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 5 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
• Combination of Options-CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes ofup to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion ofMedicaid, the description provided under "Option to Expand Medicaid" would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in "Option to Create a Separate Program" would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
Proposed State plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Name ofProject Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 6 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children's Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101) (a)(l)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101. which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXL 1.1.1.0* Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(l) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State's Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SP A to CMS for review and approval. Providing expanded benefits under the State's Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 1.1.2. D 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI. in conjunction with an expansion in the State's Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3.S A combination of both above. (Section 2101(a)(2))
* Until October 1, 2002, Alabama's CHIP was a combination program. With the mandated gradual increase of Medicaid coverage at higher income levels for children born after September 30, 1983, the Medicaid expansion portion of CHIP was subsumed, on October 1, 2002, by the Alabama Medicaid SOBRA Program for Pregnant Women and Children.
The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a1.1-DS□ separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template. (Section 211 0(b)(5)) 1.2.S Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 7 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
Alabama has not and will not claim expenditures for child health assistance prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS.
1.3.= Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. ( 42CFR 457 .130)
Assurances are on file with DHHS. The Alabama Department of Public Health continues to assure that compliance with all applicable civil rights requirements.
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective ( date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA( 42 CFR 457 .65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SP A may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
Original Plan Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Amendment 1 - Establishment of ALL Kids Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 2 - Establishment of ALL Kids PLUS Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1999 Amendment 3 -Disregards Effective/Implementation Date: June 1, 2001 Amendment 4 - Compliance Effective/Implementation Date: August 24, 2001 Amendment 5- Waiting List, Cost Sharing, Benefit Changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2003 Amendment 6-Discontinuance of the Waiting List and other Clean-Up changes
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 8 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
Effective/Implementation Date: November 23, 2004 Amendment 7 - Raise the upper income eligibility limit to 300% of FPL and other minor changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009 Amendment 8 -Include a private foundation grant as an additional source of state funding Effective/Implementation Date: October 27, 2009 Amendment 9 - Establishment of a Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009; Addendum on Dental Benefits Under Title XXI: Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 10 -Eligibility for children of employees of a public agency (state employees and public education employees) Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2011 Amendment 11 - Provisions for Implementing Temporary Adjustments to Enrollment Determination and/or Redetermination Policies and Cost Sharing Requirements for Applicants/Renewals living in and/or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event. In the event of a disaster, the State will notify CMS of the intent to provide temporary adjustments to its enrollment and/or redetermination policies, the effective dates of such adjustments and the counties/areas impacted by the disaster. Effective/Implementation Date: April 15, 2011 Amendment 12 - Increase premiums, increase co-pays and revise the methodology for determining annual aggregate cost-sharing Effective/Implementation Date: May 1, 2012 Amendment 13-Establishment of copayments for therapy services (physical, occupational, and speech), vision services and chiropractic services; and cleanup changes Effective/Implementation Date: August 1, 2013 Amendment 14-Alignment of ALL Kids fee groups with provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other editorial changes to comply with previously approved ACA SP As. Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2014 Amendment 15 - AL-16-0015-MEXP-(::HIP Medicaid expansion to cover Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 18% FPL through 141% FPL. Effective Date: October 1, 2015 Implementation Date: January 1, 2016 Amendment 16 -AL-18-0016-P AR - Attestation and documentation of Mental
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 9 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Health Parity and Addiction Equity. Submission Date: July 10, 2018 Effective Date: October 1, 2017* Implementation Date: October 1, 2017* *Note: Benefits were adjusted in October 2010 to be compliant with mental health parity; this amendment did not require any benefit changes Amendment 17 -AL-19-0017-RIM - Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Service Initiative Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 18 -AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Eligibility -Coverage From Conception to Birth Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 19 -AL-20-0019-CEN CS15 MAGI-Based Income Methodologies -Temporary Income Submission Date: February 26, 2020 Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Implementation Date July 1, 2020 Amendment 20 -AL-20-0020-COVI Allowing for Temporary Waiving of cost sharing requirements for enrollees who reside and/or work in a State or Federally declared disaster area. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Effective Date: March 1, 2020 Implementation Date: March 1, 2020 Amendment 21 - AL-20-0021-BH Documentation of AL CHIP compliance with the SUPPORT Act. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Effective Date: October 1, 2019 Implementation Date: October 24, 2018 Amendment 22 -AL-21-0022-PP Postpartum coverage Health Services Initiative for ALL Babies Submission Date: May 13, 2021 Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Implementation Date: July 1, 2021 Amendment 23 -AL-22-0023-OBJ Edits to align Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals with
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
CARTS Submission Date: 3/30/2022 Effective Date: 10/1/2021 Implementation Date: 10/1/2021 Amendment 24 - AL-22-0024-ARP Coverage of COVID-19 vaccine, testing, and treatment under American Rescue Plan Act Submission Date: 3/30/2022 Effective Date: March 11, 2021 Implementation Date: March 11, 2021 Amendment 25 - AL-22-0025-CE 12-Month Postpartum Period Continuous Eligibility Submission Date: August 18, 2022 Effective Date: October 1, 2022 Implementation Date: October 1, 2022 Amendment 26 - AL-23-0026-RIM2 CS9 Eligibility - Statewide Coverage from Conception to Birth Submission Date: January 31, 2023 Effective Date: May 1, 2023 Implementation Date: May 1, 2023 Amendment 27 - AL-23-0027-CC Amending AL-19-0017-RIM to discontinue HSI Submission Date: January 31, 2023 Effective Date: October 1, 2023 Implementation Date: October 1, 2023
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 11 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) AL-14-0016 MAGI CS7 Eligibility - Targeted Low Supersedes the (Original: AL-14-0016 Eligibility Income Children current Effective/lmplementati & sections on Date: January 1, Methods Geographic 2014) Children With Access to Area 4.1.1; Age CS10 Public Employee Coverage 4.1.2; and Income 4.1.3 Section 4.4.1: Supersedes only the MAGI-Based Income information on AL-20-0019-CEN (affects only CS15) CS15 Methodologies dependents of public Effective employees in Implementation Date: this section; July 1, 2020 supporting documentation should be incorporated as an appendix to the current state plan
Incorporate within a separate subsection under section 4.3
AL-23-0026-RIM2 CS9 Coverage from Conception (Original: AL-19-0018- to Birth RIM Effective/Approval Date: July 1, 2019)
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 12 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) (Original: AL-14-0014 XXI CS3 Eligibility for Medicaid Supersedes the Effective/lmplementatio Medicaid Expansion Program current n Date:January 1, 2014) Expansio Medicaid n expansion AL-16-0015-MEXP CHIP Medicaid expansion section 4.0 to cover Medicaid Effective/lmplementati enrollees ages 14 years to on Date: October 1, 19 years with incomes 2015 above 18% FPL through 141% FPL AL-14-0015 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible for Incorporate 2101{f) Medicaid as a Result of the within a Effective/Implementati Group Elimination of Income separate on Date: January 1, Disregards subsection 2014 under section 4.1 AL-14-0018 Eligibility CS24 Single, Streamlined Supersedes the Process Application current Effective/lmplementati Screen and Enroll Process sections 4.3 on Date: January 1, Renewals and 4.4 2014 AL-14-0017 Non- CS17 Non-Financial Eligibility - Supersedes the Financial Residency current section Effective/Implementati Eligibility 4.1.5 Non-Financial - Citizenship on Date: January 1, CS18 2014 Supersedes the CS19 Non-Financial - Social current Security Number sections 4.1.0; 4.1.1-LR; 4.1.1- CS20 Substitution of Coverage LR CS21 Non-Payment of Premiums Supersedes the current section CS27 Continuous Eligibility 4.1.9.1
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 13 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(sl
Supersedes the current section 4.4.4
Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current section 4.1.8
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 14 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
1.4-TC Tribal Consultation(Section 2107(e)(l)(C))Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved. In accordance with approved policies, on December 08, 2022, a certified letter explaining the changes proposed in AL-23-0026 and AL-23-0027 was mailed to theTribal Chairman of the one federally recognized Native American tribe in Alabama, the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. The letter included the purpose for the proposed changes and a description of the changes. In the letter, theTribal Chairman was also reminded that she had the opportunity to respond to the proposed changes within 30 days and was given contact information for any such response. The certified letter was signed by the CHIP Deputy Director. TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: January 09, 2023
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children's Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability. and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified , by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report requirements). (Section 2102(a)(l)); (42 CFR 457.80(a)) Prior to CHIP, the only two programs offering health insurance to low-income children
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 15 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
were Medicaid and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF). Medicaid served children at the minimum income levels required by federal law. This meant that Medicaid coverage was available to children at three different levels of income and age: -Those under the age of six (6) years with incomes up to 133% FPL; -Those children six (6) through 14 years of age who were born after September 30, 1983 with incomes up to 100%FPL; and, -Those remaining children through the age of 18 years (middle and older teens) with incomes at theTANF assistance level (below approximately 13% FPL). The ACCF served children (birth through 18 years) with incomes from the Medicaid levels up to 200% FPL.
From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CIDP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama's CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. Beginning October 1, 2015, however, children in this category (ages 14 to 19 with incomes between 13% FPL and 141 % FPL) will again be enrolled in a CHIP Medicaid expansion.
Originally, CIDP used a baseline number of uninsured children derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS). This baseline including the following chart was derived from a study by Winterbottom et.al. based on a three year merged Current Population Survey, or CPS, (1990-92), which showed over 200,000 children, in Alabama, under 18 years to be uninsured.
Employer Medicaid Other Uninsured Covera2:e Percent 59.3 17.2 5.1 18.4 Number 652,300 189,200 110,000 202,400
However, due to concerns about the CPS regarding potential problems with subjects' abilities to recall information, Alabama changed its baseline estimate to reflect data from the 1997 round of the Urban Institute's National Survey of America's Families (NSAF). The NSAF indicated that there were 173,012 uninsured children in Alabama. Of these, 91,209 were P 100% Federal Poverty Level (FPL), 49,579 were above 100 up to 200% FPL and 32,223 were >200% FPL.
In its first 4 years of implementation (October 1, 1998 - September 30, 2002), Phase II, ALL Kids, enrolled over 80,000 children. It is estimated that 52,000 children have current enrollment in ALL Kids at the end of FY 2002.
ALL Kids PLUS, added as a third amendment to the CHIP State Plan (October, 1999), serves as a mechanism by which children with special health care needs/conditions (CSHCN/C), who are enrolled in ALL Kids, may receive health and health related services which are beyond the
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 16 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
scope of the basic ALL Kids package. ALL Kids PLUS was designed so that it serves as a funding source for CHIP state match and as a funding mechanism for state agencies who serve CSHCN/C with state funds. State agencies participating in ALL Kids PLUS supply the state match, provide the service, and receive full reimbursement. It was originally estimated that approximately 9% of these enrollees would also receive at least one service under ALL Kids PLUS. However because the basic benefit package is so comprehensive, a much lower percentage of children are receiving PLUS services. It is expected that this percentage will increase as more state agencies contract with CHIP to become ALL Kids PLUS providers. With the advent of ALL Kids, the ACCF has changed its income eligibility criteria to serve children who are not eligible for Medicaid or ALL Kids and who have incomes up to 235% FPL. Because, the ACCF has no enrollment restriction regarding immigrants, this program has seen a dramatic increase in its Hispanic enrollment.
Guidance: Section 2.2allows states to request to use the funds available under the 10 percent limit on administrative expenditures in order to fund services not otherwise allowable. The health services initiatives must meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.10.
2.2. Health Services Initiatives-Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10) As peFmitted undeF seetion 210S(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Soeial SeeuFity Aet and fedeFOI Fegulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of ,A,,lahama is implementing a health senriees initiatwe (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the fedeFOI administFative expendituFes eap allowed feF states, to support the Redueing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Senriees Initiatiü;e. The aim of this initiative is to Feduee the infant mortality Fate in seleeted eounties within Alabama thFough the pFoivision of a ivaFiety of e"l'idenee based ease management senriees feF pFegnant women and ehildFen. These ease management senriees will taFget health, soeial, and hehavioFOI health Felated high Fisk faetoFs whieh h&\'e been shown to impaet pngnaney outeomes and infant health. Case Management senriees will eonneet patients, with high Fisk faetoFs, to appFopFiate senriees and ease manageFS will fellow up to ensuFe that Fisk faetoFs &Fe being addFessed satisfaetoFily. It is antieipated that the ease manageF will make a total of (, faee to faee visits. Thne visits would oeeuF duFing the pFenatal eaFe, and thFee visits would he pFovided post delivery.
The eaFe eooFdination senriees pFoivided postpartum ineluding senriees to the infant inelude:
i. Make home visit within one month fellowing deliveey to eomplete the fellowing: 1. EneauFOge patient ta keep postpartum appaietmeet inehuling pFa¥idieg appointmeet FemindeFs ta help ensuFe eompletian af the postpartum appointment. 2. EneouFage patieet to ehoose a Feliahle birth eontFol method. If the patient has ehosen
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 17 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
steriluetioe es her method, follow up with the patient to ensure the proeedure is eompleted. 3. Ensure patient is established withe PMP for the iefeet. 4. Ensure iefeet hes enrolled ie WIC, if eligible. S. Edueete the patient oe the importeeee of immueuetioes for the iefeet. ii. ,4,.ssist ie sehedulieg eppoietmeets with iefeet's PMP up to the first year to ensure that well hehy eheelmps ere made end immueuetioes ere up to date. Follow up after the eppoietmeets to verify that eppoietmeets were kept. Well Behy eheekups ere seheduled et: e. 1 month h. 2 months e. 4 months d. ft months e. 9 months f. 12 months HI. Promote the ehild's overall physieel, eogeitive, end emotioeel de¥elopmeet through edueetieg pereets/eeregi¥ers about developmental milestones eeeordieg to the ehild's ege end developmental abilities. iv. Complete ee ASQ 3 (Ages end Stages Questioeeeire, Third Edition, e developmental sereeeieg tool) es appropriate et feee to feee eppoietmeets. v. Edueete the parents about the importeeee of reeding to the iefeet to promote eogeiti'ie de¥elopmeet. vi. Mek:e referrels for the ehild, es appropriate, sueh es Early Ieterveetioe, Children's Rehehilitetioe Sen'iees, ete. ¥ii. Prior to the ehild's first birthday, ensure he/she is established withe dentist. viii. Sereee the mother for post pertum depression et eeeh feee to feee ¥isit end meli,e referrals end fellaÌ, up (es needed)
With the eneptioe of pro¥idieg eeeessery preeetel monitoring by e nurse ie the home or health department setting, ea HSI funds will he spent oe direet eere.
The high risk: feetors that HSI will address ieelude the folloÌ'ieg: ACEs Seore of Í4 Depressioe1 Diabetes Mellitus Current multiple births Suhsteeee Ahusei Metereel egeJ Hypertension Ieterpersoeel safety Treesportetioe needs Housing Instability Food Ieseeurity Utility needs Ahuse4---- Enrollment ie CHIP uehore eoverege Prior poor pregeeeey outeomes._____________
1 Depression noted at anytime during the pregnancy or postpartum period (90 days postpartum) 2 History of use or current substance use 3 <21 or>35 4 Emotional, physical, or sexual 5 Fetal Death - Stillbirth after 20 weeks; Infant death -first year of life; Preterm birth - <37 weeks gestation; Low Birthweight - <2500 grams; Very Low Birthweight - <1500 grams; Other serious chronic conditions (ex: heart disease, renal disease, chronic medical illnesses, etc.); and, Maternal Death (death of a woman while
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 18 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
To he eligible fer the HSI, pregnant women and/or their infants in seleeted eounties must ha¥e at least one of the high risk faetors eited aho"ie and have an ineome no greater than the upper CmP limit (eurrently 312% FPL). HSI serviees will he offered whether or not the patient has health insuranee eoverage and regardless of the type of insuranee. Case management serviees fer individuals enrolled in Medieaid will he time limited until the implementation of the ease management serviees pra,•ided in the A,lahama Coordinated Health Network (ACHN) seheduled to begin Oetoher 1, 1019. Individuals with other insuranee that are provided ease management serviees will not he pFO"iided ease management serviees using HSI fends.
Patients will he enrolled in the HSI initiati"fe during pregnaney, during the post partum period, or by referral. Onee enrolled, HSI serviees will eontinue, as appropriate, fer one year post deli"fery with the eueptions noted in the paragraph aho"fe.
The HSI will he eoordinated by the Alabama Department of Puhlie Health and deli"fered through designated eounty health departments. Depending upon the needs of those partieipating in the initiative, serviees may he provided by puhlie health nurses, puhlie health soeial worl©rs, eommunity health workers, ete.
The proposed eounties fer initial implementation of the HSI inelude Montgomery, Maeon and Russell eounties. Serviees supported through this HSI will not supplant other federal, state or loeal funds alloeated fer similar serviees.
Outreaeh aetivities fer the RIM HSI inelude pro"iiding edueation and infermation to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the eaunties in whieh the expansion is implemented.
In monitoring/evaluating the progress and sueeess of this program, the total number of women and ehildren served will he eaptured and reported to ALL Kids on an agreed upon sehedule hut no less than a quarterly basis. Traelang and reporting of "fisits and birth outeomes (birth weight, mortality within the first year of life and maternal health indiees) will also he ineluded in reports to ALL Kids.
The east of the HSI is budgeted to he $753,615 for FY 1019 (July Sept).
Case Management Costs: Initially, within the proposed three eounty area, approximately SOO women/families eould he served in FY 1019. The number of ease management hours per person/family is estimated to he 10 hours/quarter at an average east of $135/hour. This hourly rate would aeeount fer salary
pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes).
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 19 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
eost of those pFovidiBg/eooFdinating seFViees. ,"Additionally, it is estimated that staff will tFavel 25 miles peF home visit and theFe will be two home visits/patientlquarteF at the state mileage FeimbuFsement Fate of S0.545/mile.
Annual 1st QuarteF Case Management: EnFollees X ease management houFs S2,700,000 S(;75,000 X Sl35.00/houF TF&vel: # enFollees X miles/Found tFip X 2 tFips/quarteF X mileage S 54,500 S 13,(;25 FeimbuFsement Fate
Start Up/OutFeaeh Costs: As the HSI is being developed, eosts &Fe beiBg alloeated foF peFSonnel support to inelude up to two FTEs (one full time pFojeet manageF and otheF aneillaey support staff as needed). Additionally, eosts &Fe ineluded foF the development of mateFials to pFomote and edueate health eaFe pFovideFs and eommunity oFgani-zations thFoughout the implementation eounties about the initiative and to gaFneF support and partieipation of ageneieslpFovideFs. Edueation and awaFeness mateFials to outFeaeh to women will also be pFepaFed. E:Kpenses to eonduet (as well as attend) meetings, eonfeFenees andloF tFainings to shaFe infoFmation about the pFogFam and geneFate paFtieipation &Fe also ineluded as part of the startup and implementation eosts. ----------------------------+l•'HAnFHnFHUIH&Hl---+lst QuaFteF PeFsonnel Costs (Salary, FFiBge, IndiFeet eosts) S200,000 SS0,000 Edueational/tFainiBg mateFials S 10,000 Sl0,000 (pFovideFsloFgani-zations and partieipants) Costs foF meetings (tFansportatioe-/meetiBg fees)
GF&nd Total: S2,9(;9,SOO S7S3,fi2S (PeFsonnel, MateFials, Meeting eosts, Case Management)
HSI II: ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative: As permitted under section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative. This HSI will not supplant or match CHIP Federal funds with other Federal funds, nor allow other Federal funds to supplant or match CHIP Federal funds. This HSI will assist in improving the health of children by ensuring their mothers have access to healthcare services during their postpartum period. The aim of this initiative is to provide full health insurance coverage during the postpartum period to enrollees who have been prenatally covered in the Reducing Infant Mortality Conception to Birth program known as ALL Babies. The length of the ALL Babies postpartum period is equivalent to Alabama Medicaid's current definition of the length of postpartum period "From delivery through the end of the month in which the 60th day postpartum falls, counting from the date the pregnancy ends either as a full term or as a miscarriage." ALL Babies participants will be enrolled automatically in the postpartum HSI
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 20 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-24)Page 24#
initiative. Metrics used to measure the impact of the state's HSI program on the health of low income children and their mothers will be included in the state's CHIP Annual Report.
Cost: The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $360,000 for FY 2023. This figure is based on anticipated enrollment (870 enrollees) in 36 counties with an average enrollment of 2.5 months.
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements-(Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(l)(C)); (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009)Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a State in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(l)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice.
ALL Kids provides a certified letter to the federally recognized tribe in the state when considering amendments to the State Plan or other program changes requiring CMS approval. The tribe is given 30 days to respond. In the event of an emergency, ALL Kids will submit a faxed letter to the tribe and give 10 days for response.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expandedD eligibility under the State's Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4. Guidance: In Section 3.1., discussion may include, but is not limited to: contracts with managed health care plans (including fully and partially capitated plans); contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; and other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography, as well as the State methods for establishing and defining the delivery systems.
Should the State choose to cover unborn children under the Title XXI State plan, the
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 21 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-25)Page 25#
State must describe how services are paid. For example, some states make a global payment for all unborn children while other states pay for services on fee-for-services basis. The State's payment mechanism and delivery mechanism should be briefly described here.
Section 2103(f)(3) of the Act, as amended by section 403 of CHIPRA, requires separate or combination CHIP programs that operate a managed care delivery system to apply several provisions of section 1932 of the Act in the same manner as these provisions apply under title XIX of the Act. Specific provisions include: section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision ofinformation; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. If the State CHIP program operates a managed care delivery system, provide an assurance that the State CHIP managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant sections of section 1932 of the Act. States must submit the managed care contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office servicing them for review and approval.
In addition, states may use up to 10 percent of actual or estimated Federal expenditures for targeted low-income children to fund other forms of child health assistance, including contracts with providers for a limited range of direct services; other health services initiatives to improve children's health; outreach expenditures; and administrative costs (See 2105(c)(2)(A)). Describe which, if any, of these methods will be used.
Examples of the above may include, but are not limited to: direct contracting with school-based health services; direct contracting to provide enabling services; contracts with health centers receiving funds under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; contracts with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under section 1886(d)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Act; contracts with other hospitals; and contracts with public health clinics receiving Title V funding. If applicable, address how the new arrangements under Title XXI will work with existing service delivery methods, such as regional networks for chronic illness and disability; neonatal care units, or early-intervention programs for at-risk infants, in the delivery and utilization of services. (42CFR 457.490(a))
3.1. Delivery Standards Describe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(a))
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 22 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-26)Page 26#
From February 2, 1998 through September 30, 2002, Phase I of CHIP, a Medicaid expansion was in existence. On October 1, 2002, Phase I of Alabama's CHIP was subsumed by the Alabama SOBRA Medicaid Program. As of October 1, 2015, CHIP will again expand Medicaid by covering Medicaid emollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 13% FPL through 141% FPL.
ALL Kids: Program Operation-Administration From inception of the program in 1998 through May, 2001, ALL Kids contracted with the State Employee's Insurance Board (SEIB) to serve as its emollment and premium billing/receiving office. As emollment grew, ALL Kids staff increased, and the need for data management grew, the ADPH CHIP unit and SEIB jointly decided to move the emollment and premium billing/receiving functions to the CHIP unit. The Alabama Department of Public Health (Department) now manages all emollment aspects of the ALL Kids program and utilizes other contractors to administer certain aspects of the ALL Kids program including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Providing all eligible persons involved in ALL Kids an individual policy or certificate that states the insurance protection provided, the method and place of filing claims, and to whom benefits are payable. The policy or certificate indicates that coverage was obtained through CHIP; 2. Maintenance of a claims database for the purpose of program management. 3. Management of evaluation surveillance procedures. 4. Consultation for actuarial services 5. Consultation for development of data systems 6. Consultation for development of specialized outreach plans
Program Operation-Benefits and Services The ALL Kids program is a self-funded, discounted fee-for-service*, PPO, delivery system. In order to assure delivery of the insurance product(s), the Department utilizes a private health care delivery organization(s) to provide benefits and services. Both indemnity plan(s) and or managed care plans(s) are acceptable and have been used. The selected vendor(s) is required to perform, including but not limited to, the following:
1. Furnishing coverage information and ID cards; 2. Member service responses to claims inquiries; 3. Claims certification, investigation, adjudication, and internal appeals process; 4. Processing and distribution of benefit payments to providers; 5. Appropriate and accurate fee administration; 6. Strict financial accounting and reconciliation; 7. Effective management of networks (if applicable); 8. Demonstrated capability to serve Alabama membership;
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 23 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-27)Page 27#
9. Effective medical, pharmacy and dental management including medical review of claims decisions; 10. Production of claims, contract, and other legal forms as required; 11. Establishment and maintenance of appropriate banking arrangements; 12. Continuous and accurate electronic transmission of all data; 13. Production of reports that capture claim and utilization experience and trends; 14. Other special services as may be requested from time to time 15. Have a network of physicians, dentists, pharmacies, and other providers capable of meeting the demands of the ALL Kids Program. 16. Facilitation of a medical home for each enrollee.
*The exception to the fee-for-service payment system is the method of reimbursement to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs) based on a prospective payment system (PPS). This is in compliance with section 503 of the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). In accordance with this provision of CHIPRA, ALL Kids has elected to adopt the Medicaid PPS Rates effective October 1, 2009. This method of payment will be implemented August 25, 2010 for all qualifying services rendered on or after October 1, 2009.
In the past, ALL Kids has used three (3) insurance venders, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama (statewide), Prime Health (in 10 southwestern counties from 10/98-9/00) and United Healthcare (14 counties from 10/01-7 /02) for the above services. However, due to low enrollment in Prime Health and United Healthcare (which was due to patient choice), each of those programs elected, with the mutual consent of the ALL Kids program, to discontinue serving as an ALL Kids vendor. Currently, the only ALL Kids vendor for the above services is Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama. This vendor provides services statewide.
CHIP makes health care coverage available to all individuals eligible for ALL Kids on a "guaranteed issue" basis with no exclusions of coverage for pre-existing conditions, and on a "guaranteed renewable" basis for those eligible.
ALL Kids PLUS Program Operation-Administration For this addition to the program, the Alabama Department of Public Health has partnered (and seeks to partner) with other governmental agencies (which serve special needs children) to provide the state match, provide or provide for covered ALL Kids PLUS services, to authorize case by case reimbursement for ALL Kids PLUS services, to notify ALL Kids PLUS families of their approval for services, and select one case manager per child so as to minimize duplication and gaps in services. PLUS services became available through CRS as of October 1, 2000. An ALL Kids PLUS contract was signed with the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation effective October 1, 2002.
Several state agencies, other provider entities, and advocates within the state have met to develop the
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 24 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-28)Page 28#
concept and plan of operation for ALL Kids PLUS.
At the present time, the list of ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies is restricted to those governmental agencies supplying the state match money. If other state or appropriated matching funds become available, this restriction may be modified or eliminated. A child must be enrolled in ALL Kids to qualify for PLUS services. When a child is identified with a special condition or need that a participating agency serves, he/she is referred to that agency based on that special condition/need. This agency will, based on the availability of funds, assign a case manager to the child, authorize needed services within the agency, and make referrals to other authorizing agencies for additional services if needed. All agencies authorizing PLUS services for a child notify the child's case manager and referral site (if different) for approval of services. Each child will only have one ALL Kids PLUS case manager. The decision as to which agency will provide the case management will be determined by the agencies involved in the child's care and will be based on what makes the best practice sense and is in the best interest of the child.
Authorizing agencies bill the insurance vendor(s) for any authorized PLUS services that the agencies have provided directly or indirectly. The Alabama Department of Public Health reimburses the insurance vendor(s) in the same manner that reimbursement for the basic ALL Kids program is handled. At this time, the participating PLUS agencies do not utilize a central integrated data system. However, their day-to-day practice involves coordination through the case manager with other agencies to avoid duplication. Each agency submits all claims/data to the insurance vendor (BCBS) for adjudication and reimbursement. While a child may have claims submitted by more than one agency, only one agency may be reimbursed for case management services.
Check here if the State child health program delivers services using a managed care □ delivery model. The State provides an assurance that its managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant provisions of section 1932 of the Act, including section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932( c ), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932( d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 193 2( e ), Sanctions for Noncompliance. The State also assures that it will submit the contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office for review and approval. (Section 2103(f)(3))
Guidance: In Section 3 .2., note that utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: reguirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review,
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 25 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-29)Page 29#
coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. (42CFR 457.490(b))
3.2. Describe the utilization controls under the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children. Describe the systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(b))
Utilization control mechanisms are in place for the ALL Kids program to ensure that children use only health care that is appropriate, medically necessary, and/or approved by the State or the participating health plan. In addition, policies are in place to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner according to the vendors' medical necessity definition. The current Blue Cross Blue Shield policies are available upon request.
Before being approved for participation in the ALL Kids program, health plan vendors must develop and have in place utilization review policies and procedures, demand management, and disease state management mechanisms. Provider networks approved for the ALL Kids program are accepted based on evidence of the vendors' provider credentialing policies, provider accessibility, cost effectiveness, and efficiency.
Each ALL Kids PLUS authorizing state agency has a utilization review mechanism particular to that agency. Services approved for ALL Kids PLUS are those which are developmentally necessary and/or physically necessary. Reviewing the appropriate use of services is part of the case manager's duties.
The Alabama Medicaid Agency applies the same utilization controls to the CHIP Medicaid expansion enrollees as it does to the entire Medicaid child book of business. Section 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology
Guidance: States electing to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State's Medicaid plan or combination plan should check the appropriate box and provide the ages and income level for each eligibility group. If the State is electing to take up the option to expand Medicaid eligibility as allowed under section 214 of CHIPRA regarding lawfully residing, complete section 4.1-LR as well as update the budget to reflect the additional costs if the state will claim title XXI match for these children until and if the time comes that the children are eligible for Medicaid.
Approval Date: January 13, 2023Effective Date: October 1, 2022 26
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-30)Page 30#
Medicaid Expansion4.0.□ 4.0.1. Ages ofeach eligibility group and the income standard for that group:
Separate Program Check all standards that will apply to the State plan. ( 42CFR4.1.□ 457.305(a) and 457.320(a))
4.1.0ODescribe how the State meets the citizenship verification requirements. Include whether or not State has opted to use SSA verification option.
4.1.1 area served by the Plan ifless than Statewide: □Geographic 4.1.2 ofeach eligibility group, including unborn children and pregnant □Ages women (ifapplicable) and the income standard for that group:
Age: through birth (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 4.1.2.1-PC□ 2002)
4.1.3 of each separate eligibility group (ifapplicable): □Income 4.1.3.1-PCD 0% ofthe FPL (and not eligible for Medicaid) through % ofthe FPL (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) 4.1.4OResources of each separate eligibility group (including any standards relating to spend downs and disposition of resources):
4.1.5OResidency (so long as residency requirement is not based on length oftime in state):
4.1.6[8JDisability Status (so long as any standard relating to disability status does not restrict eligibility): Children will be eligible for ALL Kids regardless ofdisability. ALL Kids PLUS is available to children with special conditions/needs who are enrolled in ALL Kids. ALL Kids PLUS enrollment is restricted to services authorized and financed by PLUS participating agencies. However, ifaccess to additional matching funds becomes available and/or the health needs of CSHCC/N change, authorized services will be revised to reflect these changes.
4.1.7[8JAccess to or coverage under other health coverage:
A child is not eligible for ALL Kids ifs/he has any other health insurance coverage or is eligible for Medicaid.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 27 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-31)Page 31#
4.1.80Duration of eligibility, not to exceed 12 months:
4.1.9\0ther Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility, including those standards in 42 CFR 457.310 and 457.320 that are not addressed above. For instance: Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in Alabama (initially Montgomery, Macon and Russell). A phased in approach (see CS9 for list of initial phase counties) will be utilized until coverage is offered statewide. The time frame for the phase in period will be 3-5 years. Comprehensive coverage will be provided to this population from the date of enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CIDP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. Obstetric coverage for current ALL Kids members includes all prenatal care through 90 days postpartum and is billed as a bundled payment. Social Security numbers for the babies will not be required unless and until the child is born and applies for renewal.
Guidance: States may only require the SSN of the child who is applying for coverage. If SSNs are required and the State covers unborn children, indicate that the unborn children are exempt from providing a SSN. Other standards include, but are not limited to presumptive eligibility and deemed newborns.
States should specify whether Social Security Numbers (SSN) 4.1.9.1 D are required.
Guidance: States should describe their continuous eligibility process and populations that can be continuously eligible.
4.1.9.2[gl Continuous eligibility Section 2107(e)(l)(J) applies section 1902(e)(16) equally to CHIP and allows individuals who were eligible for and enrolled in CHIP while pregnant to remain eligible regardless of changes in circumstance except for the following:
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 28 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-32)Page 32#
screen and enroll process.
Section 5. Outreach and Coordination
5.1. (formerly 2.2)Describe the current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children by addressing sections 5 .1.1 and 5 .1.2.(Section 2102)(a)(2) (42CFR 457.80(b))
Guidance: The information below may include whether the state elects express lane eligibility a description of the State's outreach efforts through Medicaid and state-only programs.
5.1.1. (formerly 2.2.1.) The steps the State is currently talcing to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs (i.e., Medicaid and state-only child health insurance):
In Alabama, thanks to outreach efforts of a variety of public and private agencies and organizations, there is a high awareness level of children's health insurance programs and their eligibility requirements. Over one-fourth of children under the age of 19 in Alabama are covered by Medicaid or ALL Kids. The programs are reaching children who might not otherwise have access to the health care they need.
Prior to CHIP, the Medicaid Program was the only public health insurance program for children in Alabama. Health services are provided in Alabama to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children by private physicians, the 67 Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) county health departments, 16 primary care centers (including Federally Qualified Health Centers), two children's hospitals (The Children's Hospital of Alabama and Women's and Children's Hospital at the University of South Alabama) school health nurses, and one Indian Health Service Clinic. In addition to the two children's hospitals, Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services, Children's Rehabilitation Services (CRS) provides specialty care to uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children with special health care needs. As lead agency for Alabama's Early Intervention System, this agency coordinates services for infants and toddlers eligible for IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), part C. This section describes the current efforts made by the ADPH to provide health care services, and to identify and enroll uncovered children in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs. This section also describes the efforts made by CRS, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to identify and enroll all uncovered children who are eligible to participate in the Medicaid and ALL Kids programs.
Alabama Department of Public Health As the CHIP lead agency, the ADPH is actively involved in all aspects of identification and enrollment of children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs and
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 37 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-33)Page 33#
health insurance programs that involve public-private partnerships. Activities include the creation, publication, and distribution of marketing materials, management of the ALL Kids enrollment process, and targeted outreach activities for specific populations such as faith-based organizations, etc. The Alabama Department of Public Health provides some direct as well as support patient care for uninsured and Medicaid enrolled children and adolescents. Direct services for this population include: preventive child health services (well-child check-ups), prenatal services, Women Infants and Children Supplemental Nutrition [WIC] program services, preventive health education, immunizations, and Family Planning program services. Support services include case management services, the provision of information and referral via toll-free telephone lines, and laboratory services. These services are funded through federal Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant funds, federal Title X Family Planning program funds, federal WIC Program funds, Medicaid program reimbursements, federal immunization funds, state legislative appropriations, some local government appropriations, and a small amount of patient fee revenue. A variety of the above direct and support services are provided within ADPH county health departments. In fiscal year 2001, 34,664 children (birth through age 18 years) received health services in local county health departments. (This number excludes single service patients [STD-only, Immunization-only, WIC-only].) The Alabama Department of Public Health is the state's Title V agency. Additionally, there are approximately 512 school health nurses, R.N.s and L.P.N.s, (working under the auspices of the ADPH, private hospitals, the Alabama State Department of Education, and/or local education agencies) in the state who provide a variety of health screening services, primary care and emergency services, Medicaid/ALL Kids enrollment facilitation, etc.
Income assessments are performed on all patients enrolled in ADPH clinics. The income assessments are reviewed for possible Medicaid eligibility. Beginning in FY 1991, Medicaid eligibility workers were out-stationed in health departments and other health care facilities to accept applications and complete Medicaid eligibility determinations at the time of health visits. A streamlined, four-page expanded Medicaid eligibility form, which was implemented in FY 1991, has been revised into a joint application with CIDP and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is available at county health departments. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility personnel currently assist patients in completing the forms and data is put into an automated Medicaid system on-site. Final determination for Medicaid can then be made immediately. If the children appear to be ALL Kids or ACCF eligible the application is forwarded to the appropriate program.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by ADPH intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Out-stationed Medicaid eligibility workers are based in many ADPH clinics, hospitals, and primary care centers across the state. Additionally, two Medicaid out stationed workers and a clerk are now located in the CHIP office who process many ALL Kids referrals. A third worker will be added in FY 2003.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 38 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-34)Page 34#
Cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level.
In order to provide additional outreach, the ADPH operates two toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. The toll-free telephone lines (established prior to the implementation of CIDP and continued to the present) are known as Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection. Two integral parts of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, are information on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referrals. to health providers who accept Medicaid-eligible children and Medicaid-eligible pregnant women. Referral services provided by the Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection staff members are expanded through consultation supplied by a host of additional professionals located within the ADPH. The toll-free number for Healthy Beginnings is 1-800-654-1385. The Info Connection number is 1-800-545-1098. Both lines are operational 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week; office hours are from 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. each week day. The Healthy Beginnings and Info Connection lines are publicized statewide through newspapers, television, posters, and pamphlets. Presentations regarding the lines are conducted statewide to various organizations and agencies. The numbers are also published in Alabama South Central Bell telephone books. Additionally, with the implementation of CHIP, the CHIP unit maintains two toll-free telephone lines (888-373-5437 for enrollment and eligibility issues and 877-774-9521 for administrative issues). Finally, in addition to the above efforts, ALL Kids, Medicaid, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed a joint application and renewal form for use by all three programs. This enables families to be screened for eligibility for all three programs and facilitates referrals and timely enrollment in the appropriate program.
Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA) ADECA notifies the ALL Kids regional staff when a plant or large business plans to close in the near future. ALL Kids regional staff present ALL Kids information and materials at employee meetings prior to the plant/business closing. In order to prevent gaps in health insurance coverage for the children of the employees of the plant/business, an ALL Kids policy was developed which provides for beginning ALL Kids coverage (for eligible children) the day after employer sponsored coverage ends if an application is received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit within 30 days after the plant/business closing.
Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services Children's Rehabilitation Service Children's Rehabilitation Service (CRS) also has coordination agreements with the Alabama Medicaid Agency. (These contracts existed prior to CHIP and have continued to be in effect.) The Alabama Medicaid Agency contracted with CRS for the provision of specialty medical services, specialized therapy (such as physical, occupational, speech, etc.) services, and case management services to children with special health care needs. With the implementation of ALL Kids, CRS clinics were added as preferred providers under the ALL Kids basic benefits
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 39 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-35)Page 35#
package and the ALL Kids PLUS package.
New applications, as well as annual reviews of established patients, are assessed by CRS intake staff and/or care coordinators for possible referral for medical assistance through Medicaid, ALL Kids, ACCF, or SSI. When appropriate, staff assist families in completing the application forms, making appointments, and gathering medical information. Joint Medicaid/ALL Kids/ACCF eligibility forms are available in all CRS offices and clinics. As in the ADPH, cross training sessions with staff at many levels has improved interagency communication at the community level. Medicaid and ALL Kids information and outreach brochures and posters are available in every CRS office throughout the state.
Additionally, like the ADPH, CRS operates toll-free telephone lines for use by the general public. One line is operated at the state level in Montgomery and additional lines are located in each CRS district office. An integral part of the information provided to callers, via these telephone lines, is Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility and referral information. CRS and Early Intervention (EI) have both completed database matches with ALL Kids files to identify children known to both programs. CIDP staff have participated in many staff trainings throughout the state to assist CRS and EI staff in outreach for ALL Kids, Medicaid, and ACCF.
Division of Early Intervention As the lead agency for Alabama's early intervention system for infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities and their families, this unit provides a toll free Child Find telephone number for use by the general public and primary referral sources. Additional efforts for coordination are described in the PLUS sections of this document.
Medicaid A&ency The Alabama Medicaid Agency has 135 eligibility workers in over 170 locations to enroll children eligible for SOBRA Medicaid whose the family's income is at or below 100 percent of FPL (for children born after September 30, 1983) or 133 percent of the FPL (for children through age five). With the implementation of CIDP, 23 workers were added throughout the state. In March, 2002, two eligibility workers and a clerk were housed in the ALL Kids central office to review applications referred from the ALL Kids eligibility workers. In addition to the CIDP office, these workers are located in places children are likely to go to receive health care - - county health departments, Federally Qualified Health Centers and hospitals. Because workers are in the community, they can and do establish working relationships with public and private providers, social service agencies and others. For example, supervisors provide in service training and education on Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF eligibility to physicians, Head Start workers, day care centers, Human Resources staff and others. The Alabama Medicaid Agency also has 10 district offices located throughout the state that process applications for the elderly and the disabled population. The 80 eligibility workers and 20 supervisors advise applicants about other programs and refer the applicants to the proper
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 40 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-36)Page 36#
office when they do not qualify for a disabled program. They also advise about programs for which other family members may be eligible. These district offices work closely with providers to keep them informed of all programs available through the Medicaid Agency.
Applications for Medicaid, ALL Kids, and ACCF are easily available to anyone who needs one. Applications are available not only from Medicaid workers but also at physicians' offices, county offices of the Department of Human Resources and hospitals. All sources of the joint application (i.e., ADPH, CRS, etc.) allow a "mail-in" application process thereby allowing Medicaid to complete a phone interview instead of a face-to-face interview. Medicaid has a toll free number for anyone to call to ask questions about Medicaid eligibility and find out where and how to apply. The number is 1-800-362-1504. Medicaid's Web site contains information on Medicaid eligibility and is used by advocates to assist people who want to apply for Medicaid.
Through its Medical Care Advisory Committee and its Physicians Task Force, Medicaid receives guidance on ways to reach potential Medicaid eligible. Medicaid staff regularly brief these groups, who represent both providers and consumers, on all facets of the Medicaid program, including eligibility. Both groups are kept informed of upcoming changes in the Medicaid program and encouraged to provide comments and suggestions. With welfare reform and the separation of Medicaid eligibility from eligibility for public assistance, the Alabama Medicaid Agency and the Department of Human Resources have developed new cooperative arrangements to assure that children in the state's lowest income families have access to Medicaid. Applications may be completed through the mail with a telephone interview, thus eliminating the need for a face-to-face contact. Currently DHR workers assess their clients to determine whether they might be eligible for any Medicaid, ALL Kids, or ACCF program. Workers help to complete forms, gather information and make appointments as necessary. However, the enrollment function for this Medicaid program will be transferred from DHR to the Medicaid Agency within the coming year.
Outreach occurs after the birth of an infant to a Medicaid recipient. Following the birth of each newborn whose mother is a Medicaid recipient, the Alabama Medicaid Agency sends the infant's parent or guardian a pamphlet on the Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program as well as a pamphlet on immunizations. When children are enrolled in the SSI Program, they are automatically enrolled in the Medicaid Program. Additionally, a brochure is sent to parents/guardians of all new SSI eligible children encouraging them to participate in the EPSDT program. In addition to these efforts, social workers within the ADPH conduct patient recruitment as a part of their case management activities. These recruitment efforts are conducted through community presentations and professional relationships with other State and local agencies which serve mothers and children.
The Alabama Department of Human Resources and the Alabama Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation also provide case management services for Medicaid children
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 41 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-37)Page 37#
known to their agencies, in order to facilitate their enrollment in health services particularly mental health services through the Rehabilitation Option.
Through CIDP Phase I, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, working with the Alabama Department of Public Health, took several major steps to identify and enroll all uncovered children who were eligible to participate in this public health insurance program. New eligibility workers were hired and they, plus existing eligibility workers, were trained in CHIP eligibility criteria as well as other Medicaid eligibility criteria. These eligibility workers are out stationed in health departments, hospitals, community health centers, CIDP office, etc.
In order to streamline the CIDP/Medicaid enrollment process, the Alabama Medicaid Agency initiated continuous eligibility for all Medicaid children under the age of 19 years, on April 1, 1998. Continuous eligibility means that Medicaid enrolled children maintain their Medicaid coverage continuously for one year from enrollment or re-determination.
Additionally, numerous presentations, regarding CIDP, have been made by knowledgeable professionals who are members of the broad based CHIP Workgroup and CHIP staff. These presentations include addresses to education professionals, rural health groups, child care management agencies, parents of children with special health care needs, Indian Health Service staff, the general public, etc. Some specific activities include:
Notice to all Medicaid providers News releases and camera-ready materials for newspapers Articles published in newsletters of health care provider associations-Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Alabama Hospital Association, Alabama Dental Association, and others Television commercials Radio spots Brochures have been distributed to date for out stationed Medicaid workers, public health workers, county human resources workers, Early Intervention Coordinating Councils, Mental Health Centers, family services centers, primary health care centers, hospitals, advocacy and professional organization, and in the school system, principles and guidance counselors. Brochures distributed at state meetings of Alabama Conference of Social Work, Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics-Alabama Chapter, Alabama Dental Association, Family Practice doctors, and others Satellite conferences to provide information about the basic ALL Kids Program and instruction in completing the application. Distribution of applications and brochures to all public school systems, local health departments, welfare offices, hospitals, community health centers, physician and dentist offices, pharmacies, WIC clinics, and family law attorneys, etc. Public forums for parents and advocates of CSHCC/N (Children with Special Health Care Conditions/Needs)
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 42 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-38)Page 38#
With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion aed the RlM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
In addition to the above, the state has engaged in the following particular activities to promote ALL Kids PLUS. Originally, it was anticipated that ALL Kids PLUS would involve four state programs, Children's Rehabilitation Service, Early Intervention, Mental Health/Mental Retardation, and Civitan International Research Center Sparks Clinics. After conducting database matches, reviews of Pediatric Health History information, claims data, through mutual agreement, Sparks determined that their services were being adequately reimbursed through the ALL Kids basic benefit package. Therefore, attention was focused on the remaining three agencies. Since that time, CIDP has entered into discussions with the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind with regard to becoming an ALL Kids PLUS provider. CRS has had an active contract for the provision of PLUS services since October, 2000 and has served as a valuable partner in establishing protocols for the identification of ALL Kids enrollees in need of PLUS services and the identification of current clients in need of insurance coverage.
Initially it was anticipated that children would be identified for the PLUS program through an in-depth analysis of the Pediatric Health History and chart reviews. Practical experience has shown that this was not the most productive method of identification. Database matches were necessary as a first action to even identify ALL Kids enrollees who were being served by CRS. After this baseline was established, claims reviews were shown to be a more valuable mechanism in identifying children eligible for PLUS services than were chart reviews. This claims review revealed that a much smaller percentage of ALL Kids enrollees, than originally projected, were in need of services beyond those available in the basic benefits package. Program staff continually monitor feedback from providers and families regarding the need for additional services. This type of feedback and analysis has influenced the approaches that have been used with the other potential ALL Kids PLUS agencies. Through the activities of the regional ALL Kids staff, central office social work consultant, and customer service staff, ALL
Kids enrollees in need of these specialized services provided by ALL Kids PLUS agencies have been identified and referred as appropriate.
In August of 1999, the ADPH broadcasted a nationwide satellite conference to educate the provider community and other concerned individuals regarding ALL Kids PLUS. In addition, CIDP staff provided training on the PLUS program to CRS staff at regional meetings.
Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) The DHR has continued to partner with the ADPH to communicate ALL Kids information to
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 43 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-39)Page 39#
their county staffs. They have provided initial and continuing updates to county DHR staff as well as provided periodic shipments of applications, posters, etc. The DHR has also assisted with outreach efforts through its childcare management agencies and facilitated communication with licensed child day-care homes and centers.
Guidance: The State may address the coordination between the public-private outreach and the public health programs that is occurring statewide. This section will provide a historic record of the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children from the time the State's plan was initially approved. States do not have to rewrite his section but may instead update this section as appropriate.
5.1.2. (formerly 2.2.2.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in health insurance programs that involve a public-private partnership:
There is only one health insurance program for children in Alabama that resembles a public private partnership. This program is known as the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF) and is a part of Blue Cross Blue Shield. The Alabama Child Caring Foundation provides limited ambulatory health insurance to low income, non-Medicaid/non-ALL Kids, uninsured children under the age of 19 years who remain full-time students through grade 12. The program is funded through private donations and matching funds from Blue Cross Blue Shield. Outreach for this program is conducted through articles in Blue Cross Blue Shield publications and public service announcements in local newspapers, via television, and radio stations. The University of Alabama and Auburn University coaches' television shows expressly advertise the Foundation. Case finding is conducted by school administrators, school nurses, day care operators, and others. Additionally referrals to the Foundation are received from the ALL Kids program, local offices of the ADPH, the Alabama Medicaid Agency, the Alabama Department of Human Resources, the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Dislocated Workers program, individual health care providers, civic organizations, churches, Sunday School classes, other religious organizations, and from Foundation participants.
Guidance: The State should describe below how it's Title XXI program will closely coordinate the enrollment with Medicaid because under Title XXL children identified as Medicaid-eligible are required to be enrolled in Medicaid. Specific information related to Medicaid screen and enroll procedures is requested in Section 4.4. (42CFR 457.80(c))
5.2. (formerly 2.3)Describe how CHIP coordinates with other public and private health insurance programs, other sources of health benefits coverage for children, other relevant child health programs, (such as title V), that provide health care services for low-income children to increase the number of children with creditable health
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 44 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-40)Page 40#
coverage.(Section 2102(a)(3),2102(b)(3)(E)and 2102(c)(2))(42CFR 457.80(c)).This item requires a brief overview of how Title XXI efforts - particularly new enrollment outreach efforts - will be coordinated with and improve upon existing State efforts.
The State of Alabama assures coordination with other public and private programs providing creditable coverage for low-income children. The SOBRA Medicaid program, ALL Kids, and the Alabama Child Caring Foundation have developed and use joint application and renewal forms.
All applications received by the ALL Kids enrollment unit are screened for Medicaid eligibility. When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as potentially eligible for Medicaid, the family's application is sent to a Medicaid enrollment worker. Medicaid then processes it. As stated previously, two Medicaid enrollment workers and one clerical worker are physically located within the ALL Kids enrollment unit. This process also works in the reverse (applications are sent from Medicaid to ALL Kids).
When a child is identified by an ALL Kids enrollment worker as not potentially eligible for the Medicaid or ALL Kids but potentially eligible for the Alabama Child Caring Foundation (ACCF), the family's application is sent to ACCF which then processes it and the opposite is also true.
Because it is recognized that the eligibility and enrollment systems of these three programs are not as seamless as needed, ALL Kids employs a full time MSW staff person. This staff person has responsibility to assist families in overcoming obstacles related to eligibility, enrollment, claims, and referral for specialty services as needed. Additional responsibilities include development and maintenance of the ALL Kids policy manual.
In addition, the State coordinates with the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. See the previous section for a broader description of the collaboration.
5.2-EL The State should include a description of its election of the Express Lane eligibility option to provide a simplified eligibility determination process and expedited enrollment of eligible children into Medicaid or CHIP.
Guidance: Outreach strategies may include, but are not limited to, community outreach workers, out stationed eligibility workers, translation and transportation services, assistance with enrollment forms, case management and other targeting activities to inform families of low-income children of the availability of the health insurance program under the plan or other private or public health coverage.
The description should include information on how the State will inform the target of the availability of the programs, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, and
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 45 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-41)Page 41#
assist them in enrolling in the appropriate program. 5.3. Strategies Describe the procedures used by the State to accomplish outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance or other public or private health coverage to inform them of the availability of the programs, and to assist them in enrolling their children in such a program. (Section 2102(c)(l)) (42CFR 457.90)
Phase I - Medicaid Expansion This portion of the outreach section, as it pertains to Phase I of Alabama's Title XXI program, consists solely of efforts that were targeted toward Medicaid eligibles who were born after September 30, 1983 and who are under 19 years of age. There were four primary avenues through which outreach was conducted. These avenues were (1) the use of existing outreach approaches, (2) an initiative to improve communication with and services for the state's rapidly expanding Hispanic population, (3) an increase in the number of Medicaid eligibility workers, and ( 4) coordination with the State Medical Association and physicians to educate physicians and their potentially eligible patients. Detailed information regarding these efforts is available from CHIP upon request.
Phase II - ALL Kids Outreach for ALL Kids is conducted through coordinated Statewide and regional efforts and in each county through partnerships, contracts, and regional CIDP coordinators. These efforts consist of a three-pronged approach: (1) Statewide media campaigns and initiatives; (2) outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants; and, (3) outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies. The purposes of all of these activities is to build networks and coalitions of persons who can inform individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what it has to offer, and assist individuals in completing application forms. Outreach is conducted by a variety of individuals and in a variety of settings. Each feature of the three-pronged outreach approach is described below:
• Statewide media campaigns and initiatives - The media campaigns focus on informing individuals about the availability of ALL Kids and what they have to offer as well as providing information regarding where applications or other information may be obtained. Additionally, ALL Kids staff attend a wide variety of association meetings and conferences to inform memberships of the availability of children's health insurance. The staff have developed specialized outreach materials (from videos to informational brochures and flyers to specific handouts) for specific groups to meet their needs.
Staff have exhibited at booths and presentations to the Medical Association of the State
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 46 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-42)Page 42#
of Alabama, Alabama Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Family Practice Physicians, Dentists, Social Workers, Department of Human Resources staff, Mental Health staff, Family Law Judges, Hospitals, Hospital auxiliaries, WIC staff, Public Health Staff, etc.
• Outreach conducted by multi-county regional workers and consultants - since the Spring of 2002, ALL Kids consultants have been and/are employed throughout the state, to disseminate information about the program to develop coalitions and networks of local residents to assist individuals in completing and submitting applications. These regional coordinators, their supervisory directors, and consultants are many times based in the county health departments but also utilize numerous off-site locales and alternative working hours. • Outreach conducted through existing programs and agencies - Information about CHIP, applications, and application assistance are available through existing child-related programs such as the Child Care Management Agencies and their targeted child day care centers, Food Stamps, Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Program clinics, WIC clinics, community health centers, Indian Health Services, school nurse programs, school counselor programs, Early Intervention programs, other social service agencies, etc. These programs and agencies have successful histories of serving the target population and the CHIP program utilizes their contact with this population to broaden outreach efforts. Dissemination of CHIP information to these entities has been facilitated since representatives of these agencies and programs served on the CHIP Advisory Council and continue to be in contact with CHIP as stakeholders. • With specific regard to the Conception to Birth expansion and the RIM HSI, the ADPH will provide information to pertinent providers, hospitals and programs serving the target population residing in the counties in which the expansion is implemented.
Phase Ill - ALL Kids PLUS Outreach for this special population is conducted primarily by the ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. Outreach includes educating primary and specialty care physicians regarding ALL Kids PLUS, identifying and contacting children who may need PLUS services through reviews of agency rolls and possible reviews of the pediatric health histories (part of the application process), contact with community health centers, etc. Information about ALL Kids PLUS is incorporated into all publications and presentations.
In an effort to continually improve the ALL Kids PLUS, CHIP staff continue to meet with the ALL Kids PLUS participating agencies to identify and resolve any problematic areas and to recruit additional participating agencies. PLUS agencies assist the CHIP staff in developing contracts, performance standards, and procedures for ongoing monitoring and oversight of the ALL Kids PLUS program.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 Approval Date: January 13, 2023 47
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-43)Page 43#
NOTE: The application form and other materials have been translated into Spanish. Additionally, the ALL Kids enrollment unit employs a Spanish-speaking staff member and a Hispanic consultant has been hired to develop a Hispanic outreach plan.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 48 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-44)Page 44#
Section 6. Coverage Requirements for Children's Health Insurance D Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State's Medicaid plan and proceed to Section 7 since children covered under a Medicaid expansion program will receive all Medicaid covered services including EPSDT.
6.1. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply.) (Section 2103(c)); (42CFR 457.410(a))
Guidance: Benchmark coverage is substantially equal to the benefits coverage in a benchmark benefit package (FEHBP-eguivalent coverage, State employee coverage, and/or the HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the state). If box below is checked, either 6.1.1.1., 6.1.1.2., or 6.1.1.3. must also be checked. (Section 2103(a)(l))
6.1.1. [gj Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(a)(l) and 42 CFR 457.420)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan, as described in and offered under Section 8903(1) of Title 5, United States Code. (Section 2103(b)(l) (42 CFR 457.420(b)) 6.1.1.1. D FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(b)(l) (42 CFR 457.420(a)) (If checked, attach copy of the plan.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is State employee coverage, meaning a coverage plan that is offered and generally available to State employees in the state. (Section 2103(b)(2)) 6.1.1.2. D State employee coverage; (Section 2103(b)(2)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is offered by a health maintenance organization (as defined in Section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Services Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives of such coverage plans offered by an HMO in the state. (Section 2103(b)(3) (42 CFR 457.420(c)))
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 49 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-45)Page 45#
6.1.1.3. [8J HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(b)(3)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
The benefit package offered by the health maintenance organization with the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives was selected after several well attended public meetings where the benefits of the three benchmark plans were compared with the assistance of the insurers/administrators for the three plans. The benefit plan was altered slightly to make it more appropriate for children's needs.
In addition to the ALL Kids basic benefits package, additional benefits may be available for enrollees who have special needs. These additional benefits are known as ALL Kids PLUS benefits and are only available as prescribed by ALL Kids PLUS authorizing agencies. These decisions regarding what benefits are provided, the requirements for their receipt, and the provision of the benefits is under the auspices of the PLUS authorizing state agencies. These state agencies are those with which CHIP has a contract for the provision of ALL Kids PLUS services, those agencies that ordinarily serve children with special health care conditions and needs, and which provide the matching funds for federal CHIP funding
The ALL Kids benefits plan is described in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD), which is available upon request. The benefit package for enrollees in the CHIP Medicaid expansion will be identical to other children enrolled in comprehensive Medicaid categories.
Guidance: States choosing Benchmark-equivalent coverage must check the box below and ensure that the coverage meets the following requirements: ■ the coverage includes benefits for items and services within each of the categories of basic services described in 42 CFR 457.430: • dental services • inpatient and outpatient hospital services, • physicians' services, • surgical and medical services, • laboratory and x-ray services, • well-baby and well-child care, including age-appropriate immunizations, and • emergency services; • the coverage has an aggregate actuarial value that is at least actuarially equivalent to one of the benchmark benefit packages (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, or coverage offered through an HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial enrollment in the state); and • the coverage has an actuarial value that is equal to at least 75 percent of the actuarial value of the additional categories in such package, if offered, as
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 50 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-46)Page 46#
described in 42 CFR 457.430: • coverage of prescription drugs, • mental health services, • vision services and • hearing services.
If 6.1.2. is checked, a signed actuarial memorandum must be attached. The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 42 CFR 457.431. The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State results.
The actuarial report must be prepared by an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. This report must be prepared in accordance with the principles and standards of the American Academy of Actuaries. In preparing the report, the actuary must use generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, use a standardized set of utilization and price factors, use a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of children who are expected to be covered under the State child health plan, apply the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services), without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used, and take into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by taking into account the increase in actuarial value of benefits coverage offered under the State child health plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing under such coverage. (Section 2103(a)(2))
6.1.2. Benchmark-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(a)(2) and 42 CFR 457.430) □ Specify the coverage, including the amount, scope and duration of each service, as well as any exclusions or limitations. Attach a signed actuarial report that meets the requirements specified in 42 CFR 457.431.
Guidance: A State approved under the provision below, may modify its program from time to time so long as it continues to provide coverage at least equal to the lower of the actuarial value of the coverage under the program as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark programs. If "existing comprehensive state based coverage" is modified, an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans must be attached. Also, the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for "existing comprehensive state-based coverage" must be described in the space provided for all states. (Section 2103(a)(3))
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 51 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-47)Page 47#
6.1.3. Existing Comprehensive State-Based Coverage; (Section 2103(a)(3) and 42 □ CFR 457.440) This option is only applicable to New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania. Attach a description of the benefits package, administration, and date of enactment. If existing comprehensive State-based coverage is modified, provide an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997 or one of the benchmark plans. Describe the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for existing comprehensive state-based coverage.
Guidance: Secretary-approved coverage refers to any other health benefits coverage deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Secretary upon application by a state. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.250)
6.1.4. D Secretary-approved Coverage. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.450) Guidance: Section 1905(r) of the Act defines EPSDT to require coverage of (1) any medically necessary screening, and diagnostic services, including vision, hearing, and dental screening and diagnostic services, consistent with a periodicity schedule based on current and reasonable medical practice standards or the health needs of an individual child to determine if a suspected condition or illness exists; and (2) all services listed in section 1905(a) of the Act that are necessary to correct or ameliorate any defects and mental and physical illnesses or conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. Section 1902(a)(43) of the Act requires that the State (1) provide and arrange for all necessary services, including supportive services, such as transportation, needed to receive medical care included within the scope of the EPSDT benefit and (2) inform eligible beneficiaries about the services available under the EPSDT benefit.
If the coverage provided does not meet all of the statutory requirements for EPSDT contained in sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, do not check this box.
6.1.4.1. D Coverage of all benefits that are provided to children that is the same as the benefits provided under the Medicaid State plan, including Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT).
6.1.4.2. Comprehensive coverage for children under a Medicaid Section 1115 D demonstration waiver.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 52 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-48)Page 48#
Coverage that the State has extended to the entire Medicaid population. 6.1.4.3. 0
Guidance: Check below if the coverage offered includes benchmark coverage, as specified in §457.420, plus additional coverage. Under this option, the State must clearly demonstrate that the coverage it provides includes the same coverage as the benchmark package, and also describes the services that are being added to the benchmark package.
6.1.4.4. i:;gj Coverage that includes benchmark coverage plus additional coverage. In the second amendment to the Alabama CHIP State Plan, ALL Kids PLUS was established which provided additional benefits for children with special health care conditions/needs. Attachment A contains a detailed description of the ALL Kids PLUS component of CHIP.
Coverage that is the same as defined by existing comprehensive state 6.1.4.5. D based coverage applicable only in New York, Pennsylvania or Florida. (under 42 CFR 457.440)
Guidance: Check below if the State is purchasing coverage through a group health plan, and intends to demonstrate that the group health plan is substantially equivalent to or greater than coverage under one of the benchmark plans specified in 457.420, through the use of a benefit-by benefit comparison of the coverage. Provide a sample of the comparison format that will be used. Under this option, if coverage for any benefit does not meet or exceed the coverage for that benefit under the benchmark, the State must provide an actuarial analysis as described in457.431 to determine actuarial equivalence.
Coverage under a group health plan that is substantially equivalent to or 6.1.4.6. D greater than benchmark coverage through a benefit by benefit comparison (Provide a sample of how the comparison will be done).
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7. P Other. (Describe) Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in geographic areas in Alabama where CIDP unborn coverage is available. Alabama will utilize a phased in approach (see CS9 for list of initial phase counties) until coverage is provided statewide. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 53 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-49)Page 49#
coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. Coverage begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. The definition of comprehensive coverage includes coverage for obstetrical benefits. If a pregnant woman has other coverage but the other coverage does not include obstetrical benefits, then the other coverage would be considered non comprehensive, regardless of any other benefits it insures. In this circumstance, the pregnant woman would meet the criterion for not having comprehensive coverage.
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 21 lO(a)) (42CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women. but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 21 lO(a)) (42CFR 457.490) A description of the scope, amount and duration of services covered under ALL Kids and ALL Kids PLUS, as well as any exclusions and limitations can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. Health insurance benefits provided to conception to birth enrollees will be identical to the health insurance benefits provided to any pregnant ALL Kids enrollee. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. In geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available, coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 54 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-50)Page 50#
of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1.
6.2.1. 5 Inpatient services (Section 21 lO(a)(I))
6.2.2. 5 Outpatient services (Section 21 I0(a)(2))
6.2.3. 5 Physician services (Section 2110(a)(3))
6.2.4. 5 Surgical services (Section 21 I0(a)(4))
6.2.5. 5 Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. (Section 21 I0(a)(5))
6.2.6. 5 Prescription drugs (Section 21I0(a)(6)) 6.2.7. 0 Over-the-counter medications (Section 21I0(a)(7))
6.2.8. 5 Laboratory and radiological services (Section 21 IO(a)(8))
6.2.9. 5 Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family services and supplies (Section 21I0(a)(9))
6.2.10.5 Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.18., but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structural services (Section 21IO(a)(I0))
6.2.11.5 Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.19, but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including community-based services (Section 21IO(a)(I I)
6.2.12.5 Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices) (Section 21 IO(a)(12))
6.2.13.5 Disposable medical supplies (Section 2110(a)(13))
Guidance: Home and community based services may include supportive services such as home health nursing services, home health aide services. personal care, assistance with activities of daily living. chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 55 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-51)Page 51#
the home.
6.2.14. w Home and community-based health care services (Section 2110(a)(14))
Guidance: Nursing services may include nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services in a home, school or other setting.
6.2.15.x Nursing care services (Section 2110(a)(15))
6.2.16.0 Abortion only ifnecessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result ofan act ofrape or incest (Section 2110(a)(16)
6.2.17. w Dental services (Section 2110(a)(l 7)) States updating their dental benefits must complete 6.2-DC (CIITPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)
6.2.18.x Vision screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.19.x Hearing screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.20.x Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(18))
6.2.21.x Outpatieny substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(19))
6.2.22.x Case management services (Section 2110(a)(20))
6.2.23.x Care coordination services (Section 211 0(a)(21))
6.2.24. w Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders (Section 2110(a)(22))
6.2.25.x Hospice care (Section 2110(a)(23))
Guidance: See guidance for Section 6.1.4.1 for guidance on the statutory requirements for EPSDT under sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act. If the benefit being provided does not meet the EPSDT statutory requirements, do not check the box below. 6.2.26. D EPSDT consistent with requirements ofsections 1905(r) and 1902(a)( 43) of the Act
Guidance: Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial,
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 56 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-52)Page 52#
therapeutic or rehabilitative service may be provided, whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting, if recognized by State law and only if the service is: 1) prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as prescribed by State law; 2) performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician; or 3) furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license.
6.2.27. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services. (Section 2110(a)(24))
Effective March 11, 2021 and through the last day of the first calendar quarter that begins one year after the last day of the COVID-19 emergency period described in section 1135(g)(l)(B) of the Act, and for all populations covered in the CHIP state child health plan:
COVID-19 Vaccine: • The state provides coverage of COVID-19 vaccines and their administration, in accordance with the requirements of section 2103( c)(11 )(A) of the Act.
COVID-19 Testing: • The state provides coverage of COVID-19 testing, in accordance with the requirements of section 2103 (c)( 11 )(B) of the Act. • The state assures that coverage of COVID-19 testing is consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions of diagnostic and screening testing for COVID-19 and its recommendations for who should receive diagnostic and screening tests for COVID-19. • The state assures that coverage includes all types of FDA authorized COVID- 19 tests.
COVID-19 Treatment: • The state assures that the following coverage of treatments for COVID-19 are provided without amount, duration, or scope limitations, in accordance with requirements of section 2103 (c )( 11 )(B) of the Act: o The state provides coverage of treatments for COVID-19 including specialized equipment and therapies (including preventive therapies); o The state provides coverage of any non-pharmacological item or service described in section 21 lO(a) of the Act, that is medically necessary for treatment of COVID-19; and
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 57 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-53)Page 53#
o The state provides coverage of any drug or biological that is approved (or licensed) by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or authorized by the FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to treat or prevent COVID-19, consistent with the applicable authorizations. Coverage for a Condition That May Seriously Complicate the Treatment of COVID-19: • The state provides coverage for treatment of a condition that may seriously complicate COVID-19 treatment without amount, duration, or scope limitations, during the period when a beneficiary is diagnosed with or is presumed to have CO VID-19, in accordance with the requirements of section 2103(c)(l l)(B) of the Act.
Premiums for private health care insurance coverage (Section 2110(a)(25)) 6.2.28.□ 6.2.29. , Medical transportation (Section 2110(a)(26))
Guidance: Enabling services, such as transportation, translation, and outreach services, may be offered only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals.
6.2.30., Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) (Section 2110(a)(27))
6.2.31., Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not included under this Section (Section 211 0(a)(28)) Transplantation Services Emergency and Urgent Care Services Skilled Nursing Services Vision Services 6.2-DC Dental Coverage(CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) The State will provide dental coverage to children through one of the following. Please update Sections 9.10 and 10.3-DC when electing this option. Dental services provided to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2103(a)(5)):
6.2.1-DC, State Specific Dental Benefit Package. The State assures dental services represented by the following categories of common dental terminology (CDT6) codes are included in the dental benefits:
Current Dental Terminology,© 2() 1 Q American, I)ental Association. All rights reserved.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 58 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-54)Page 54#
Alabama has no state law applicable to public notice of either cost sharing changes or waiting list implementations in CIDP.
Public Notice of Cost Sharing Changes: Specific public notice was given via a meeting of CIDP stakeholders in August 2003 and letters to enrollees' families informing them of the changes in cost sharing. This meeting and the mailings followed much publicity in the state regarding the state's financial situation and the possible impact on CIDP if a statewide referendum to raise taxes on (September 9, 2003) did not pass.
Public Notice of the Waiting List: ALL Kids initiated a waiting list beginning with all new enrollees who would have had an effective date October 1, 2003. Once the decision had been made to establish a waiting list, a press statement was released and letters were sent to stakeholders and other interested parties informing them of the institution of a waiting list and stressing the importance of returning renewal forms on time. Additionally, a letter to this effect was sent to every enrollee family along with a new insurance card(s). All of these notices were issued during the month of September 2003 prior to the impact of the waiting list.
On August 23, 2004, ALL Kids reopened enrollment and discontinued use of the waiting list.
If the State determines that it is again necessary to implement a waiting list, it will provide prior, appropriate public notice.
There are no public notice state laws regarding enrollment caps and waiting lists in SCIDP. 9.9.3. Describe the State's interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 111 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-55)Page 55#
limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total I-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
CHIPB U dl5et STATE:AL FFYBudget Federal Fiscal Year 2023 State's enhanced FMAP rate 80.70%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments ---- Managed care ---- oer member/oer month rate Fee for Service $ 298,566,016 Total Benefit Costs $ 298,566,016 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) $ 6.600.000
Cost of Proposed SP A Chan6es -Benefit $ 10,000,000 Net Benefit Costs $ 301,966,016
Administration Costs Personnel $ 6,384,170 General administration $ 3,875,354 Contractors/Brokers
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 112 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-56)Page 56#
STATE:AL FFYBudget Claims Processing Outreach/marketing costs $ 794,500 Health Services Initiatives $ 610,000 Other $ 1,229,312 Total Administration Costs $ 12,893,336 10% Administrative Cap $ 30,196,602
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes $ 10,360,000
Federal Share $ 254,091,497 State Share $ 60,767,855 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan $ 314,859,352
NOTE: Cost of Proposed SPA Changes consist of benefit and postpartum HSI coverage for 36 counties (See CS9).
The Source of State Share Funds: State General Fund
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP's website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(l),(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
10.1.1. The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
10.2.< The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e))
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 113 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-57)Page 57#
10.3.. The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC. The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity (Section 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expandedD eligibility under the State's Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1. . The State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.935(b))(The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1. . 42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2. . Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3. . Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4. . Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5. . Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6. . Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program)
Section 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections(Sections 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expandedD eligibility under the State's Medicaid plan.
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 114 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-58)Page 58#
and procedures that are unique to the applicant's rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility. Alabama's appeals process meets the requirements of the Program Specific Review as outlined in CFR.457.1120-457.1180. The ALL Kids appeals and grievance process can be found in Attachment A. The individuals involved in the Information review (first level) are not involved in the Administrative Review (second level) thus impartiality in the appeals process is provided. The individuals who conduct the Administrative Review are not involved in the Information Review process not in the original determination process. The review process for children enrolled in a CIDP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children's programs Guidance: "Health services matters" refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120.
The State assures that the State laws or regulations are consistent with the intent of 42 CFR 457,1130(b). This grievance process for health service matters is provided by the insurance vendor and is in compliance with state laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and all other applicable regulations of the Department of Labor Procedures. A copy of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama appeals process can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. The grievance process for children enrolled in a CIDP Medicaid expansion is the same as the review process for children enrolled in other Medicaid full service children's programs.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs-If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 115 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-59)Page 59#
ATTACHMENT A
GRIEVANCE POLICY General Information
Applicants and enrollees ofthe ALL Kids Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have a right to discuss and question how eligibility for enrollment was determined. In particular they have the right to request review ofprogram decisions concerning:
• Denial ofeligibility • Failure to make a timely determination ofeligibility • Suspension or termination ofenrollment, including disenrollment for failure to pay premiums.
The ALL Kids Review Process has three levels ofreview--Information Review, Administrative Review and Formal Review. Requests for an Administrative Review and Formal Appeal must be submitted in writing. All correspondence with the applicant /enrollee concerning Administrative Review or Formal Review will be in writing.
ALL Kids Plus Services Requests for review ofdecisions made regarding eligibility for the ALL Kids Plus services must first be made to the ALL Kids Plus participating agency's appropriate appeals process. This is necessary since eligibility for ALL Kids Plus is dependent on the participating agency's eligibility criteria for services. Once the appeals prqcess through the ALL Kids Plus participating agency has been exhausted, an appeal request may be made to the Children's Health Insurance Program as described in ADPH ALL Kids Review Process.
Information Review In many cases problems can be handled informally through the Information Review Process without the need for an Administrative or Formal Review. CHIP staff is committed to using the Information Review process to provide a speedy and fair resolution when possible and appropriate.
Parents/designated representatives can initiate an Information Review via contact (telephone, e-mail or letter) with the Enrollment Unit supervisory staff, CHIP administrative staff, the CHIP social work consultant, CHIP regional staff, or interested agencies. Once the problem has been received, the appropriate staff will review the situation and initiate immediate action to resolve the problem and
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 116 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-60)Page 60#
communicate the decision or resolution. If additional information is needed, the enrollee/applicant will be given the opportunity to provide clarification or submit additional information. Decisions made in the Information Review are usually provided within two working days. Notification to the applicant/enrollee will be communicated in the manner in which the request was made. Summation of the inquiry, review and resolution will be maintained on file and noted with the appropriate applicant/enrollee information.
If the problem remains unresolved in the eyes of the applicant/enrollee, they will be provided detailed information regarding their right to an Administrative Review, right to continued enrollment during the review process and provided copies of all forms and the procedures necessary to move forward through the review process. Appropriate notation will be kept in the applicant's/enrollee's electronic file noting the initial complaint, any information gathered during the Information Review, the decision reached through Information Review, the date of such decision and the applicant/enrollees intent to go forward with the Administrative Review Process.
Administrative Review In order to be considered, an Administrative Review Request Form must be received within ten (10) days of the final decision from the Information Review. The CHIP social work consultant will assist in gathering information that may clarify the request. All information on file from the Information Review and any information gathered by the CHIP Social Work consultant will be circulated to a three person Administrative Review Committee whose members were not involved in the Information Review process nor in the original determination process.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the Administrative Review Committee will be hearing information regarding their situation. They have the right to speak in person or have a representative of their choosing present during the review. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under grievance.
The Committee's decision and the Program Director's review of the decision must be completed within thirty-days (30) of receiving the Administrative Review Request Form. Applicant/enrollees will be notified in writing of the Administrative Review Committee's decision within three working days of the decision. Additionally this notification will include the applicant/enrollee's rights to continued review and the policy regarding a request for Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
If the grievance remains unresolved in the applicant/enrollee's eyes, the applicant/enrollee may file a request for a Formal Review by the State Health Officer.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 117 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-61)Page 61#
Formal Review In order to be considered by the State Health Officer, a Request for Formal Review must be submitted to the CHIP office within ten (10) days of the final decision of the Administrative Review Committee. This request must be submitted on the Formal Review Request Form.
The applicant/enrollee will be notified in advance of the date and time that the State Health Officer will be hearing information regarding their case. Applicants/enrollees may appear in person or have a representative of their choosing to present information the State Health Officer. They may also submit additional information and review program records and guidelines pertaining to the matter under gnevance.
Generally a decision will be issued within thirty-days (30) following receipt of the Request for Formal Review. Applicants/enrollees will be notified of the decision of the State Health Officer within three (3) working days of the decision.
The decision made by the State Health Officer is the final step in the administrative proceedings and will exhaust all administrative remedies.
Expedited Review If the enrollment or eligibility matter under review would worsen health conditions of the applicant/enrollee or jeopardize lives, an expedited CHIP review may be provided. An Expedited Review will be made within seventy-two (72) hours by quickly obtaining and reviewing information so as not to cause unnecessary harm to the applicant/enrollee.
Right for Continued Benefits During Appeals Process When the eligibility decision under review concerns renewal or re-determination of coverage, and the enrollee files a Request for Administrative Review, CHIP staff will ensure that coverage for that enrollee is continued until the review process is completed. The enrollee will be notified in writing of this continuation of coverage and their responsibility regarding any health services costs incurred if the resulting review decision supports termination of coverage. The enrollee will be issued a temporary health plan identification card with a coverage end date equal to the maximum length of time allowed for both the Administrative and Formal Review processes.
Effective Date: October 1, 2022 118 Approval Date: January 13, 2023
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(pdf)(page-62)Page 62#
‐
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA AL-23-0026-RIM2 Summary#
(al)(al-23-0026-rim2)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
Approval Package
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA AL-24-0031-FCEP and AL-24-0031-ABSC PDF#
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Alabama
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: AL-24-0031-FCEP and AL-24-0031-ABSC
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
April 1, 2024
Wanda Davis Deputy Director, Children's Health Insurance Program 201 Monroe Street Montgomery, AL 36104
Dear Wanda Davis:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) State Plan Amendments (SPAs) numbers AL-24-0031-FCEP and AL-24-0031-ABSC, submitted on January 18, 2024, have been approved. These SPAs have an effective date of October 1, 2024.
Through AL-24-0031-FCEP, Alabama expands CHIP eligibility from 36 counties to statewide for the from-conception-to-end-of-pregnancy (FCEP) coverage group with family incomes up to and including 312 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) whose birth parent is not otherwise eligible for Medicaid or CHIP. Coverage for the FCEP population is identical to the benefit package provided to pregnant individuals in Medicaid. A copy of the approved CS9 template is attached and has been incorporated into sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 of Alabama’s CHIP state plan.
Also through AL-24-0031-ABSC, Alabama expands its health services initiative (HSI), the ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative, from 36 counties to statewide in order to provide 60 days of postpartum coverage for birth parents covered under the ALL Babies program.
The HSI approval is based on section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and 42 CFR §§ 457.10 and 457.618, which authorize use of title XXI administrative funding for HSIs that improve the health of children, including targeted low-income children and other low- income children. Consistent with section 2105(c)(6)(B) of the Act and 42 CFR § 457.626, title XXI funds used to support an HSI cannot supplant Medicaid or other sources of federal funding. The state’s total title XXI administrative expenditures may not exceed 10 percent of its total annual title XXI computable expenditures.
The state shall ensure that the available title XXI administrative funding is sufficient to continue the proper administration of the CHIP program. If such funds become less than sufficient, the state agrees to redirect title XXI funds from the support of this HSI to the administration of the CHIP state plan. The state shall report annually to CMS the expenditures funded by the HSI for each federal fiscal year.
Your Project Officer is Joshua Bougie. He is available to answer your questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related matters. His contact information is as follows:
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
Page 2 – Wanda Davis
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: (410) 786-8117 E-mail: joshua.bougie@cms.hhs.gov
If you have additional questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs, at (410) 786-1536. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely, /Signed by Sarah deLone/
Sarah deLone Director
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: Alabama (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR 457.40(b)) Scott Harris, State Health Officer, Alabama Department of Public Health, January 16, 2024 (Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)):
Name: Cathy Donald Position/Title: Acting CHIP Director Name: Shaundra B. Morris Position/Title: Director, ADPH Financial Services Name: ________________ Position/Title: _________________
Disclosure Statement This information is being collected to pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1397aa, which requires states to submit a State Child Health Plan in order to receive federal funding. This mandatory information collection will be used to demonstrate compliance with all requirements of title XXI of the Act and implementing regulations at 42 CFR part 457. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148 (CMS-10398 #34). Public burden for all of the collection of information requirements under this control number is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26- 05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
Introduction: Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 1005-33 amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, further modified the program. The HEALTHY KIDS Act and The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 together resulted in an extension of funding for CHIP through federal fiscal year 2027.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the State plan amendments (SPAs). It reflects the regulatory requirements at 42 CFR Part 457 as well as the previously approved SPA templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SPA template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed. • Added new provisions related to delivery methods, including managed care, to section 3 (81 FR 27498, issued May 6, 2016)
States are not required to resubmit existing State plans using this current updated template. However, States must use this updated template when submitting a new State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirements for Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. (42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. ASPA is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90-day review period, or clock for CHIP Spas, that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete response is received. More information on the SPA review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a “clean” copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101) ;(42 CFR 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of State Approach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state’s program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology- The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable. (Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)); (42CFR 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage; benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary- approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope,
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State’s use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre- existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 2101(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: • Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
• establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SPA process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background) They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • 10 (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
• Combination of Options-CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes of up to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion of Medicaid, the description provided under “Option to Expand Medicaid” would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in “Option to Create a Separate Program” would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
Where the state’s assurance is requested in this document for compliance with a particular requirement of 42 CFR 457 et seq., the state shall place a check mark to affirm that it will be in compliance no later than the applicable compliance date.
Proposed State plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Name of Project Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101) (a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101, which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXI.
1.1.1. * Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(1) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SPA to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.2. Providing expanded benefits under the State’s Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI, in conjunction with an expansion in the State’s Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3. A combination of both above. (Section 2101(a)(2)) Until October 1, 2002, Alabama’s CHIP was a combination program. With the mandated gradual increase of Medicaid coverage at higher income levels for children born after September 30, 1983, the Medicaid expansion portion of CHIP was subsumed, on October 1, 2002, by the Alabama Medicaid SOBRA Program for Pregnant Women and Children.
1.1-DS The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template. (Section 2110(b)(5))
1.2. Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
Alabama has not and will not claim expenditures for child health assistance prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS.
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
1.3. Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. (42CFR 457.130) Assurances are on file with DHHS. The Alabama Department of Public Health continues to assure that compliance with all applicable civil rights requirements.
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA(42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
Original Plan Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Implementation Date:
Amendment 1 – Establishment of ALL Kids Effective Date: February 1, 1998 Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 2 – Establishment of ALL Kids PLUS Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1999 Amendment 3 – Disregards Effective/Implementation Date: June 1, 2001 Amendment 4 - Compliance Effective/Implementation Date: August 24, 2001 Amendment 5 – Waiting List, Cost Sharing, Benefit Changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2003 Amendment 6 – Discontinuance of the Waiting List and other Clean-Up changes Effective/Implementation Date: November 23, 2004 Amendment 7 – Raise the upper income eligibility limit to 300% of FPL and other minor changes Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009 Amendment 8 – Include a private foundation grant as an additional source of state funding Effective/Implementation Date: October 27, 2009 Amendment 9 – Establishment of a Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
(RHCs) Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 2009; Addendum on Dental Benefits Under Title XXI: Effective/Implementation Date: October 1, 1998 Amendment 10 – Eligibility for children of employees of a public agency (state employees and public education employees) Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2011 Amendment 11 – Provisions for Implementing Temporary Adjustments to Enrollment Determination and/or Redetermination Policies and Cost Sharing Requirements for Applicants/Renewals living in and/or working in FEMA or Governor declared disaster areas at the time of a disaster event. In the event of a disaster, the State will notify CMS of the intent to provide temporary adjustments to its enrollment and/or redetermination policies, the effective dates of such adjustments and the counties/areas impacted by the disaster. Effective/Implementation Date: April 15, 2011 Amendment 12 – Increase premiums, increase co-pays and revise the methodology for determining annual aggregate cost-sharing Effective/Implementation Date: May 1, 2012 Amendment 13 – Establishment of copayments for therapy services (physical, occupational, and speech), vision services and chiropractic services; and cleanup changes Effective/Implementation Date: August 1, 2013 Amendment 14 – Alignment of ALL Kids fee groups with provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other editorial changes to comply with previously approved ACA SPAs. Effective/Implementation Date: January 1, 2014 Amendment 15 - AL-16-0015-MEXP – CHIP Medicaid expansion to cover Medicaid enrollees ages 14 years to 19 years with incomes above 18% FPL through 141% FPL. Effective Date: October 1, 2015 Implementation Date: January 1, 2016 Amendment 16 – AL-18-0016-PAR - Attestation and documentation of Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity. Submission Date: July 10, 2018 Effective Date: October 1, 2017* Implementation Date: October 1, 2017* *Note: Benefits were adjusted in October 2010 to be compliant with mental health parity; this amendment did not require any benefit changes Amendment 17 – AL-19-0017-RIM - Reducing Infant Mortality (RIM) Health Service Initiative Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Amendment 18 – AL-19-0018-RIM CS9 Eligibility – Coverage From Conception to Birth Submission Date: July 17, 2019 Effective Date: July 1, 2019 Implementation Date: July 1, 2019 Amendment 19 – AL-20-0019-CEN CS15 MAGI-Based Income Methodologies – Temporary Income Submission Date: February 26, 2020 Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Implementation Date July 1, 2020 Amendment 20 – AL-20-0020-COVI Allowing for Temporary Waiving of cost sharing requirements for enrollees who reside and/or work in a State or Federally declared disaster area. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Effective Date: March 1, 2020 Implementation Date: March 1, 2020 Amendment 21 - AL-20-0021-BH Documentation of AL CHIP compliance with the SUPPORT Act. Submission Date: July 29, 2020 Effective Date: October 1, 2019 Implementation Date: October 24, 2018 Amendment 22 – AL-21-0022-PP Postpartum coverage Health Services Initiative for ALL Babies Submission Date: May 13, 2021 Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Implementation Date: July 1, 2021 Amendment 23 – AL-22-0023-OBJ Edits to align Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals with CARTS Submission Date: March 30, 2022 Effective Date: October 1, 2021 Implementation Date: October 1, 2021 Amendment 24 – AL-22-0024-ARP Coverage of COVID-19 vaccine, testing, and treatment under American Rescue Plan Act Submission Date: March 30, 2022 Effective Date: March 11, 2021 Implementation Date: March 11, 2021 Amendment 25 - AL-22-0025-CE 12-Month Postpartum Period Continuous Eligibility Submission Date: August 25, 2022 Effective Date: October 1, 2022 Implementation Date: October 1, 2022 Amendment 26 - AL-23-0026-RIM2
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
CS9 Eligibility - Statewide Coverage from Conception to Birth Submission Date: January 9, 2023 Effective Date: May 1, 2023 Implementation Date: May 1, 2023 Amendment 27 - AL-23-0027-CC Amending AL-19-0017-RIM to discontinue HSI Submission Date: January 9, 2023 Effective Date: October 1, 2023 Implementation Date: September 30, 2023 Amendment 28 - AL-23-0028-ROR Reach Out and Read HSI Submission Date: February 1, 2023 Effective Date: June 1, 2023 Implementation Date: June 1, 2023 Amendment 29 - AL-23-0029-MH Project ECHO Model for IECMH Submission Date: February 1, 2023 Effective Date: June 1, 2023 Implementation Date: June 1, 2023 Amendment 30 – AL-24-0030-VC/TE (Pending) Transition the current approved State Plan into the new Title XXI Template; Assure compliance with SHO #23-003 re: Mandatory Coverage of Adult Vaccinations; updating and relating the Grievance Policy description from Attachment A to Section 12; And other minor technical edits Submission Date: January 10, 2024 Effective Date: October 1, 2023 Implementation Date: October 1, 2023 Amendment 31 – AL-24-0031-ABSC Expand FCEP and the HSI Postpartum Coverage from 36 counties to statewide Submission Date: January 18, 2024 Effective date: October 1, 2024 Implementation date: October 1, 2024
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) AL-14-0016 MAGI CS7 Eligibility – Targeted Low Supersedes the (Original: AL-14-0016 Eligibility Income Children current Effective/Implementati & sections on Date: January 1, Methods Geographic 2014) Children With Access to Area 4.1.1; Age CS10 Public Employee Coverage 4.1.2; and Income 4.1.3 Section 4.4.1: Supersedes only the MAGI-Based Income information onAL-20-0019-CEN CS15 Methodologies dependents of(affects only CS15) publicEffective employees inImplementation Date: this section;July 1, 2020 supporting documentation should be incorporated as an appendix to the current state plan
Incorporate within a separate subsection under section 4.3
AL-24-0031-FCEP CS9 Coverage from Conception Supersedes to Birth previously AL-23-0026-RIM2 approved CS9 Effective/Approval Date: May 1, 2023
Original: AL-19-0018- RIM Effective/Approval Date: July 1, 2019
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s)
(Original: AL-14-0014 XXI CS3 Eligibility for Medicaid Supersedes the Effective/Implementatio Medicaid Expansion Program current n Date: January 1, 2014) Expansion Medicaid expansion AL-16-0015-MEXP CHIP Medicaid expansion section 4.0 to cover Medicaid Effective/Implementati enrollees ages 14 years to on Date: October 1, 19 years with incomes 2015 above 18% FPL through 141% FPL AL-14-0015 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible for Incorporate 2101(f) Medicaid as a Result of the within a Effective/Implementati Group Elimination of Income separate on Date: January 1, Disregards subsection 2014 under section 4.1 AL-14-0018 Eligibility CS24 Single, Streamlined Supersedes the Process Application current Effective/Implementati Screen and Enroll Process sections 4.3 on Date: January 1, Renewals and 4.4 2014 AL-14-0017 Non- CS17 Non-Financial Eligibility – Supersedes the Financial Residency current section Effective/Implementati Eligibility 4.1.5 on Date: January 1, CS18 Non-Financial – Citizenship 2014 Supersedes the CS19 Non-Financial – Social current Security Number sections 4.1.0; 4.1.1-LR; 4.1.1- CS20 Substitution of Coverage LR
CS21 Non-Payment of Supersedes the Premiums current section CS27 4.1.9.1 Continuous Eligibility
Supersedes the
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
Transmittal Number SPA PDF Description Superseded Group # Plan Section(s) current section 4.4.4
Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current section 4.1.8
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
1.4- TC Tribal Consultation (Section 2107(e)(1)(C)) Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved. In accordance with approved policies, on December 14, 2023, a certified letter explaining the changes proposed in AL-24-0031-FCEP and AL-24-0031-ABSC was mailed to the Tribal Chairman of the one federally recognized Native American tribe in Alabama, the Poarch Band of Creek Indians. The letter included the purpose for the proposed changes and a description of the changes. In the letter, the Tribal Chairman was also reminded that she had the opportunity to respond to the proposed changes within 30 days and was given contact information for any such response. The certified letter was signed by the CHIP Deputy Director. TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: January 14, 2024
2.2. Health Services Initiatives-Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10)
HSI I - ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative: As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative. This HSI will not supplant or match CHIP Federal funds with other Federal funds, nor allow other Federal funds to supplant or match CHIP Federal funds. This HSI will assist in improving the health of children by ensuring their mothers have access to healthcare services during their postpartum period. The aim of this initiative is to provide full health insurance coverage during the postpartum period to enrollees who have been prenatally covered in the Reducing Infant Mortality From Conception to Birth End of Pregnancy program known as ALL Babies. The length of the ALL Babies postpartum period is equivalent to Alabama Medicaid’s current definition of the length of postpartum period “From delivery through the end of the month in which the 60th day postpartum falls, counting from the date the pregnancy ends either as a full term or as a miscarriage.” ALL Babies participants will be enrolled automatically in the postpartum HSI initiative. Metrics used to measure the impact of the state’s HSI program on the health of low-income children and their mothers will be included in the state’s CHIP Annual Report.
Cost: The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $2,982,927 for FY2025. This figure is based on anticipated enrollment (4,527 enrollees) in 36 counties statewide with an average enrollment of 2.5 months.
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
HSI II – Reach Out and Read (ROR) Initiative: As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to continue to deliver Reach Out and Read, an AAP-endorsed, evidence-based model to promote early literacy, early learning and school readiness as part of routine pediatric primary care visits for children, birth to age 5 in five Alabama counties (Jefferson, Macon, Marshall, Monroe, and Randolph). Funding for this initiative is to bolster ROR efforts in the five counties for the existing ROR program in order to increase grade level reading. This HSI will assist in transforming the standard of pediatric care for young children in Alabama to sharpen the focus on activities that support social and emotional development. The criteria used to determine eligibility for the services is the age of the child and the type of visit. The child must be seen for a well-child visit in order to receive the service.
Funds under this HSI will not supplant or match CHIP Federal Funds with other Federal funds, nor allow other Federal funds to supplant or match CHIP Federal funds. Metrics used to measure the impact of the state’s HSI program on the health of low-income children will be included in the state’s CHIP Annual Report.
Cost: The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $500,000 and limited to two years ($250,000 for FY 2023 and $250,000 for FY2024). The budget timeline for the ROR HSI begins June 1, 2023 and will end May 31, 2025.
Find information on Reach Out and Reach and the evidence supporting its effectiveness at https://reachoutandread.org/why-we-matter/
HSI III – Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Services: As permitted under section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act and federal regulations at 42 CFR 457.10, the State of Alabama is implementing a health services initiative (HSI) that will use CHIP funds, within the federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to increase workforce capacity around Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Services (IECMH). IECMH works to develop the capacity of the child from birth to 5 years of age to form close and secure adult and peer relationships. The vision of the Alabama IECMH System of Care is that “Every child has opportunities from the start to reach their full potential within healthy positive relationships.” To achieve this vision, their mission is “to create and sustain a culturally sensitive system that promotes positive early experiences through collaborative partnerships, empowering families, and building capacity across communities.”
Alabama Department of Mental Health will establish the evidence based Project ECHO Model® learning framework to train a variety of professionals (childcare workers, head start staff, mental health clinicians, etc.) statewide working directly with children birth to five and their families on topics such as Understanding Trauma in Young Children, What is IECMH and IECMH Consultation and Why It is Important, Self-Care, Addressing Behavioral Challenges in Young Children, Attachment, and Early Brain Development. The Project ECHO Model® is a telementoring program designed to create communities of learners by bringing together
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
healthcare or other service providers and experts in topical areas using didactic and case‐based presentations, fostering an “all learn, all teach approach.” The only eligibility to participate in the IECMH ECHO training/telementoring program is to be a professional serving young children and families who want to build their capacity to address the social/emotional, and behavioral needs of the population they care for. The participating professionals will be surveyed in those foundational topics to determine additional topics they desire to learn about that will be applicable and beneficial to their practice. Advertisement of the availably of the training will be coordinated through our partner state agencies and local agencies who serve low-income children/families. Child welfare and childcare licensing staff will be asked to share information with local childcare and county staff, through the training calendar on the website for the Alabama Association for Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health (First 5 Alabama) which is sent out to all First 5 Alabama members (many of whom serve low-income children), to Early Head Start and Head Start state and local administrators, etc. Metrics used to measure the impact of the state’s HSI program on the health of low-income children will be included in the state’s CHIP Annual Report.
Funds under this HSI will not supplant or match CHIP Federal Funds with other Federal funds, nor allow other Federal funds to supplant or match CHIP Federal funds.
Cost: The cost of the HSI is budgeted to be $20,000 for FY 2023 and funding will end September 30, 2023.
:
4.1.9 Other Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility, including those standards in 42 CFR 457.310 and 457.320 that are not addressed above. For instance: Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth end of pregnancy for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in Alabama (initially Montgomery, Macon and Russell). A phased in approach (see CS9 for list of initial phase counties) will be was utilized until coverage is could be offered provided statewide. The time frame for the phase in period will be 3-5 years. Comprehensive coverage will be provided to this population from the date of enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60-day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. Obstetric coverage for current ALL Kids members includes all prenatal care through 90 days postpartum and is billed as a bundled
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
payment. Social Security numbers for the babies will not be required unless and until the child is born and applies for renewal.
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7. Other. (Describe) Comprehensive health coverage will be provided from conception to birth end of pregnancy for those with family incomes up to and including 312% FPL, whose mothers do not have comprehensive coverage, and reside in select counties in geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available. Alabama will utilized a phased in approach (see CS9 for list of initial phase counties) for FCEP until coverage is could be provided statewide. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through an ALL Babies HSI Initiative. Coverage begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60-day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity- related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. The definition of comprehensive coverage includes coverage for obstetrical benefits. If a pregnant woman has other coverage but the other coverage does not include obstetrical benefits, then the other coverage would be considered non-comprehensive, regardless of any other benefits it insures. In this circumstance, the pregnant woman would meet the criterion for not having comprehensive coverage.
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women, but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR 457.490)
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
A description of the scope, amount and duration of services covered under ALL Kids and ALL Kids PLUS, as well as any exclusions and limitations can be found in the ALL Kids Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is available upon request. Health insurance benefits provided to conception to birth end of pregnancy enrollees will be identical to the health insurance benefits provided to any pregnant ALL Kids enrollee. The date of enrollment may be as early as the first day of maternity-related service provision even if the application is completed a few days after the service is received. In other cases coverage will begin on the date the application is received by the CHIP office. Prenatal care, labor and delivery and limited postpartum care are paid using a bundled payment. In addition to the bundled payment, the state will provide comprehensive coverage during the postpartum period through ALL Babies HSI Initiative. In geographic areas in Alabama where CHIP unborn coverage is available, Coverage for bundled obstetrical benefits begins upon enrollment and will continue until the last day of the month in which the 60 day postpartum period has elapsed after the end of a pregnancy. For example, if a woman gives birth on June 26, benefits covered in the bundled package or postpartum HSI would end on August 31. The first day without coverage would be September 1.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
- Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
CHIP Budget STATE: AL FFY Budget Federal Fiscal Year 2025 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 80.99%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments Managed care per member/per month rate Fee for Service 671,836,819 Total Benefit Costs 671,836,819 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) 6,600,000 Net Benefit Costs 665,236,819 Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit 68,332,233
Administration Costs Personnel 6,560,304 General administration 11,222,156 Contractors/Brokers Claims Processing Outreach/marketing costs 900,000 Health Services Initiatives-Postpartum 2,982,927 Reach out and Read 125,000 Other 1,162,866 Total Administration Costs 22,948,253 10% Administrative Cap 67,183,682
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes 70,580,160
Federal Share 557,361,090 State Share 130,823,982 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan 688,185,072
NOTE: Cost of Proposed SPA Changes consist of benefit and postpartum HSI coverage statewide. The Source of State Share Funds: State General Fund and Tobacco Settlement
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(pdf)(page-24)Page 24#
‐
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA AL-24-0031-FCEP and AL-24-0031-ABSC Summary#
(al)(al-24-0031-fcep-and-al-24-0031-absc)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
Through these SPAs, the state expands CHIP eligibility from 36 counties to statewide for the from-conception-to-the-end-of-pregnancy (FCEP) coverage group and they expand its ALL Babies Postpartum Initiative Health Services Initiative (HSI) from 36 counties to statewide.
Approval Package
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA CA-21-0032 PDF#
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: California
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: CA-21-0032
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
September 14, 2021
Jacey Cooper Chief Deputy Director Health Care Programs Department of Health Care Services 1501 Capitol Avenue, MS 0000 Sacramento, CA 95899-7413
Dear Ms. Cooper:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendment (SPA) CA- 21-0032, submitted on June 28, 2021, has been approved. This SPA establishes a Health Services Initiative (HSI) to provide comprehensive coverage during the 12-month postpartum period for women whose newborns had been covered as targeted low-income children from conception to birth. The benefits provided during this postpartum period are identical to the benefits provided to Medicaid pregnant women. The SPA has an effective date of July 1, 2020.
Section 2105(a)(l)(D)(ii) of the Social Security Act (the Act) and 42 CFR §457.10 authorize use of title XXI administrative funding for expenditures for HSIs under the plan for improving the health of children, including targeted low-income children and other low- income children. Consistent with section 2105(c)(6)(B) of the Act and 42 CFR §457.626, title XXI funds used to support an HSI cannot supplant Medicaid or other sources of federal funding.
The state shall ensure that the remaining title XXI administrative funding, within the state's 10 percent limit, is sufficient to continue the proper administration of the CHIP program. If such funds become less than sufficient, the state agrees to redirect title XXI funds from the support of this HSI to the administration of the CHIP program. The state shall report annually to CMS the expenditures funded by the HSI for each federal fiscal year.
Additionally, the state has informed us that it intends to submit subsequent SPAs to adopt the option described in sections 9812 and 9822 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP), to provide comprehensive coverage during an extended 12-month postpartum period under the Medicaid and CHIP state plans, effective April 1, 2022. Please inform CMS if the state anticipates implementing this ARP provision later than April 1, 2022.
Your title XXI project officer is Ms. Joyce Jordan. She is available to answer questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related issues. Her contact information is as follows:
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
Page 2 - Ms. Jacey Cooper
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop: S2-01-16 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: (410) 786-3413 E-mail: Joyce.Jordan@cms.hhs.gov
If you have any questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs, at (410) 786-1536. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely, /Signed by Amy Lutzky/
Amy Lutzky Deputy Director
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA (42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
CA RESPONSE:
Date Original Plan Submitted: November 19, 1997 Date Plan Approved: March 24, 1998 Date Plan Effective/Implemented: July 1, 1998
Date Amendment#1 Purpose: Changed its income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program to be in compliance with the State enabling legislation. This amendment lowered income eligibility from 200 percent of the FPL net income to 200 percent of the FPL gross income. This amendment was initiated at the start of the program's implementation on July 1, 1998. Date Amendment #1 Submitted: April 14, 1998 Date Amendment #1 Approved: June 29, 1998 Date Amendment #1 Effective/Implemented: July 1, 1998
Date Amendment#2 Purpose: Increased the enrollment broker fees from $25 to $50 per successful applicant. Date Amendment #2 Submitted: January 8, 1999 Date Amendment #2 Approved: December 21, 1999 Date Amendment #2 Effective/Implemented: October 1, 1998
Date Amendment#3 Purpose: Expanded income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program by disregarding income between 200 to 250 percent of the FPL. Income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program is further expanded by applying Medi-Cal income deductions when determining eligibility for the Healthy Families Program. The Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) provider-claiming period for services received prior to enrollment is also lengthened from 30 to 90 days. Date Amendment #3 Submitted: August 3, 1999 Date Amendment #3 Approved: November 23, 1999 Date Amendment #3 Effective/Implemented: July 22, 1999
Date Amendment#4 Purpose: Allowed a Family Contribution Sponsor to pay a specific child's HFP) premiums for the first year of enrollment. Date Amendment #4 Submitted: December 9, 1999 Date Amendment #4 Approved: March 6, 2000 Date Amendment #4 Effective/Implemented: March 1, 2000
Date Amendment#5 Purpose: Exempted cost sharing for American Indians (AI) and Alaskan Native (AN) children who meet the eligibility criteria for
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
the Healthy Families Program (HFP) and provide acceptable documentation of their status as AI or AN children. Date Amendment #5 Submitted: April 17, 2000 Date Amendment #5 Approved: July 7, 2000 Date Amendment #5 Effective Date: October 6, 1999
Date Amendment#6 Purpose: Indicated the State’s partial compliance with the final SCHIP regulations. Date Amendment #6 Submitted: July 2, 2002 Date Amendment #6 Approved: September 19, 2002 Date Amendment #6 Effective Date: August 24, 2001 Date Amendment#7 Purpose: Expanded coverage levels to 300 percent of the FPL for children residing in selected counties (Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara) through the CCHIP). This amendment also expands coverage to children up to age 2 born to mothers enrolled in the AIM program with family incomes up to 300 percent of the FPL. Date Amendment #7 Submitted: April 1, 2003 Date Amendment #7 Approved: June 10, 2004 Date Amendment #7 Effective: January 1, 2003 – CCHIP Expanded Coverage levels; and July 1, 2004 – AIM Program
Date Amendment #8 Purpose: Implemented oral health services initiative, including case management, oral health education, preventative services, and mobile dental vans. Date Amendment #8 Submitted: July 24, 2003 Date Amendment #8 Approved: January 16, 2004 Date Amendment #8 Effective: January 1, 2004
Date Amendment #9 Purpose: Allowed the State to provide presumptive eligibility to children with family incomes from 100 to 200 percent of the FPL through the CHDP program. Date Amendment #9 Submitted: September 9, 2003 Date Amendment #9 Approved: December 8, 2003 Date Amendment #9 Effective: July 1, 2003
Date Amendment #10 Purpose: Allowed the State to claim for the State’s rural health demonstration projects as a health services initiative under the SCHIP 10 percent administrative cap. The rural health demonstration projects, which were previously approved under the California SCHIP State plan, aim to improve access to health care services for low-income medically underserved and uninsured populations in rural areas and special populations who have rural occupations. By claiming for the rural health demonstrations under the 10 percent cap, the State has the flexibility to provide services for all low-income children, thereby benefiting all low- income children, not just SCHIP enrollees. The amendment also allows the State to use tobacco taxes as a new source of State funding.
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
Date Amendment #10 Submitted: December 15, 2003 Date Amendment #10 Approved: March 11, 2004 Date Amendment #10 Effective: February 1, 2004
Date Amendment #11 Purpose: Increased premiums for children with family incomes from above 200 percent of the FPL up to and including 250 percent of the FPL. The amendment also provides for school-based outreach for the Healthy Families Program through a partnership between the State and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Date Amendment #11 Submitted: March 23, 2005 Date Amendment #11 Approved: March 15, 2007 Date Amendment #11 Effective: March 22, 2005 (School-based Outreach) July 1, 2005 (Premium Increase)
Date Amendment #12 Purpose: Extend health care coverage to unborn children with family income up to 300 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL). Date Amendment #12 Submitted: June 30, 2005 Date Amendment #12 Approved: March 28, 2006 Date Amendment #12 Effective: July 1, 2004
Date Amendment #13 Purpose: Added a fifth county (Santa Cruz) to their County Program allowing children to be enrolled from 250 percent to 300 percent of the FPL. However, it was subsequently withdrawn by the State on 11/6/08. Date Amendment #13 Submitted: July 12, 2007 Date Amendment #13 Approved: Withdrawn (November 6, 2008)
Date Amendment #14 Purpose: Responded to program changes enacted by the Legislature to increase premiums, place a cap on dental benefits, limit 5 certain vision benefits, apply a wait list, and remove the 6-month residency requirement for pregnant women in the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Date Amendment #14 Submitted: April 2, 2009 Date Amendment #14 Approved: January 14, 2010 Date Amendment #14 Effective: January 31, 2009 Wait List /Disenrollment Infrastructure January 6, 2009 AIM 6-Month Residency Requirement Elimination February 1, 2009 HFP Family Contribution Increase, & Vision Benefit Modification July 1, 2009 Dental Benefit Cap
Date Amendment #15 Purpose: CHIPRA Shifting of Presumptive Eligibility Cost to Title XIX Funds; CHIPRA Option of Lawfully Residing Children; CHIPRA Shifting of Accelerated Enrollment Cost to Title XIX Funds; Presumptive Eligibility at Initial Application under Title XXI Funds. Date Amendment #15 Submitted: June 30, 2009
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
Date Amendment #15 Approved: December 29, 2009 Date Amendment #15 Effective: April 1, 2009
Date Amendment #16 Purpose: Implemented a health services initiative to support the California Poison Control System (CPSC). Date Amendment #16 Submitted: October 16, 2009 Date Amendment #16 Approved: December 3, 2009 Date Amendment #16 Effective: July 1, 2009
Date Amendment #17 Purpose: Increased premiums and co-payments for children with a family income above 150 percent up to and including 250 percent of the FPL. The amendment also proposes to limit dental plan choices for new subscribers. These changes are based on changes in State law. Date Amendment #17 Submitted: December 24, 2009 Date Amendment #17 Approved: July 29, 2010 Date Amendment #17 Effective: November 1, 2009
Date Amendment #18 Purpose: Premium Increases Date Amendment #18 Submitted: June 1, 2011 Date Amendment #18 Approved: Withdrawn July 3, 2012 Date Amendment #18 Effective: Not applicable.
Date Amendment #19 Purpose: Expanded eligibility in CCHIP from 300 percent of the FPL to 400 percent of the FPL in San Mateo County; Eliminated the dental benefit cap; Implemented an electronic data match with the Social Security Administration for citizen verification; Required CHIP payments to FQHCs and RHCs comply with Medicaid payment requirements. Date Amendment #19 Submitted: June 29, 2012 Date Amendment #19 Approved: September 7, 2012 Date Amendment #19 Effective: October 1, 2011: Dental Benefit Cap Elimination January 1, 2012: County Children's Health Initiative Program (CCHIP) October 1, 2009: Prospective Payment System for FQHC’s and RHC’s January 1, 2010: Citizenship Verification Requirement
SPA # 20. Purpose of SPA: To eliminate the “Healthy Families” program, and transition the majority of children from a separate program to a Medicaid expansion under the Medi-Cal program in California. This SPA reflects changes previously effectuated through section 1115 demonstration authority. Proposed effective date: December 31, 2013 Proposed implementation date: January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
SPA #17-0043. Purpose of SPA: To implement provisions for temporary adjustments to enrollment, eligibility determination and redetermination policies, and premium and cost-sharing requirements for children in families living and/or working in Governor or FEMA declared disaster areas. In the event of a declared disaster, the State will notify CMS that it intends to provide temporary adjustments to its enrollment, eligibility determination and/or redetermination policies, and premium and/or cost-sharing requirements, the effective and duration date of such adjustments, and the applicable Governor or FEMA declared disaster areas.
Some or all of the temporary adjustments would apply to the following populations: Population 1 (County Children’s Health Initiative Program - CCHIP) Population 2 (Unborn Option) Population 3 (Medi-Cal Access Program - MCAP) Population 4 (Medi-Cal Access Infant Program - MCAIP) Proposed effective date: October 1, 2017 Proposed implementation date: October 1, 2017
SPA #18-0028. Purpose of SPA: To implement the transition of MCAP (Population 3) services provided by public-private-partnership to services provided by California’s Medi-Cal Managed Care delivery system. Proposed effective date: July 1, 2017 Proposed implementation date: July 1, 2017
SPA # 19-0036 Purpose of SPA: To demonstrate compliance with 42 CFR section 457 et al., the Managed Care Final Rule FR 81 27497. Proposed effective date: July 1, 2018 Proposed implementation date: July 1, 2018
SPA # 21-0032 Purpose of SPA: To extend postpartum care period to 365 days for unborn populations. California is choosing to implement the American Rescue Plan Act for its Medicaid population, this Health Services Initiative is to prevent disparity between the state’s pregnancy groups and its unborn groups. Proposed effective date: July 1, 2020 Proposed implementation date: July 1, 2020
2.2. Health Services Initiatives (HSI) - Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at 42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10)
CA RESPONSE:
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
Postpartum Care Extension California will use CHIP funds, within the 10 percent federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the extension of the postpartum period from the existing 60-day period to a full 12-month period. This extension includes Population 2, the lower income unborn population with incomes from 0- 208 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). It also includes Population 3, the upper income unborn option with incomes from 208-322 percent of the FPL, known as the Medi-Cal Access Program (MCAP).
On March 11, 2021, President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) into law. This allows states to extend its postpartum coverage from 60 days to 12 months, effective April 1, 2022. This extension is to be provided to Medicaid pregnancy groups and CHIP pregnancy groups. To cover a larger population, California utilizes the CHIP unborn option covering children from conception to birth.
Because the ARPA does not address the unborn group (only pregnancy groups), California is proposing this HSI to prevent disparity among the groups, and provide the 12-month postpartum period to its unborn CHIP population.
All pregnant individuals should receive comprehensive care during the postpartum period to assess their physical recovery from pregnancy and childbirth, address chronic conditions (such as diabetes or hypertension), address mental health issues (including postpartum depression), discuss reproductive health (including contraception and birth spacing), and ensure continuity of care. In spite of having a higher prevalence of medical conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, pregnant Medicaid and CHIP individuals have lower postpartum care visit rates than do individuals with private insurance. More than half of pregnancy-related deaths occur in the postpartum period, with 12 percent occurring after six weeks postpartum.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends: • All women have contact with their health care providers within the first three weeks’ postpartum • Initial visit followed by individualized ongoing care as needed, including a comprehensive postpartum visit no later than 12 weeks after birth • Timely follow-up care with obstetrician-gynecologists or primary care doctors for women who had pregnancy complications or who have chronic medical conditions • Scope of care that includes a full assessment of: 1) Physical, social, and psychological wellbeing; 2) Infant care and feeding; 3) Sexuality, contraception, and birth spacing; 4) Sleep and fatigue; 5) Physical recovery from birth;
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
6) Chronic disease management; and 7) Health maintenance
The Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) defines a pregnancy- related death as the death of a woman while pregnant or within 1 year of the end of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy. Over one half of maternal deaths occur between the first day of the postpartum period up through the 365th day during postpartum period. Causes can include cardiovascular issues, hypertension, infection, and other non-cardiovascular conditions. Identifying the causes of maternal mortality and morbidity is complex and coverage is only one factor. Research strongly indicates that access to health care throughout a woman’s reproductive years is essential for prevention, early detection, and treatment of some of the conditions that place women at higher risk for pregnancy-related complications, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic hypertension.
As defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, infant mortality is the death of an infant before the first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births. In addition to giving us key information about maternal and infant health, the infant mortality rate is an important marker of the overall health of a society. In 2018, the infant mortality rate in the United States was 5.7 deaths per 1,000 live births.
A major cause of infant mortality is Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID). The term SUID is used to describe the sudden and unexpected death of a baby less than 1 year old in which the cause was not obvious before investigation. About 3,600 babies in the United States die suddenly and unexpectedly each year. Sudden unexpected infant deaths include sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), accidental suffocation in a sleeping environment, and other deaths from unknown causes. Although the SUID rate has declined since the 1990s, significant racial and ethnic differences continue.
These studies suggest that changing the concept of postpartum care and the emphasis on risk reduction for maternal health, both in the immediate postpartum period and in the extended postpartum period up to one year after delivery, is essential to maintain the health of the child. To ensure that the state can measure the impact of this HSI, CMS proposes to report on three of the CMS Maternal and Child Health or Adult Core Set measures: • Prenatal and Postpartum Care: Postpartum Care (PPC-AD) • Contraceptive Care- Postpartum Women Ages 21-44 (CCP-AD) • Initiation and Engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse or Dependence Treatment (IET-AD)
These measures are relevant to the covered populations and can be tied back to promoting the health of the child. For example, timely postpartum visits can be used to screen mothers for postpartum depression and support breastfeeding,
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
which both have been shown to influence health outcomes for children.
Population 2, unborn children (pregnant women) with income from 0 up to 208 percent of the FPL, receive prenatal care, prescriptions, labor and delivery, dental care, and services for other conditions that may complicate the pregnancy. Postpartum coverage is also included and lasts until the end of the month of the 365th day following the end of the pregnancy. There are approximately 3,100individuals enrolled in California’s Unborn Option with income from 0 up to 138 percent of the FPL There are also approximately 3,500 individuals enrolled with incomes from 138 up to 208 percent of the FPL. Of this population,75 percent identify as Hispanic. This coverage is available throughout the state.
Population 3 (MCAP), unborn children (pregnant women) with income from 208 up to 317 percent of the FPL, receive comprehensive healthcare from the effective date of coverage in MCAP until the last day of the month in which the 365th day following the end of the pregnancy occurs. There are approximately 3,548 individuals enrolled in MCAP, and is available throughout the state.
The postpartum care provided to the state’s CHIP populations is identical to the care provided to the state’s Medicaid population, and by providing 12 months of postpartum care to these CHIP populations, California prevents disparity between the populations benefitted by the ARPA provisions and the California CHIP populations that are not included in the ARPA postpartum provisions. MCAP subscribers will still continue to receive their services through the managed care delivery system, and individuals in Population 2 will still continue to receive services through the fee-for-service delivery system. To further align with ARPA provisions in the state, for both populations, this postpartum care extension will be provided for 365 days, including the remaining days of the month in which the 365th day falls.
The State assures that the HSI programs will not supplant or match CHIP federal funds with other federal funds, or allow other federal funds to supplant or match CHIP federal funds.
Poison Treatment Advice and Prevention. California uses CHIP funds, within the 10 percent federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the California Poison Control System (CPCS). CPCS provides daily, 24-hour emergency telephone treatment advice, referral assistance, and information to manage exposure to poisonous and hazardous substances. The CPCS answers poisoning emergency calls from the general public 24 hours a day, 365 days each year at no charge. At all times, a Specialist in Poison Information (SPI) is available to manage cases and Certified Specialists in Poison Information (CSPI) manage cases and direct Poison Information Providers. The service is provided to all communities, including underserved and indigent populations, in over 150 languages and via telecommunications devices for the deaf and hearing impaired (TDD).
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
The call center receives approximately 220,000 calls per year involving someone ingesting poison and other hazardous substances. Nearly 40 percent of all calls relate to children age 0-18 with annual household incomes of $55,000 or less (250 percent FPL for a family of 4). Another 10 percent of calls are for children 0-18 with incomes up to $65,000 (250 percent FPL for a family of 5). Children under the age of five account for the majority of poison exposures. In addition to calls regarding exposure, another 90,000 calls are for information and are considered preventive. Of these calls, 64 percent are for children age 0 18 in families with incomes at $55,000 or less, and another 12 percent for families with incomes up to $65,000. Only children below the age of 19 are served through this HSI.
Poison center public education programs direct attention and resources to “identified at-risk populations”. In California, the targeted at-risk populations are Latinos, African Americans, and children born to low income parents. Of California’s 2.5 million children under the age of five (2016 U.S. Census), approximately 525,000 live in poverty. African-Americans and Latinos are California’s largest at-risk groups.
A line of consumer-based educational materials has been developed in Spanish using research findings with target audiences. Materials are culturally relevant, take into consideration health literacy levels and clearly illustrate and describe poison center services. Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hmong, Russian and Armenian brochures have also been developed. Materials are customized and culturally relevant to each group.
A Community Health Worker Initiative directs efforts to the “hardest to reach” and “at highest risk” populations. Community health workers deliver the CPCS message through group education sessions, community health fairs, and local events, as well as informally, though one-on-one outreach in their neighborhoods, churches, and community gatherings
CPCS advertises the national public toll free number and its own TTY toll free number in both the white pages and the “customer guide” (usually appearing on page 2) of all California telephone directories. Listings placed with the major local phone companies (SBC, Verizon) are applied to each directory they publish in California. CPCS also places these listings in the smaller rural phone company, as well as independent community directories.
The State assures that the HSI programs will not supplant or match CHIP federal funds with other federal funds, or allow other federal funds to supplant or match CHIP federal funds.
9.10 Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following:
- Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
The Source of State Share Funds: State General Fund Based on January 2021 CARTS Submission
HSI SPA Changes TF GF FF FFY 2020-2021 $97,333,000 $34,067,000 $63,266,000 FFY 2021 $77,866,000 $27,253,000 $50,613,000
CHIP Budget Projections
STATE: CA FFY Budget FFY Budget
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
Federal Fiscal Year 2020-2021 2022 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 65.00% 65.00%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments Managed care $2,540,049,031 $2,499,029,459 per member/per month rate $2,162.00 $2,340.00 Fee for Service $2,097,154,725 $2,166,141,625 Total Benefit Costs $4,637,203,756 $4,665,171,084 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) ($66,347,407) ($64,270,000) Net Benefit Costs $4,570,856,349 $4,600,901,084 Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit
Administration Costs Personnel 21,916,238 20,861,313 General administration Contractors/Brokers Claims Processing 86,190,890 82,042,142 Outreach/marketing costs Health Services Initiatives (postpartum) $97,333,000 $77,866,000 Health Services Initiatives (Poison) $2,950,000 $2,950,000 Other Total Administration Costs $208,390,128 $183,719,455 10% Administrative Cap $507,872,928 $511,211,231
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes (postpartum) $97,333,000 $77,866,000
Federal Share $3,406,550,899 $3,245,225,066 State Share $1,372,695,580 $1,539,395,472 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan $4,779,246,479 $4,784,620,538
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA CA-21-0032 Summary#
(ca)(ca-21-0032)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
This amendment implements a health services initiative (HSI) to to provide comprehensive coverage during the 12-month postpartum period for women whose newborns had been covered as targeted low-income children from conception to birth.
Approval Package
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA CA-24-0046 PDF#
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: California
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: CA-24-0046
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
July 10, 2024
Michelle Baass Interim State Medicaid Director Director of Health Care Programs Department of Health Care Services 1501 Capitol Avenue, MS 0000 Sacramento, CA 95899-7413
Dear Director Baass:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) State Plan Amendment (SPA), CA- 24-0046, submitted on June 29, 2024, has been approved. This SPA has an effective date of January 1, 2024.
Through this SPA, California provides 12 months of continuous eligibility (CE) coverage to individuals enrolled in its separate CHIP, pursuant to section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (CAA, 2023). Section 5112 of the CAA, amended titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act to require that states provide 12 months of CE for children under the age of 19 in Medicaid and CHIP. In California, this provision applies to the targeted low-income children and from-conception-to-end-of-pregnancy (FCEP) population. A copy of the approved CS27 state plan page is attached to be incorporated into the state’s approved CHIP state plan.
Your Project Officer is Joyce Jordan. She is available to answer your questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related matters. Her contact information is as follows:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop: S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: 410-786-3413 E-mail: Joyce.Jordan@cms.hhs.gov
If you have additional questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs, at (410) 786-1536. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely, /Signed by Sarah deLone/
Sarah deLone Director
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
CHIP Eligibility
State Name: California OMB Control Number: 0938-1148
Transmittal Number: CA - 24 - 0046 Separate Child Health Insurance Program CS27 General Eligibility - Continuous Eligibility
2107(e)(1)(K) of the SSA and 42 CFR 457.342 and 435.926; 2107(e)(1)(J) and 1902(e)(16) of the SSA
Mandatory 12-Month Postpartum Continuous Eligibility in CHIP for States Electing This Option in Medicaid
At state option in Medicaid, states may elect to provide continuous eligibility for an individual’s 12-month postpartum period consistent with section 1902(e)(16) of the SSA. If elected under Medicaid, states are required to provide the same continuous eligibility and extended postpartum period for pregnant individuals in its separate CHIP. A separate CHIP cannot implement this option if not also elected under the Medicaid state plan.
State elected the Medicaid option to provide continuous eligibility through the 12- month postpartum period Yes
The state assures the extended postpartum period available to pregnant targeted low-income children or targeted low- income pregnant women under section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the SSA is provided consistent with the following provisions:
Individuals who, while pregnant, were eligible and received services under the state child health plan or waiver shall remain eligible throughout the duration of the pregnancy (including any period of retroactive eligibility) and the 12- month postpartum period, beginning on the day the pregnancy ends and ending on the last day of the 12th month consistent with paragraphs (5) and (16) of section 1902(e) of the SSA
Continuous eligibility is provided to targeted low-income children who are pregnant or targeted low-income pregnant women (if applicable) who are eligible for and enrolled under the state child health plan through the end of the 12-month postpartum period who would otherwise lose eligibility because of a change in circumstances, unless:
The individual or representative requests voluntary disenrollment.
The individual is no longer a resident of the state.
The Agency determines that eligibility was erroneously granted at the most recent determination or renewal of eligibility because of Agency error or fraud, abuse, or perjury attributed to the individual.
The individual dies.
Unlike continuous eligibility for children, states providing the 12-month postpartum period may not end an individual’s continuous eligibility due to becoming eligible for Medicaid.
Consistent with section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the SSA, the state assures that continuous eligibility is provided through an individual’s pregnancy and 12-month postpartum period regardless of an individual becoming eligible for Medicaid.
Benefits provided during the 12-month postpartum period must be the same scope of comprehensive services consistent with the benefit package elected by the state under section 2103(a) of the SSA that is available to targeted low-income children and/or targeted low-income pregnant women and may include additional benefits as described in Section 6 of the CHIP state plan.
Page 1 of 2
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
CHIP Eligibility
Mandatory Continuous Eligibility for Children
The CHIP Agency must provide that children who have been determined eligible under the state plan shall remain eligible, regardless of any changes in the family’s circumstances, for a 12-month continuous eligibility period.
Consistent with section 2107(e)(1)(K) of the SSA, the state assures that continuous eligibility is provided to its targeted low-income children for a duration of 12 months, regardless of any changes in circumstances, unless:
The child attains age 19.
The child or child's representative requests voluntary disenrollment.
The child is no longer a resident of the state.
The Agency determines that eligibility was erroneously granted at the most recent determination or renewal of eligibility because of Agency error or fraud, abuse, or perjury attributed to child or child's representative.
The child dies.
The child becomes eligible for Medicaid.
The state elects to provide coverage to the from-conception-to-end-of-pregnancy (FCEP) population (otherwise known as Yes the "unborn").
The state assures continuous eligibility for the FCEP population is provided in the same manner as continuous eligibility for other targeted low-income children, except for the duration of the continuous eligibility period.
The duration of continuous eligibility for the FCEP population depends on whether a state enrolls the birthing parent into Medicaid for coverage of labor and delivery or pays for the delivery under CHIP. The state conducts at least one of the following actions upon birth of the child:
CHIP pays for labor and delivery and the state screens the child for potential eligibility for Medicaid. Yes
Emergency Medicaid pays for labor and delivery and the state deems the newborn eligible for Medicaid and ends Yes the continuous eligibility period in CHIP.
PRA Disclosure Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 50 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. V.20240322
Page 2 of 2
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA CA-24-0046 Summary#
(ca)(ca-24-0046)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
Through this SPA, the state provides 12 months of continuous eligibility (CE) coverage to individuals enrolled in its separate CHIP, pursuant to section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (CAA, 2023). In California, this provision applies to the targeted low-income children and from-conception-to-end-of-pregnancy (FCEP) populations.
Approval Package
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)California CHIP State Plan Amendment 20 (approval package)#
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents State/Territory Name: California State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: CA-CHIP SPA #20 This file contains the following documents in the order listed: 1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages 3) Final Approved State Plan
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail StoP 52-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244F185O urs .FNITIS fl)R MÊDIC-'IRF & MIDIC]\ID 'TNVICf,S CENfTR IOB MEDICAfD & CHIP SERVICES Mari Cantwell Chief Deputy Director Department of Health Care Services 1501 Capitol Avenue, MS 0000 Sacramento, C A 9 5899 -7 4 13 DEC 2 7 2017 Dear Ms. Cantwell: This letter is to inform you that the centers for Medicare & Medicaid Seruices (cMS) has approved your children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendment (SPA), CA- iHfp SpÁ +ZO, submiued to CMS on June 27,2014. This SPA updates Califomia's full state plan by removing the former Ile althy Families component of the state's separate CHIP, which "ou".éd childre[up to age 19 above the Medicaid levels with income up to 250 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL). The Heatthy Families popìulation was subsumed into the state's Medicaid program on January 1,2014. with this sPA, califomia's separate CHIP is now comprised of the following populations, effective January 1, 2014: c The county children's Health Initiative Program (CCHIP), which operates in San Francisco, san Mateo, and santa clara counties for children from age 0 to 19, who are above 261 percent FPL up to and including 317 percent Federal poverty level (FPL); o Children from conception to birth, under the "unbom" option for children with income from zero up to 317 percent of the FPL; and ¡ An infant population (linked to the unborn option), from age 0 to 2, who arc above 261 percent FPL and up to and including 3 17 percent FLP' The transition of the Healthy Fømilies poEiation from CHIP to Medicaid began on January 1, 2013, when Califomia received approval for a time limited section 1 I 15 demonstration to phase in Medicaid coverage of approximately 751,000 former Healtlry Familíes childten with income upto 250 percent ofthe FPL. This phase in was completed by December 31,2013. Upon càmpletion of the phase in, the state feceived approval on January 1,2014 to cover both new "*oil"". and transitioning Healthy Families children within this income range under Medicaid sPA CA-13-0021. CA CHIP SpA #20 also deletei outdated eligibility information and incorporates references to formerly approved MAGI SPAs throughout the current GHIP state plan template as appropriate. In addition, CtVtS is approving SPA CA-17-0045, which permits presumptive eligibility for
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-3)Page 3#
Page 2 - Ms. Mari Cantwell some children remaining in California's separate program. Califomia has had presumptive eligibility in place since 2003, but this policy was not specified in the state's original CS28 submission. The effective date of this SPA is July 1, 2017. Your title XXI project office is Ms. Stacey Green. She is available to answer your questions and other CHlP-related matters. Her contact information is as follows: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Cerfer for Medicaid & CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop 52-06-08 Baltimore, MD 21244-1 85 0 Telephone: (410) 7 86-61 02 E-mail: Stacey.Green@cms.hhs.gov Official communications regarding program matters should be sent simultaneously to Ms. Green and Ms. Henrietta Sam-Louie, Associate Regional Administrator (ARA), Division of Medicaid and Children's Health Operations, in our San Francisco Regional Offrce. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Division of Medicaid and Children's Health Operations 90-7th Street, Suite 5-300 San Francisco, CA 94103-6706 Ifyou have additional questions, please contact Ms. Amy Lutzky, Director, Division ofState Coverage Programs, at (410) 786-0721. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff. Sincerely, ^ /'^)*-A /uJ^'* 'yrv Zt^,"<%"^."- GslrØ Anne Marie Costello Director cc Ms. Henrietta Sam-Louie, ARA, CMS Region IX, San Francisco / Anne Marie Costello /
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-4)Page 4#
(ffi"*" CHIP Eligibility State Transm¡ttal Number: TN - l7 - 0045 ApprovalDale:_ OMB Control Number: 093E- I 148 42 CFR 457 .355 and 435.1102,2107 (eX IXL) and 19204 ofthe SSA The ClllP Agercy covers childrcn whcn dctcrnrincd plesumptively eligible by a qualified entity I Describe the population ofchildren to whom presumptive eligibility applies: Presumptive eligibility app¡¡es to a subset ofchildren described in California's approved C59 template, which specifies the :ligibility levels und€r the conception to birlh option in the state's separate CHIP. Speçifically, presumptive eligibility applies to children from conoept¡on to b¡rth from 0 up to 208 percent ofthe Federal povefy level (FPL). E Descr¡be the duration ofthe presumptive eligibility per¡od and any I¡mitat¡ons Ihe presumptive el¡gibility period begins on the date that a determination is made by the qualified entity, and ends on the day the final CHIP eligibility determination is made for children w¡th famil¡es that have filled out a full applicat¡on with¡n that time peliod; oruntil the end ofthe following month if an application forCHIP is notfiled by the fam¡ly w¡th¡nthat t¡me period. An ndividual is eligible for one presumptive eligibility period within a l2 month period, stading with the effective date of the initial PE period (PE is available only one time during pregnancy). I Describe the application process and eligibility determination factors us€d: When a child comes into a CHDP prov¡der's office, the entity helps the appl¡cant complete a presumpt¡ve eligib¡l¡ty form, referred to as a pre-enrollment application in California. The eligibility determinat¡on factors include: CHIP specific eligibility factors, sùch as the child being under age l9 and not enrolled in other health insurance; household income; state rcsidency, and awfully residing status. All ofth¡s information is collected through self-attestat¡on. A noncitizen pregnant appl¡cant without a lawfully residing status is approved for presumptive eligibility coverage ofthe unborn child under CHIP. The presumpt¡ve 3ligib¡lity ent¡ty will make an eligibility determ¡nation according to the income Iimitof20S percent ofthe FPL. Ifthech¡ld meets all ofthe eligib¡l¡ty cr¡ter¡a, the presumptive eligibility form is submitted into DHCS'Medi-Cal Eligibil¡ty Data Systerr iMEDS), and presumptive eligibility is effective immediately. The family is given a temporary Benefits Card. Coverage ;ontinues for up two months while an eligibil¡ty determination is being made. I The CHIP Agency uses qualified entities, as defined in section 19204, to determine eligibility presurnptively for children. sPA# CA-17-0045 DEC 2 7 2011 Effective Date: JUly 1,2017 Page I of3
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-5)Page 5#
;Iñ!T CHIP Eligibility Effective Date: JulY 1 ,2017 Page 2 of 3 - ls authorized ro determine a child's eligibility to receive assistance under the Special Supplemental Food U prog."r for Women. Infants, and Children (WlC) under section l7 of the Ch ild N utrition Act of 1966 r--r ls author¡zed to determ¡ne a child's etigibility under the Medicaid state plan or for child health assistance u under the Children's Health lnsurance Program (CHIP) _ ls an elementary or secondary school, as defined in section l4l0l ofthe Elementary and secondary ! Education Act of l9ó5 (20 U.S.C. 8801) n Is an elementary or secondary school operated or supported by the Bureau oflndian Affairs I Is a state or Tribal child support enforcement agency undert¡tle lV-Dofthe Act ,- ls an organization that prov¡des emergency food and shelter under a grant under the Stewart B. McKinn€y u Homeless Assistance Act r-ì ls a state or Tribal office or entity involved in enrollmentinthe program under Medicaid, CHIP, ortitle ! rv-A ofthe Act Is an organizat¡on that determines eligibility for any assistance or benefits provided under any program of - oublic oì assisted housing that receives Federal funds, including the program under section I or any other U sect¡on ofthe United States HousingActof I937 (42 U.S.C. 1437) or under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act of 1996 (25 U S C. 4l0l et seq ) X Any other entity the state so d€ems, as approved by the Secretary Name of entity Description CHDP Providers Presumptive eligibility is provided through the Child Health and D¡sability Prevent¡on (CHDP) program. This program provides heallh assessments for early detection and prevention ofdisease and disabilities for low-income children and youth. CHDP providers oversee the screening and follow- up components of Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program for Medicaid eligible children and youth. ln July 2003, the CHDP program also began the using the "CHDP Cateway,"an automated pre-enrollment process for uninsured children. The CHDP Gateway serves as the entry point for low ¡ncome childr€n to enroll in ongoing health care covemge through Medicaid or CHIP, The CHIp Agency assures that ¡t has communicated the requirements for qualified entities, at 19204(bX3) I ofthe Act, and provided adequate training to the entit¡es and organizations involved. A copy ofthe train¡ng materials has been included. i sPA# CA-17-0045 Approval DEC 2 7 20li
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-6)Page 6#
ffim" CHIP Eligibility PRA Disclosure Statement Acoording to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Thevalid OMB control num ber for this inform ation collect¡on is 093 8- I 148. The time required to complete this information colt€ction is est¡mated to average 50 hours per response, includ¡ng the time to review instruct¡ons, search ex¡st¡ng data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. Ifyou have comments çoncerning the accuracy of the time €stimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS,7500 Secur¡ty Boulevard, Attn: PRA R€ports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baftimorc, Morylond 21244-1850. , ruror.,r, 201 of 1, 3 sPA# CA-17-0045 Approval DEC 2 7 zglt Effective Date: July Page
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-7)Page 7#
1 TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: California (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR, 457.40(b))
(Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)):
Name: Mari Cantwell
Position/Title: Chief Deputy Director, Department of Health Care Services Name:
Position/Title:
Name:
Position/Title:
*Disclosure. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-0707. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, write to: CMS, 7500 Security Blvd., Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-8)Page 8#
2 Introduction: Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 105-33 amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 further modified the program.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the state plan amendments (SPAs). It reflects the regulatory requirements at 42 CFR Part 457 as well as the previously approved SPA templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SPA template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is developing regulations to implement the CHIPRA requirements. When final regulations are published in the Federal Register, this template will be modified to reflect those rules and States will be required to submit SPAs illustrating compliance with the new regulations. States are not required to resubmit their State plans based on the updated template. However, States must use the updated template when submitting a State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirements for Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. (42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. A SPA is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90 day review period, or clock for CHIP SPAs, that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete response is received. More information on the SPA review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-9)Page 9#
3 When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a “clean” copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101); (42 CFR, 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of State Approach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state’s program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology- The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable. (Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)); (42CFR, 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage;
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-10)Page 10#
4 benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary-approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope, and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State’s use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre-existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 2101(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-11)Page 11#
5 Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: • Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SPA process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background)
They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • 10 (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
• Combination of Options- CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes of up to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-12)Page 12#
6 health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion of Medicaid, the description provided under “Option to Expand Medicaid” would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in “Option to Create a Separate Program” would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
Proposed State plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Name of Project Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-13)Page 13#
7 Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101)(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101, which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXI.
1.1.1. Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(1) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SPA to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.2. Providing expanded benefits under the State’s Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI, in conjunction with an expansion in the State’s Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3. A combination of both of the above. (Section 2101(a)(2))
CA RESPONSE:
CHIP Program History and 2013/2014 Transition of Healthy Families Children
Shortly after enactment of the federal Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Governor Wilson developed a program for implementing this initiative in California. He submitted his legislative package to the legislature in August of 1997, and the Legislature worked with the Governor to enact the Healthy Families Program (HFP) in the last weeks of the 1997-98 legislative sessions. The Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB) created the HFP, and the County Children’s Health Initiative Program (CCHIP) under a separate CHIP program. The HFP provided coverage to infants up through the age of two born to mothers enrolled in the Access for Infants and Mothers (AIM) Program. On March 28, 2006, under CHIP SPA #12, the state also received approval to expand coverage to unborn children (pregnant women) under the state’s separate CHIP plan.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-14)Page 14#
8 Effective July 1, 2014, SB 857 (Chapter 31, Statutes of 2014) eliminated the MRMIB and transferred its responsibilities to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). This bill required the elimination of the HFP under California’s separate program and the transition of the majority of children in the HFP to a title XXI funded Medicaid expansion program. The bill also prohibited DHCS from approving additional local entities for participation in CCHIP. In addition, SB 857 required local entities that were participating in CCHIP on March 23, 2010, to continue to participate in the program, maintaining eligibility standards, methodologies, and procedures at least as favorable as those in effect on March 23, 2010, through September 30, 2019 (September 30, 2019 the federal Maintenance of Effort (MOE) date). If a county participating in the program as of March 23, 2010, elects to cease funding the non-federal share of program expenditures during the MOE timeframe, the bill requires DHCS to provide funding from the General Fund in amounts equal to the total non-federal share of incurred expenditures.
On December 31, 2012, California received approval from CMS to amend California's section 1115 demonstration, the "California Bridge to Reform Demonstration (11-W-00193/9)." The authority provided California with time limited authority to transition a population of approximately 751,293 children from HFP into a Medicaid (Medi-Cal) expansion demonstration population in several phases. Approval of this demonstration amendment was effective through December 31, 2013. The state also received approval on April 29, 2015 to expand coverage to optional targeted low-income children with family incomes up to and including 250 percent of the FPL under the Medicaid state plan (SPA CA-13-0021).
As specified above, the programs covered under CHIP transitioned from the authority of MRMIB to the DHCS. As part of this transition, the majority of children covered under HFP were transitioned to a new Medicaid expansion program, referred to in California as the Optional Targeted Low-Income Children’s Program (OTLICP). However, the state continues to cover four populations, described in detail below, in its separate CHIP. • CCHIP children in three counties (Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo): This program retains its name and program operations. • Unborn children (pregnant women): Lower income Benefits and cost sharing for the lower income children are based on the Medi-Cal program. This program is referred to as the “unborn option.” • Unborn children (pregnant women): Upper income Benefits and cost sharing for the upper income children are based on state employee benchmark coverage. This program is referred to as the Medi-Cal Access Program (MCAP), and was formerly referred to as AIM. • Infants. This program was originally referred to as MCAP infant program, and is now referred to as the Medi-Cal Access Infant Program (MCAIP).
Overview of Current Structure of Coverage in California and CHIP Combination Program
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-15)Page 15#
9
Coverage in California Covered California (http://www.coveredca.com) is the health insurance marketplace in California. The exchange enables individuals and small businesses to purchase health insurance at federally subsidized rates. It is administered by an independent agency of the government of California. Individuals, including families with children potentially eligible for Medicaid or CHIP, can also apply online at the Covered California website. California determines whether children are eligible for Medicaid (no-cost Medi-Cal) or other CHIP programs via the California Healthcare Eligibility, Enrollment, and Retention System (CalHEERS). CalHEERS is a computer system that contains California’s Single Streamlined Application, which is consistent with ACA requirements.
Individuals can also apply in person or by mail at a local county human services agency or by phone or mail at Covered California. If individuals need assistance applying or have questions, the state provides a link to find a certified enroller in the area.
Children’s Coverage through Separate CHIP Under the Title XXI plan, children will receive health coverage, as well as comprehensive vision and dental coverage. California covers children in its separate CHIPs under the following programs:
Population 1: COUNTY CHILDREN’S HEALTH INITIATIVE PROGRAMS (CCHIP) Population 2: UNBORN OPTION (low income population receiving MEDI-CAL like benefit) Population 3: MEDI-CAL ACCESS PROGRAM (MCAP/higher income population receiving state employee benchmark coverage) Population 4: MEDI-CAL ACCESS INFANT PROGRAM (MCAIP/infants born to Population 3 only)
In addition to the separate CHIP, certain title XXI funded children receive coverage through a Medicaid expansion that also includes dental and vision coverage. Children with certain complicated medical conditions will receive treatment of those conditions through the state’s highly regarded California Children’s Services (CCS) program. Similarly, children with serious emotional disturbances may receive treatment of their condition from county mental health departments. This comprehensive child focused benefits package provides children with preventive, full scope, quality health care which is designed to help promote healthier children and, as a result, healthier families for the state of California.
POPULATION 1/COUNTY CHILDREN’S HEALTH INITIATIVE PROGRAMS (CCHIP)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-16)Page 16#
10 CCHIP is available in Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties. These children receive coverage that is benchmarked to California’s state employees under the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS).
In Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties, CCHIP enrolled children receive health coverage from a Medicaid health plan that participates in CCHIP, and has a contract with the counties to provide the services. Specialized services are carved out for CCS, as is also carved out for Medicaid and MCAIP children. Under the CCHIP model, children diagnosed with an eligible CCS condition will be referred to the CCS program for a full eligibility determination, including financial eligibility. In the CHIP Program, enrolled children with an eligible CCS condition are “deemed” to meet the financial eligibility requirements. In CCHIP, children that do not meet all the CCS eligibility criteria have all their medical needs met by the health plan as occurs today under the CalPERS. Children enrolled in the CCHIP also receive comprehensive dental and vision coverage also designed after the CalPERS.
CCHIP is administered by the counties on behalf of DHCS. Application screening to assure children are not eligible for no-cost Medi-Cal is done via CalHEERS. CCHIP covers children with income above 261 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) up to and including 317 percent of the FPL. This is consistent with the CS7 in Attachment 1.
DHCS is responsible for review and ongoing monitoring of each of the CCHIP expansions to assure compliance with federal Title XXI regulations and California’s approved state plan.
POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION (LOW INCOME POPULATION RECEIVING MEDI-CAL BENEFIT)
The Unborn Option offers prenatal care, prescriptions, labor and delivery, dental care, and services for other conditions that may complicate the pregnancy to pregnant women whose income is from 0 to 208 percent of the FPL. This is consistent with the CS9 template in Attachment 1. Postpartum coverage is also included and lasts until the end of the month of the 60th day following the end of the pregnancy. Infants are eligible for Medi-Cal at birth with no family income limit for the first year of life.
POPULATIONS 3 MEDI-CAL ACCESS PROGRAM (MCAP)/ POPULATION 4 MEDI-CAL ACCESS INFANT PROGRAM (MCAIP)
MCAP provides comprehensive health benefits for targeted low income unborn children with household incomes above 208 percent up to and including 317 percent of the FPL. This is consistent with the CS9 template in Attachment 1. Pregnant women are not eligible for MCAP if they are on Medi-Cal or have employer-sponsored coverage
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-17)Page 17#
11 (unless the coverage has such high deductibles that DHCS views the coverage as being tantamount to being uninsured). As approved in California’s SPA, FFP is claimed for infants through the age of one born to MCAP mothers with household incomes above 208 percent of the FPL up to and including 317 percent FPL. This is consistent with the CS9 in Attachment 1. MCAIP provides health benefits for infants up to age two born to MCAP mothers with incomes above 261 percent of the FPL up to and including 317 percent of the FPL.
California CHIP State Plan Attachments Attachment # Name of Attachment Relevant CHIP State Plan Section Purpose of Attachment 1 CA approved ACA Eligibility Templates Section 4/Eligibility To reflect approved eligibility pages referenced in the table in section 1.4, subsections of 4.0, and 8.7 specifically. 2 State Employee Benchmark Benefit for MCAP and CCHIP Section 6.1.1.2/Benefits To describe benefits for Population 1 (CCHIP) and 3 (MCAP) 3 Medicaid benefits for the Unborn Option and MCAIP Section 6.1.4.1/Benefits To describe Medicaid benefits for Population 2 (Unborn Option) and 4 (MCAIP) 4 Medicaid benefit limitations for the Unborn Option and MCAIP Section 6.1.4.1/Benefits To describe applicable limitations under Medicaid for Populations 2 and 4 5 Summary table of benefits for all pops Section 6.2/Benefits To provide a summary of benefits across all separate CHIP populations 6 & 7 Dental coverage for MCAP and CCHIP Section 6.2.2.2/Benefits This attachment includes CDT codes for Delta Dental (Attachment 6) and Liberty Dental (Attachment 7). Also, there is a general description in Attachment 2 on page 11. 8 Dental coverage for the Unborn Option and MCAIP Section 6.2.1/Benefits Attachment 3, Page 4, Paragraph 10 and Attachment 4, Page 53, Section 10.
1.1-DS
The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-18)Page 18#
12 (Section 2110(b)(5))
1.2.
Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
1.3.
Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. (42CFR 457.130)
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA (42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
CA RESPONSE:
Date Original Plan Submitted: November 19, 1997 Date Plan Approved: March 24, 1998 Date Plan Effective/Implemented: July 1, 1998
Date Amendment#1 Purpose: Changed its income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program to be in compliance with the State enabling legislation. This amendment lowered income eligibility from 200 percent of the FPL net income to 200 percent of the FPL gross income. This amendment was initiated at the start of the program's implementation on July 1, 1998. Date Amendment #1 Submitted: April 14, 1998 Date Amendment #1 Approved: June 29, 1998 Date Amendment #1 Effective/Implemented: July 1, 1998
Date Amendment#2 Purpose: Increased the enrollment broker fees from $25 to $50 per successful applicant.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-19)Page 19#
13 Date Amendment #2 Submitted: January 8, 1999 Date Amendment #2 Approved: December 21, 1999 Date Amendment #2 Effective/Implemented: October 1, 1998
Date Amendment#3 Purpose: Expanded income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program by disregarding income between 200 to 250 percent of the FPL. Income eligibility for the Healthy Families Program is further expanded by applying Medi-Cal income deductions when determining eligibility for the Healthy Families Program. The Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP) provider-claiming period for services received prior to enrollment is also lengthened from 30 to 90 days. Date Amendment #3 Submitted: August 3, 1999 Date Amendment #3 Approved: November 23, 1999 Date Amendment #3 Effective/Implemented: July 22, 1999
Date Amendment#4 Purpose: Allowed a Family Contribution Sponsor to pay a specific child's HFP) premiums for the first year of enrollment. Date Amendment #4 Submitted: December 9, 1999 Date Amendment #4 Approved: March 6, 2000 Date Amendment #4 Effective/Implemented: March 1, 2000
Date Amendment#5 Purpose: Exempted cost sharing for American Indians (AI) and Alaskan Native (AN) children who meet the eligibility criteria for the Healthy Families Program (HFP) and provide acceptable documentation of their status as AI or AN children. Date Amendment #5 Submitted: April 17, 2000 Date Amendment #5 Approved: July 7, 2000 Date Amendment #5 Effective Date: October 6, 1999
Date Amendment#6 Purpose: Indicated the State’s partial compliance with the final SCHIP regulations. Date Amendment #6 Submitted: July 2, 2002 Date Amendment #6 Approved: September 19, 2002 Date Amendment #6 Effective Date: August 24, 2001 Date Amendment#7 Purpose: Expanded coverage levels to 300 percent of the FPL for children residing in selected counties (Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara) through the CCHIP). This amendment also expands coverage to children up to age 2 born to mothers enrolled in the AIM program with family incomes up to 300 percent of the FPL. Date Amendment #7 Submitted: April 1, 2003 Date Amendment #7 Approved: June 10, 2004 Date Amendment #7 Effective: January 1, 2003 – CCHIP Expanded Coverage levels; and July 1, 2004 – AIM Program
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-20)Page 20#
14
Date Amendment #8 Purpose: Implemented oral health services initiative, including case management, oral health education, preventative services, and mobile dental vans. Date Amendment #8 Submitted: July 24, 2003 Date Amendment #8 Approved: January 16, 2004 Date Amendment #8 Effective: January 1, 2004
Date Amendment #9 Purpose: Allowed the State to provide presumptive eligibility to children with family incomes from 100 to 200 percent of the FPL through the CHDP program. Date Amendment #9 Submitted: September 9, 2003 Date Amendment #9 Approved: December 8, 2003 Date Amendment #9 Effective: July 1, 2003
Date Amendment #10 Purpose: Allowed the State to claim for the State’s rural health demonstration projects as a health services initiative under the SCHIP 10 percent administrative cap. The rural health demonstration projects, which were previously approved under the California SCHIP State plan, aim to improve access to health care services for low-income medically underserved and uninsured populations in rural areas and special populations who have rural occupations. By claiming for the rural health demonstrations under the 10 percent cap, the State has the flexibility to provide services for all low-income children, thereby benefiting all low-income children, not just SCHIP enrollees. The amendment also allows the State to use tobacco taxes as a new source of State funding. Date Amendment #10 Submitted: December 15, 2003 Date Amendment #10 Approved: March 11, 2004 Date Amendment #10 Effective: February 1, 2004
Date Amendment #11 Purpose: Increased premiums for children with family incomes from above 200 percent of the FPL up to and including 250 percent of the FPL. The amendment also provides for school-based outreach for the Healthy Families Program through a partnership between the State and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Date Amendment #11 Submitted: March 23, 2005 Date Amendment #11 Approved: March 15, 2007 Date Amendment #11 Effective: March 22, 2005 (School-based Outreach) July 1, 2005 (Premium Increase)
Date Amendment #12 Purpose: Extend health care coverage to unborn children with family income up to 300 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL). Date Amendment #12 Submitted: June 30, 2005 Date Amendment #12 Approved: March 28, 2006
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-21)Page 21#
15 Date Amendment #12 Effective: July 1, 2004
Date Amendment #13 Purpose: Added a fifth county (Santa Cruz) to their County Program allowing children to be enrolled from 250 percent to 300 percent of the FPL. However, it was subsequently withdrawn by the State on 11/6/08. Date Amendment #13 Submitted: July 12, 2007 Date Amendment #13 Approved: Withdrawn (November 6, 2008)
Date Amendment #14 Purpose: Responded to program changes enacted by the Legislature to increase premiums, place a cap on dental benefits, limit 5 certain vision benefits, apply a wait list, and remove the 6-month residency requirement for pregnant women in the Access for Infants and Mothers program. Date Amendment #14 Submitted: April 2, 2009 Date Amendment #14 Approved: January 14, 2010 Date Amendment #14 Effective: January 31, 2009 Wait List /Disenrollment Infrastructure January 6, 2009 AIM 6-Month Residency Requirement Elimination February 1, 2009 HFP Family Contribution Increase, & Vision Benefit Modification July 1, 2009 Dental Benefit Cap
Date Amendment #15 Purpose: CHIPRA Shifting of Presumptive Eligibility Cost to Title XIX Funds; CHIPRA Option of Lawfully Residing Children; CHIPRA Shifting of Accelerated Enrollment Cost to Title XIX Funds; Presumptive Eligibility at Initial Application under Title XXI Funds. Date Amendment #15 Submitted: June 30, 2009 Date Amendment #15 Approved: December 29, 2009 Date Amendment #15 Effective: April 1, 2009
Date Amendment #16 Purpose: Implemented a health services initiative to support the California Poison Control System (CPSC). Date Amendment #16 Submitted: October 16, 2009 Date Amendment #16 Approved: December 3, 2009 Date Amendment #16 Effective: July 1, 2009
Date Amendment #17 Purpose: Increased premiums and co-payments for children with a family income above 150 percent up to and including 250 percent of the FPL. The amendment also proposes to limit dental plan choices for new subscribers. These changes are based on changes in State law. Date Amendment #17 Submitted: December 24, 2009 Date Amendment #17 Approved: July 29, 2010 Date Amendment #17 Effective: November 1, 2009
Date Amendment #18 Purpose: Premium Increases
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-22)Page 22#
16 Date Amendment #18 Submitted: June 1, 2011 Date Amendment #18 Approved: Withdrawn July 3, 2012 Date Amendment #18 Effective: Not applicable.
Date Amendment #19 Purpose: Expanded eligibility in CCHIP from 300 percent of the FPL to 400 percent of the FPL in San Mateo County; Eliminated the dental benefit cap; Implemented an electronic data match with the Social Security Administration for citizen verification; Required CHIP payments to FQHCs and RHCs comply with Medicaid payment requirements. Date Amendment #19 Submitted: June 29, 2012 Date Amendment #19 Approved: September 7, 2012 Date Amendment #19 Effective: October 1, 2011: Dental Benefit Cap Elimination January 1, 2012: County Children's Health Initiative Program (CCHIP) October 1, 2009: Prospective Payment System for FQHC’s and RHC’s January 1, 2010: Citizenship Verification Requirement
SPA # 20. Purpose of SPA: To eliminate the “Healthy Families” program, and transition the majority of children from a separate program to a Medicaid expansion under the Medi-Cal program in California. This SPA reflects changes previously effectuated through section 1115 demonstration authority. Proposed effective date:
December 31, 2013 Proposed implementation date: January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014
Transmittal Number SPA Group PDF # Description Superseded Plan Section(s) CA-14-0001
Approval Date: 8/11/2016 Effective/Imple mentation Date: January 1, 2014 MAGI Eligibility & Methods CS7
CS15 Eligibility – Targeted Low Income Children
MAGI-Based Income Methodologies Supersedes the current sections 4.1.1, 4.1.2 and 4.1.3
Incorporate within a separate subsection under section 4.3 CA-14-0002
Approval Date: 9/08/2015 Effective/Imple mentation Date: January 1, 2014
XXI Medicaid Expansion CS3 Eligibility for Medicaid Expansion Program Supersedes the current Medicaid expansion section 4.0 CA-14-0003 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible Incorporate within a separate subsection
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-23)Page 23#
17 Transmittal Number SPA Group PDF # Description Superseded Plan Section(s)
Approval Date: 7/22/2014 Effective/Imple mentation Date: January 1, 2014
2101(f) Group for Medicaid as a Result of the Elimination of Income Disregards under section 4.1 CA-14-0004
Approval Date: Not yet approved. Effective/Imple mentation Date: October 1, 2013 Eligibility Processing CS24 Eligibility Process
CA-14-0005
Approval Date: 4/9/2015 Effective/Imple mentation Date: January 1, 2014
Non- Financial Eligibility CS17
CS18
CS19
CS20
CS21
CS27
CS28 Non-Financial Eligibility – Residency
Non-Financial Eligibility – Citizenship
Non-Financial Eligibility – Social Security Number
Non-Financial Eligibility – Substitution of Coverage
Non-Financial Eligibility – Non-Payment of Premiums
General Eligibility – Continuous Eligibility Supersedes the current section 4.1.5
Supersedes the current sections 4.1.0; 4.1-LR; 4.1.1-LR
Supersedes the current section 4.1.9.1
Supersedes the current section 4.4.4
Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current section 4.1.8
Supersedes the current section 4.3.2
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-24)Page 24#
18
1.4- TC Tribal Consultation (Section 2107(e)(1)(C)) Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved.
CA RESPONSE:
In July 2014, CMS determined that tribal consultation was not necessary for the Medicaid companion SPA (Medicaid SPA CA-13-0021), expanding Medicaid eligibility related to the end of the HFP and the transition of children from a separate to a Medicaid expansion. This CHIP SPA is administrative in nature and does restrict eligibility, reduce payment rates or make updates to payment methodologies to Indian health programs, reduce or restrict access to covered services, increase services reimbursed to Indian health programs or update the tribal consultation policy in any way.
TN No: Approval Date Effective Date: NA
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children’s Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability, and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
CA RESPONSE:
The uninsurance rate for children 0-18 in California is 4 percent. Type of coverage breaks out in the following manner for children in the state: • Employer coverage is 45 percent, • Non-group coverage is 7 percent, • Medicaid coverage is 42 percent, and
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-25)Page 25#
19 • Other public coverage is 2 percent.
The data source for this information is the Kaiser Family Foundation’s (KFF) analysis of the Census Bureau's March 2014-2016 Current Population Survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements). Estimates are based on the average taken from March 2014-2016 data.
Population 1/CCHIP: CCHIP is a health insurance program in Santa Clara, San Francisco and San Mateo counties. CCHIP provides medical, dental and vision to children from age 0 up to age 19 with family income above 261 percent of the FPL and up to and including 317 percent FPL. This is consistent with the CS7 in Attachment 1. • Only available in Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo counties. • There are approximately -6,300 individuals enrolled in the three counties that offer CCHIP. • Race demographics not tracked
Source: CalHEERS daily extract file on enrollment.
Population 2/Unborn Option: The Unborn Option offers prenatal care, prescriptions, and labor and delivery, dental care, and services for other conditions that may complicate the pregnancy. Unborn Children (pregnant women) with income from 0 up to 208 percent of the FPL and who are not eligible for Medi-Cal. This is consistent with the CS9 in Attachment 1. Postpartum coverage is also included and lasts until the end of the month of the 60th day following the end of the pregnancy. An infant is eligible for Medi-Cal at birth with no family income limit for the first year of life. • There are approximately 18,000 individuals enrolled in California’s Unborn Option. • 75 percent of the population identify as Hispanic, Other races rank at 6 percent or under. • >65 years of age • California’s Unborn Option is available throughout the state.
Source: DHCS enrollment data.
Population 3/MCAP: Provides low cost health insurance coverage to uninsured, unborn children (pregnant women) with income from 208 up to 317 percent FPL. This is consistent with the CS9 in Attachment 1. MCAP provides comprehensive healthcare from the effective date of coverage in MCAP until the last day of the month in which the 60th day following the end of the pregnancy occurs. Pregnant women receive their care from participating health plans. Infants born to women enrolled in MCAP are eligible for enrollment in MCAIP (see Population 4 below) or the Medi-Cal program. • There are approximately 3,100 enrolled in MCAP.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-26)Page 26#
20 • 74 percent of the population identify as “Other” in regards to Race/Ethnicity; 8 percent White; 6 Hispanic; <1 percent other ethnicities • >18 pregnant woman; <18 if emancipated minor • MCAP is available throughout the state
Source: MCAP enrollment data provided by DHCS’ administrative vendor.
Population 4/MCAIP: MCAP linked infants and children (MCAIP) ages 0 up to 2 years with income above 261 percent of the FPL up to and including 317 percent of the FPL. This is consistent with the CS7 in Attachment 1. Provides health care services (medical, dental and vision) through Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans. There are approximately 986 individuals enrolled in MCAIP • 64 percent of the population identify as “Other” in regards to Race/Ethnicity; 8 percent Hispanic; 6 percent White; <1 percent other ethnicities • Ages 0-2 • MCAIP is available throughout the state
Source: DHCS enrollment data provided by MIS/DSS data warehouse.
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified, by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report requirements). (Section 2102(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.80(a))
CA REPSONSE: Public Health Care Programs for Children. A significant number are served through public programs. The public programs under which children may get coverage include the following: Medi-Cal. California’s largest public health insurance program serving children is Medicaid (known in California as Medi-Cal). • Children served under the categorically needy categories (SSI/SSP and Federal Poverty Level coverage groups). • The Medically Needy program under Title XIX, Section 1902(a)(10)(C) provides benefits to children under age 21 who meet the applicable eligibility requirements.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-27)Page 27#
21 California Health Care for Indigents Program. This program provides funding to large counties for uncompensated hospital, physician, and other health service costs.
To be eligible for California Health Care for Indigents funds, counties must meet their Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement, and provide or arrange for follow-up medical treatment for children with health problems and/or medical disorders detected through the CHDP program.
Rural Health Services (RHS). RHS provides funding to small rural counties for uncompensated hospital, physician, and other health services costs. This is not the same as the Rural Health Demonstration Project.
To be eligible, counties must participate in the County Medical Services Program, meet their MOE requirement, and provide or arrange for follow-up medical treatment for children with health problems and/or medical disorders detected through the CHDP program.
Counties may contract with the DHCS for the rural counties’ obligation to provide follow-up treatment for the conditions identified in CHDP screens.
Seasonal Agricultural and Migratory Workers Health Program. This program provides financial and technical assistance to primary care clinics serving the needs of seasonal, agricultural, and migratory workers and their families. Individuals pay on a sliding scale.
California Children’s Services (CCS). CCS provides funding for medical care for eligible low-income families with children with serious medical problems, such as critical acute illnesses, chronic illnesses, genetic diseases, physical handicaps, major injuries due to violence and accidents, congenital defects, and neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit level conditions. It provides physician, hospital, laboratory, X-ray, rehabilitation services, medications, and medical case management.
To be eligible, individuals must be under 21years of age, have a medical condition covered by CCS, be a resident of the county, have an adjusted gross family income below $40,000 or a projected out-of-pocket medical cost greater than twenty percent of the family income.
Direct health services are frequently provided through community health centers, school based health centers and voluntary practitioner programs.
Type of coverage breaks out in the following manner for children in California: • Employer coverage is 45 percent, • Non-group coverage is 7 percent,
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-28)Page 28#
22 • Medicaid coverage is 42 percent, and • Other public coverage is 2 percent.
The data source for this information is the Kaiser Family Foundation’s (KFF) analysis of the Census Bureau's March 2014-2016 Current Population Survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements). Estimates are based on the average taken from March 2014-2016 data.
Guidance: Section 2.2 allows states to request to use the funds available under the 10 percent limit on administrative expenditures in order to fund services not otherwise allowable. The health services initiatives must meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.10.
2.2. Health Services Initiatives (HSI) - Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at 42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10)
CA RESPONSE: Poison Treatment Advice and Prevention. California uses CHIP funds, within the 10 percent federal administrative expenditures cap allowed for states, to support the California Poison Control System (CPCS). CPCS provides daily, 24-hour emergency telephone treatment advice, referral assistance, and information to manage exposure to poisonous and hazardous substances. The CPCS answers poisoning emergency calls from the general public 24 hours a day, 365 days each year at no charge. At all times, a Specialist in Poison Information (SPI) is available to manage cases and Certified Specialists in Poison Information (CSPI) manage cases and direct Poison Information Providers. The service is provided to all communities, including underserved and indigent populations, in over 150 languages and via telecommunications devices for the deaf and hearing impaired (TDD).
The call center receives approximately 220,000 calls per year involving someone ingesting poison and other hazardous substances. Nearly 40 percent of all calls relate to children age 0-18 with annual household incomes of $55,000 or less (250 percent FPL for a family of 4). Another 10 percent of calls are for children 0-18 with incomes up to $65,000 (250 percent FPL for a family of 5). Children under the age of five account for the majority of poison exposures. In addition to calls regarding exposure, another 90,000 calls are for information and are considered preventive. Of these calls, 64 percent are for children age 0 18 in families with incomes at $55,000 or less, and another 12 percent for families with incomes up to $65,000. Only children below the age of 19 are served through this HSI.
Poison center public education programs direct attention and resources to “identified
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-29)Page 29#
23 at-risk populations”. In California, the targeted at-risk populations are Latinos, African Americans, and children born to low income parents. Of California’s 2.5 million children under the age of five (2016 U.S. Census), approximately 525,000 live in poverty. African-Americans and Latinos are California’s largest at-risk groups.
A line of consumer-based educational materials has been developed in Spanish using research findings with target audiences. Materials are culturally relevant, take into consideration health literacy levels and clearly illustrate and describe poison center services. Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hmong, Russian and Armenian brochures have also been developed. Materials are customized and culturally relevant to each group.
A Community Health Worker Initiative directs efforts to the “hardest to reach” and “at highest risk” populations. Community health workers deliver the CPCS message through group education sessions, community health fairs, and local events, as well as informally, though one-on-one outreach in their neighborhoods, churches, and community gatherings
CPCS advertises the national public toll free number and its own TTY toll free number in both the white pages and the “customer guide” (usually appearing on page 2) of all California telephone directories. Listings placed with the major local phone companies (SBC, Verizon) are applied to each directory they publish in California. CPCS also places these listings in the smaller rural phone company, as well as independent community directories.
The State assures that the HSI programs will not supplant or match CHIP federal funds with other federal funds, or allow other federal funds to supplant or match CHIP federal funds.
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements- (Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(1)(C)); (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a State in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(1)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-30)Page 30#
24 matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice.
CA REPSONSE:
California’s Title XXI program follows the same tribal consultation process as the California Medicaid Program. This process is identified in the Medicaid approved State Plan Amendment (SPA) 10-018, effective October 1, 2010, which was approved by CMS on March 16, 2011, and further amended in the Medicaid approved SPA 12-002, effective January 1, 2012, and approved on June 15, 2012.
DHCS participates in the Tribal Consultation activities, as the administering state agency for California’s Medicaid Program.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4. Guidance: In Section 3.1., discussion may include, but is not limited to: contracts with managed health care plans (including fully and partially capitated plans); contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; and other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography, as well as the State methods for establishing and defining the delivery systems.
Should the State choose to cover unborn children under the Title XXI State plan, the State must describe how services are paid. For example, some states make a global payment for all unborn children while other states pay for services on fee-for-services basis. The State’s payment mechanism and delivery mechanism should be briefly described here.
Section 2103(f)(3) of the Act, as amended by section 403 of CHIPRA, requires separate or combination CHIP programs that operate a managed care delivery system to apply several provisions of section 1932 of the Act in the same manner as these provisions apply under title XIX of the Act. Specific provisions include: section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. If the State CHIP program operates a managed care delivery system, provide an assurance that the State CHIP managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant sections of section 1932 of the Act. States must submit the managed care contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office servicing them for review and approval.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-31)Page 31#
25
In addition, states may use up to 10 percent of actual or estimated Federal expenditures for targeted low-income children to fund other forms of child health assistance, including contracts with providers for a limited range of direct services; other health services initiatives to improve children’s health; outreach expenditures; and administrative costs (See 2105(c)(2)(A)). Describe which, if any, of these methods will be used.
Examples of the above may include, but are not limited to: direct contracting with school-based health services; direct contracting to provide enabling services; contracts with health centers receiving funds under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; contracts with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under section 1886(d)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Act; contracts with other hospitals; and contracts with public health clinics receiving Title V funding. If applicable, address how the new arrangements under Title XXI will work with existing service delivery methods, such as regional networks for chronic illness and disability; neonatal care units, or early-intervention programs for at-risk infants, in the delivery and utilization of services. (42CFR 457.490(a))
3.1. Delivery Standards Describe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(a))
CA RESPONSE:
Overview of the Delivery Systems
POPULATION 1/CCHIP: Delivery System. Service delivery in the CCHIP component of California’s separate CHIP exists in three counties and is provided by health plans contracted by each county. These health plans are health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that also contract with DHCS to participate in the CHIP and Medi-Cal Program. Having these same plans available is an asset to families in that they may assume continuity of care should they go from enrollment in CCHIP to other CHIP or Medicaid programs and vice versa.
Administration. CCHIP is administered by the county on behalf of DHCS. The health plans are directly responsible for CCHIP enrollment in the Local Initiative Health Plan (LI) or County Organized Health System (COHS), distribution of written materials including correspondence, billing statements, Evidence of Coverage booklet, and premium collection, etc. DHCS will oversee program activities to assure compliance with federal Title XXI regulations.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-32)Page 32#
26 POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION: Delivery System. This separate CHIP population receives coverage under the unborn option, and is modeled after coverage provided to pregnant women under the Medi-Cal program. Coverage for this population is primarily delivered on a Fee-for-Service (FFS) basis under Medi-Cal. However, individuals residing in a county with a COHS must receive coverage through the managed care delivery system under Medi-Cal.
Administration. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program and is administered by DHCS.
POPULATION 3/MCAP: Delivery System. This separate CHIP population also receive coverage under the unborn option (similar to Population 2). However, this coverage is the same as state employee benchmark coverage. Service delivery in MCAP is provided through a public-private partnership, where DHCS contracts to have private health plans administer coverage. Up to eight different health plans work with the private contractor to deliver services. These health plans are HMOs and contract with DHCS to participate in both the Medi-Cal and CHIP Program.
Administration. The MCAP program is administered by DHCS, which contracts with the private sector to provide subsidized coverage for beneficiaries. To cover the full cost of care, California uses Proposition 99 tobacco tax monies to subsidize subscriber and contributions, while the subscriber pays 1.5 percent of their adjusted annual income (please see cost sharing section for more details on cost sharing for this population).
POPULATION 4/MCAIP: Delivery System. California’s MCAIP offers coverage to newborn children born from mothers who received MCAP (see Population 3 above) through the first two years of life. This separate CHIP population receives coverage that is provided through Medi-Cal’s Managed Care delivery system. California’s approach to serve targeted low-income children is through an integrated system of care.
Administration. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program and is administered by DHCS.
SPECIALIZED SERVICES
To meet the special needs of children, the CHIP program will also ensure the provision of necessary specialized services beyond those offered through the comprehensive insurance package in a coordinated manner. The CCS program and county mental health departments will address the significant needs of the minority of children whose needs may not be fully met under an insurance benefit package. The CCS program will provide case management and treatment for chronic, serious, and complex physically
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-33)Page 33#
27 handicapping conditions, while county mental health departments will provide appropriate services to meet the needs of seriously emotionally disturbed children. Both programs will reimburse providers for these specialized services.
Children receiving such services will continue to have their primary health needs served through their Managed Care Plan. Allowing those specialized services to be provided as a complement to, but outside of, the managed care setting is consistent with Federal mandates that prohibit mandatory enrollment of children with special medical needs in managed care.
Mental Health. A basic benefit package of mental health services will be provided by the health care plans. This basic package for mental health treatment includes 20 outpatient visits, and 30 inpatient mental health days per year. While it is anticipated that the great majority of the mental health needs of children will be met under their Managed Care Plan, it is recognized that some seriously emotionally disturbed children will require more specialized mental health services. Allowing such services to be provided outside of the managed care setting is consistent with regulations that prohibit mandatory enrollment of children with special needs into managed care. Consistent with the treatment of similarly situated privately insured populations, these children are eligible for specialized mental health services through the county mental health system of care. Children with serious emotional disturbances (estimated at between 3-5 percent of the general population) will be referred by the health care plan to the county mental health program for treatments, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the two organizations, for any needed additional mental health services. The required MOU will formalize this important arrangement. The county mental health program will coordinate the delivery of mental health and other health care services with the health care plan for those children who meet the criteria of serious emotional disturbance.
County mental health programs will provide mental health treatment services directly or through contracts with private organizations and individual providers. The requirements for provider selection and quality improvement for these mental health services will be consistent with those used for the Medi-Cal program for a similar population.
California Children’s Services Program. Integrating the CCS program into CHIP is a logical way to ensure that uninsured low income children with serious health conditions will continue to have access to a program highly respected by the medical community because of its focus on high quality care. Children with chronic, serious, and complex physically handicapping conditions are best served by systems and programs that have been organized specifically to serve them. It is important that care not be disrupted and that continuity and quality of services be maintained. With these goals in mind, plans will be required to refer CCS-eligible children to the CCS program for the treatment of CCS-eligible conditions.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-34)Page 34#
28 CCS, the Title V designated program for children with special health care needs, provides medical case management and payment for health care services for those children with eligible medical conditions who live in families with annual incomes below $40,000. Coverage is, and will be, limited to coverage of the specific conditions. The program establishes standards for approval of inpatient hospital facilities and pediatric specialty and subspecialty providers delivering care to eligible children. The program also has an extensive system of special care centers located at tertiary medical centers at which multispecialty, multidisciplinary teams deliver coordinated inpatient and outpatient care to children with chronic medical conditions. The centers include cardiac, chronic pulmonary disease, hematology and oncology, myelomeningocele, hemophilia, sickle cell, renal, infectious disease/immunology, hearing and speech, metabolic disorders, inherited neurologic disease, limb defect, gastroenterology, craniofacial anomalies and endocrinology. The program also approves neonatal intensive care, pediatric intensive care, and pediatric rehabilitation units.
CCS program staff determines the appropriate source of health care for eligible children, assist families in accessing care, and identify other needs of the child and family that could impact the care of the eligible condition.
The services to treat the CCS eligible medical condition of a child enrolled in CHIP will not be the responsibility of the contracting health plan in which the child is enrolled. The CCS program will continue to authorize the medically necessary services to treat the condition using the program’s regulations, policies, procedures and guidelines in determining the appropriateness of providers, and the necessity for services. CCS will expand the systems of communication that have been instituted to work with Medi-Cal managed care plans that have CCS services “carved out” from their capitation rate. Local CCS programs carefully coordinate the authorization and delivery of specialty and subspecialty services with the primary care provider to which the child is assigned.
The state assures that its managed care contract(s) comply with 2103(f)(3) of the Act, which cross reference the following sections of 1932 of the Act: Section 1932(a)(4) process for enrollment and termination and change of enrollment Section 1932(a)(5) provision of information Section 1932(b) beneficiary protections Section 1932(c) Quality Assurance Standards Section 1932(d) Protections against Fraud and Abuse and Section 1932(e) Sanctions for noncompliance
Check here if the State child health program delivers services using a managed care delivery model. The State provides an assurance that its managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant provisions of section 1932 of the Act, including section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-35)Page 35#
29 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. The State also assures that it will submit the contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office for review and approval. (Section 2103(f)(3))
Populations 1, 3 and 4 has services delivered through a managed care delivery model.
Guidance: In Section 3.2., note that utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: requirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after-hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review, coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. (42CFR, 457.490(b))
3.2. Describe the utilization controls under the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children. Describe the systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42CFR 457.490(b))
CA REPSONSE: DHCS utilizes Medi-Cal managed care plans that comply with the Medicaid utilization controls. Virtually all of the plans are regulated by California’s Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) under the Knox-Keene Act - established specifically for managed care plans licensing. The Knox-Keene Act prescribes rules for the organization of HMOs and other managed care entities. It specifies plan standards, marketing rules, and consumer disclosure requirements. It also establishes fiscal solvency requirements and quality assurance standards. The Knox-Keene Act can be found at http://wpso.dmhc.ca.gov/regulations/docs/2017kkaregs.pdf, with Sections 1370-1370.4 outlining utilization review.
Health Plan Regulatory Oversight. POPULATION 1/CCHIP POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION POPULATION 3/MCAP POPULATION 4/MCAIP
These plans are regulated by DMHC, under the Knox- Keene Act. The Knox-Keene Act,
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-36)Page 36#
30 as previously stated, prescribes rules for the organization of health maintenance organizations and other managed care entities. It specifies plan standards, marketing rules, and consumer disclosure requirements. It also establishes fiscal solvency requirements and quality assurance standards.
Services are provided in accordance with the routine utilization review procedure used in the Medi-Cal program consistent with the Title XIX state plan, which operates under the Knox-Keene Act in a Managed Care setting.
Section 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology
Guidance: States electing to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan or combination plan should check the appropriate box and provide the ages and income level for each eligibility group. If the State is electing to take up the option to expand Medicaid eligibility as allowed under section 214 of CHIPRA regarding lawfully residing, complete section 4.1-LR as well as update the budget to reflect the additional costs if the state will claim title XXI match for these children until and if the time comes that the children are eligible for Medicaid.
CA RESPONSE: Please see Attachment 1 for all of the references to the approved templates, including details regarding eligibility levels, in Section 4 below.
4.0.
Medicaid Expansion
4.0.1. Ages of each eligibility group and the income standard for that group:
CA REPSONSE:
OPTIONAL TARGETED LOW INCOME CHILDREN PROGRAM (OTLICP): Please see approved CS3 template for age and income standards.
ASSET WAIVER CHILDREN/CS3 PROXY: Please see approved CS3 template.
Please also see approved CS3 template for age and income levels for OTLICP, as well as the state’s narrative to the CS3 related to the proxy methodology for asset waiver children. 4.1.
Separate Program Check all standards that will apply to the State plan. (42CFR 457.305(a) and 457.320(a))
4.1.0 Describe how the State meets the citizenship verification requirements.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-37)Page 37#
31 Include whether or not State has opted to use SSA verification option.
Please see approved CS18 template for citizenship verification requirements.
4.1.1 Geographic area served by the Plan if less than Statewide:
Please see approved CS7 and CS9 templates for geographic area requirements.
4.1.2 Ages of each eligibility group, including unborn children and pregnant women (if applicable) and the income standard for that group:
CA RESPONSE: Please see Section 2 above for overview of relevant separate CHIP populations (Populations 1, 2, 3 and 4 above), and also see CS7 template for approved income levels for Populations 1. Also please see CS23 template for approved income levels for Population 4.
4.1.2.1-PC Age: From confirmed pregnancy to birth (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002)
CA RESPONSE:
Please see Section 2 above for overview of relevant separate CHIP populations (Populations 2 and 3) and also see approved CS9 template for approved income levels for the unborn population.
4.1.3 Income of each separate eligibility group (if applicable):
CA RESPONSE: Please see information above for each group.
4.1.3.1-PC 0% of the FPL (and not eligible for Medicaid) through 317% of the FPL (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002).
CA RESPONSE: Please see information above for Populations 2 and 3.
4.1.4 Resources of each separate eligibility group (including any standards relating to spend downs and disposition of resources):
4.1.5 Residency (so long as residency requirement is not based on length of time in state):
CA REPSONSE: Please see approved CS17 template for residency requirements.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-38)Page 38#
32
4.1.6 Disability Status (so long as any standard relating to disability status does not restrict eligibility):
4.1.7 Access to or coverage under other health coverage:
4.1.8 Duration of eligibility, not to exceed 12 months:
CA RESPONSE: Please see approved CS27 template related to continuous eligibility requirements.
4.1.9 Other Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility, including those standards in 457.310 and 457.320 that are not addressed above. For instance:
CA RESPONSE: Please see approved CS23 template for other eligibility standards related to Population 4.
Guidance: States may only require the SSN of the child who is applying for coverage. If SSNs are required and the State covers unborn children, indicate that the unborn children are exempt from providing a SSN. Other standards include, but are not limited to presumptive eligibility and deemed newborns.
4.1.9.1
States should specify whether Social Security Numbers (SSN) are required.
CA RESPONSE: Please see approved CS19 for SSN requirements.
Guidance: States should describe their continuous eligibility process and populations that can be continuously eligible.
4.1.9.2 Continuous eligibility
CA RESPONSE: DHCS has continuous eligibility programs for children and unborn children (pregnant women). Please see the approved CS27 template for continuous eligibility requirements. Continuous eligibility is applicable to Populations 1 and 2.
Continuous Eligibility for Children (CEC) provides children with 12 months of continuous coverage through Medicaid and CHIP, even if the family experiences a change in income during the year. CEC is applicable for Population 1.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-39)Page 39#
33 Continuous eligibility for Unborn (“Pregnant Women”): Provides continuous eligibility throughout the pregnancy and until the end of the post-partum period, regardless of changes in income or household composition. The post-partum period begins on the date the pregnancy ends and lasts until the end of the month in which the 60th day after the end of the pregnancy occurs. This is applicable for Population 2.
4.1-PW
Pregnant Women Option (section 2112) The State includes eligibility for one or more populations of targeted low-income pregnant women under the plan. Describe the population of pregnant women that the State proposes to cover in this section. Include all eligibility criteria, such as those described in the above categories (for instance, income and resources) that will be applied to this population. Use the same reference number system for those criteria (for example, 4.1.1-P for a geographic restriction). Please remember to update sections 8.1.1-PW, 8.1.2-PW, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: States have the option to cover groups of “lawfully residing” children and/or pregnant women. States may elect to cover (1) “lawfully residing” children described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; (2) “lawfully residing” pregnant women described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; or (3) both. A state electing to cover children and/or pregnant women who are considered lawfully residing in the U.S. must offer coverage to all such individuals who meet the definition of lawfully residing, and may not cover a subgroup or only certain groups. In addition, states may not cover these new groups only in CHIP, but must also extend the coverage option to Medicaid. States will need to update their budget to reflect the additional costs for coverage of these children. If a State has been covering these children with State only funds, it is helpful to indicate that so CMS understands the basis for the enrollment estimates and the projected cost of providing coverage. Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option.
4.1- LR
Lawfully Residing Option (Sections 2107(e)(1)(J) and 1903(v)(4)(A); (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006 issued July 1, 2010) Check if the State is electing the option under section 214 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) regarding lawfully residing to provide coverage to the following otherwise eligible pregnant women and children as specified below who are lawfully residing in the United States including the following: A child or pregnant woman shall be considered lawfully present if he or she is: (1) A qualified alien as defined in section 431 of PRWORA (8 U.S.C. §1641); (2) An alien in nonimmigrant status who has not violated the terms of the status under which he or she was admitted or to which he or she has changed after admission; (3) An alien who has been paroled into the United States pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. §1182(d)(5)) for less than 1 year, except for an alien paroled for prosecution, for deferred inspection or pending removal proceedings;
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-40)Page 40#
34 (4) An alien who belongs to one of the following classes: (i) Aliens currently in temporary resident status pursuant to section 210 or 245A of the INA (8 U.S.C. §§1160 or 1255a, respectively); (ii) Aliens currently under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) pursuant to section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1254a), and pending applicants for TPS who have been granted employment authorization; (iii) Aliens who have been granted employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), (10), (16), (18), (20), (22), or (24); (iv) Family Unity beneficiaries pursuant to section 301 of Pub. L. 101-649, as amended; (v) Aliens currently under Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) pursuant to a decision made by the President; (vi) Aliens currently in deferred action status; or (vii) Aliens whose visa petition has been approved and who have a pending application for adjustment of status; (5) A pending applicant for asylum under section 208(a) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1158) or for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1231) or under the Convention Against Torture who has been granted employment authorization, and such an applicant under the age of 14 who has had an application pending for at least180 days; (6) An alien who has been granted withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture; (7) A child who has a pending application for Special Immigrant Juvenile status as described in section 101(a)(27)(J) of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(27)(J)); (8) An alien who is lawfully present in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands under 48 U.S.C. § 1806(e); or (9) An alien who is lawfully present in American Samoa under the immigration laws of American Samoa.
Elected for pregnant women. Elected for children under age 19
Please see approved CS18 template.
4.1.1-LR The State provides assurance that for an individual whom it enrolls in Medicaid under the CHIPRA Lawfully Residing option, it has verified, at the time of the individual’s initial eligibility determination and at the time of the eligibility redetermination that the individual continues to be lawfully residing in the United States. The State must first attempt to verify this status using information provided at the time of initial application. If the State cannot do so from the information readily available, it must require the individual to provide documentation or
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-41)Page 41#
35 further evidence to verify satisfactory immigration status in the same manner as it would for anyone else claiming satisfactory immigration status under section 1137(d) of the Act.
Please see approved CS18 template.
4.1-DS
Supplemental Dental (Section 2103(c)(5) - A child who is eligible to enroll in
dental-only supplemental coverage, effective January 1, 2009. Eligibility is limited to only targeted low-income children who are otherwise eligible for CHIP but for the fact that they are enrolled in a group health plan or health insurance offered through an employer. The State’s CHIP plan income eligibility level is at least the highest income eligibility standard under its approved State child health plan (or under a waiver) as of January 1, 2009. All who meet the eligibility standards and apply for dental-only supplemental coverage shall be provided benefits. States choosing this option must report these children separately in SEDS. Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
4.2. Assurances The State assures by checking the box below that it has made the following findings with respect to the eligibility standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and
42 CFR 457.320(b))
4.2.1. These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis.
4.2.2. Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these
standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering
children with a lower family income. This applies to pregnant women included
in the State plan as well as targeted low-income children.
4.2.3. These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre-existing
medical condition. This applies to pregnant women as well as targeted
low-income children.
4.2-DS Supplemental Dental - Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option. For dental-only supplemental coverage, the State assures that it has made the following findings with standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b))
4.2.1-DS These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis.
4.2.2-DS Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these
standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering
children with a lower family income.
4.2.3-DS These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a
pre-existing medical condition. 4.3. Methodology. Describe the methods of establishing and continuing eligibility and enrollment. The description should address the procedures for applying the eligibility standards, the organization and infrastructure responsible for making and reviewing eligibility determinations, and the process for enrollment of individuals receiving covered
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-42)Page 42#
36 services, and whether the State uses the same application form for Medicaid and/or other public benefit programs. (Section 2102)(b)(2)) (42CFR, 457.350)
CA RESPONSE:
The state’s eligibility and enrollment processes operate in a manner consistent with the requirements of 42 CFR 457, subpart C. These processes are applied at the time of initial application and at redetermination, and ensure that eligible targeted low-income children are identified and appropriately enrolled in the California separate CHIP programs. California determines whether children are eligible for Medicaid (no-cost Medi-Cal) or other CHIP programs via the California Healthcare Eligibility, Enrollment, and Retention System (CalHEERS). CalHEERS is a computer system that contains California’s Single Streamlined Application, which can be used for both CHIP and the OTLICP, as well as other Medicaid populations. California’s Single Streamlined Application is consistent with ACA requirements.
DHCS and the county programs are responsible for reviewing eligibility determinations and establishing continued enrollment.
Please also reference the approved CS15 template.
Guidance: The box below should be checked as related to children and pregnant women. Please note: A State providing dental-only supplemental coverage may not have a waiting list or limit eligibility in any way.
4.3.1. Limitation on Enrollment Describe the processes, if any, that a State will use for instituting enrollment caps, establishing waiting lists, and deciding which children will be given priority for enrollment. If this section does not apply to your state, check the box below. (Section 2102(b)(2)) (42CFR, 457.305(b))
Check here if this section does not apply to your State.
Guidance: Note that for purposes of presumptive eligibility, States do not need to verify the
citizenship status of the child. States electing this option should indicate so in the
State plan. (42 CFR 457.355)
If DHCS determines that sufficient funds are not available to cover the estimated cost of program expenditures and it is necessary to limit enrollment, DHCS will place children on a waiting list until adequate funding becomes available to resume enrollment. This determination will be made in a public meeting, pursuant to State law. DHCS will notify the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services prior to implementation of a waiting list in writing (by email, fax, letter or other appropriate means).
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-43)Page 43#
37 In addition, the DHCS website is updated to reflect any program changes and newsletter articles are updated for our community partners. Each new applicant family affected by the waiting list will receive notification in writing.
a. When a waiting list is implemented, the program will continue to receive new applications; however, no eligibility determinations will be made until adequate funding is available. Placement on the waiting list is only for new applications. New applications will be screened through CalHEERS’ Single Streamlined Application for Medi-Cal, California’s Title XIX Medicaid program and these applications will be forwarded to the applicant’s local county welfare department for a Medi-Cal eligibility determination. Siblings and newborns of current enrollees and children formerly eligible for No-Cost Medi-Cal who apply are considered new applicants and are subject to the waiting list. Each new applicant family whose child is placed on the waiting list will be notified by letter. In addition, the notification letter will contain information about where the family may apply for other potential coverage (e.g., Medi-Cal).
b. If the State is using a waiting list, children will be placed on the waiting list in the order in which their applications were received based on the date the application was received. If DHCS determines that sufficient funds are available to cover some or all children on the waiting list, the applications will be reviewed for children on the waiting list in the order their application was received.
c. When children are removed from the waiting list, each family will receive a notification letter, informing them that sufficient funding is now available for the enrollment of their child and requesting that the family complete a pre-printed application, updating any changes and information to determine eligibility for enrollment. When the application and other updated documentation is received, DHCS will screen the application based upon income eligibility to either the CHIP Program or the state’s Medi-Cal program. If the family does not reply within seventeen (17) calendar days, as noted on the application, the application will be denied for being incomplete.
If the family submits the information after the requested due date the child may be placed back onto the waiting list, in the order in which the new application is received. In addition, the DHCS website is updated to reflect any program changes and newsletter articles are updated for our community partners. Each family affected by disenrollments will receive notification in writing thirty (30) days prior to disenrollment. These subscribers will also be placed on the waiting list until sufficient funding is available to cover program expenditures. The subscriber child’s effective date on the waiting list will be the date of his or her disenrollment. However, children with chronic conditions through California Children’s Services (CCS) who are CCS eligible solely by virtue of their eligibility are exempt from disenrollment and will continue their enrollment.
If DHCS later determines sufficient funds are available to cover some or all eligible subscriber children, the Program will stop disenrolling children during the renewal process and begin enrolling subscriber children back into the program. When all children who were disenrolled have been removed from the
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-44)Page 44#
38 waiting list, eligibility will then be assessed for the additional waitlisted children, in the order of their effective dates on the waiting list.
If only a waiting list is implemented, children who have current enrollment in the Program will remain enrolled, so long as they continue to meet all eligibility criteria and remain current with premium payments.
4.3.2. Check if the State elects to provide presumptive eligibility for children that meets the requirements of section 1920A of the Act. (Section 2107(e)(1)(L)); (42 CFR 457.355)
CA REPSONSE: Please see approved CS28 template for presumptive eligibility requirements.
Guidance: Describe how the State intends to implement the Express Lane option. Include information on the identified Express Lane agency or agencies, and whether the State will be using the Express Lane eligibility option for the initial eligibility determinations, redeterminations, or both.
4.3.3-EL Express Lane Eligibility Check here if the state elects the option to rely on a finding from an Express Lane agency when determining whether a child satisfies one or more components of CHIP eligibility. The state agrees to comply with the requirements of sections 2107(e)(1)(E) and 1902(e)(13) of the Act for this option. Please update sections 4.4-EL, 5.2-EL, 9.10, and 12.1 when electing this option. This authority may not apply to eligibility determinations made before February 4, 2009, or after September 30, 2013. (Section 2107(e)(1)(E))
4.3.3.1-EL Also indicate whether the Express Lane option is applied to (1) initial eligibility determination, (2) redetermination, or (3) both.
4.3.3.2-EL List the public agencies approved by the State as Express Lane agencies.
4.3.3.3-EL List the components/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane. In this section, specify any differences in budget unit, deeming, income exclusions, income disregards, or other methodology between CHIP eligibility determinations for such children and the determination under the Express Lane option.
4.3.3.3-EL List the component/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane.
4.3.3.4-EL Describe the option used to satisfy the screen and enrollment
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-45)Page 45#
39 requirements before a child may be enrolled under title XXI.
Guidance: States should describe the process they use to screen and enroll children required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 457.80(c). Describe the screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by an Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated. Describe whether the State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from an Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
In this section, states should describe their eligibility screening process in a way that addresses the five assurances specified below. The State should consider including important definitions, the relationship with affected Federal, State and local agencies, and other applicable criteria that will describe the State’s ability to make assurances. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A) and 2110(b)(2)(B)), (42 CFR 457.310(b)(2), 42CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 457.80(c)(3))
4.4. Eligibility screening and coordination with other health coverage programs States must describe how they will assure that:
4.4.1. only targeted low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid or not covered under a group health plan or health insurance (including access to a State health benefits plan) are furnished child health assistance under the plan. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A), 2110(b)(2)(B)) (42 CFR 457.310(b), 42 CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.80(c)(3)) Confirm that the State does not apply a waiting period for pregnant women.
CA RESPONSE: California (“Covered California”) is a State Based Marketplace (SBM) and is responsible for performing all Marketplace functions, such as application processing, eligibility and enrollment activities. All individuals, including individuals seeking coverage through CHIP, apply for and enroll in coverage through Marketplace websites established and maintained by California. California is currently using a Single Streamlined Application, which can be used for both CHIP and the OTLICP, and other type of coverage. California ensures that applicants who appear to be eligible for Medicaid are enrolled in Medicaid, and that eligible targeted low-income children are appropriately enrolled in separate CHIP coverage. These screening processes are used
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-46)Page 46#
40 both at the time of initial eligibility determinations and at redetermination.
4.4.2. children found through the screening process to be potentially eligible for medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan are enrolled for assistance under such plan; (Section 2102(b)(3)(B)) (42CFR, 457.350(a)(2))
CA RESPONSE: California ensures that applicants who appear to be eligible for Medicaid are enrolled in Medicaid, and that eligible targeted low-income children are appropriately enrolled in separate CHIP coverage. These screening processes are used both at the time of initial eligibility determinations and at redetermination. As noted above, California is currently using a Single Streamlined Application, which can be used for both CHIP and Medi-Cal children.
4.4.3. children found through the screening process to be ineligible for Medicaid are enrolled in CHIP; (Sections 2102(a)(1) and (2) and 2102(c)(2)) (42CFR 431.636(b)(4))
4.4.4. the insurance provided under the State child health plan does not substitute for coverage under group health plans. (Section 2102(b)(3)(C)) (42CFR, 457.805)
Please see approved CS20 template for CA’s substitution strategies.
4.4.4.1. (formerly 4.4.4.4) If the State provides coverage under a premium assistance program, describe: 1) the minimum period without coverage under a group health plan. This should include any allowable exceptions to the waiting period; 2) the expected minimum level of contribution employers will make; and 3) how cost-effectiveness is determined. (42CFR 457.810(a)-(c))
4.4.5. Child health assistance is provided to targeted low-income children in the
State who are American Indian and Alaska Native. (Section 2102(b)(3)(D))
(42 CFR 457.125(a))
Guidance: When the State is using an income finding from an Express Lane agency, the State must still comply with screen and enroll requirements before enrolling children in CHIP. The State may either continue its current screen and enroll process, or elect one of two new options to fulfill these requirements.
4.4-EL The State should designate the option it will be using to carry out screen and enroll
requirements:
The State will continue to use the screen and enroll procedures required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-47)Page 47#
41 and 42 CFR 457.80(c). Describe this process.
The State is establishing a screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by the Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated.
The State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from the Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
Section 5. Outreach and Coordination
5.1. (formerly 2.2) Describe the current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable
health coverage for uninsured children by addressing sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2.
(Section 2102)(a)(2) (42CFR 457.80(b))
Guidance: The information below may include whether the state elects express lane eligibility a description of the State’s outreach efforts through Medicaid and state-only programs.
5.1.1. (formerly 2.2.1.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs (i.e., Medicaid and state-only child health insurance):
CA REPSONSE:
California currently identifies and enrolls uncovered children who are potentially eligible to participate in public programs in several ways:
• CCS and Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) providers identify children who may be potentially eligible for Medi-Cal and refer the family to the appropriate office to apply. State statute requires CCS applicants who may be eligible to apply for Medi-Cal . • CHDP providers identify children who are uninsured and appear to be eligible for no cost Medi-Cal or the CHIP programs, grant presumptive eligibility in one of
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-48)Page 48#
42 the two programs, and encourage families to apply for continuing coverage. • To facilitate the application process, Medi-Cal outstations eligibility workers in locations that serve large numbers of potentially eligible children, such as disproportionate share hospitals, prenatal clinics and federally qualified health centers. • DHCS utilizes a Single Streamlined Application, which can be used for both CHIP and the Medi-Cal program.
Guidance: The State may address the coordination between the public-private outreach and the public health programs that is occurring statewide. This section will provide a historic record of the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children from the time the State’s plan was initially approved. States do not have to rewrite his section but may instead update this section as appropriate.
5.1.2. (formerly 2.2.2.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in health insurance programs that involve a public-private partnership:
CA REPSONSE:
Historical
POPULATION 1/CCHIP
Historically, since CCHIP projects were sponsored and funded from local funds, there were financial incentives built in for local counties to assure coordination with Medi-Cal and HFP. More children could be covered at the county level using local dollars if they were not financially sponsoring children who could otherwise be covered by state and federal dollars. In 2014, California transferred the funding source from local entities to the state.
Other standards that were put in place to identify and enroll all children were: • CCHIP used the same income standards and deductions as the Medi-Cal and HFP to assure consistency among the programs. • CCHIP used a resource disregard when determining eligibility, again to assure consistency with the Medi-Cal and HFP. • At the time of initial application, a Medi-Cal and Healthy Families screening occurred. Applications with children screened to Medi-Cal or Healthy Families were submitted to the State’s Single Point of Entry for processing. • As with the initial eligibility determination, annual reviews occurred to assure continued eligibility for CCHIP, including the Medi-Cal and Healthy Families
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-49)Page 49#
43 screening. • The State also modified its annual review process to include forwarding applications to counties known to have a CCHIP when a child was determined to have income above Healthy Families guidelines.
POPULATIONS 2, 3 & 4/UNBORN OPTION, MCAP, and MCAIP
Historically, DHCS utilized it’s Baby-Cal program which provided extensive outreach to pregnant women about the importance of obtaining prenatal care, and informed them that, if they had modest incomes, state programs were available to help them. The program targeted pregnant women who may have been eligible for participation in the MCAP program. MCAP also worked with three community-based outreach contractors in various regions of the state to distribute informational materials via mail and at public events. MCAP’s contractors previously conducted other innovative activities such as educating insurance agents about the program, conducting a telemarketing campaign, and producing public service announcements. MCAP also conducted outreach through an application assistance fee paid to individuals and entities that assisted families in filling out the MCAP application.
Current Practice
Currently the State utilizes a number of ways to identify and ensure uninsured eligible children are enrolled, such as: • Use of a Single Streamlined Application • Coordinated Open Enrollment Outreach • County grants • UCLA Center data • Stakeholder Engagement • State-Only Expansion • Healthcare Options for all children
Guidance: The State should describe below how its Title XXI program will closely coordinate the enrollment with Medicaid because under Title XXI, children identified as Medicaid-eligible are required to be enrolled in Medicaid. Specific information related to Medicaid screen and enroll procedures is requested in Section 4.4. (42CFR 457.80(c))
5.2. (formerly 2.3) Describe how CHIP coordinates with other public and private health insurance programs, other sources of health benefits coverage for children, other relevant child health programs, (such as title V), that provide health care services for low-income children to increase the number of children with creditable health coverage. (Section 2102(a)(3), 2102(b)(3)(E) and 2102(c)(2)) (42CFR 457.80(c)). This item requires a brief overview of how Title XXI efforts – particularly new enrollment outreach efforts – will
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-50)Page 50#
44 be coordinated with and improve upon existing State efforts.
CA RESPONSE: A central component in the design of the CHIP programs is an extensive outreach campaign. The outreach for the programs is designed to be performed by CHDP providers, community-based organizations, county health agencies, and other entities that are geared to assist targeted low-income families in obtaining needed health and related services. CHDP providers will provide early medical screenings and immunizations (following Early Periodic, Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) guidelines), grant presumptive eligibility for uninsured children in appropriate CHIP program and Medi-Cal programs, and encourage families to apply for continuing coverage for either Medi-Cal, CHIP, or Covered California.
Note that California provides EPSDT only Population 4 (MCAIP) and Population 2 (Unborn) if the beneficiary is under the age of 19 in the separate CHIP.
POPULATION 1/COUNTY CHILDREN’S HEALTH INITIATIVE PROGRAM (CCHIP)
Outreach Efforts Include • Covered California Quick Guide for Certified Enrollment Counselors for CCHIP • Certified Enrollment Counselors from Covered California assist in the enrollment process • County funds for outreach • County Eligibility Workers to assist in enrollment
POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION
Outreach Efforts Include: • DHCS Stakeholder Communication Update • DHCS Pregnancy Stakeholder Workgroup • Various Stakeholders and Advocates have outreach efforts relating to DHCS programs • County funds for outreach efforts • County Eligibility Workers assist in the enrollment process
POPULATION 3 & 4/MEDI-CAL ACCESS PROGRAM (MCAP) & MEDI-CAL ACCESS INFANT PROGRAM (MCAIP)
Outreach Efforts Include: • DHCS Stakeholder Communication Update • DHCS Pregnancy Stakeholder Workgroup
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-51)Page 51#
45 • Various Stakeholders and Advocates have outreach efforts relating to DHCS programs • MCAP Welcome Packet • Single Streamlined Application process simplifies the entire process by determining eligibility for all Insurance Affordability Programs (IAPs) • Covered California’s website mentions MCAP and its benefits • Enrollment information is shared with insurance brokers • Certified Enrollment Counselors from Covered California assist in the enrollment process • County funds for outreach efforts • County Eligibility Workers assist in the enrollment process
Coordination with Medicaid (Medi-Cal):
OPTIONAL TARGETED LOW INCOME CHILDRENS PROGRAM (OTLICP)
OTLICP, a CHIP Medicaid Expansion, serves children whose family income falls above the applicable Medi-Cal FPL income standard and who are not eligible for no-cost Medi-Cal. OTLICP has been designed to have a smooth interface with Title XIX Medi-Cal and includes a number of provisions to ensure that the program enrolls only targeted low-income children. DHCS compares its participant list against Medi-Cal’s enrollment files to ensure that children do not already have creditable coverage through Medi-Cal.
5.2-EL The State should include a description of its election of the Express Lane eligibility option to provide a simplified eligibility determination process and expedited enrollment of eligible children into Medicaid or CHIP.
Guidance: Outreach strategies may include, but are not limited to, community outreach workers, outstationed eligibility workers, translation and transportation services, assistance with enrollment forms, case management and other targeting activities to inform families of low-income children of the availability of the health insurance program under the plan or other private or public health coverage.
The description should include information on how the State will inform the target of the availability of the programs, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, and assist them in enrolling in the appropriate program.
5.3. Strategies Describe the procedures used by the State to accomplish outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance or other public or private health coverage to inform them of the availability of the programs, and to assist them in enrolling their children in such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)) (42CFR 457.90)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-52)Page 52#
46
CA RESPONSE:
1. DHCS continues to improve the state’s Single Streamlined Application to allow enrollment in all programs, including subsidized and unsubsidized coverage in the marketplace. • Having a simplified application in an environment where all eligibility is determined provides ease of access. It also shows the availability of all programs the applicant may be eligible for.
2. Enrollment information packets. • Managed care plans provide mailed out information to provide options and education to what benefits are offered.
Section 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan and proceed to Section 7 since children covered under a Medicaid expansion program will receive all Medicaid covered services including EPSDT.
6.1. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply.) (Section 2103(c)); (42CFR 457.410(a))
Guidance: Benchmark coverage is substantially equal to the benefits coverage in a benchmark benefit package (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, and/or the HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the state). If box below is checked, either 6.1.1.1., 6.1.1.2., or 6.1.1.3. must also be checked. (Section 2103(a)(1))
6.1.1.
Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.420)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan, as described in and offered under Section 8903(1) of Title 5, United States Code. (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(b))
6.1.1.1.
FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(a)) (If checked, attach copy of the plan.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is State employee coverage, meaning a coverage plan that is offered
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-53)Page 53#
47 and generally available to State employees in the state. (Section 2103(b)(2))
6.1.1.2.
State employee coverage; (Section 2103(b)(2)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
CA RESPONSE: This type of coverage applies to Populations 1 (CCHIP) and 3 (MCAP). Please see Attachment 2.
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is offered by a health maintenance organization (as defined in Section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Services Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives of such coverage plans offered by an HMO in the state. (Section 2103(b)(3) (42 CFR 457.420(c)))
6.1.1.3.
HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(b)(3)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: States choosing Benchmark-equivalent coverage must check the box below and ensure that the coverage meets the following requirements: the coverage includes benefits for items and services within each of the categories of basic services described in 42 CFR 457.430: • dental services • inpatient and outpatient hospital services, • physicians’ services, • surgical and medical services, • laboratory and x-ray services, • well-baby and well-child care, including age-appropriate immunizations, and • emergency services; the coverage has an aggregate actuarial value that is at least actuarially equivalent to one of the benchmark benefit packages (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, or coverage offered through an HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial enrollment in the state); and the coverage has an actuarial value that is equal to at least 75 percent of the actuarial value of the additional categories in such package, if offered, as described in 42 CFR 457.430: • coverage of prescription drugs, • mental health services, • vision services and • hearing services.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-54)Page 54#
48
If 6.1.2. is checked, a signed actuarial memorandum must be attached. The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 42 CFR 457.431. The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State results.
The actuarial report must be prepared by an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. This report must be prepared in accordance with the principles and standards of the American Academy of Actuaries. In preparing the report, the actuary must use generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, use a standardized set of utilization and price factors, use a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of children who are expected to be covered under the State child health plan, apply the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services), without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used, and take into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by taking into account the increase in actuarial value of benefits coverage offered under the State child health plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing under such coverage. (Section 2103(a)(2))
6.1.2.
Benchmark-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(a)(2) and 42 CFR 457.430) Specify the coverage, including the amount, scope and duration of each service, as well as any exclusions or limitations. Attach a signed actuarial report that meets the requirements specified in 42 CFR 457.431.
Guidance: A State approved under the provision below, may modify its program from time to time so long as it continues to provide coverage at least equal to the lower of the actuarial value of the coverage under the program as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark programs. If “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” is modified, an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans must be attached. Also, the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” must be described in the space provided for all states. (Section 2103(a)(3))
6.1.3.
Existing Comprehensive State-Based Coverage; (Section 2103(a)(3) and 42 CFR 457.440) This option is only applicable to New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania.
Attach a description of the benefits package, administration, and date of enactment. If existing comprehensive State-based coverage is modified, provide
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-55)Page 55#
49 an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans. Describe the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for existing comprehensive
state-based coverage.
Guidance: Secretary-approved coverage refers to any other health benefits coverage deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Secretary upon application by a state. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.250)
6.1.4.
Secretary-approved Coverage. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.450)
6.1.4.1.
Coverage the same as Medicaid State plan
CA RESPONSE: This coverage applies to Population 2 (Unborn Option) and Population 4 (MCAIP). Please see Attachment 3.
6.1.4.2.
Comprehensive coverage for children under a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver
6.1.4.3.
Coverage that either includes the full EPSDT benefit or that the State has extended to the entire Medicaid population
Guidance: Check below if the coverage offered includes benchmark coverage, as specified in 457.420, plus additional coverage. Under this option, the State must clearly demonstrate that the coverage it provides includes the same coverage as the benchmark package, and also describes the services that are being added to the benchmark package.
6.1.4.4.
Coverage that includes benchmark coverage plus additional coverage
6.1.4.5.
Coverage that is the same as defined by existing comprehensive
state-based coverage applicable only New York, Pennsylvania, or
Florida (under 457.440)
Guidance: Check below if the State is purchasing coverage through a group health plan, and intends to demonstrate that the group health plan is substantially equivalent to or greater than to coverage under one of the benchmark plans specified in 457.420, through use of a benefit-by-benefit comparison of the coverage. Provide a sample of the comparison format that will be used. Under this option, if coverage for any benefit does not meet or exceed the coverage for that benefit under the benchmark, the State must provide an actuarial analysis as described in 457.431 to determine actuarial equivalence.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-56)Page 56#
50
6.1.4.6.
Coverage under a group health plan that is substantially equivalent to or greater than benchmark coverage through a benefit by benefit comparison (Provide a sample of how the comparison will be done)
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7.
Other (Describe)
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women, but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 2110(a)) (42CFR 457.490)
CA RESPONSE: Unless otherwise specified, these services are provided to all four separate CHIP populations. Please see Attachment 5.
6.2.1.
Inpatient services (Section 2110(a)(1))
6.2.2.
Outpatient services (Section 2110(a)(2))
6.2.3.
Physician services (Section 2110(a)(3))
6.2.4.
Surgical services (Section 2110(a)(4))
6.2.5.
Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. (Section 2110(a)(5))
6.2.6.
Prescription drugs (Section 2110(a)(6)) 6.2.7.
Over-the-counter medications (Section 2110(a)(7))
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-57)Page 57#
51 6.2.8.
Laboratory and radiological services (Section 2110(a)(8))
6.2.9.
Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family services and supplies (Section 2110(a)(9))
6.2.10.
Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.18., but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structural services (Section 2110(a)(10))
6.2.11.
Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.19, but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including community-based services (Section 2110(a)(11)
6.2.12.
Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices) (Section 2110(a)(12))
6.2.13.
Disposable medical supplies (Section 2110(a)(13))
Guidance: Home and community based services may include supportive services such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home.
6.2.14.
Home and community-based health care services (Section 2110(a)(14))
Guidance: Nursing services may include nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services in a home, school or other setting.
6.2.15.
Nursing care services (Section 2110(a)(15))
6.2.16.
Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest (Section 2110(a)(16)
6.2.17.
Dental services (Section 2110(a)(17)) States updating their dental benefits must complete 6.2-DC (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)
6.2.18.
Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(18))
6.2.19.
Outpatient substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(19))
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-58)Page 58#
52 6.2.20.
Case management services (Section 2110(a)(20))
6.2.21.
Care coordination services (Section 2110(a)(21))
6.2.22.
Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders (Section 2110(a)(22))
6.2.23.
Hospice care (Section 2110(a)(23))
Guidance: Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic or rehabilitative service may be provided, whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting, if recognized by State law and only if the service is: 1) prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as prescribed by State law; 2) performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician; or 3) furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license.
6.2.24.
Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services. (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.25.
Premiums for private health care insurance coverage (Section 2110(a)(25))
6.2.26.
Medical transportation (Section 2110(a)(26))
Guidance: Enabling services, such as transportation, translation, and outreach services, may be offered only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals.
6.2.27.
Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) (Section 2110(a)(27))
6.2.28.
Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not included under this Section (Section 2110(a)(28))
6.2-DC Dental Coverage (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) The State will provide dental coverage to children through one of the following. Please update Sections 9.10 and 10.3-DC when electing this option. Dental services provided to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2103(a)(5)):
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-59)Page 59#
53 6.2.1-DC State Specific Dental Benefit Package. The State assures dental services represented by the following categories of common dental terminology (CDT1) codes are included in the dental benefits: 1. Diagnostic (i.e., clinical exams, x-rays) (CDT codes: D0100-D0999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 2. Preventive (i.e., dental prophylaxis, topical fluoride treatments, sealants) (CDT codes: D1000-D1999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 3. Restorative (i.e., fillings, crowns) (CDT codes: D2000-D2999) 4. Endodontic (i.e., root canals) (CDT codes: D3000-D3999) 5. Periodontic (treatment of gum disease) (CDT codes: D4000-D4999) 6. Prosthodontic (dentures) (CDT codes: D5000-D5899, D5900-D5999, and D6200-D6999) 7. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (i.e., extractions of teeth and other oral surgical procedures) (CDT codes: D7000-D7999) 8. Orthodontics (i.e., braces) (CDT codes: D8000-D8999) 9. Emergency Dental Services
CA RESPONSE: This coverage is applicable to Population 2 (Unborn Option) and Population 4 (MCAIP). Please see Attachments 3 and 4.
6.2.1.1-DC Periodicity Schedule. The State has adopted the following periodicity schedule: State-developed Medicaid-specific American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Other Nationally recognized periodicity schedule Other (description attached)
6.2.2-DC Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5), 42 CFR 457.410, and 42 CFR 457.420)
6.2.2.1-DC FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(i)) (If checked, attach copy of the dental supplemental plan benefits description and the applicable CDT2 codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.2-DC State employee coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(ii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-60)Page 60#
54
CA RESPONSE: This coverage is applicable to Population 1 (CCHIP) and 3 (MCAP). Please see Attachments 2, 6, and 7, which includes covered CPT codes for the two dental plans.
6.2.2.3-DC HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(iii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2-DS
Supplemental Dental Coverage- The State will provide dental coverage to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services. Children eligible for this option must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2110(b)(5)(C)(ii)). Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: Under Title XXI, pre-existing condition exclusions are not allowed, with the only exception being in relation to another law in existence (HIPAA/ERISA). Indicate that the plan adheres to this requirement by checking the applicable description.
In the event that the State provides benefits through a group health plan or group health coverage, or provides family coverage through a group health plan under a waiver (see Section 6.4.2.), pre-existing condition limits are allowed to the extent permitted by HIPAA/ERISA. If the State is contracting with a group health plan or provides benefits through group health coverage, describe briefly any limitations on pre-existing conditions. (Formerly 8.6.)
6.3. The State assures that, with respect to pre-existing medical conditions, one of the following two statements applies to its plan: (42CFR 457.480)
6.3.1.
The State shall not permit the imposition of any pre-existing medical condition exclusion for covered services (Section 2102(b)(1)(B)(ii)); OR 6.3.2.
The State contracts with a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, or contracts with a group health plan to provide family coverage under a waiver (see Section 6.6.2. (formerly 6.4.2) of the template). Pre-existing medical conditions are permitted to the extent allowed by HIPAA/ERISA. (Formerly 8.6.) (Section 2103(f)) Describe:
Guidance: States may request two additional purchase options in Title XXI: cost effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system and for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4. Additional Purchase Options- If the State wishes to provide services under the plan
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-61)Page 61#
55 through cost effective alternatives or the purchase of family coverage, it must request the appropriate option. To be approved, the State must address the following: (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4.1.
Cost Effective Coverage- Payment may be made to a State in excess of the
10 percent limitation on use of funds for payments for: 1) other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; 2) expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); 3) expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and 4) other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan, if it demonstrates the following (42CFR 457.1005(a)):
6.4.1.1. Coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures must meet the coverage requirements above. Describe the coverage provided by the alternative delivery system. The State may cross reference Section 6.2.1 - 6.2.28. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(i)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
6.4.1.2. The cost of such coverage must not be greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided for the coverage described above; Describe the cost of such coverage on an average per child basis. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(ii)) (42CFR 457.1005(b))
Guidance: Check below if the State is requesting to provide cost-effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system. This allows the State to waive the 10 percent limitation on expenditures not used for Medicaid or health insurance assistance if coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures meets the requirements of Section 2103; the cost of such coverage is not greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided under Section 2103; and such coverage is provided through the use of a community-based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Services Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923.
If the cost-effective alternative waiver is requested, the State must demonstrate that payments in excess of the 10 percent limitation will be used for other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); expenditures for outreach activities as provided in
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-62)Page 62#
56 Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan. (42CFR, 457.1005(a))
6.4.1.3. The coverage must be provided through the use of a community based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Social Security Act. Describe the community-based delivery system. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(iii)) (42CFR 457.1005(a))
Guidance: Check 6.4.2.if the State is requesting to purchase family coverage. Any State requesting to purchase such coverage will need to include information that establishes to the Secretary’s satisfaction that: 1) when compared to the amount of money that would have been paid to cover only the children involved with a comparable package, the purchase of family coverage is cost effective; and 2) the purchase of family coverage is not a substitution for coverage already being provided to the child. (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2.
Purchase of Family Coverage- Describe the plan to purchase family coverage. Payment may be made to a State for the purpose of family coverage under a
group health plan or health insurance coverage that includes coverage of targeted low-income children, if it demonstrates the following: (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2.1. Purchase of family coverage is cost-effective. The State’s cost of purchasing family coverage, including administrative expenditures, that includes coverage for the targeted low-income children involved or the family involved (as applicable) under premium assistance programs must not be greater than the cost of obtaining coverage under the State plan for all eligible targeted low-income children or families involved; and (2) The State may base its demonstration of cost effectiveness on an assessment of the cost of coverage, including administrative costs, for children or families under premium assistance programs to the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children or families, done on a case-by-case basis, or on the cost of premium assisted coverage in the aggregate.
6.4.2.2. The State assures that the family coverage would not otherwise substitute for health insurance coverage that would be provided to such children but for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.1010(b))
6.4.2.3. The State assures that the coverage for the family otherwise meets title
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-63)Page 63#
57 XXI requirements. (42CFR 457.1010(c))
6.4.3-PA: Additional State Options for Providing Premium Assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002 issued February, 2, 2010) A State may elect to offer a premium assistance subsidy for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), to all targeted low-income children who are eligible for child health assistance under the plan and have access to such coverage. No subsidy shall be provided to a targeted low-income child (or the child’s parent) unless the child voluntarily elects to receive such a subsidy. (Section 2105(c)(10)(A)). Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option. Does the State provide this option to targeted low-income children?
Yes
No
6.4.3.1-PA Qualified Employer-Sponsored Coverage and Premium Assistance Subsidy
6.4.3.1.1-PA Provide an assurance that the qualified employer-sponsored insurance meets the definition of qualified employer-sponsored coverage as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), and that the premium assistance subsidy meets the definition of premium assistance subsidy as defined in 2105(c)(10)(C).
6.4.3.1.2-PA Describe whether the State is providing the premium assistance subsidy as reimbursement to an employee or for out-of-pocket expenditures or directly to the employee’s employer.
6.4.3.2-PA: Supplemental Coverage for Benefits and Cost Sharing Protections Provided under the Child Health Plan.
6.4.3.2.1-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(E)(i), provide an assurance that the State is providing for each targeted low-income child enrolled in such coverage, supplemental coverage consisting of all items or services that are not covered or are only partially covered, under the qualified employer-sponsored coverage consistent with 2103(a) and cost sharing protections consistent with Section 2103(e).
6.4.3.2.2-PA Describe whether these benefits are being provided through the employer or by the State providing wraparound benefits.
6.4.3.2.3-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage, the State ensures that such group health plans or health insurance coverage offered through an employer will be certified by an actuary as coverage that is equivalent to a benchmark benefit package described
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-64)Page 64#
58 in Section 2103(b) or benchmark equivalent coverage that meets the requirements of Section 2103(a)(2).
6.4.3.3-PA: Application of Waiting Period Imposed Under State Plan: States are required to apply the same waiting period to premium assistance as is applied to direct coverage for children under their CHIP State plan, as specified in Section 2105(c)(10)(F).
6.4.3.3.1-PA Provide an assurance that the waiting period for children in premium assistance is the same as for those children in direct coverage (if State has a waiting period in place for children in direct CHIP coverage).
6.4.3.4-PA: Opt-Out and Outreach, Education, and Enrollment Assistance
6.4.3.4.1-PA Describe the State’s process for ensuring parents are permitted to disenroll their child from qualified employer-sponsored coverage and to enroll in CHIP effective on the first day of any month for which the child is eligible for such assistance and in a manner that ensures continuity of coverage for the child (Section 2105(c)(10)(G)).
6.4.3.4.2-PA Describe the State’s outreach, education, and enrollment efforts related to premium assistance programs, as required under Section 2102(c)(3). How does the State inform families of the availability of premium assistance, and assist them in obtaining such subsidies? What are the specific significant resources the State intends to apply to educate employers about the availability of premium assistance subsidies under the State child health plan? (Section 2102(c))
6.4.3.5-PA Purchasing Pool- A State may establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool and may provide a premium assistance subsidy for enrollment in coverage made available through this pool (Section 2105(c)(10)(I)). Does the State provide this option?
Yes
No
6.6.3.5.1-PA Describe the plan to establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool.
6.6.3.5.2-PA Provide an assurance that employers who are eligible to participate: 1) have less than 250 employees; 2) have at least one employee who is a pregnant woman eligible for CHIP or a member of a family that has at least one child eligible under the State’s CHIP plan.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-65)Page 65#
59 6.6.3.5.3-PA Provide an assurance that the State will not claim for any administrative expenditures attributable to the establishment or operation of such a pool except to the extent such payment would otherwise be permitted under this title.
6.4.3.6-PA Notice of Availability of Premium Assistance- Describe the procedures that assure that if a State provides premium assistance subsidies under this Section, it must: 1) provide as part of the application and enrollment process, information describing the availability of premium assistance and how to elect to obtain a subsidy; and 2) establish other procedures to ensure that parents are fully informed of the choices for child health assistance or through the receipt of premium assistance subsidies (Section 2105(c)(10)(K)).
6.4.3.6.1-PA Provide an assurance that the State includes information about premium assistance on the CHIP application or enrollment form.
Section 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care
Guidance: Methods for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Methods to assure quality include the application of performance measures, quality standards consumer information strategies, and other quality improvement strategies.
Performance measurement strategies could include using measurements for external reporting either to the State or to consumers and for internal quality improvement purposes. They could be based on existing measurement sets that have undergone rigorous evaluation for their appropriateness (e.g., HEDIS). They may include the use of standardized member satisfaction surveys (e.g., CAHPS) to assess members’ experience of care along key dimensions such as access, satisfaction, and system performance.
Quality standards are often used to assure the presence of structural and process measures that promote quality and could include such approaches as: the use of external and periodic review of health plans by groups such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance; the establishment of standards related to consumer protection and quality such as those developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; and the formation of an advisory group to the State or plan to facilitate consumer and community participation in the plan.
Information strategies could include: the disclosure of information to beneficiaries about their benefits under the plan and their rights and responsibilities; the provision of comparative information to consumers on the performance of available health plans and providers; and consumer education strategies on how to access and effectively use health insurance coverage to maximize quality of care.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-66)Page 66#
60 Quality improvement strategies should include the establishment of quantified quality improvement goals for the plan or the State and provider education. Other strategies include specific purchasing specifications, ongoing contract monitoring mechanisms, focus groups, etc.
Where States use managed care organizations to deliver CHIP care, recent legal changes require the State to use managed care quality standards and quality strategies similar to those used in Medicaid managed care.
Tools for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Tools and types of information available include, HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) measures, CAHPS (Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study) measures, vital statistics data, and State health registries (e.g., immunization registries).
Quality monitoring may be done by external quality review organizations, or, if the State wishes, internally by a State board or agency independent of the State CHIP Agency. Establishing grievance measures is also an important aspect of monitoring.
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 8.
Guidance: The State must specify the qualifications of entities that will provide coverage and the conditions of participation. States should also define the quality standard they are using, for example, NCQA Standards or other professional standards. Any description of the information strategies used should be linked to Section 9. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR, 457.495)
7.1. Describe the methods (including external and internal monitoring) used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care, particularly with respect to well-baby care, well-child care, and immunizations provided under the plan. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.495(a)) Will the State utilize any of the following tools to assure quality? (Check all that apply and describe the activities for any categories utilized.)
CA RESPONSE:
The state views the use of quality standards, performance measurement information strategies, and quality improvement strategies as critical components to transforming access to health plan coverage from the provision of access to the creation of a medical home. Below is a description of how California uses a number of tools and strategies in CHIP to ensure health care coverage translates to meaningful access to necessary services.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-67)Page 67#
61 With the transition of MRMIB programs to DHCS, quality improvement strategies, quality standards, and performance measurement information strategies are conducted in the same manner as Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is addressed in California’s Title XIX plan.
Measuring Clinical Quality: The model health plan contract requires contractors to provide the state with audited clinical measures consisting of the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) 3.0 Performance Measures as well as any age relevant HEDIS measures which are included in versions of HEDIS numbered higher than 3.0. Plans must also report the number of subscribers who received a health assessment visit within 120 days or four consecutive months after their effective date of coverage. These data must be measured or audited by an independent third party and reported annually. DHCS may use the data to provide information to subscribers in its annual open enrollment or program application materials.
Standards Designed to Improve to Quality of Care: Health plans are required to assure that its providers will use the most recent recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) with regard to recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Annually, the plan must inform the caretakers of its enrollees of the AAP’s recommended schedule of preventive care visits. The notice must be in English, Spanish and any other language which is spoken in more than 5 percent of the plan’s enrollee’s households.
Quality Management Processes: The contractor must assure the State that its Quality Management processes have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory by either the National Committee on Quality Assurance, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, or the State of California’s Medi-Cal Managed Care Program. The contractor must also maintain a system of accountability for quality improvement activities which includes the participation of the contractor’s governing body, the designation of a Quality Improvement Committee, supervision of the activities of the Medical Director, and the inclusion of contracted physicians and other providers in the process of quality improvement development and performance.
Quality Assurance Measures
Virtually all of the plans are regulated by California’s Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) under the Knox-Keene Act - established specifically for managed care plans licensing. The Knox-Keene Act prescribes rules for the organization of HMOs and other managed care entities. It specifies plan standards, marketing rules, and consumer disclosure requirements. It also establishes fiscal solvency requirements and quality assurance standards.
California’s separate CHIP populations rely on the quality assurance requirements of the Knox-Keene Act which regulates health plans. Quality assurance requirements specifically require that plans have quality assurance programs, and that providers
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-68)Page 68#
62 establish a program to review the quality of care being provided and identify, evaluate and remedy problems related to access, continuity of care, utilization and monitoring of plan providers. POPULATION 1/CCHIP POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION POPULATION 3/MCAP POPULATION 4/MCAIP
7.1.1.
Quality standards
CA RESPONSE:
POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION POPULATION 3/ MCAP POPULATION 4/MCAIP
DHCS monitors quality standards through:
• Analysis and trending of reports from health, dental and vision plans. DHCS staff will collect and analyze a variety of reports generated by participating plans, regulatory entities, and external quality review organizations to monitor the quality of care received and to focus plan efforts on areas needing improvement. These reports include:
1. Benefit Grievances: Benefit grievances filed by CHIP Program subscribers with participating plans. Participating plans will be contractually required to report benefit grievances once a year. These reports will be shared with subscribers who request the information. In addition, DHCS will track any publicly available information on the number and type of benefit grievances filed by all subscribers enrolled in a participating plan (Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) reports all benefit grievances filed with plans annually). Grievance information will be used by DHCS to identify plan performance needing improvement and to form the basis of future performance standards.
2. Regulatory Entity Reports: DHCS will work with the state’s two health insurance industry regulatory entities (the Departments of Insurance and Managed Health Care) to assure that all publicly available data on health plan performance is known to DHCS.
3. Enrollment and Disenrollment Reports: These reports will be generated by the program’s administrative contractor
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-69)Page 69#
63 POPULATION 1/CCHIP
DHCS monitors quality standards in the CCHIP projects through:
• Analysis and trending of reports from health, dental and vision plans. DHCS staff will collect and analyze a variety of reports generated by participating plans, regulatory entities, and external review organizations to monitor the quality of care received and to focus plan efforts on areas needing improvement. These reports include:
1. Benefit Grievances: Benefit grievances filed by CCHIP Program subscribers with participating plans. Participating plans will be contractually required to report benefit grievances once a year. These reports will be shared with subscribers who request the information. In addition, DHCS will track any publicly available information on the number and type of benefit grievances filed by all subscribers enrolled in a participating plan (DMHC reports all benefit grievances filed with plans annually). Grievance information will be used by DHCS to identify plan performance needing improvement and to form the basis of future performance standards.
2. Regulatory Entity Reports: DHCS will work with the state’s two health insurance industry regulatory entities (the Departments of Insurance and Corporations) to assure that all publicly available data on health plan performance is known to DHCS.
• Monitoring the accreditation status of participating plans by entities such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).
• The specific indicators to be tracked will focus on child or adolescent specific outcome measures, such as:
a. Ambulatory Care – Emergency Department Visits (AMB-ED) b. Children and Adolescent Access to Primary Care Practitioners (CAP-CH) c. Well-Child Visits in the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Years of Life (W34-CH) d. Child Immunization Status (CIS-3) e. Immunizations for Adolescents (IMA-2)
To the extent feasible, DHCS intends to utilize the audited HEDIS measures generated by the California Cooperative Healthcare Reporting Initiative (CCHRI). CCHRI is a collaborative effort of purchasers, providers and plans who are committed to produce audited performance data on health plans that can be compared across plans and tracked over time. The health plans participating in CCHRI represent
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-70)Page 70#
64 95 percent of the commercially enrolled California health maintenance organization population. At present, the only audited child-specific HEDIS measure being collected by CCHRI is the immunization status of two year olds. Until audited measures are available, DHCS will collect unaudited health plan reported information on other HEDIS child and adolescent based measures.
7.1.2.
Performance measurement
POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION POPULATION 3/ MCAP POPULATION 4/MCAIP
DHCS evaluates and selects a means to enforce plan performance related to the performance standards. Enforcement can take one of several approaches. These include using either a fiscal (or enrollment) penalty based system in which plans are penalized when DHCS identifies a deficiency, or a performance target based system in which plans agree to put a percentage of their premium at risk if they do not achieve the predetermined performance levels.
POPULATION 1/CCHIP
The volume of children in CCHIP, coupled with the short-term duration of the funding makes it infeasible to set up separate performance measures.
However, the CCHIP projects are modeled consistent with the CHIP Program and the health plans delivering the CCHIP services are the same health plans, and also participate in Medicaid. Thus, the information produced for the CHIP and Medicaid program plans will be reflective of the performance for CCHIP.
7.1.2 (a) CHIPRA Quality Core Set
7.1.2 (b) Other
DHCS External Accountability Set 7.1.3.
Information strategies
POPULATION 2/UNBORN OPTION POPULATION 3/ MCAP POPULATION 4/MCAIP DHCS will use information strategies in line with the Medi-Cal program.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-71)Page 71#
65 POPULATION 1/ CCHIP The county LI and COHS will provide to its enrolled members a detailed description of covered benefits, exclusions, and grievance procedures in their Evidence of Coverage (EOC) booklet.
7.1.4.
Quality improvement strategies
All of the approaches described under quality standards, performance measurement, and information strategies are used by DHCS to encourage quality improvement by participating plans. This is done through five strategic approaches. These are:
• Keeping up to date on developments in quality improvement, including any indicators that may be developed regarding the high quality medical home; • Feeding back information to plans to help them understand their own performance over time and how they compare to other plans providing services to subscribers; • Enforcing of contractual provisions which link quality based measures to plan performance; • Increasing plan performance targets over time; and • Providing quality based information to families. This final approach empowers the consumer to punish or reward plans with enrollment based on the value each family places on the quality standards.
Guidance: Provide a brief description of methods to be used to assure access to covered services, including a description of how the State will assure the quality and appropriateness of the care provided. The State should consider whether there are sufficient providers of care for the newly enrolled populations and whether there is reasonable access to care. (Section 2102(a)(7)(B))
7.2. Describe the methods used, including monitoring, to assure: (Section 2102(a)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.495)
DHCS will also take a number of steps to monitor access to covered services. Some of these are:
• DHCS will monitor the ongoing status of health plans with their regulators to assure quality services are available to subscribers. • DHCS will use plan enrollment and disenrollment reports as an early warning signal of access problems with a health plan.
7.2.1. Access to well-baby care, well-child care, well-adolescent care and childhood and adolescent immunizations. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(a))
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-72)Page 72#
66 The State utilizes three steps to assure and monitor access to well-baby care, well-child care, well-adolescent care and childhood and adolescent immunizations.
1. Through contracts, all plans are required to provide preventive services in accordance with recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics and immunizations in accordance with the American Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP). Health plans are also required on an annual basis to inform enrollees of the schedule for receiving preventive and immunization services and on the availability of these services (which include well baby, child and adolescent care, and childhood and adolescent immunizations).
2. The State issues an annual member guide to CHIP enrollees. This member guide includes a schedule for well-visits and immunizations for babies, young children and adolescents.
3. The State monitors access to preventive services using HEDIS. Each year health plans report the number of children receiving well visits and immunizations. The State compares plan reports to national guidelines and benchmarks to determine deficiencies. Plans with deficient performance compared to all plans in the program are asked to submit a corrective action plan. The State is currently exploring minimum performance thresholds which will be implemented with the July 1, 2004 contracts.
The State assures that the monitoring efforts used for CHIP and Medicaid will be used for CCHIP.
7.2.2. Access to covered services, including emergency services as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. (Section 2102(a)(7)) 42CFR 457.495(b))
California state law contains specific requirements for access to services, including emergency services. These requirements can be found in Health and Safety Code, Section 1367 and California Code of Regulations, Sections, 1300.67.2 and 1300.67.2.1. All plans operating in California are subject to these requirements. The State regulator of managed care organizations, DMHC, enforces this law.
In addition to State law, the State uses several methods to monitor access to services. The State collects information on the number of specific CHIP enrollee grievances each plan has received, and the number of enrollee complaints the State had directly received. The plan grievances and enrollee complaints are categorized and patterns of complaints among the plans are reviewed periodically.
The State requires plans to submit annual performance measures, using HEDIS, which provides information on the delivery of well care and immunizations. This information is
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-73)Page 73#
67 provided on DHCS website, including Managed Care – Quality Improvement & Performance Measurement Reports and the Managed Care Performance Dashboard.
Through the county contracts with the State, counties will be required to submit utilization data on preventive and emergency services and grievances from CCHIP enrollees.
7.2.3. Appropriate and timely procedures to monitor and treat enrollees with chronic,
complex, or serious medical conditions, including access to an adequate number of
visits to specialists experienced in treating the specific medical condition and access to out-of-network providers when the network is not adequate for the enrollee’s medical condition. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42CFR 457.495(c))
To meet the special needs of children, CHIP ensures the provision of necessary specialized services beyond those offered through the comprehensive insurance package in a coordinated manner. The CCS program addresses the significant needs of the minority of children whose needs may not be fully met under an insurance benefit package. The CCS program provides case management and treatment for chronic, serious, and complex physically handicapping conditions. Coverage is and will be limited to coverage of the specific condition. The program establishes standards for the approval of inpatient hospital facilities and pediatric specialty and subspecialty providers delivering care to eligible children. The program also has an extensive system of special care centers located at tertiary medical center at which multispecialty, multidisciplinary teams deliver coordinated inpatient and outpatient care to children with chronic medical conditions. The centers include cardiac, chronic pulmonary disease, hematology and oncology, myelomeningocele, hemophilia, sickle cell, renal, infectious disease/immunology, hearing and speech metabolic disorders, inherited neurologic disease, limb defect, gastroenterology, craniofacial anomalies and endocrinology. The program also approves neonatal intensive care, pediatric intensive care, and pediatric rehabilitation units.
The program staff determines the appropriate source of health care for eligible children, assist families in accessing care, and identify other needs of the child and family that could impact the care of the eligible condition.
The services to treat the CCS eligible medical condition of a child enrolled in CHIP will not be the responsibility of the contracting health plan in which the child is enrolled. The CCS program will continue to authorize the medically necessary services to treat the conditions using the program’s regulations, policies, procedures, and guidelines in determining the appropriateness of providers, and the necessity for services. CCS will expand the systems of communication that have been instituted to work with Medi-Cal managed care plans that have CCS services “carved out” from their capitation rate. Local CCS programs carefully coordinate the authorization and delivery of specialty and
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-74)Page 74#
68 subspecialty services with the primary care provider to which the child is assigned. This program will reimburse providers for these specialized services. Children receiving such services will continue to have their primary health needs serviced through the insurance program. Allowing those specialized services to be provided as a complement to, but outside of, the managed care setting is consistent with recent actions in the Federal Budget Reconciliation Act (BBA 1997) which prohibit mandatory enrollment of children with special medical needs in managed care.
On an annual basis the State will review the number of active CHIP cases in the CCS program. The State will also require participating plans to report the number of referrals they have made to the CCS program each quarter. The State will also use the HEDIS CAHPS survey to monitor access and quality of these services. This survey has a special module to address the satisfaction and experiences of families which children who have chronic conditions.
The state will include in its CCHIP contracts a requirement to report the number of active CCHIP/CCS cases and the number of children referred to the CCS program. Of those children enrolled in CCHIP, some will qualify for CCS services based on CCS eligibility requirements whereby services for the qualifying CCS eligible condition will be provided by CCS. In those cases where a family does not qualify based on CCS eligibility requirements, the medically necessary services will be provided by the CCHIP health plan.
California’s State Department of Managed Healthcare licensure requirements includes adequacy of network including specialists covered services not available in network must be covered out of network.
7.2.4. Decisions related to the prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with State law or, in accordance with the medical needs of the patient,
within 14 days after the receipt of a request for services. (Section 2102(a)(7))
(42CFR 457.495(d)) Exigent medical circumstances may require more rapid response according to the medical needs of the patient.
California state law contains specific requirements for health plan utilization review, including prospective, retrospective, and concurrent review. State law also requires independent medical review of health plans decisions concerning medical necessity. These requirements, found at Health and Safety Code Section 1367.01 and 1374.30 et seq., are designed to ensure that the prior authorization process does not present an undue barrier for continuity and access to care.
The State assures that this method is implemented under the CCHIP program.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-75)Page 75#
69 Section 8. Cost-Sharing and Payment
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 9.
8.1. Is cost-sharing imposed on any of the children covered under the plan? (42CFR 457.505) Indicate if this also applies for pregnant women. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009)
8.1.1.
Yes 8.1.2.
No, skip to question 8.8.
8.1.1-PW
Yes 8.1.2-PW
No, skip to question 8.8.
Guidance: It is important to note that for families below 150 percent of poverty, the same limitations on cost sharing that are under the Medicaid program apply. (These cost-sharing limitations have been set forth in Section 1916 of the Social Security Act, as implemented by regulations at 42 CFR 447.50 - 447.59). For families with incomes of 150 percent of poverty and above, cost sharing for all children in the family cannot exceed 5 percent of a family's income per year. Include a statement that no cost sharing will be charged for pregnancy-related services. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2. Describe the amount of cost-sharing, any sliding scale based on income, the group or groups of enrollees that may be subject to the charge by age and income (if applicable) and the service for which the charge is imposed or time period for the charge, as appropriate. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2.1.
Premiums:
CA RESPONSE:
Population 1 (CCHIP): $21 per child per month with a maximum of $63 per family per month • Families who prepay 3 months of premiums do not have to pay the fourth month • Families who pay their premiums with Electronic Funds Transfer receive a 25 percent discount
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-76)Page 76#
70 Population 2 (Unborn) Not applicable Population 3 (MCAP): 1.5 percent of the enrollee’s annual Modified Adjusted Gross
Income (MAGI) Population 4 (MCAIP): $13 per child per month with a maximum of $36 per family per month
8.2.2.
Deductibles:
8.2.3.
Coinsurance or copayments:
CA RESPONSE:
POPULATION 1 (CCHIP) Depending on the family income, the copayment may be $5, $10, or$15 a visit. The maximum out-of-pocket amount for services in one benefit year is $250/household.
No Copay: Preventative Care Services
Maternity Care
Medical Transportation
X-Ray and Laboratory Services
Inpatient Hospital Services
Durable Medical Equipment
Family Planning Services
Inpatient Mental Health
Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED)
Inpatient Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment
Inpatient Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy
Skilled Nursing Care
Dental: Preventative
Dental: Fillings
Dental: Sealants
Dental: Diagnostic X-Rays
Dental: Orthodontia
$10 Copay: Physician Services
Generic Prescription Drugs
Emergency Care Services
Outpatient Mental Health
Outpatient Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment
Outpatient Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy
Acupuncture (optional)
Chiropractic (optional)
Biofeedback (optional)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-77)Page 77#
71
Vision: Examination
Vision: Prescription Glasses
Dental: Major Services (Root canal, oral surgery, crowns, bridges, dentures)
$15 Copay: Name Brand Prescription Drugs
Outpatient Hospital Services (unless hospitalized)
POPULATION 2 (Unborn)/POPULATION 3 (MCAP)/POPULATION 4 (MCAIP) Not applicable
8.2.4.
Other:
8.2-DS
Supplemental Dental (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) For children enrolled in the dental-only supplemental coverage, describe the amount of cost-sharing, specifying any sliding scale based on income. Also describe how the State will track that the cost sharing does not exceed 5 percent of gross family income. The 5 percent of income calculation shall include all cost-sharing for health insurance and dental insurance. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b), and (c), 457.515(a) and (c), and 457.560(a)) Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
8.2.1-DS Premiums:
8.2.2-DS Deductibles:
8.2.3-DS Coinsurance or copayments:
8.2.4-DS Other:
8.3. Describe how the public will be notified, including the public schedule, of this cost sharing (including the cumulative maximum) and changes to these amounts and any differences based on income. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.505(b))
CA RESPONSE:
The public has been notified of cost-sharing requirements in the application, and enrollment materials and program regulations. If there is a change in the enrollee’s contribution, the program plan will provide notification in writing. Enrollee copays are also listed in plan disclosure documents, such as Evidence of Coverage (EOC) documents provided to each family. Income Guidelines and cost sharing is also available on DHCS’ website. Agencies and individuals who help families with their application will also be familiar with the program’s cost-sharing requirements and be able to communicate them to families when discussing the program.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-78)Page 78#
72
Guidance: The State should be able to demonstrate upon request its rationale and justification regarding these assurances. This section also addresses limitations on payments for certain expenditures and requirements for maintenance of effort.
8.4. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the cost sharing in its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.4.1.
Cost-sharing does not favor children from higher income families over lower income families. (Section 2103(e)(1)(B)) (42CFR 457.530) 8.4.2.
No cost-sharing applies to well-baby and well-child care, including
age-appropriate immunizations. (Section 2103(e)(2)) (42CFR 457.520) 8.4.3
No additional cost-sharing applies to the costs of emergency medical services delivered outside the network. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42CFR 457.515(f))
CA RESPONSE: Chapter 3 of California Statute 2011 (AB 97) assures that cost-sharing is consistent with Section 2103 of the Social Security Act.
8.5. Describe how the State will ensure that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of such family’s income for the length of the child’s eligibility period in the State. Include a description of the procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the State for overpayment by an enrollee: (Section 2103(e)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.560(b) and 457.505(e))
CA RESPONSE:
POPULATION 1 (CCHIP)
Copayments DHCS sets health benefit copayments from $5 to $15 for CCHIP. Copayments are not applicable in CCHIP for preventive services. In addition, DHCS has set a $250 annual maximum out-of-pocket so that no family is required to pay copayments after it has contributed $250 during a given year. Enrollees are encouraged to retain all of their copayment receipts and notify the health plan when $250 maximum has been reached. The CCHIP health plans also electronically track the number of enrollees who meet the annual maximum to ensure that no family’s copay goes over the annual maximum out-of-pocket contribution. However, the $250 limit does not apply to dental or vision coverage. California does not have copays for most dental services that children receive (preventive exams, cleanings, restorations, sealants, and fluoride treatments), and has lowered all other copays to a maximum of $5. Children who meet CCS conditions receive their services (orthodontics) from CCS without a copay. Therefore, California has determined that including dental services in the $250 maximum is not needed. Very few
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-79)Page 79#
73 families will have to pay a copay at all for dental services and those that do will be for a specific condition (root canal) which should have limited utilization.
California rules are consistent with title XXI, which require that cost sharing not exceed an amount that is “nominal” under Medicaid law, with appropriate adjustment for inflation or other reasons as the Secretary determines to be reasonable.
Premiums CCHIP premiums are based on $21 per child per month, with a maximum of $63 per family per month, equaling annual premiums of $252 for one child, $504 for two children, and $756 for three children or more. Cost sharing requirements do not exceed those allowable under title XXI. Using 261 percent FPL as the baseline income, Table 1 below provides an analysis of the 5 percent cost sharing limit compared to the highest premium that is charged. Therefore, California provides assurances that the cost sharing requirements continue to be within the allowable limits established under title XXI and is highly unlikely the family will ever get close to the 5 percent limit.
Table 1: Aggregate Cost Sharing for Families Above 261 percent FPL up to and including 317 percent FPL under CCHIP Family Size Annual Income of a Single Parent Family @ 261% FPL +$1* 5% Ceiling Annual Premium Contribution ** Annual Premium + $250 Family Cap on Health Copays Number of Dental and Vision Visits for Non- Preventive Services Needed to Exceed 1 child $42,387 $2,119 $252 $502 101 2 children $53,297 $2,665 $504 $754 151 3 children $64,207 $3,210 $756 $1,006 202
*Dollar amounts are based on March, 1 2017 Federal Poverty Level **Does not include premium discounts for pre-payment. If included, it would reduce the premium amounts by 25 percent.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-80)Page 80#
74 POPULATION 2 (UNBORN) Co-payments and premiums are not applicable to this population.
POPULATION 3 (MCAP)
Premiums The premium charged to pregnant women (unborn) enrolled on or after July 1, 2004, is limited to 1.5 percent of family income. Copayments and deductibles are not applicable to this population.
California ensures that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of a family’s income as is required by Section 2103(3)(B) of title XXI. The table below demonstrates that the maximum cost sharing falls well within the 5 percent annual cap.
Table 2: Aggregate Premiums for Pregnant Women/Families Above 208 percent of FPL up to and including 317 percent of FPL: Family Size Annual Income of a Single Parent Family @ 208% FPL + $1* 5% Ceiling Percentage of Annual Income Annual Premium Contribution
1 child $33,781 $1,689 1.5% $507 2 children $42,475 $2,124 1.5% $637 3+children $51,169 $2,558 1.5% $767
*Dollar amounts are based on March 1, 2017 FPL.
POPULATION 4 (MCAIP)
Premiums California ensures that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of a family’s income as is required by Section 2103(3)(B) of title XXI. Copayments and deductibles are not applicable to this population. The table below demonstrates that the maximum cost sharing falls well within the 5 percent annual cap.
Table 3: Aggregate Cost Sharing for Families Above 261 percent FPL up to and including 317 percent FPL for MCAIP
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-81)Page 81#
75 Family Size Annual Income of a Single Parent Family @ 261% FPL +$1* 5% Ceiling Annual Premium Contribution** 1 child $42,387 $2,119 $156 2 children $53,297 $2,665 $312 3 children $64,207 $3,210 $468
8.6. Describe the procedures the State will use to ensure American Indian (as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) and Alaska Native children will be excluded from cost-sharing. (Section 2103(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.535)
CA RESPONSE: Indian means any individual defined at 25 U.S.C. 1603(13), 1603(28), or 1679(a), or who has been determined eligible as an Indian, under 42 CFR 136.12. This means the individual: (i) Is a member of a Federally recognized Indian tribe; (ii) Resides in an urban center and meets one or more of the four criteria: (A) Is a member of a tribe, band, or other organized group of Indians, including those tribes, bands, or groups terminated since 1940 and those recognized now or in the future by the State in which they reside, or who is a descendant, in the first or second degree, of any such member; (B) Is an Eskimo or Aleut or other Alaska Native; (C) Is considered by the Secretary of the Interior to be an Indian for any purpose; or (D) Is determined to be an Indian under regulations issued by the Secretary; (iii) Is considered by the Secretary of the Interior to be an Indian for any purpose; or (iv) Is considered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to be an Indian for purposes of eligibility for Indian health care services, including as Start Printed Page 27868a California Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, or other Alaska Native. The provision of child health assistance to low income children who are American Indians/Alaskan Natives will be assured through the following procedures:
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-82)Page 82#
76 • Technical assistance by the state American Indian Health Program, Federal Indian Health Services, and tribes in tracking of services to American Indians. • Inclusion of American Indian ethnicity using the federal definition on the application form for tracking purposes. • Training to local American Indian clinic staff for outreach and referral to the program. • Use of the 30 American Indian primary care clinics (which are CHDP providers) to screen low-income youth, provide initial treatment and referral either to Medi-Cal or the appropriate CHIP program. • Implementation of a provision to exempt American Indian and • Alaska Native (AI/AN) families that meet the cost sharing waiver requirements, from monthly premiums and benefit copayments. This exemption is implemented the same in CCHIP as it is in the other CHIP populations. The exemption from premiums will be made at the time of application submission when a family declares AI/AN status consistent with the documentation requirements listed below. The family will have two months to submit the required documentation to continue the premium waiver. If documentation is not submitted within two months from enrollment, premiums will be charged prospectively. When acceptable documentation is submitted, the copayment waiver will also be applied. Acceptable documentation for the applicant or the child includes:
1. An American Indian or Alaskan Native enrollment document from a federally recognized tribe; or 2. A Certificate Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB) from the Bureau of Indian Affairs; or 3. A Certificate of Indian Heritage from an Indian Health Service facility operating in the State of California.
• Education to Certified Application Assistants about the cost sharing exemption for AI/AN families that meet the cost sharing waiver requirements. • CCHIPs will provide the same cost sharing waivers as the other CHIP programs. • CCHIP will include this cost sharing exemption notice in their member handbooks.
8.7. Provide a description of the consequences for an enrollee or applicant who does not pay a charge. (42CFR 457.570 and 457.505(c))
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-83)Page 83#
77
CA RESPONSE:
POPULATION 1/COUNTY CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(CCHIP)
Premium payments are invoiced the first week of the month and due on the 20th day of the coverage month. If a family fails to make a payment for a child/children, the next month’s invoice the family receives includes a 30 day past due warning, the amount due for the previous month and the current month, the date by which payment must be remitted, and the date the coverage will end if payment is not made. If the premium remains unpaid, the following month’s invoice includes a 60 day past due warning. If the premium has not been received on the 20th day of that month, a courtesy call is placed to the family, and the same day, a warning letter is sent to the family, which includes information on payment options, the disenrollment date, and instructions on how to complete the request form for continued enrollment. On the call, the family is reminded that a premium payment is due and that a child/children will be disenrolled as of the end of the month. The family is also questioned regarding whether the notification was received. A last billing statement is also mailed to the family on the 20th day of the month coverage is set to end, and if the payment has still not been received by the last day of that month, a disenrollment with appeal information letter is sent to the applicant. After disenrollment, if the full past-due premium is paid within 30-days, the child will be reinstated with no break in coverage.
POPULATION 2/MEDI-CAL UNBORN OPTION
There is no cost sharing for this population.
POPULATION 3/MEDI-CAL ACCESS PROGRAM (MCAP)
Once a pregnant woman is enrolled into MCAP, she cannot be disenrolled for
non-payment.
POPULATION 4/MEDI-CAL ACCESS INFANT PROGRAM (MCAIP)
If a program participant fails to make a payment, the next month’s invoice he receives includes a 30 day past due warning. The second month’s invoice includes the amount due for the previous month and the current month, the date by which payment must be remitted, and the date the coverage will end if payment is not made. If the premium is 45 days past due, a warning letter is sent to the applicant, which includes information on payment options, the disenrollment date, and an instructions on how to complete the request form for continued enrollment. If the premium has not been received on the 20th of the second month, a courtesy call is placed to the applicant. The applicant is reminded that a premium payment is due and that his or her child will be disenrolled as of the end
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-84)Page 84#
78 of the month. He or she is also questioned regarding whether he or she received the notification. A last billing statement is also mailed to the applicant on the 20th day of the month, and if the payment has still not been received by the last day of the second month, a disenrollment with appeal information letter is sent to the applicant.
Guidance: Section 8.7.1 is based on Section 2101(a) of the Act provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner that is coordinated with other sources of health benefits coverage for children.
8.7.1. Provide an assurance that the following disenrollment protections are being applied:
Guidance: Provide a description below of the State’s premium grace period process and how the State notifies families of their rights and responsibilities with respect to payment of premiums. (Section 2103(e)(3)(C))
8.7.1.1.
State has established a process that gives enrollees reasonable notice of and an opportunity to pay past due premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees prior to disenrollment. (42CFR 457.570(a))
8.7.1.2.
The disenrollment process affords the enrollee an opportunity to show
that the enrollee’s family income has declined prior to disenrollment for non-payment of cost-sharing charges. (42CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.3.
In the instance mentioned above, that the State will facilitate enrolling the child in Medicaid or adjust the child’s cost-sharing category as appropriate. (42CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.4
The State provides the enrollee with an opportunity for an impartial review to address disenrollment from the program. (42CFR 457.570(c))
8.8. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the payment aspects of its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.8.1.
No Federal funds will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(4)) (42CFR 457.220) 8.8.2.
No cost-sharing (including premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance
and all other types) will be used toward State matching requirements.
(Section 2105(c)(5) (42CFR 457.224) (Previously 8.4.5) 8.8.3.
No funds under this title will be used for coverage if a private insurer would have been obligated to provide such assistance except for a provision limiting this obligation because the child is eligible under the this title. (Section 2105(c)(6)(A)) (42CFR 457.626(a)(1))
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-85)Page 85#
79 8.8.4.
Income and resource standards and methodologies for determining Medicaid eligibility are not more restrictive than those applied as of June 1, 1997. (Section 2105(d)(1)) (42CFR 457.622(b)(5)) 8.8.5.
No funds provided under this title or coverage funded by this title will include coverage of abortion except if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Section 2105)(c)(7)(B)) (42CFR 457.475) 8.8.6.
No funds provided under this title will be used to pay for any abortion or to assist in the purchase, in whole or in part, for coverage that includes abortion (except as described above). (Section 2105)(c)(7)(A)) (42CFR 457.475)
Section 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration
Guidance: States should consider aligning its strategic objectives with those discussed in Section II of the CHIP Annual Report.
9.1. Describe strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health
coverage among targeted low-income children and other low-income children:
(Section 2107(a)(2)) (42CFR 457.710(b))
CA RESPONSE:
California has developed strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health coverage for targeted low-income children and other low-income children. These objectives are all focused toward the state’s overarching concern that increasing the extent of creditable health coverage will significantly improve the health status of California’s children. The strategic objectives are to:
1. Increase the awareness of low income uninsured families about the availability of comprehensive low or no cost health coverage for children as well as the importance of timely and ongoing care for children. Motivate such families to obtain coverage for their children.
2. Continue to provide an application and enrollment process that is easy for targeted low-income families to understand and use, and measure monitoring efforts to ensure compliance with ACA requirements.
3. Assure that health services purchased by the program are accessible to enrolled children.
4. Assure the participation of community-based organizations in outreach and education activities.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-86)Page 86#
80 5. Encourage the inclusion of traditional and safety net providers in health plan networks.
6. Assure that enrolled children with significant health needs receive access to appropriate care.
Guidance: Goals should be measurable, quantifiable and convey a target the State is working towards.
9.2. Specify one or more performance goals for each strategic objective identified: (Section 2107(a)(3)) (42CFR 457.710(c))
CA RESPONSE:
Objective 1: Increase the awareness of low-income families about the availability of comprehensive low or no cost health coverage for children as well as the importance of timely and ongoing care for children. Motivate such families to obtain coverage for their children.
Performance goals: 1.1 Using Current Population Survey (CPS) longitudinal data, increase the percentage of Medi-Cal and CHIP eligible children who are enrolled in the programs.
1.2 Reduce the percentage of uninsured children in target income families that have family incomes above no cost Medi-Cal levels.
1.3 Based on DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures for Emergency Department visits (AMB-ED), reduce the percentage of children using the emergency room as their usual source of primary care.
Proposed measures: California will use Current Population Survey (CPS) longitudinal data to identify children who eligible but not enrolled in the programs, as well as Medi-Cal and emergency room data as obtained by the AMB-ED DHCS External Accountability Set measures for Emergency Department visits.
Objective 2: Continue to provide an application and enrollment process that is easy for targeted low-income families to understand and use, and measure monitoring efforts to ensure compliance with ACA requirements.
Performance goals: 2.1 Assure that Medi-Cal and CHIP program services provide written and telephone
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-87)Page 87#
81 services in the languages spoken by the target population.
2.2 Continue to improve an application process that can be completed without an in-person meeting.
Proposed measures: California uses a Single Streamlined Application that is available in English and Spanish in the electronic version, with all threshold languages being available for the paper application.
Objective 3: Assure that health services purchased by the program are accessible to enrolled children by using DHCS Accountability Measures.
Performance goals: 3.1 Based on DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures for Children and Adolescents Access to Primary Care Physicians (CAP-CH), achieve year-to-year improvements in the percentage of targeted low-income children that have had a visit with a primary care provider during the year.
3.2 Based on DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures for well-child visits for the third through sixth year of life (W34-CH), achieve year-to-year improvements in the percentage of targeted low-income children that have had well-child examinations at the appropriate intervals for their age.
3.3 Based on DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures for Childhood Immunization Status (CIS-3) and Immunizations for Adolescents (IMA-CH), achieve year-to-year improvements in the percentage of targeted low-income children who receive required immunizations by age 2 and by age 13.
3.4 Based on the 2017 Child Core Set for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); DHCS will utilize the ADD-CH measure to monitor dose adjustment, follow-up visits, support services, ongoing treatment, and potential risks with ongoing treatment.
Proposed measures: California will use DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures relevant to children’s service accessibility for all health plans participating in the insurance program, and participating health plans will be contractually obligated to participate in annual reporting. California will also use Behavioral health measures – Clinical Depression and Follow-up Plan (CDF) from the 2017 Child Core Set measure to track usage and follow-up care for children with ADHD.
Objective 4: Assure the participation of community-based organizations in outreach
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-88)Page 88#
82 and education activities.
Performance goals: 4.1 Ensure that varieties of entities experienced in working with targeted low-income populations are eligible to assist families with enrollment. 4.2 Ensure that a variety of entities experienced in working with targeted low-income populations conduct outreach/education and have input in the development of culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach and enrollment materials.
Proposed measures: DHCS requires the outreach/education contractor to allocate a percentage of resources to fund the participation of community-based organizations in the state’s outreach efforts, and requires the contractor to document their participation.
Objective 5: Encourage the inclusion of traditional and safety net providers in health plan networks.
Performance goals: 5.1 Achieve increases in the number of children enrolled in health coverage who have access to a provider located within their zip code.
5.2 Achieve increases in the number of children who have access to traditional and safety net providers as defined by Health Resources and Services Administration’s Federally Qualified Health Center Look-Alike Program.
Proposed measures: DHCS requires participating plans to report annually on the number of subscribers selecting traditional and safety net providers.
Objective 6: Assure that enrolled children with significant health needs receive access to appropriate care.
Performance goals: 6.1 Based on DHCS’ External Accountability Set Measures for Children and Adolescents Access to Primary Care Physicians (CAP-CH), achieve year-to-year maintenance and/or improvements in the percentage of children with special health care needs with a source of coverage for primary care and specialty care. California will also use Behavioral health measures – Clinical Depression and Follow-up Plan (CDF) from the 2017 Child Core Set measure to track usage and follow-up care for children with ADHD.
6.2 Ensure that children with special health care needs experience no break in coverage/services as they access specialized services.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-89)Page 89#
83
6.3 Based on the 2017 Child Core Set for ADHD (ADD-CH), ensure that there is follow-up care for children prescribed ADHD medications to help address quality of care for children with significant health needs.
Proposed measures: DHCS tracks the number of children with special health care needs who participate in the program. DMHC will also monitor subscriber complaints and health plans’ compliance with referral requirements. These complaints and grievances can be submitted to DMHC, and provide an Independent Medical Review (IMR) if needed.
COUNTY CHILDREN’S HEALTH INITIATIVE PROGRAM (CCHIP)
The volume of children in CCHIP makes it infeasible to set up separate performance goals and measures. However, the CCHIP projects are modeled consistent with the Medi-Cal and CHIP programs and the health plans delivering the CCHIP services are the same health plans. Thus, the information produced for the Medi-Cal and CHIP programs plans will be reflective of the performance for CCHIP.
Guidance: The State should include data sources to be used to assess each performance goal. In addition, check all appropriate measures from 9.3.1 to 9.3.8 that the State will be utilizing to measure performance, even if doing so duplicates what the State has already discussed in Section 9.
It is acceptable for the State to include performance measures for population subgroups chosen by the State for special emphasis, such as racial or ethnic minorities, particular high-risk or hard to reach populations, children with special needs, etc.
HEDIS (Health Employer Data and Information Set) 2008 contains performance measures relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. In addition, HEDIS 3.0 contains measures for the general population, for which breakouts by children’s age bands (e.g., ages < 1, 1-9, 10-19) are required. Full definitions, explanations of data sources, and other important guidance on the use of HEDIS measures can be found in the HEDIS 2008 manual published by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. So that State HEDIS results are consistent and comparable with national and regional data, states should check the HEDIS 2008 manual for detailed definitions of each measure, including definitions of the numerator and denominator to be used. For states that do not plan to offer managed care plans, HEDIS measures may also be able to be adapted to organizations of care other than managed care.
9.3. Describe how performance under the plan will be measured through objective, independently verifiable means and compared against performance goals in order to
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-90)Page 90#
84 determine the State’s performance, taking into account suggested performance indicators as specified below or other indicators the State develops: (Section 2107(a)(4)(A),(B)) (42CFR 457.710(d))
CA RESPONSE: Measures are outlined in Section 9.2 above.
Check the applicable suggested performance measurements listed below that the State plans to use: (Section 2107(a)(4)) 9.3.1.
The increase in the percentage of Medicaid-eligible children enrolled in Medicaid. 9.3.2.
The reduction in the percentage of uninsured children. 9.3.3.
The increase in the percentage of children with a usual source of care. 9.3.4.
The extent to which outcome measures show progress on one or more of the health problems identified by the state. 9.3.5.
HEDIS Measurement Set relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. 9.3.6.
Other child appropriate measurement set. List or describe the set used.
9.3.7.
If not utilizing the entire HEDIS Measurement Set, specify which measures will be collected, such as: 9.3.7.1.
Immunizations 9.3.7.2.
Well childcare 9.3.7.3.
Adolescent well visits 9.3.7.4.
Satisfaction with care 9.3.7.5.
Mental health 9.3.7.6.
Dental care 9.3.7.7.
Other, list:
9.3.8.
Performance measures for special targeted populations.
9.4.
The State assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires.
(Section 2107(b)(1)) (42CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should include an assurance of compliance with the annual reporting requirements, including an assessment of reducing the number of low-income uninsured children. The State should also discuss any annual activities to be undertaken that relate to assessment and evaluation of the program.
9.5.
The State assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. Briefly describe the State’s plan for these annual assessments and reports. (Section 2107(b)(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-91)Page 91#
85 The state will perform the annual assessments and evaluations required in Section 2108(a) to assess its progress in meeting the performance goals and measures identified in Section 9. Data necessary to prepare these reports will be drawn from administrative files maintained by the CHIP and Medi-Cal programs, the Current Population Survey, disenrollment surveys of CHIP Program participants, and HEDIS reports. 9.6.
The State assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review or audit. (Section 2107(b)(3)) (42CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should verify that they will participate in the collection and evaluation of data as new measures are developed or existing measures are revised as deemed necessary by CMS, the states, advocates, and other interested parties.
9.7.
The State assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed.
(42CFR 457.710(e))
9.8. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.135)
9.8.1.
Section 1902(a)(4)(C) (relating to conflict of interest standards) 9.8.2.
Paragraphs (2), (16) and (17) of Section 1903(i) (relating to limitations on payment) 9.8.3.
Section 1903(w) (relating to limitations on provider donations and taxes) 9.8.4.
Section 1132 (relating to periods within which claims must be filed)
Guidance: Section 9.9 can include discussion of community-based providers and consumer representatives in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. Issues to address include a listing of public meetings or announcements made to the public concerning the development of the children's health insurance program or public forums used to discuss changes to the State plan.
9.9. Describe the process used by the State to accomplish involvement of the public in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. (Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(a) and (b))
CA RESPONSE: From the beginning, California has sought to gather public input in the design of the program. In anticipation of developing a Title XXI children’s health program, in late July and early August of 1997, the Secretary of the Health and Welfare Agency and the Director of DHCS held round table discussions with interested parties and solicited written feedback from constituency groups. Governor Wilson introduced his children’s
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-92)Page 92#
86 health proposal on August 27, 1997. After introduction of the plan, the Secretary of the Health and Welfare Agency held meetings with numerous stakeholder groups to obtain their feedback on the proposal. Using the Governor’s proposal as a framework, the state legislative package (AB 1126, SB 903, AB 217, and AB 1572) was developed through a joint “Health Access” conference committee. The conference committee held several open committee meetings, during which time the public was invited to offer feedback on the proposal.
Since the passage of the enabling legislation, the state staff has met with numerous interested parties to solicit feedback on the design and implementation of the state plan. Some examples of such interested parties are: the Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies, the California Association of Public Hospitals, the California Medical Association, the California Primary Care Association, the Local Health Plans of California, the DHS Multicultural Task Force, representatives of the Private Essential Access Community Hospitals, the California HealthCare Foundation, the Los Angeles County Medi-Cal Managed Care Oversight Council, the Children’s Hospital Association, the Child Health Policy Advisory Committee, and the Statewide Parent-Teacher Association.
Furthermore, California held two public forums to receive input from the community to implement its children’s health program. The forums, held in Oakland, were hosted by the state. Over 400 people attended and roughly 60 gave public testimony regarding Healthy Families implementation.
DHCS has also solicited input specifically relating to the development of the Healthy Families outreach campaign through a series of eight meetings with representatives of counties, program agencies, community based organizations, advocacy groups, health plans and providers.
The public had the opportunity to offer input as to the implementation of the Program on an ongoing basis, through opportunities to provide input directly to the state or through the Advisory Board established in statute. The state maintains an extensive mailing list for individuals and entities who want to receive information. Mailing list subscribers receive agendas and minutes of Board meetings and draft regulations. California holds open meetings twice monthly, where it solicits public input on draft regulations prior to adopting them. In addition to receiving oral feedback from the public during public meetings, state staff distribute copies of all correspondence regarding the implementation to all.
The enabling legislation also established a 14 member Advisory Panel. The Advisory Panel includes representatives from the subscriber population, primary care clinics, disproportionate share hospitals, mental health providers, substance abuse providers, county public health providers, health plans, the education community, and the business
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-93)Page 93#
87 community; physicians who are board certified in pediatrics and family practice medicine; and a representative of a family of children with special needs.
9.9.1. Describe the process used by the State to ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the State on the development and implementation of the procedures required in 42 CFR 457.125. States should provide notice and consultation with Tribes on proposed pregnant women expansions. (Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(c))
CA RESPONSE: Throughout the years, California has solicited and received input from various Indian Tribes, tribal affiliated organizations and boards on matters related to enrollment in the Medi-Cal and CHIP Programs. Several activities include:
• Participation in American Indian sponsored conferences, meetings and workgroups. • Coordinated distribution of targeted outreach materials to the American Indian population via conferences, clinics, and meetings. • Meetings with various tribal affiliated organizations and boards to identify acceptable documentation to demonstrate tribal affiliation for families to qualify for the Healthy Families cost sharing waiver.
9.9.2. For an amendment relating to eligibility or benefits (including cost sharing and enrollment procedures), describe how and when prior public notice was provided as required in 42 CFR 457.65(b) through (d).
CA RESPONSE: Initially, the public was informed of the premium and benefit change through budget hearings, legislative approval and enactment of the Chapter 157, Statutes of 2009 (Assembly Bill 1422) affecting premiums, and was again informed of those changes through promulgation of regulations in accordance with State law. Promulgation of regulations also entailed public meetings of the state.
The family contribution amounts increased for the highest income families pursuant to the Chapter 157, Statutes of 2009 (Assembly Bill 1422), which took effect on November 1, 2009. The family contribution increased for families with income greater than 150 percent and up to 250 percent FPL. In addition, benefit changes enacted by regulations increased co-payments for families with incomes greater than 150 percent and up to 250 percent FPL. Lastly, pursuant to regulations new families with children enrolled on or after November 1, 2009, will have limited dental plan choice effective November 1, 2009.
The dental benefit change aligns the CHIP rules with state employees dental benefit rules.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-94)Page 94#
88 In order to provide adequate prior public notice of the family contribution increase, co-payment benefit increase and changes to the applicant’s choice of participating dental plans, the Program took a multi-layered approach. Each existing family received advanced notification through an initial 30-day notification letter of the upcoming program change.
The Program included this 30-day notification letter with the September monthly billing invoice regarding the program changes. This notice was sent to all existing subscribers. If any family experienced a change in circumstances and would be impacted by the premium and co-payment increase, they were allowed to request a premium re-evaluation. Premium Re-Evaluation Forms were also posted on the program website or families could call the toll free line to receive a pre-filled out form. In addition, the website was updated to reflect all program changes and newsletter articles were provided to community partners and stakeholders.
The program also took additional steps to ensure adequate public notice of the increase in family contributions and co-payments for higher income families and changes in new applicants’ choice of participating dental plans. For example, enrollment Entities and Certified Application Assistants in the local communities were notified through the monthly newsletter and users of the electronic application were also notified through an electronic online message when logging onto the system.
Public Service Announcements were provided on the dedicated toll-free line.
9.9.3. Describe the State’s interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-95)Page 95#
89
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1
CHIP Budget Projections
STATE: CA FFY Budget FFY Budget Federal Fiscal Year 2013 2014 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 65.00% 65.00%
Benefit Costs
Insurance payments - - Managed care $1,309,760,269 $1,161,016,067 per member/per month rate $119.15 $119.07 Fee for Service $547,879,132 $483,378,754 Total Benefit Costs $1,857,639,520 $1,644,394,940 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) (92,585,780) (68,784,114) Net Benefit Costs $1,765,053,739 $1,575,610,826 Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit - -
Administration Costs
Personnel - - General administration $94,422,201 $43,414,158 Contractors/Brokers - - Claims Processing - - Outreach/marketing costs - - Health Services Initiatives - -
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-96)Page 96#
90 STATE: CA FFY Budget FFY Budget Other - - Total Administration Costs $94,422,201 $43,414,158 10% Administrative Cap $196,117,069 $175,067,856
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes - -
Federal Share $1,208,659,284 $1,052,366,163 State Share $650,816,537 $566,658,703 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan $1,859,475,940 $1,619,024,985
NOTE: California does not have projections from FY 2012 for baseline prior to transition of children from Healthy Families under separate to Medicaid expansion. Actual costs are described below.
The Source of State Share Funds: State General Fund
CMS tracks state expenditures through the automated Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System/State Children's Health Insurance Budget and Expenditure System (MBES/CBES). The system allows states to report budgeted and actual expenditures for Medicaid and CHIP, by electronically submitting their forms to the CMS Data Center and the Medicaid data base. The information provided below is based on actuals from the CMS21 forms for California’s separate population and from the CMS 64.21 Medicaid expansion program for the quarters before and after the former Healthy Families transition from a separate program to a Medicaid expansion. As illustrated below, the total state and Federal expenditures after the transition decreased by approximately $219 million. Type of Title XXI Funded Program FFY Quarter 1 of 2013 (Prior to Transition of Separate to Medicaid Expansion) FFY Quarter 2 of 2013 (After Transition from Separate to Medicaid Expansion) Cost difference after transition of former Healthy Families children from a separate to a Medicaid expansion. Separate Federal: $247,155,406 State: $107,779,971 Total: $354,935,377 Federal: $99,762,091 State: $34,057,914 Total: $133,820,005 Federal: Decrease of $147,393,315 State: Decrease of $73,722,057 Total: Decrease of $221,115,372
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-97)Page 97#
91 Medicaid Expansion
Federal: $18,762,043 State: $10,102,635 Total: $28,864,678
Federal: $17,175,695 State: $9,248,450 Total: $26,424,145
Federal: Decrease of $1,586,348 State: Decrease of $854,185 Total: Decrease of $2,440,533 Total for Separate and Medicaid Expansion Federal: $265,917,449 State: $117,882,606 Total: $383,800,055 Federal: $116,937,786 State: $43,306,364 Total: $160,244,150
Federal: Decrease of $148,979,663 State: Decrease of $74,576,242 Total: Decrease of $223,555,905
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP’s website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(1),(2)) (42CFR 457.750)
10.1.1.
The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
10.2.
The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42CFR 457.710(e))
10.3.
The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-98)Page 98#
92 quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity (Section 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1.
The State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.935(b)) (The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1.
42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2.
Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3.
Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4.
Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5.
Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6.
Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program)
Section 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections (Sections 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan.
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes and procedures that are unique to the applicant’s rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility.
CA RESPONSE:
Described below is a description of California’s review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. These processes reflect those in
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-99)Page 99#
93 the CHIP Program and CCHIP.
a. As required in 42 CFR 457.1130(a), California provides applicants and enrollees the opportunity to review eligibility and enrollment issues such as denial of eligibility; failure to make a timely determination of eligibility; and suspension or termination of enrollment, including disenrollment for failure to pay cost sharing. These eligibility and enrollment issues are specifically included in the CHIP program regulations, and notification letters to applicants and enrollees. All decisions are provided in writing and all decisions which have a negative impact on an applicant or enrollee include instructions on how to appeal the decision if the applicant or enrollee believes the decision is incorrect.
b. For purposes of implementing 42 CFR 457.1170 California has determined that the first level appeal review conducted by the Title XXI Unit within DHCS meets the core requirements as defined in 42 CFR 457.1150(a) as an impartial review. This unit operates separately from the administrative vendor or health plan and the functions involving an eligibility determination. During an appeal, the information is received from the enrollee regarding the eligibility appeal, and the Title XXI unit evaluates the appeal based on specific criteria.
An applicant may file an appeal if s/he is dissatisfied with any action or failure to act, which has occurred in connection with a participating health plan’s coverage the applicant’s remedy shall be to file an appeal with DHCS, with the Title XXI unit evaluating the appeal. An applicant may also file an appeal if s/he believes eligibility effective date of coverage, enrollment decision, disenrollment decision, or plan transfer request decision was made in violation of the program rules. An applicant may designate an authorized representative to file the appeal and inquire about the status of the appeal.
The applicant must file a written appeal within 60 calendar days from the date of the written notice of the decision. The appeal is forwarded to DHCS within five (5) business days of receipt and will send the applicant a letter with this information.
Special handling cases i.e. cases that require the State’s attention, will be forwarded to DHCS (including copies of all documentation and correspondence) within five (5) business days.
If an appeal is incomplete or does not concern at least one of the three issues listed above or is received beyond the specified timeframe (i.e., 60 days), the applicant is not entitled to a full appeal, and the administrative vendor will review the request and process as correspondence.
First level appeals are written appeals received by the health plan, administrative vendor,
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-100)Page 100#
94 or DHCS for the first time. A first level appeal must be filed within 60 days of the date on the decision notification by vendor or state. The administrative vendor or health plan will forward first level appeals within five (5) business days of receipt to DHCS. The appeal must explain why the applicant thinks the decision was incorrect and how they want the program to resolve the issue.
Exceptions:
The administrative vendor or health plan will forward any first level appeal to DHCS if:
• The appeal includes outstanding medical bills incurred due to a disputed effective date of coverage. • The appeal is of a sensitive nature and the referral has been approved (i.e., request from legislative member).
All appeals requiring DHCS’ review will be forwarded to DHCS within 5 business days of receipt. MCAP will provide a timeline/chronology of critical events (application received, determination made or not made, letters sent to or by the applicant, earliest effective date, etc.) and identify any mistakes.
If a first level appeal is denied, the applicant will be notified of his or her right to request an administrative hearing.
c. As required in 42 CFR 457.1170, California provides enrollees the opportunity for continuation of enrollment pending the completion of review of a termination of enrollment, including a decision to disenroll for failure to pay cost sharing. Prior to disenrollment, enrollees are notified of the impending termination, the reason for such termination, and a pre-printed form in which to request continued enrollment and to provide the necessary information or explanation as to why termination should not occur. This provision of the Program was implemented in February 2003.
d. As required by 42 CFR 457.1180, California provides timely written notification to applicants and enrollees on all decisions made. In addition, as explained in Paragraphs a., and c. above, all decisions which have a negative impact on an applicant or enrollee include the reason for the determination, instructions on how to appeal the decision and request continued enrollment if the applicant or enrollee believes the decision is incorrect, and the standard and expedited timeframes for review.
e. As required by 42 CFR 457.1140(c), California provides all review decisions in writing.
f. As required by 42 CFR 457.1140(b) and 457.1160(a), California completes reviews in a
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-101)Page 101#
95 reasonable amount of time. When determining what a reasonable amount of time is, California considers an expedited review in situations where there is an immediate need for health services. Appeals are forwarded to DHCS within 5 business days of receipt, and are filed within 60 days of the date on the decision notification by vendor or state.
g. California affirms that each applicant or enrollee has the right to represent him or herself or choose a representative, the right to review his or her file and other relevant information and the right to participate fully in the review process. In reviewing the specific requirements of 42 CFR 457.1140(d)(1)-(3) California modified its current appeal language to include an affirmative statement regarding an applicant’s or enrollee’s right to representation and opportunity to review his or her records. California complies with the requirement to allow an applicant or enrollee to participate fully in the review process. Any notification of an appeal able determination includes full notification of appeal rights and instructs the applicant or enrollee that he or she can submit additional information for review.
Guidance: “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120.
CA REPSONSE:
a. Participating plans are required by state law to establish and maintain a grievance system approved by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC). The DMHC is responsible for licensing and regulating pre-paid plans (health, dental, and vision) in California.
The plan’s grievance process must provide reasonable procedures in accordance with DMHC regulations to ensure adequate consideration of grievances and provide for recertification when appropriate. Subscribers who are not satisfied with the plan’s final determination or who have not received a response to their grievance with 30 calendar days, have the option of appealing to the DMHC.
DHCS complies with 42 CFR 457.1120(a)(2) using the statewide review system which is required of all health care service plans operating in California, including DHCS and CCHIP participating plans. This system is enforced by the California Department of Managed Care (DMHC). The statewide review system provides an impartial review of any health care service eligible for coverage and payment under a health plan contract. The issues that are handled through this process include: • Accessibility
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-102)Page 102#
96 • Coverage/Benefits Disputes • Appeals of Denials, delays, reductions, suspensions, terminations of Care • Appeals of failure to approve, furnish, provide Payment • Quality of Care • Billing and Financial • Attitude and Service
These issues handled through the statewide review system are consistent with the issues that would otherwise be addressed by 42 CFR 457.1130(b).
DMHC reviews the appeals as a standard review or as an Independent Medical Review (IMR). (The IMR allows subscribers to obtain an impartial review of any health care service eligible for coverage and payment under a health plan contract that has been denied, modified, or delayed by a decision of the plan, or by one of its contracting providers, in whole or in part due to a finding that the services are not medically necessary). The standard review and IMR process include a final resolution by DMHC staff or DMHC contractor that is binding on the health plan.
As required by 42 CFR 457.1160(b), California has established a time frame for completing external reviews, through both the standard review process and IMR, that accounts for the medical need of patients. To this end, within standard conditions, the review is completed within 90 calendar days of the date that a request for review was made. California also provides review within 72 hours for situations if operating under the standard timeframe could jeopardize the life or health of the enrollee.
The patient protection provision in state law that was established for managed care enrollees in California also apply to the Program subscribers since they are enrolled in licensed managed care plans. Thus, members are instructed to use their health plan’s grievance process-including the DMHC’s IMR process, if the subscriber has a grievance. When subscribers call DHCS directly, staff serves as an ombudsman assisting subscribers with the grievance process.
b. As required by 42 CFR 457.1180, California provides or requires the managed care plans to provide timely written notice of any decision that is subject to review under 457.1130(b) (described above). This notice includes the reason for the determination, the standard and expedited timeframes (described above), the way in which review can be requested, and the circumstances in which the enrollee may continue pending review.
c. As required by 42 CFR 457.1140(d), all applicants and enrollees have the opportunity to represent themselves, or have a representative they choose in the review process. All applicants and enrollees can review their files, or other information that is relevant to their review decision in a timely manner. And, all applicants and enrollees have the
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-103)Page 103#
97 opportunity to fully participate in the review process, whether that process is in person or in writing.
d. As required by 42 CFR 457.1140(c), all review decisions are in writing.
e. DHCS requires all participating plans to report benefits-related grievances once a year. In addition, DHCS tracks all complaints directly received from subscribers, and any publicly available information on the number and type of benefit grievances filed by subscribers enrolled in a participating plan. Grievance information is used by DHCS to identify problem areas and to take appropriate steps towards improvements.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs- If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-104)Page 104#
98 Key for Newly Incorporated Templates The newly incorporated templates are indicated with the following letters after the numerical section throughout the template.
• PC- Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • PW- Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • TC- Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • DC- Dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • DS- Supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • PA- Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • EL- Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • LR- Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010)
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-105)Page 105#
99 CMS Regional Offices CMS Regional Offices States Associate Regional Administrator Regional Office Address Region 1- Boston Connecticut Massachuset ts Maine New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont Richard R. McGreal richard.mcgreal@cms.hhs.gov John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg. Room 2275 Boston, MA 02203-0003 Region 2- New York New York Virgin Islands New Jersey Puerto Rico Michael Melendez michael.melendez@cms.hhs.gov 26 Federal Plaza Room 3811 New York, NY 10278-0063 Region 3- Philadelphia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Ted Gallagher ted.gallagher@cms.hhs.gov The Public Ledger Building 150 South Independence Mall West Suite 216 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Region 4- Atlanta Alabama Florida Georgia Kentucky Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Jackie Glaze jackie.glaze@cms.hhs.gov
Atlanta Federal Center 4th Floor 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909 Region 5- Chicago Illinois Indiana Michigan Minnesota Ohio Wisconsin Verlon Johnson verlon.johnson@cms.hhs.gov 233 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60601 Region 6- Dallas Arkansas Louisiana New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Bill Brooks bill.brooks@cms.hhs.gov 1301 Young Street, 8th Floor Dallas, TX 75202 Region 7- Kansas City Iowa Kansas Missouri Nebraska
James G. Scott james.scott1@cms.hhs.gov Richard Bulling Federal Bldg. 601 East 12 Street, Room 235 Kansas City, MO 64106-2808 Region 8- Denver Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Richard Allen richard.allen@cms.hhs.gov Federal Office Building, Room 522 1961 Stout Street Denver, CO 80294-3538 Region 9- San Francisco
Arizona California Hawaii Nevada American Samoa Guam Northern Mariana Islands Gloria Nagle gloria.nagle@cms.hhs.gov 90 Seventh Street Suite 5-300 San Francisco Federal Building San Francisco, CA 94103
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-106)Page 106#
100
Region 10- Seattle Idaho Washington Alaska Oregon Carol Peverly carol.peverly@cms.hhs.gov 2001 Sixth Avenue MS RX-43 Seattle, WA 98121
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-107)Page 107#
101 GLOSSARY Adapted directly from Sec. 2110. DEFINITIONS. CHILD HEALTH ASSISTANCE- For purposes of this title, the term ‘child health assistance’ means payment for part or all of the cost of health benefits coverage for targeted low-income children that includes any of the following (and includes, in the case described in
Section 2105(a)(2)(A), payment for part or all of the cost of providing any of the following), as specified under the State plan: 1. Inpatient hospital services. 2. Outpatient hospital services. 3. Physician services. 4. Surgical services. 5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. 6. Prescription drugs and biologicals and the administration of such drugs and biologicals, only if such drugs and biologicals are not furnished for the purpose of causing, or assisting in causing, the death, suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person. 7. Over-the-counter medications. 8. Laboratory and radiological services. 9. Prenatal care and prepregnancy family planning services and supplies. 10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (18) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structured services. 11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (19) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including community-based services. 12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices). 13. Disposable medical supplies. 14. Home and community-based health care services and related supportive services (such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home). 15. Nursing care services (such as nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services) in a home, school, or other setting. 16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 17. Dental services. 18. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services. 19. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services. 20. Case management services. 21. Care coordination services. 22. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders.
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-108)Page 108#
102 23. Hospice care. 24. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services (whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting) if recognized by State law and only if the service is-- a. prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as defined by State law, b. performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician, or c. furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license. 25. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage. 26. Medical transportation. 27. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals. 28. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not excluded under this section.
TARGETED LOW-INCOME CHILD DEFINED- For purposes of this title-- 1. IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), the term ‘targeted low-income child’ means a child-- a. who has been determined eligible by the State for child health assistance under the State plan; b. (i) who is a low-income child, or (ii) is a child whose family income (as determined under the State child health plan) exceeds the Medicaid applicable income level (as defined in paragraph (4)), but does not exceed 50 percentage points above the Medicaid applicable income level; and c. who is not found to be eligible for medical assistance under title XIX or covered under a group health plan or under health insurance coverage (as such terms are defined in Section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act). 2. CHILDREN EXCLUDED- Such term does not include-- a. a child who is a resident of a public institution or a patient in an institution for mental diseases; or b. a child who is a member of a family that is eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits plan on the basis of a family member's employment with a public agency in the State. 3. SPECIAL RULE- A child shall not be considered to be described in paragraph (1)(C) notwithstanding that the child is covered under a health insurance coverage program that has been in operation since before July 1, 1997, and that is offered by a State which receives no Federal funds for the program's operation. 4. MEDICAID APPLICABLE INCOME LEVEL- The term ‘Medicaid applicable income level’ means, with respect to a child, the effective income level (expressed as a percent of the poverty line) that has been specified under the State plan under title XIX (including under a waiver authorized by the Secretary or under Section 1902(r)(2)), as of June 1, 1997, for the child to be eligible for medical
(ca)(ca-chipspa-20)(page-109)Page 109#
103 assistance under Section 1902(l)(2) for the age of such child. 5. TARGETED LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMAN.—The term ‘targeted low-income pregnant woman’ means an individual— (A) during pregnancy and through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of her pregnancy) ends; (B) whose family income exceeds 185 percent (or, if higher, the percent applied under subsection (b)(1)(A)) of the poverty line applicable to a family of the size involved, but does not exceed the income eligibility level established under the State child health plan under this title for a targeted low-income child; and (C) who satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(C), (2), and (3) of Section 2110(b) in the same manner as a child applying for child health assistance would have to satisfy such requirements.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this title: 1. CHILD- The term ‘child’ means an individual under 19 years of age. 2. CREDITABLE HEALTH COVERAGE- The term ‘creditable health coverage’ has the meaning given the term ‘creditable coverage’ under Section 2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(c)) and includes coverage that meets the requirements of section 2103 provided to a targeted low-income child under this title or under a waiver approved under section 2105(c)(2)(B) (relating to a direct service waiver). 3. GROUP HEALTH PLAN; HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ETC- The terms ‘group health plan’, ‘group health insurance coverage’, and ‘health insurance coverage’ have the meanings given such terms in Section 2191 of the Public Health Service Act. 4. LOW-INCOME CHILD - The term ‘low-income child’ means a child whose family income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved. 5. POVERTY LINE DEFINED- The term ‘poverty line’ has the meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by such section. 6. PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSION- The term ‘preexisting condition exclusion’ has the meaning given such term in section 2701(b)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(1)(A)). 7. STATE CHILD HEALTH PLAN; PLAN- Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms ‘State child health plan’ and ‘plan’ mean a State child health plan approved under Section 2106. 8. UNINSURED CHILD- The term ‘uninsured child’ means a child that does not have creditable health coverage.
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA CT-22-0001 & CT-22-0001-CHIP PDF#
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Connecticut
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: CT-22-0001 & CT-22-0001-CHIP
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop: S2-01-16 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
October 24, 2022
Gui Woolston Director of Medicaid and Division of Health Services State of Connecticut Department of Social Services 55 Farmington Avenue Hartford, CT 06105
Dear Mr. Woolston:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendments (SPAs) CT-22-0001 and CT-22-0001-CHIP, submitted on June 14, 2022 with additional information provided in response to CMS’ Request for Additional Information on October 11, 2022, have been approved. These SPAs have an effective date of April 1, 2022.
Through these SPAs, Connecticut extends CHIP eligibility to children from conception to the end of pregnancy (otherwise known as “unborn”) whose parents are not otherwise eligible for Medicaid or CHIP with incomes up to and including 258 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). SPA CT-22-0001 also adds presumptive eligibility for unborn children and CHIP coverage for unborn children of public employees who have access to public employee health coverage. A copy of the approved CS9 template and updated CS28 template are attached and have been incorporated into sections 4.1.2.1-PC and 4.3.2 of Connecticut’s CHIP state plan, respectively. The state has also provided the necessary maintenance of agency contribution analysis to demonstrate that the state has consistently contributed to the cost of public employee coverage, with increases for inflation, since 1997.
By providing the same behavioral health benefits to its unborn population that are available to other targeted low-income children in CHIP, Connecticut is in compliance with the mental health parity requirements at section 2107(c)(7)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act). CMS will work with Connecticut to determine the state’s compliance with requirements under section 2105(c)(5) of the Act, added through section 5022 of the Substance Use Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities (SUPPORT) Act, as they apply to the unborn population through our review of the state’s pending CHIP SPA CT-20-0013-CHIP.
Your Project Officer is Tess Hines. Tess is available to answer your questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related matters. Tess’s contact information is as follows:
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-3)Page 3#
Page 2 – Mr. Gui Woolston
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop: S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: 410-786-0435 E-mail: Mary.Hines@cms.hhs.gov
If you have any questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs, at (410) 786-1536. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely, /Signed by Sarah deLone/
Sarah deLone Director
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-4)Page 4#
CHIP Eligibility
State Name: Connecticut OMB Control Number: 0938‐1148
Transmittal Number: CT - 22 - 0001 Separate Child Health Insurance Program CS28 General Eligibility - Presumptive Eligibility for Children
42 CFR 457.355 and 435.1102, 2107(e)(1)(L) and 1920A of the SSA
The CHIP Agency covers children when determined presumptively eligible by a qualified entity. Yes
■ Describe the population of children to whom presumptive eligibility applies:
All children, from birth to the age of nineteen, with incomes above 196% of the FPL and up to and including 318% of the FPL. All unborn children, with incomes from zero up to and including 258% of the FPL.
■ Describe the duration of the presumptive eligibility period and any limitations:
The date the eligibility determination for CHIP is made, if an application for CHIP is filed by the last day of the month following the month in which the determination of presumptive eligibility is made; or The last day of the month following the month in which the determination of presumptive eligibility is made, if no application for CHIP is filed by that date. No more than two periods within a calendar year. The above applies to all children, from conception to the age of nineteen.
■ Describe the application process and eligibility determination factors used:
Qualified entities may use either an online portal for presumptive eligibility applications or a simplified, one page presumptive eligibility paper application. The above applies to all children, from conception to the age of nineteen.
■ The CHIP Agency uses qualified entities, as defined in section 1920A, to determine eligibility presumptively for children. Separate Child Health Insurance Program CS30 General Eligibility - List of Qualified Entities
A qualified entity is an entity that is determined by the agency to be capable of making presumptive eligibility determinations based on an individual’s household income and other requirements, and that meets at least one of the following requirements. Select the types of entities used to determine presumptive eligibility:
Furnishes health care items and services covered under the approved plan and is eligible to receive payments under the approved plan Is authorized to determine a child’s eligibility to participate in a Head Start program under the Head Start Act Is authorized to determine a child’s eligibility to receive child care services for which financial assistance is provided under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 Is authorized to determine a child’s eligibility to receive assistance under the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) under section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966
SPA: CT-22-0001 Approval Date: October 24, 2022 Effective Date: April 1, 2022 Page 1 of 2
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-5)Page 5#
CHIP Eligibility
Is authorized to determine a child’s eligibility under the Medicaid state plan or for child health assistance under the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Is an elementary or secondary school, as defined in section 14101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801)
Is an elementary or secondary school operated or supported by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Is a state or Tribal child support enforcement agency under title IV-D of the Act
Is an organization that provides emergency food and shelter under a grant under the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act Is a state or Tribal office or entity involved in enrollment in the program under Medicaid, CHIP, or title IV-A of the Act
Is an organization that determines eligibility for any assistance or benefits provided under any program of public or assisted housing that receives Federal funds, including the program under section 8 or any other section of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437) or under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.)
Any other entity the state so deems, as approved by the Secretary
The CHIP Agency assures that it has communicated the requirements for qualified entities, at 1920A(b)(3) ✔ of the Act, and provided adequate training to the entities and organizations involved. A copy of the training materials has been included.
An attachment is submitted.
PRA Disclosure Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 50 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. V.20181119
SPA: CT-22-0001 Approval Date: October 24, 2022 Effective Date: April 1, 2022 Page 2 of 2
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-6)Page 6#
CHIP Eligibility
State Name: Connecticut OMB Control Number: 0938‐1148
Transmittal Number: CT - 22 - 0001 Separate Child Health Insurance Program CS9 Eligibility - Coverage From Conception to Birth
42 CFR 457.10
■ Coverage From Conception to Birth - Coverage from conception to birth when the mother is not eligible for Medicaid.
✔ The CHIP Agency operates this covered group in accordance with the following provisions:
Age Standard
From conception through birth.
Does the state have an additional age definition or other age-related conditions? No
Income Standards
Income standards are applied statewide. Yes
Are there any exceptions, e.g. populations in a county which may qualify under either a statewide income standard or a No county income standard?
Statewide Income Standard
The statewide income standard is: From zero up to 258 % FPL
■ Exempted from requirement of providing or applying for a Social Security Number.
■ Exempted from requirement of verifying citizenship status.
PRA Disclosure Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 50 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. V.20181119
SPA: CT-22-0001 Approval Date: October 24, 2022 Effective Date: April 1, 2022 Page 1 of 1
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-7)Page 7#
10/24/22 TEMPLATE FOR CHILD HEALTH PLAN UNDER TITLE XXI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CHILDREN’S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
(Required under 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (New section 2101(b)))
State/Territory: Connecticut (Name of State/Territory)
As a condition for receipt of Federal funds under Title XXI of the Social Security Act, (42 CFR 457.40(b))
Deidre S. Gifford, MD, MPH, Commissioner, June 14, 2022 (Signature of Governor, or designee, of State/Territory, Date Signed)
submits the following Child Health Plan for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and hereby agrees to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the approved Child Health Plan, the requirements of Title XXI and XIX of the Act (as appropriate) and all applicable Federal regulations and other official issuances of the Department.
The following State officials are responsible for program administration and financial oversight (42 CFR 457.40(c)): Name: Gui Woolston, Ph.D Position/Title: Director of Medicaid and Division of Health Services
Name: Michael Gilbert Position/Title: Deputy Commissioner
*Disclosure. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1148 (CMS-10398 #34). The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, write to: CMS, 7500 Security Blvd., Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. 1
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-8)Page 8#
Introduction: Section 4901 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), public law 105-33 amended the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new title XXI, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). In February 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) renewed the program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 further modified the program.
This template outlines the information that must be included in the state plans and the state plan amendments (SPAs). It reflects the regulatory requirements at 42 CFR Part 457 as well as the previously approved SPA templates that accompanied guidance issued to States through State Health Official (SHO) letters. Where applicable, we indicate the SHO number and the date it was issued for your reference. The CHIP SPA template includes the following changes: • Combined the instruction document with the CHIP SPA template to have a single document. Any modifications to previous instructions are for clarification only and do not reflect new policy guidance. • Incorporated the previously issued guidance and templates (see the Key following the template for information on the newly added templates), including: • Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • Dental and supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010) • Moved sections 2.2 and 2.3 into section 5 to eliminate redundancies between sections 2 and 5. • Removed crowd-out language that had been added by the August 17 letter that later was repealed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is developing regulations to implement the CHIPRA requirements. When final regulations are published in the Federal Register, this template will be modified to reflect those rules and States will be required to submit SPAs illustrating compliance with the new regulations. States are not required to resubmit their State plans based on the updated template. However, States must use the updated template when submitting a State Plan Amendment.
Federal Requirements for Submission and Review of a Proposed SPA. (42 CFR Part 457 Subpart A) In order to be eligible for payment under this statute, each State must submit a Title XXI plan for approval by the Secretary that details how the State intends to use the funds and fulfill other requirements under the law and regulations at 42 CFR Part 457. A SPA is approved in 90 days unless the Secretary notifies the State in writing that the plan is disapproved or that specified additional information is needed. Unlike Medicaid SPAs, there is only one 90 day review period, or clock for CHIP SPAs, that may be stopped by a request for additional information and restarted after a complete response is received. More information on the SPA review process is found at 42 CFR 457 Subpart A.
2
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-9)Page 9#
When submitting a State plan amendment, states should redline the changes that are being made to the existing State plan and provide a “clean” copy including changes that are being made to the existing state plan.
The template includes the following sections: 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements- This section should describe how the State has designed their program. It also is the place in the template that a State updates to insert a short description and the proposed effective date of the SPA, and the proposed implementation date(s) if different from the effective date. (Section 2101); (42 CFR 457.70) 2. General Background and Description of State Approach to Child Health Coverage and Coordination- This section should provide general information related to the special characteristics of each state’s program. The information should include the extent and manner to which children in the State currently have creditable health coverage, current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children and how the plan is designed to be coordinated with current health insurance, public health efforts, or other enrollment initiatives. This information provides a health insurance baseline in terms of the status of the children in a given State and the State programs currently in place. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls- This section requires a description that must include both proposed methods of delivery and proposed utilization control systems. This section should fully describe the delivery system of the Title XXI program including the proposed contracting standards, the proposed delivery systems and the plans for enrolling providers. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology- The plan must include a description of the standards used to determine the eligibility of targeted low-income children for child health assistance under the plan. This section includes a list of potential eligibility standards the State can check off and provide a short description of how those standards will be applied. All eligibility standards must be consistent with the provisions of Title XXI and may not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. In addition, if the standards vary within the state, the State should describe how they will be applied and under what circumstances they will be applied. In addition, this section provides information on income eligibility for Medicaid expansion programs (which are exempt from Section 4 of the State plan template) if applicable. (Section 2102(b)); (42 CFR 457.305 and 457.320) 5. Outreach- This section is designed for the State to fully explain its outreach activities. Outreach is defined in law as outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance under the plan or under other public or private health coverage programs. The purpose is to inform these families of the availability of, and to assist them in enrolling their children in, such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)); (42 CFR 457.90) 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance- Regarding the required scope of health insurance coverage in a State plan, the child health assistance provided must consist of any of the four types of coverage outlined in Section 2103(a) (specifically, benchmark coverage; benchmark-equivalent coverage; existing comprehensive state-based coverage; and/or Secretary- approved coverage). In this section States identify the scope of coverage and benefits offered 3
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
under the plan including the categories under which that coverage is offered. The amount, scope, and duration of each offered service should be fully explained, as well as any corresponding limitations or exclusions. (Section 2103); (42 CFR 457.410(A)) 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care- This section includes a description of the methods (including monitoring) to be used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care and to assure access to covered services. A variety of methods are available for State’s use in monitoring and evaluating the quality and appropriateness of care in its child health assistance program. The section lists some of the methods which states may consider using. In addition to methods, there are a variety of tools available for State adaptation and use with this program. The section lists some of these tools. States also have the option to choose who will conduct these activities. As an alternative to using staff of the State agency administering the program, states have the option to contract out with other organizations for this quality of care function. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.495) 8. Cost Sharing and Payment- This section addresses the requirement of a State child health plan to include a description of its proposed cost sharing for enrollees. Cost sharing is the amount (if any) of premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and other cost sharing imposed. The cost-sharing requirements provide protection for lower income children, ban cost sharing for preventive services, address the limitations on premiums and cost-sharing and address the treatment of pre- existing medical conditions. (Section 2103(e)); (42 CFR 457, Subpart E) 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration- The section addresses the strategic objectives, the performance goals, and the performance measures the State has established for providing child health assistance to targeted low income children under the plan for maximizing health benefits coverage for other low income children and children generally in the state. (Section 2107); (42 CFR 457.710) 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations- Section 2108(a) requires the State to assess the operation of the Children’s Health Insurance Program plan and submit to the Secretary an annual report which includes the progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low income children. The report is due by January 1, following the end of the Federal fiscal year and should cover that Federal Fiscal Year. In this section, states are asked to assure that they will comply with these requirements, indicated by checking the box. (Section 2108); (42 CFR 457.750) 11. Program Integrity- In this section, the State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Sections 2101(a) and 2107(e); (42 CFR 457, subpart I) 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections- This section addresses the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters, health services matters (i.e., grievances), and for states that use premium assistance a description of how it will assure that applicants and enrollees are given the opportunity at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility to obtain health benefits coverage other than through that group health plan. (Section 2101(a)); (42 CFR 457.1120)
Program Options. As mentioned above, the law allows States to expand coverage for children through a separate child health insurance program, through a Medicaid expansion program, or through a combination of these programs. These options are described further below: 4
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
• Option to Create a Separate Program- States may elect to establish a separate child health program that are in compliance with title XXI and applicable rules. These states must establish enrollment systems that are coordinated with Medicaid and other sources of health coverage for children and also must screen children during the application process to determine if they are eligible for Medicaid and, if they are, enroll these children promptly in Medicaid. • Option to Expand Medicaid- States may elect to expand coverage through Medicaid. This option for states would be available for children who do not qualify for Medicaid under State rules in effect as of March 31, 1997. Under this option, current Medicaid rules would apply.
Medicaid Expansion- CHIP SPA Requirements In order to expedite the SPA process, states choosing to expand coverage only through an expansion of Medicaid eligibility would be required to complete sections: • 1 (General Description) • 2 (General Background) They will also be required to complete the appropriate program sections, including: • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 5 (Outreach) • 9 (Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration including the budget) • 10 (Annual Reports and Evaluations).
Medicaid Expansion- Medicaid SPA Requirements States expanding through Medicaid-only will also be required to submit a Medicaid State Plan Amendment to modify their Title XIX State plans. These states may complete the first check-off and indicate that the description of the requirements for these sections are incorporated by reference through their State Medicaid plans for sections: • 3 (Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls) • 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology) • 6 (Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance) • 7 (Quality and Appropriateness of Care) • 8 (Cost Sharing and Payment) • 11 (Program Integrity) • 12 (Applicant and Enrollee Protections)
• Combination of Options- CHIP allows states to elect to use a combination of the Medicaid program and a separate child health program to increase health coverage for children. For example, a State may cover optional targeted-low income children in families with incomes of up to 133 percent of poverty through Medicaid and a targeted group of children above that level through a separate child health program. For the children the State chooses to cover under an expansion of Medicaid, the description provided under “Option to Expand Medicaid” would apply. Similarly, for children the State chooses to cover under a separate program, the provisions outlined above in “Option to Create a Separate Program” would apply. States wishing to use a combination of approaches will be 5
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
required to complete the Title XXI State plan and the necessary State plan amendment under Title XIX.
Proposed State plan amendments should be submitted electronically and one signed hard copy to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at the following address: Mary T. Hines Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd Baltimore, Maryland 21244 Attn: Children and Adults Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop - S2-01-16
6
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Section 1. General Description and Purpose of the Children’s Health Insurance Plans and the Requirements
1.1. The state will use funds provided under Title XXI primarily for (Check appropriate box) (Section 2101)(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.70):
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through the development of a separate program that meets the requirements of Section 2101, which details coverage requirements and the other applicable requirements of Title XXI.
1.1.1. Obtaining coverage that meets the requirements for a separate child health program (Sections 2101(a)(1) and 2103); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided primarily through providing expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid program (Title XIX). Note that if this is selected the State must also submit a corresponding Medicaid SPA to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.2. Providing expanded benefits under the State’s Medicaid plan (Title XIX) (Section 2101(a)(2)); OR
Guidance: Check below if child health assistance shall be provided through a combination of both 1.1.1. and 1.1.2. (Coverage that meets the requirements of Title XXI, in conjunction with an expansion in the State’s Medicaid program). Note that if this is selected the state must also submit a corresponding Medicaid state plan amendment to CMS for review and approval. 1.1.3. A combination of both of the above. (Section 2101(a)(2))
1.1-DS The State will provide dental-only supplemental coverage. Only States operating a separate CHIP program are eligible for this option. States choosing this option must also complete sections 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2-DS, 8.2-DS, and 9.10 of this SPA template. (Section 2110(b)(5))
1.2. Check to provide an assurance that expenditures for child health assistance will not be claimed prior to the time that the State has legislative authority to operate the State plan or plan amendment as approved by CMS. (42 CFR 457.40(d))
1.3. Check to provide an assurance that the State complies with all applicable civil rights requirements, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 45 CFR part 80, part 84, and part 91, and 28 CFR part 35. (42 CFR 457.130)
7
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
Guidance: The effective date as specified below is defined as the date on which the State begins to incur costs to implement its State plan or amendment. (42 CFR 457.65) The implementation date is defined as the date the State begins to provide services; or, the date on which the State puts into practice the new policy described in the State plan or amendment. For example, in a State that has increased eligibility, this is the date on which the State begins to provide coverage to enrollees (and not the date the State begins outreach or accepting applications).
1.4. Provide the effective (date costs begin to be incurred) and implementation (date services begin to be provided) dates for this SPA (42 CFR 457.65). A SPA may only have one effective date, but provisions within the SPA may have different implementation dates that must be after the effective date.
Original Plan Date Plan Submitted: January 15, 1998 Date Plan Approved: April 27, 1998 Effective date: HUSKY A (Medicaid Expansion) October 1, 1997 HUSKY B (Separate Child Health) January 1, 1998
Amendment #1: AI/AN Children Cost Sharing Exempt Date Submitted: January 21, 2000 Date Approved: July 14, 2000 Date Effective: January 1, 2000
Amendment # 2: Compliance/Reduce Period of un-insurance from 6 to 2 months Date Submitted: July 1, 2002 Date Approved: October 25, 2005
Amendment #3: Premium Increase Date Submitted: March 25, 2004 Date Approved: June 21, 2004 Date Effective: February 1, 2004
Amendment #4: Premium Rollback Date Submitted: June 29, 2004 Date Approved: September 24, 2004 Date Effective: February 1, 2004
Amendment #5: Behavioral Health Carve Out & Eliminates Self-declaration of Income Date Submitted: May 8, 2006 Date Approved: August 1, 2006 Date Effective: July 18, 2005 and January 1, 2006
8
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
Amendment #6: Change from MCOs to PIHPs, four months newborn premium waiving, pharmacy carve-out, expedited newborn application processing, dental carve-out, change from PIHPs to MCOs.
Date Submitted: June 30, 2008 Date Approved: August 18, 2009 Date Effective: January 1, 2008, February 1, 2008, June 11, 2008, August 1, 2008, September 1, 2008
Amendment #7:
Coverage for children under the age of 19 who are qualified aliens and lawfully residing in the United States, regardless of their date of entry into the country. Revision of Appendix 3.1 (HUSKY Plus Physical) to reflect elimination of steering committee.
Date Submitted: July1, 2009 Date Approved: December 8, 2009 Date Effective: April 1, 2009
Amendment #8: Cost sharing changes and implementation of presumptive eligibility Date Submitted: April 29, 2011 Date Approved: August 21, 2015 Date Effective: March 1, 2011
Amendment #9: Technical revision using new State Plan format to the Lawfully Residing Option in accordance with section 214 of CHIPRA previously amended under SPA #7.
Implementation of the HUSKY Health medical administrative services organization (ASO) delivery system for all CHIP medical benefits and the elimination of the medical managed care delivery system model.
Cessation of the Statewide Standard Review Process available through the Connecticut Insurance Department for external appeals of health services matters. Pursuant to 42 CFR 457.1120(a)(1), the Department has developed a program specific review process in which a clinical director at the Department (Medical, Behavioral Health or Dental director) will conduct the appeal of an ASO decision concerning a health services matter.
Date Submitted: June 30, 2012 Date Approved: February 22, 2017 Date Effective: January 1, 2012
9
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
CT-17-0010-CHIP (Amendment #10): Describes the new premium bands following ACA/MAGI implementation, incorporates and cross-references the MAGI SPA templates, adds coverage for the coverage of gender dysphoria, and makes certain other technical corrections.
Date Submitted: October 13, 2017 Date Approved: November 15, 2017 Date Effective: July 1, 2017 Proposed Effective date: July 1, 2017
CT-18-0011-CHIP (Amendment #11): Reflects compliance with MHPAEA requirements, adds coverage for Birth to Three services; makes changes to the supplemental program for children with special health care needs. Date Submitted: June 29, 2018 Date Approved: September 2, 2021 Date Effective: HUSKY Plus changes – July 1, 2017; Birth to Three and MHPAEA – October 1, 2017
CT-20-0012 – Disaster Relief SPA (Amendment #12): Disaster Relief SPA for the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency to implement temporary adjustments to enrollment and redetermination policies and cost sharing requirements. Date Submitted: June 30, 2020 Date Approved: September 27, 2020 Date Effective: March 18, 2020 Proposed Effective date: March 18, 2020
CT-20-0013-CHIP (Amendment #13): SUPPORT ACT – Behavioral Health Services.
Date Submitted: June 30, 2020 Date Approved: Date Effective: Proposed Effective Date: October 24, 2019
CT-22-0001 (Amendment #14): Prenatal Coverage/Unborn Child Option
Date Submitted: June 14, 2022 Date Approved: October 24, 2022 Date Effective: April 1, 2022 Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 2022 10
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
CT-22-0005 (Amendment #14): Extended Postpartum Coverage
Date Submitted: June 14, 2022 Date Approved: July 26, 2022 Date Effective: April 1, 2022 Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 2022
1.4 MAGI SPAs
The following MAGI Eligibility plan amendments, CT-14-0001, 14-0003, 14-0004 and 14-0005, replace and supersede the following plan sections, as noted below. Please see Appendix 1.4 for the plan amendments and supporting templates/PDFs. Please note that the effective date for the MAGI eligibility changes was January 1, 2014. Additional Eligibility changes reflected in CT-22-0001 and 22-0005, are also reflected below.
Transmittal Number SPA Group PDF # Description Superseded Plan Section(s) CT-14-0001 MAGI CS15 MAGI-Based Income Incorporated within a separate Eligibility & Methodologies subsection Effective/ Methods under section 4.3 Implementation Date: CS7 Eligibility – Targeted Low January 1, 2014 Income Children Supersedes the current sections Geographic Area 4.1.1; Age 4.1.2; CS10 Eligibility – Children Who and Income 4.1.3 Have Access to Public Employee Coverage Supersedes current section 4.1.7 regarding CS10 Maintenance of Agency children of public employees Contribution
Appendix: Incorporate within a separate appendix
CT-22-0001 MAGI CS9 Eligibility – Coverage from Incorporated within section Eligibility & Conception to Birth 4.1.2.1-PC Effective/ Methods Implementation Date: CS10 Maintenance of Agency Supersedes current section April 1, 2022 Contribution 4.1.7 regarding 11
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
Transmittal Number SPA Group PDF # Description Superseded Plan Section(s) children of public employees
CT-14-0003 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible for Incorporated within a separate 2101(f) Group Medicaid as a Result of the subsection under section 4.1 Effective/ Elimination of Income Implementation Date: Disregards January 1, 2014 CT-14-0004 Eligibility CS24 Eligibility Process Supersedes the current sections Processing 4.3 and 4.4 Effective/Implementatio n Date: October 1, 2013 CT-14-0005 Non-Financial CS17 Non-Financial Eligibility – Supersedes the current Eligibility Residency section 4.1.5 Effective/ Implementation Date: CS18 Non-Financial Eligibility – January 1, 2014 Citizenship Incorporated in new sections 4.1.0; supersedes the current CS19 Non-Financial Eligibility – sections 4.1.10 Social Security Number 4.1.10.1
CS20 Non-Financial Eligibility – Incorporated in new Substitution of Coverage section 4.1.9.1
CS21 Non-Financial Eligibility – Non-Payment of Premiums Supersedes the current section 4.4.4 CS28 General Eligibility – Presumptive Eligibility for Children Supersedes the current section 8.7
Supersedes the current sections , 4.3, 4.3.24.4.3 and 5.1.1 regarding presumptive eligibility
CT-22-0005 Non-Financial CS27 General Eligibility – Incorporated in section 4.1.9.2 Eligibility Continuous Eligibility Effective/ Implementation Date: April 1, 2022
CT-22-0001 Non-Financial CS28 General Eligibility – 12
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
Transmittal Number SPA Group PDF # Description Superseded Plan Section(s) Eligibility Presumptive Eligibility for Supersedes the Effective/Implementati Children current section 8.7 on Date: April 1, 2022
Supersedes the current sections, 4.3, 4.3.24.4.3 and 5.1.1 regarding presumptive eligibility
1.4- TC Tribal Consultation (Section 2107(e)(1)(C)) Describe the consultation process that occurred specifically for the development and submission of this State Plan Amendment, when it occurred and who was involved.
On May 13, 2022, in accordance with the tribal consultation policy, the Department notified the representatives of the two federally recognized tribes of the proposed changes to the HUSKY B program by email. [comments or response, if any].
TN No: Approval Date Effective Date
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children’s Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability, and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including 13
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified , by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report requirements). (Section 2102(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.80(a))
The State can measure the number of children with creditable health coverage to the extent that they are enrolled in either the HUSKY A or HUSKY B program. Since the start of the HUSKY program and combined HUSKY A and B marketing in July 1998 an additional 51,090 children enrolled in the Medicaid program resulting in their access to creditable health coverage. The increased Medicaid enrollment in addition to the 13,086 HUSKY B members means that an additional 51,090 children now have creditable health coverage in comparison to July 1998.
Please see Appendix 2.1 for a breakdown of HUSKY A (Medicaid) and HUSKY B (CHIP) enrollment by race and ethnicity; a breakdown of HUSKY A and HUSKY B enrollments by county; and HUSKY B enrollment by income level. Please note that we do not have HUSKY A enrollment data broken out by income. The income limit for HUSKY A is 196% of the FPL.
The state currently does not have public-private partnerships.
Guidance: Section 2.2 allows states to request to use the funds available under the 10 percent limit on administrative expenditures in order to fund services not otherwise allowable. The health services initiatives must meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.10.
2.2. Health Services Initiatives- Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at 42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10)
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements- (Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(1)(C)); (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a State in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(1)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is 14
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice. The State seeks advice from the two Connecticut federally-recognized tribes, the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and The Mohegan Tribe, through periodic meetings with tribal health representatives and by ongoing written and electronic communications.
The State tribal leads for the HUSKY and CHIP programs meet with tribal representatives at least once annually to update the representatives on developments in the Medicaid and CHIP programs. These meetings include a discussion of program changes, including, but not limited to, waivers, demonstration projects and State Plan amendments.
The process that led to the development of this State Plan Amendment included introductory meetings with tribal representatives in May 2010 to describe the State Plan Amendment process and the tribal consultation requirement. The Department’s tribal leads described the Medicaid State Plan Amendment and CHIP plan processes and discussed the method of consultation and communication that would best serve the tribal representatives’ needs. The tribal representatives agreed to an informal process in which the Department sends copies of the public notice for proposed amendments to the tribes prior to submission to CMS. If the State has not received comments or questions concerning the plan amendment within two weeks, the State determines that the tribe does not have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed amendment. In addition to this informal consultation process, for State Plan Amendments that may have a unique or particular impact on tribal members, for example, a program or plan change that exempts tribal members from some requirement, the State will also arrange for a meeting or teleconference with the tribal representatives to discuss the proposed change.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4. Guidance: In Section 3.1., discussion may include, but is not limited to: contracts with managed health care plans (including fully and partially capitated plans); contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; and other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography, as well as the State methods for establishing and defining the delivery systems. 15
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
Should the State choose to cover unborn children under the Title XXI State plan, the State must describe how services are paid. For example, some states make a global payment for all unborn children while other states pay for services on fee-for-services basis. The State’s payment mechanism and delivery mechanism should be briefly described here.
Section 2103(f)(3) of the Act, as amended by section 403 of CHIPRA, requires separate or combination CHIP programs that operate a managed care delivery system to apply several provisions of section 1932 of the Act in the same manner as these provisions apply under title XIX of the Act. Specific provisions include: section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. If the State CHIP program operates a managed care delivery system, provide an assurance that the State CHIP managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant sections of section 1932 of the Act. States must submit the managed care contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office servicing them for review and approval.
In addition, states may use up to 10 percent of actual or estimated Federal expenditures for targeted low-income children to fund other forms of child health assistance, including contracts with providers for a limited range of direct services; other health services initiatives to improve children’s health; outreach expenditures; and administrative costs (See 2105(c)(2)(A)). Describe which, if any, of these methods will be used.
Examples of the above may include, but are not limited to: direct contracting with school-based health services; direct contracting to provide enabling services; contracts with health centers receiving funds under section 330 of the Public Health Service Act; contracts with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under section 1886(d)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Act; contracts with other hospitals; and contracts with public health clinics receiving Title V funding. If applicable, address how the new arrangements under Title XXI will work with existing service delivery methods, such as regional networks for chronic illness and disability; neonatal care units, or early-intervention programs for at-risk infants, in the delivery and utilization of services. (42 CFR 457.490(a))
3.1. Delivery Standards Describe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of the choice of financing and the methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42 CFR 457.490(a)) The State will utilize the same delivery system and utilization controls as applicable to the rest of the CHIP population. 16
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
Check here if the State child health program delivers services using a managed care delivery model. The State provides an assurance that its managed care contract(s) complies with the relevant provisions of section 1932 of the Act, including section 1932(a)(4), Process for Enrollment and Termination and Change of Enrollment; section 1932(a)(5), Provision of Information; section 1932(b), Beneficiary Protections; section 1932(c), Quality Assurance Standards; section 1932(d), Protections Against Fraud and Abuse; and section 1932(e), Sanctions for Noncompliance. The State also assures that it will submit the contract(s) to the CMS Regional Office for review and approval. (Section 2103(f)(3))
As described in the State’s Medicaid state plan amendment, under Part A of the HUSKY Plan, the State used Title XXI funds to expand Medicaid eligibility for children 14-18 with family income up to 185% of the FPL. The Title XXI- funded expansion of Medicaid was phased out effective 10/1/02. As of 10/1/02, Title XXI funds are used only for the stand-alone SCHIP program (HUSKY B).
As of 1/1/12, all medical services for Connecticut’s Medicaid and CHIP population are coordinated by the statewide HUSKY Health medical Administrative Services Organization (ASO). The State eliminated the managed care organization (MCO) service delivery model on 12/31/11. Medical services for children with family income over 185% of the FPL under the HUSKY Plan, Part B are now obtained through providers in the fee-for-service Connecticut Medical Assistance Program (CMAP) network, the same network through which Connecticut’s Medicaid recipients receive their benefits. Behavioral health services have been administered by a behavioral health ASO since 7/1/05 and a dental ASO has provided dental services since 9/1/08. Pharmacy services have been provided through CMAP network providers since 2/1/08.
The State selects ASOs through a competitive bidding process. The State issues a Request for Proposal (RFP) that establishes operational and financial requirements and requires bidders to provide evidence of their ability to meet the requirements. The requirements include but are not limited to: access to care, provider network, member services, utilization management, claims processing, and quality assurance. The State awards the right to negotiate a contract based on a fair evaluation of all proposals submitted in response to the RFP. This method includes evaluation of the following factors: provider network for each service area, efficiency of operation, ability to provide the required services, quality management, and ability to perform the necessary administrative tasks, financial viability, and price. The ASO contracts do not include financial requirements because the ASOs are not capitated and bear no risk.
During the period 1/1/08 through 7/31/08, the state changed its contractual relationship with the existing at-risk MCOs to non-risk pre-paid inpatient health plans (PIHPs). The State returned to at-risk MCO contracts effective 8/1/08.
As of 12/31/11, the Department terminated its MCO contracts. 17
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-24)Page 24#
Following the end of the MCO contracts, the Department implemented a self-insured, managed fee-for-service approach for both Medicaid and CHIP. In support of achieving better heath and care experience outcomes for members, and engagement with providers, the Department has entered into contracts with ASOs for each of the three major service types – Medical, Behavioral Health, and Dental. The structure of each of the ASO contracts supports the Department’s desired results. A percentage of each ASO's administrative payments is withheld by the Department pending completion of each fiscal year. To earn back these withholds, each ASO must demonstrate that it has achieved identified benchmarks on health outcomes, healthcare quality, and both member and provider satisfaction measures.
ASO arrangements have substantially improved engagement with both members and providers. Members now have streamlined toll-free and web-based access to clear information and support on how to access and to utilize their benefits. Providers now have a single set of coverage guidelines for each service, and a uniform fee schedule from which to be paid.
In addition, the state, using Title XXI funds, has established a supplemental health insurance program, known as the HUSKY Plus Physical program, for those enrollees in the state subsidized portion of Part B whose medical needs cannot be accommodated within the basic benefit package offered by the Department under the HUSKY Plan, Part B. The HUSKY Plus Physical program supplements HUSKY Plan, Part B coverage for enrollees with intensive physical health needs. Effective 7/1/03, the physical health services are delivered through the Connecticut Children’s Medical Center (CCMC)/ Title V network.
Effective 7/1/17, The Department is changing the HUSKY Plus contractor from Connecticut Children’s Medical Center to the same administrative services organization (ASO) used for all HUSKY’s Medicaid and CHIP programs. Also, providers are reimbursed for HPP services using the same MMIS as for all HUSKY Health programs.
Guidance: In Section 3.2., note that utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: requirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after-hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review, coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective 18
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-25)Page 25#
and efficient manner. (42 CFR 457.490(b))
3.2. Describe the utilization controls under the child health assistance provided under the plan for targeted low-income children. Describe the systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan. (Section 2102)(a)(4) (42 CFR 457.490(b)) The state includes a definition of medical necessity and utilization management requirements in the RFP and the contracts with its ASOs. The ASOs are required to have written utilization management policies and procedures that include the medical necessity criteria for authorization and denial of payment and protocols for prior approval. The ASOs are also required to have mechanisms to ensure consistent application of the review criteria. In addition, the MCOs and ASOs must have utilization controls to ensure that only services described in the approved state plan are provided to HUSKY B members.
As discussed in Appendix 3.1 (summarizing HUSKY Plus Physical), utilization is managed through prior authorization based on individual care plans and medical necessity guidelines.
Section 4. Eligibility Standards and Methodology
Guidance: States electing to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan or combination plan should check the appropriate box and provide the ages and income level for each eligibility group. If the State is electing to take up the option to expand Medicaid eligibility as allowed under section 214 of CHIPRA regarding lawfully residing, complete section 4.1-LR as well as update the budget to reflect the additional costs if the state will claim title XXI match for these children until and if the time comes that the children are eligible for Medicaid.
4.0. Medicaid Expansion
4.0.1. Ages of each eligibility group and the income standard for that group:
4.1. Separate Program Check all standards that will apply to the State plan. (42 CFR 457.305(a) and 457.320(a))
4.1.0 Describe how the State meets the citizenship verification requirements. Include whether or not State has opted to use SSA verification option. See CT-14-0005, CS18, Non-Financial Eligibility - Citizenship.
19
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-26)Page 26#
4.1.1 Geographic area served by the Plan if less than Statewide:
4.1.2 Ages of each eligibility group, including unborn children and pregnant women (if applicable) and the income standard for that group:
Individuals must be under 19 years of age.
4.1.2.1-PC Age:Conception through birth (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002)
See CS-22-0001, CS9, Coverage from Conception through Birth.
4.1.3 Income of each separate eligibility group (if applicable):
See CT-14-0001, CS7, Eligibility – Targeted Low-Income Children
4.1.3.1-PC 0% of the FPL (and not eligible for Medicaid) through % of the FPL (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) 4.1.4 Resources of each separate eligibility group (including any standards relating to spend downs and disposition of resources): No asset/resource limit. 4.1.5 Residency (so long as residency requirement is not based on length of time in state):
See CT-14-0005, CS 17 – Non-Financial Eligibility – Residency To be eligible for the HUSKY Plan, Part B, a child must be a resident of Connecticut.
4.1.6 Disability Status (so long as any standard relating to disability status does not restrict eligibility): Measures of disability acuity will apply in HUSKY Plus Physical (See Appendix 3.1).
4.1.7 Access to or coverage under other health coverage: See CT-14-0001, CS10 – Eligibility – Children Who Have Access to Public Employee Coverage. Unborn children are also permitted to have access to public employee coverage.
4.1.8 Duration of eligibility, not to exceed 12 months:
20
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-27)Page 27#
A child who has been determined eligible for the HUSKY B program shall remain eligible for as long as all eligibility criteria are met. Eligibility for HUSKY B is reviewed annually. The renewal period is scheduled to coincide with the yearly anniversary of the initial eligibility determination. The initial eligibility period may include a presumptive eligibility period. Renewal forms are sent during the tenth month of eligibility to allow time for the family to complete and return the form in time for the renewal to be processed before the expiration of the twelfth eligible month.
4.1.9 Other Standards- Identify and describe other standards for or affecting eligibility, including those standards in 42 CFR 457.310 and 457.320 that are not addressed above. For instance:
Guidance: States may only require the SSN of the child who is applying for coverage. If SSNs are required and the State covers unborn children, indicate that the unborn children are exempt from providing a SSN. Other standards include, but are not limited to presumptive eligibility and deemed newborns.
4.1.9.1 States should specify whether Social Security Numbers (SSN) are required. CT-14-0005, CS19, Non-Financial Eligibility – Social Security Number
The Department, at time of initial determination and when determining ongoing eligibility, requires the social security number for any child requesting services under the HUSKY B program. Unborn children are also exempt from the requirement to provide a Social Security Number.
Guidance: States should describe their continuous eligibility process and populations that can be continuously eligible.
4.1.9.2 Continuous eligibility
4.1-PW Pregnant Women Option (section 2112)- The State includes eligibility for one or more populations of targeted low-income pregnant women under the plan. Describe the population of pregnant women that the State proposes to cover in this section. Include all eligibility criteria, such as those described in the above categories (for instance, income and resources) that will be applied to this population. Use the same reference number system for those criteria (for example, 4.1.1-P for a geographic restriction). Please remember to update sections 8.1.1-PW, 8.1.2-PW, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: States have the option to cover groups of “lawfully residing” children and/or pregnant women. States may elect to cover (1) “lawfully residing” children described at section 2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; (2) “lawfully residing” pregnant women described at section 21
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-28)Page 28#
2107(e)(1)(J) of the Act; or (3) both. A state electing to cover children and/or pregnant women who are considered lawfully residing in the U.S. must offer coverage to all such individuals who meet the definition of lawfully residing, and may not cover a subgroup or only certain groups. In addition, states may not cover these new groups only in CHIP, but must also extend the coverage option to Medicaid. States will need to update their budget to reflect the additional costs for coverage of these children. If a State has been covering these children with State only funds, it is helpful to indicate that so CMS understands the basis for the enrollment estimates and the projected cost of providing coverage. Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option.
4.1- LR Lawfully Residing Option (Sections 2107(e)(1)(J) and 1903(v)(4)(A); (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006 issued July 1, 2010) Check if the State is electing the option under section 214 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) regarding lawfully residing to provide coverage to the following otherwise eligible pregnant women and children as specified below who are lawfully residing in the United States including the following: A child or pregnant woman shall be considered lawfully present if he or she is: (1) A qualified alien as defined in section 431 of PRWORA (8 U.S.C. §1641); (2) An alien in nonimmigrant status who has not violated the terms of the status under which he or she was admitted or to which he or she has changed after admission; (3) An alien who has been paroled into the United States pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. §1182(d)(5)) for less than 1 year, except for an alien paroled for prosecution, for deferred inspection or pending removal proceedings; (4) An alien who belongs to one of the following classes: (i) Aliens currently in temporary resident status pursuant to section 210 or 245A of the INA (8 U.S.C. §§1160 or 1255a, respectively); (ii) Aliens currently under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) pursuant to section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1254a), and pending applicants for TPS who have been granted employment authorization; (iii) Aliens who have been granted employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9), (10), (16), (18), (20), (22), or (24); (iv) Family Unity beneficiaries pursuant to section 301 of Pub. L. 101- 649, as amended; (v) Aliens currently under Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) pursuant to a decision made by the President; (vi) Aliens currently in deferred action status; or (vii) Aliens whose visa petition has been approved and who have a pending application for adjustment of status; (5) A pending applicant for asylum under section 208(a) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1158) or for withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1231) or under the Convention Against Torture who has been
22
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-29)Page 29#
granted employment authorization, and such an applicant under the age of 14 who has had an application pending for at least180 days; (6) An alien who has been granted withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture; (7) A child who has a pending application for Special Immigrant Juvenile status as described in section 101(a)(27)(J) of the INA (8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(27)(J)); (8) An alien who is lawfully present in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands under 48 U.S.C. § 1806(e); or (9) An alien who is lawfully present in American Samoa under the immigration laws of American Samoa.
Elected for pregnant women. Elected for children under age
4.1.1-LR The State provides assurance that for an individual whom it enrolls in Medicaid under the CHIPRA Lawfully Residing option, it has verified, at the time of the individual’s initial eligibility determination and at the time of the eligibility redetermination, that the individual continues to be lawfully residing in the United States. The State must first attempt to verify this status using information provided at the time of initial application. If the State cannot do so from the information readily available, it must require the individual to provide documentation or further evidence to verify satisfactory immigration status in the same manner as it would for anyone else claiming satisfactory immigration status under section 1137(d) of the Act.
4.1-DS Supplemental Dental (Section 2103(c)(5) - A child who is eligible to enroll in dental- only supplemental coverage, effective January 1, 2009. Eligibility is limited to only targeted low-income children who are otherwise eligible for CHIP but for the fact that they are enrolled in a group health plan or health insurance offered through an employer. The State’s CHIP plan income eligibility level is at least the highest income eligibility standard under its approved State child health plan (or under a waiver) as of January 1, 2009. All who meet the eligibility standards and apply for dental-only supplemental coverage shall be provided benefits. States choosing this option must report these children separately in SEDS. Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
4.1-ID – Income Disregards – See 14-0003, CS14, Children Ineligible for Medicaid as a Result of the Elimination of Income Disregards.
4.2. Assurances The State assures by checking the box below that it has made the following findings with respect to the eligibility standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) 23
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-30)Page 30#
4.2.1. These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2. Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. This applies to pregnant women included in the State plan as well as targeted low-income children. 4.2.3. These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre-existing medical condition. This applies to pregnant women as well as targeted low- income children.
4.2-DS Supplemental Dental - Please update sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option. For dental-only supplemental coverage, the State assures that it has made the following findings with standards in its plan: (Section 2102(b)(1)(B) and 42 CFR 457.320(b)) 4.2.1-DS These standards do not discriminate on the basis of diagnosis. 4.2.2-DS Within a defined group of covered targeted low-income children, these standards do not cover children of higher income families without covering children with a lower family income. 4.2.3-DS These standards do not deny eligibility based on a child having a pre- existing medical condition.
4.3. Methodology. Describe the methods of establishing and continuing eligibility and enrollment. The description should address the procedures for applying the eligibility standards, the organization and infrastructure responsible for making and reviewing eligibility determinations, and the process for enrollment of individuals receiving covered services, and whether the State uses the same application form for Medicaid and/or other public benefit programs. (Section 2102)(b)(2)) (42 CFR 457.350)
See CT-14-0001, CS15, MAGI-Based Income Methodologies, CT-14-0004, CS24, Eligibility Process, and CT-22-0005, CS28, General Eligibility – Presumptive Eligibility for Children.
The State uses a single streamline application for its non-elderly/blind/disabled Medicaid coverage groups (parent/ caretakers, single adults and pregnant women and children),CHIP applicants and applicants for Qualified Health Plans through the State Based Marketplace. The application is a variant on the federal single streamlined application. The State encourages the use of online applications, but application may also be made over the phone or on a paper application. Applications may also be made at a number of locations. Once entered, all applicants receive a real-time determination of eligibility. If not all conditions are eligibility are verified at time of application, enrollees will be given 90 days to verify this information. Verification documents are sent to a central post office box, where they are processed by a State contractor.
Effective 6/11/08, families with a newborn child are able to initiate the application process for the newborn at a Connecticut or border hospital. The hospital will fax the 24
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-31)Page 31#
application and other supporting documents to the SPES for eligibility to be determined within one business day of receipt. Effective 4/1/11, families may apply for HUSKY B for a child at any of our certified Qualified Entities available statewide and receive a presumptive eligibility determination. The Qualified Entity will fax the application and other supporting documents to the SPES for eligibility to be entered in the eligibility system within one business day of receipt. The Qualified Entity will provide the family with a payment voucher guaranteeing coverage and payment of services for the child for 10 days in the event there is a need for immediate access to care. The presumptive period will end when a determination for regular HUSKY B is made.
Guidance: The box below should be checked as related to children and pregnant women. Please note: A State providing dental-only supplemental coverage may not have a waiting list or limit eligibility in any way.
4.3.1. Limitation on Enrollment Describe the processes, if any, that a State will use for instituting enrollment caps, establishing waiting lists, and deciding which children will be given priority for enrollment. If this section does not apply to your state, check the box below. (Section 2102(b)(2)) (42 CFR 457.305(b))
Check here if this section does not apply to your State.
Guidance: Note that for purposes of presumptive eligibility, States do not need to verify the citizenship status of the child. States electing this option should indicate so in the State plan. (42 CFR 457.355)
4.3.2. Check if the State elects to provide presumptive eligibility for children that meets the requirements of section 1920A of the Act. (Section 2107(e)(1)(L)); (42 CFR 457.355) See 22-0001, CS28, General Eligibility – Presumptive Eligibility for Children. Presumptive eligibility is also permitted for unborn children.
Guidance: Describe how the State intends to implement the Express Lane option. Include information on the identified Express Lane agency or agencies, and whether the State will be using the Express Lane eligibility option for the initial eligibility determinations, redeterminations, or both. 444
4.3.3-EL Express Lane Eligibility Check here if the state elects the option to rely on a finding from an Express Lane agency when determining whether a child satisfies one or more components of CHIP eligibility. The state agrees to comply with the requirements of sections 2107(e)(1)(E) and 1902(e)(13) of the Act for this option. Please update sections 4.4-EL, 5.2-EL, 9.10, and 12.1 when electing this option. This authority may not apply to eligibility determinations made before February 4, 2009, or after September 30, 2013. (Section 2107(e)(1)(E)) 4.3.3.1-EL Also indicate whether the Express Lane option is applied to (1) initial eligibility determination, (2) redetermination, or (3) both. 25
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-32)Page 32#
4.3.3.2-EL List the public agencies approved by the State as Express Lane agencies.
4.3.3.3-EL List the components/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane. In this section, specify any disregards, or other determination under the Express Lane option.
4.3.3.3-EL List the component/components of CHIP eligibility that are determined under the Express Lane.
4.3.3.4-EL Describe the option used to satisfy the screen and enrollment requirements before a child may be enrolled under title XXI.
Guidance: States should describe the process they use to screen and enroll children required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 457.80(c). Describe the screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by an Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated. Describe whether the State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from an Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
In this section, states should describe their eligibility screening process in a way that addresses the five assurances specified below. The State should consider including important definitions, the relationship with affected Federal, State and local agencies, and other applicable criteria that will describe the State’s ability to make assurances. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A) and 2110(b)(2)(B)), (42 CFR 457.310(b)(2), 42 CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 457.80(c)(3))
4.4. Eligibility screening and coordination with other health coverage programs States must describe how they will assure that:
4.4.1. only targeted low-income children who are ineligible for Medicaid or not covered under a group health plan or health insurance (including access to a State health benefits plan) are furnished child health assistance under the plan. (Sections 2102(b)(3)(A), 2110(b)(2)(B)) (42 CFR 457.310(b), 42 CFR 457.350(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.80(c)(3)) Confirm that the State does not apply a 26
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-33)Page 33#
waiting period for pregnant women.
See 14-0004, CS24, Eligibility Process.
4.4.2. children found through the screening process to be potentially eligible for medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan are enrolled for assistance under such plan; (Section 2102(b)(3)(B)) (42 CFR 457.350(a)(2)).
4.4.3. children found through the screening process to be ineligible for Medicaid are enrolled in CHIP. (Sections 2102(a)(1) and (2) and 2102(c)(2)) (42CFR 431.636(b)(4))
4.4.4. the insurance provided under the State child health plan does not substitute for coverage under group health plans. (Section 2102(b)(3)(C)) (42 CFR, 457.805)
See 14-0005, CS20, Non-Financial Eligibility – Substitution of Coverage
4.4.4.1. (formerly 4.4.4.4) If the State provides coverage under a premium assistance program, describe: 1) the minimum period without coverage under a group health plan. This should include any allowable exceptions to the waiting period; 2) the expected minimum level of contribution employers will make; and 3) how cost-effectiveness is determined. (42 CFR 457.810(a)-(c))
4.4.5. Child health assistance is provided to targeted low-income children in the State who are American Indian and Alaska Native. (Section 2102(b)(3)(D)) (42 CFR 457.125(a))
In accordance with Section 2102(b)(3)(D), 42 CFR 457.125(a) the Department met with representatives from both of Connecticut’s federally recognized Indian tribes in 1998, during the design phase of the HUSKY plan. The program design was discussed with the tribal representatives and their comments and suggestions were considered in the final design and ongoing operations of the program. In 2000 both tribes provided the Department information required to exempt them from cost sharing. The tribal members provided the Department with the information we need to request of American Indians in order to exempt them from cost sharing.
The Department will continue to meet with the tribes on an annual basis or more often if necessary to discuss programmatic changes to HUSKY and to consider the issues or concerns of the tribal members. The Department also provides 27
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-34)Page 34#
supplies of HUSKY informational materials and applications for distribution to tribal members. HUSKY information has also been available to tribal members via media (Public Service Announcements, T.V. and radio ads and ads in local newspapers) and other outreach efforts.
Guidance: When the State is using an income finding from an Express Lane agency, the State must still comply with screen and enroll requirements before enrolling children in CHIP. The State may either continue its current screen and enroll process, or elect one of two new options to fulfill these requirements.
4.4-EL The State should designate the option it will be using to carry out screen and enroll requirements:
The State will continue to use the screen and enroll procedures required under section 2102(b)(3)(A) and (B) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 457.350(a) and 42 CFR 457.80(c). Describe this process.
The State is establishing a screening threshold set as a percentage of the Federal poverty level (FPL) that exceeds the highest Medicaid income threshold applicable to a child by a minimum of 30 percentage points. (NOTE: The State may set this threshold higher than 30 percentage points to account for any differences between the income calculation methodologies used by the Express Lane agency and those used by the State for its Medicaid program. The State may set one screening threshold for all children, based on the highest Medicaid income threshold, or it may set more than one screening threshold, based on its existing, age-related Medicaid eligibility thresholds.) Include the screening threshold(s) expressed as a percentage of the FPL, and provide an explanation of how this was calculated.
The State is temporarily enrolling children in CHIP, based on the income finding from the Express Lane agency, pending the completion of the screen and enroll process.
Section 5. Outreach and Coordination
5.1. (formerly 2.2) Describe the current State efforts to provide or obtain creditable health coverage for uninsured children by addressing sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2. (Section 2102)(a)(2) (42 CFR 457.80(b))
Guidance: The information below may include whether the state elects express lane eligibility a description of the State’s outreach efforts through Medicaid and state- only programs.
5.1.1. (formerly 2.2.1.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all 28
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-35)Page 35#
uninsured children who are eligible to participate in public health insurance programs (i.e., Medicaid and state-only child health insurance):
The State currently conducts outreach activities through its contracts with Federally Qualified Health Centers and disproportionate share hospitals that assist applicants in completing the application. Effective March 1, 2011 the State implemented the process of presumptive eligibility in accordance with Sec. 2107(e)(1)(L) of the Social Security Act or U.S.C. 1397gg(e)(1)(L). Families may apply for HUSKY B for a child at any of our statewide certified Qualified Entities who make an immediate eligibility determination based on preliminary information provided by the family.
Guidance: The State may address the coordination between the public-private outreach and the public health programs that is occurring statewide. This section will provide a historic record of the steps the State is taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children from the time the State’s plan was initially approved. States do not have to rewrite his section but may instead update this section as appropriate.
5.1.2. (formerly 2.2.2.) The steps the State is currently taking to identify and enroll all uninsured children who are eligible to participate in health insurance programs that involve a public-private partnership: The State currently does not have any programs that involve a public-private partnership. The Healthy Steps program, which existed at the inception of HUSKY B, has been phased out and members of that program were made eligible for HUSKY A or B, according to their family income.
Guidance: The State should describe below how it’s Title XXI program will closely coordinate the enrollment with Medicaid because under Title XXI, children identified as Medicaid- eligible are required to be enrolled in Medicaid. Specific information related to Medicaid screen and enroll procedures is requested in Section 4.4. (42 CFR 457.80(c))
5.2. (formerly 2.3) Describe how CHIP coordinates with other public and private health insurance programs, other sources of health benefits coverage for children, other relevant child health programs, (such as title V), that provide health care services for low-income children to increase the number of children with creditable health coverage. (Section 2102(a)(3), 2102(b)(3)(E) and 2102(c)(2)) (42 CFR 457.80(c)). This item requires a brief overview of how Title XXI efforts – particularly new enrollment outreach efforts – will be coordinated with and improve upon existing State efforts. Title V refers potential applicants who do not qualify for its program to HUSKY B and HUSKY Plus Physical. A Department representative monitors services provided by the Connecticut Children's Medical Center, the agent responsible for HUSKY B Children with Special Health Care Needs with Title V. (See Appendix 3.1.) 29
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-36)Page 36#
The Department contracts with school-based health clinics.
HUSKY Plus Physical and the HUSKY Health medical ASO, in conjunction with the Department, also coordinate with the Birth to Three program, which provides services to children with special health care needs. 5.2-EL The State should include a description of its election of the Express Lane eligibility option to provide a simplified eligibility determination process and expedited enrollment of eligible children into Medicaid or CHIP.
Guidance: Outreach strategies may include, but are not limited to, community outreach workers, outstationed eligibility workers, translation and transportation services, assistance with enrollment forms, case management and other targeting activities to inform families of low-income children of the availability of the health insurance program under the plan or other private or public health coverage.
The description should include information on how the State will inform the target of the availability of the programs, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, and assist them in enrolling in the appropriate program.
5.3. Strategies Describe the procedures used by the State to accomplish outreach to families of children likely to be eligible for child health assistance or other public or private health coverage to inform them of the availability of the programs, and to assist them in enrolling their children in such a program. (Section 2102(c)(1)) (42 CFR 457.90)
The Department, in partnership with statewide, regional and local health and social service organizations, within available appropriations, regularly conducts public outreach and education to reach families of children likely to be eligible for HUSKY Health, be it Medicaid or CHIP. The Department’s HUSKY Outreach program includes: School based outreach efforts – HUSKY information provided through the free- and reduced-price lunch program in cooperation with the CT Department of Education and school food service directors. HUSKY information and applications are also available through the school nurses and the school-based health centers;
Participation in the CT Department of Labor’s Rapid Response Team – provision of HUSKY information and application assistance to laid-off workers;
HUSKY Health medical, dental and behavioral ASOs community-based outreach – The HUSKY ASOs provide information on benefit delivery through periodic mailings, handbooks, its website, and at various community forums including school health promotional fairs; craft shows; country fairs, etc., throughout the state.
Collaboration with Child Support Services; 30
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-37)Page 37#
Collaboration with CT’s Covering Kids and Families (CCKF) initiative –C CKF is a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded initiative, with Connecticut Voices for Children acting as the lead agency for Connecticut. CCKF funds several local HUSKY outreach projects throughout the state. The initiative supports statewide interventions and supports local projects in Bridgeport and Stratford, Stamford, and in a nine-town area East of the River (Manchester, East Hartford, Vernon, Hebron, Glastonbury, Mansfield, Willington, Coventry and Columbia). The local projects work in their communities to provide application assistance to families and help families through the renewal process, train community-based organizations on HUSKY, build relationships with local Department of Social Services (DSS) offices, train parents and high school students to promote the HUSKY program, develop model projects to enroll immigrant children and families, and work with schools, local businesses and health care providers. All three local projects use an automated tracking system to track their own activities and to identify enrollment and renewal barriers. Statewide initiatives include the coordination and provision of outreach through established groups such as schools, child care providers, pediatric care providers, the business community, and social service providers; and the HUSKY (www.huskyhealth.com) website featuring a downloadable application.
Multi-level campaign
The crux of this campaign has been grass roots, community-based outreach through schools, health centers, community meetings, fairs, events, worksites, and other venues identified by DSS, statewide partners and community contractors. Just as often, HUSKY outreach brings the message to professionals who work with parents through a 'key informant' model--these are the known and trusted people in health, education, human services and other fields who are already in the community and who can vouch for the program and provide follow-up assistance. The emphasis on grass roots, community- based outreach has been acknowledged as especially important in reaching minority communities and newcomer/immigrant populations.
Section 6. Coverage Requirements for Children’s Health Insurance
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan and proceed to Section 7 since children covered under a Medicaid expansion program will receive all Medicaid covered services including EPSDT.
6.1. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply.) (Section 2103(c)); (42 CFR 457.410(a))
Guidance: Benchmark coverage is substantially equal to the benefits coverage in a 31
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-38)Page 38#
benchmark benefit package (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, and/or the HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment in the state). If box below is checked, either 6.1.1.1., 6.1.1.2., or 6.1.1.3. must also be checked. (Section 2103(a)(1))
6.1.1. Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(a)(1) and 42 CFR 457.420)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is the standard Blue Cross/Blue Shield preferred provider option service benefit plan, as described in and offered under Section 8903(1) of Title 5, United States Code. (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(b))
6.1.1.1. FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(b)(1) (42 CFR 457.420(a)) (If checked, attach copy of the plan.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is State employee coverage, meaning a coverage plan that is offered and generally available to State employees in the state. (Section 2103(b)(2))
6.1.1.2. State employee coverage; (Section 2103(b)(2)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: Check box below if the benchmark benefit package to be offered by the State is offered by a health maintenance organization (as defined in Section 2791(b)(3) of the Public Health Services Act) and has the largest insured commercial, non-Medicaid enrollment of covered lives of such coverage plans offered by an HMO in the state. (Section 2103(b)(3) (42 CFR 457.420(c)))
6.1.1.3. HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(b)(3)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description.)
Guidance: States choosing Benchmark-equivalent coverage must check the box below and ensure that the coverage meets the following requirements: the coverage includes benefits for items and services within each of the categories of basic services described in 42 CFR 457.430: • dental services • inpatient and outpatient hospital services, • physicians’ services, • surgical and medical services, • laboratory and x-ray services,
32
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-39)Page 39#
• well-baby and well-child care, including age-appropriate immunizations, and • emergency services; the coverage has an aggregate actuarial value that is at least actuarially equivalent to one of the benchmark benefit packages (FEHBP-equivalent coverage, State employee coverage, or coverage offered through an HMO coverage plan that has the largest insured commercial enrollment in the state); and the coverage has an actuarial value that is equal to at least 75 percent of the actuarial value of the additional categories in such package, if offered, as described in 42 CFR 457.430: • coverage of prescription drugs, • mental health services, • vision services and • hearing services.
If 6.1.2. is checked, a signed actuarial memorandum must be attached. The actuary who prepares the opinion must select and specify the standardized set and population to be used under paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 42 CFR 457.431. The State must provide sufficient detail to explain the basis of the methodologies used to estimate the actuarial value or, if requested by CMS, to replicate the State results.
The actuarial report must be prepared by an individual who is a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. This report must be prepared in accordance with the principles and standards of the American Academy of Actuaries. In preparing the report, the actuary must use generally accepted actuarial principles and methodologies, use a standardized set of utilization and price factors, use a standardized population that is representative of privately insured children of the age of children who are expected to be covered under the State child health plan, apply the same principles and factors in comparing the value of different coverage (or categories of services), without taking into account any differences in coverage based on the method of delivery or means of cost control or utilization used, and take into account the ability of a State to reduce benefits by taking into account the increase in actuarial value of benefits coverage offered under the State child health plan that results from the limitations on cost sharing under such coverage. (Section 2103(a)(2))
6.1.2. Benchmark-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(a)(2) and 42 CFR 457.430) Specify the coverage, including the amount, scope and duration of each service, as well as any exclusions or limitations. Attach a signed actuarial report that meets the requirements specified in 42 CFR 457.431.
Guidance: A State approved under the provision below, may modify its program from time
33
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-40)Page 40#
to time so long as it continues to provide coverage at least equal to the lower of the actuarial value of the coverage under the program as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark programs. If “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” is modified, an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997, or one of the benchmark plans must be attached. Also, the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for “existing comprehensive state-based coverage” must be described in the space provided for all states. (Section 2103(a)(3))
6.1.3. Existing Comprehensive State-Based Coverage; (Section 2103(a)(3) and 42 CFR 457.440) This option is only applicable to New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania. Attach a description of the benefits package, administration, and date of enactment. If existing comprehensive State-based coverage is modified, provide an actuarial opinion documenting that the actuarial value of the modification is greater than the value as of August 5, 1997 or one of the benchmark plans. Describe the fiscal year 1996 State expenditures for existing comprehensive state- based coverage.
Guidance: Secretary-approved coverage refers to any other health benefits coverage deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Secretary upon application by a state. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.250)
6.1.4. Secretary-approved Coverage. (Section 2103(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.450) Guidance: Section 1905(r) of the Act defines EPSDT to require coverage of (1) any medically necessary screening, and diagnostic services, including vision, hearing, and dental screening and diagnostic services, consistent with a periodicity schedule based on current and reasonable medical practice standards or the health needs of an individual child to determine if a suspected condition or illness exists; and (2) all services listed in section 1905(a) of the Act that are necessary to correct or ameliorate any defects and mental and physical illnesses or conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. Section 1902(a)(43) of the Act requires that the State (1) provide and arrange for all necessary services, including supportive services, such as transportation, needed to receive medical care included within the scope of the EPSDT benefit and (2) inform eligible beneficiaries about the services available under the EPSDT benefit.
If the coverage provided does not meet all of the statutory requirements for EPSDT contained in sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, do not check this box.
See Appendix 6.1.4, updated on June 29, 2018 to reflect the addition of coverage of Birth to Three Services. 34
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-41)Page 41#
6.1.4.1. Coverage of all benefits that are provided to children that is the same as the benefits provided under the Medicaid State plan, including Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT).
6.1.4.2. Comprehensive coverage for children under a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver.
6.1.4.3. Coverage that the State has extended to the entire Medicaid population.
Guidance: Check below if the coverage offered includes benchmark coverage, as specified in §457.420, plus additional coverage. Under this option, the State must clearly demonstrate that the coverage it provides includes the same coverage as the benchmark package, and also describes the services that are being added to the benchmark package.
6.1.4.4. Coverage that includes benchmark coverage plus additional coverage. Please note that the HUSKY B benefits combine the most generous benefits offered at the inception of the HUSKY, Part B plan under three state employee options available in 1998 (Blue Cross, MD Health Plan, and Kaiser Permanente), in addition to covered services mandated by the Federal CHIP regulations. In addition, HUSKY B benefits also include a limited supplemental program, HUSKY Plus (which is not available to state employees) for children whose medical needs cannot be fully met by the coverage available under the regular HUSKY B benefits. (See Revised Appendix 3.1) The same benefit package (Secretary approved-benchmark plus) applies to unborn children like other children in CHIP.
6.1.4.5. Coverage that is the same as defined by existing comprehensive state- based coverage applicable only in New York, Pennsylvania or Florida. (under 42 CFR 457.440)
Guidance: Check below if the State is purchasing coverage through a group health plan, and intends to demonstrate that the group health plan is substantially equivalent to or greater than coverage under one of the benchmark plans specified in 457.420, through the use of a benefit-by-benefit comparison of the coverage. Provide a sample of the comparison format that will be used. Under this option, if coverage for any benefit does not meet or exceed the coverage for that benefit under the benchmark, the State must provide an actuarial analysis as described in 457.431 to determine actuarial equivalence.
6.1.4.6. Coverage under a group health plan that is substantially equivalent to or 35
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-42)Page 42#
greater than benchmark coverage through a benefit by benefit comparison (Provide a sample of how the comparison will be done).
Guidance: Check below if the State elects to provide a source of coverage that is not described above. Describe the coverage that will be offered, including any benefit limitations or exclusions.
6.1.4.7. Other. (Describe)
Guidance: All forms of coverage that the State elects to provide to children in its plan must be checked. The State should also describe the scope, amount and duration of services covered under its plan, as well as any exclusions or limitations. States that choose to cover unborn children under the State plan should include a separate section 6.2 that specifies benefits for the unborn child population. (Section 2110(a)) (42 CFR, 457.490)
If the state elects to cover the new option of targeted low income pregnant women, but chooses to provide a different benefit package for these pregnant women under the CHIP plan, the state must include a separate section 6.2 describing the benefit package for pregnant women. (Section 2112)
6.2. The State elects to provide the following forms of coverage to children: (Check all that apply. If an item is checked, describe the coverage with respect to the amount, duration and scope of services covered, as well as any exclusions or limitations) (Section 2110(a)) (42 CFR 457.490)
6.2.1. Inpatient services (Section 2110(a)(1))
6.2.2. Outpatient services (Section 2110(a)(2))
6.2.3. Physician services (Section 2110(a)(3))
6.2.4. Surgical services (Section 2110(a)(4))
6.2.5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. (Section 2110(a)(5))
6.2.6. Prescription drugs (Section 2110(a)(6))
6.2.7. Over-the-counter medications (Section 2110(a)(7))
6.2.8. Laboratory and radiological services (Section 2110(a)(8))
6.2.9. Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family services and supplies (Section 2110(a)(9))
36
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-43)Page 43#
6.2.10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.18., but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structural services (Section 2110(a)(10))
6.2.11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in 6.2.19, but including services furnished in a state-operated mental hospital and including community-based services (Section 2110(a)(11)
6.2.12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices) (Section 2110(a)(12))
6.2.13. Disposable medical supplies (Section 2110(a)(13))
Guidance: Home and community based services may include supportive services such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home.
6.2.14. Home and community-based health care services (Section 2110(a)(14))
Guidance: Nursing services may include nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services in a home, school or other setting.
6.2.15. Nursing care services (Section 2110(a)(15))
6.2.16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest (Section 2110(a)(16)
6.2.17. Dental services (Section 2110(a)(17)) States updating their dental benefits must complete 6.2-DC (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009)
6.2.18. Vision screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.19. Hearing screenings and services (Section 2110(a)(24))
6.2.20. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(18))
6.2.21. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services (Section 2110(a)(19))
6.2.22. Case management services (Section 2110(a)(20)) 37
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-44)Page 44#
Case management is available through the medical and behavioral ASOs, depending on the member’s needs.
6.2.23. Care coordination services (Section 2110(a)(21))
Care coordination is available to members who are part of the Primary Care Medical Home initiative .
6.2.24. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders (Section 2110(a)(22)) Short term rehabilitation is covered under HUSKY B and long-term coverage is available through HUSKY Plus. See Appendix 3.1 for additional information on HUSKY Plus Physical 6.2.25. Hospice care (Section 2110(a)(23))
Guidance: See guidance for Section 6.1.4.1 for guidance on the statutory requirements for EPSDT under sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act. If the benefit being provided does not meet the EPSDT statutory requirements, do not check the box below.
6.2.26. EPSDT consistent with requirements of sections 1905(r) and 1902(a)(43) of the Act
Guidance: Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic or rehabilitative service may be provided, whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting, if recognized by State law and only if the service is: 1) prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as prescribed by State law; 2) performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician; or 3) furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license.
6.2.27. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services. (Section 2110(a)(24)) Services of nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, podiatrists, chiropractors, and naturopaths will be covered.
6.2.28. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage (Section 2110(a)(25))
6.2.29. Medical transportation (Section 2110(a)(26))
Transportation by ambulance will be covered but non-emergency 38
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-45)Page 45#
transportation will not. Guidance: Enabling services, such as transportation, translation, and outreach services, may be offered only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals.
6.2.30. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) (Section 2110(a)(27)) Translation and outreach services will be available through the HUSKY ASOs. All printed materials must be in English and Spanish and any other languages if more than five percent of the ASO enrollees speak the alternative language.
6.2.31. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not included under this Section (Section 2110(a)(28)) See Appendices 3.1 and 6.1: HUSKY Plus Benefits and HUSKY B Benefits
6.2- UNBORN CHILDREN – The state provides the same scope of benefits to unborn children as it does to other Targeted Low-Income Children. This includes comprehensive prenatal care with no cost sharing. When comprehensive prenatal care is rendered by the same provider or provider group, the provider/group bills with a comprehensive bundle code that includes all routine prenatal, delivery and post-partum care and thus all the services are covered under the unborn children option. If a different provider or provider group renders the delivery, the delivery will be covered by Emergency Medicaid since the comprehensive bundle code cannot be billed. 6.2-DC Dental Coverage (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) The State will provide dental coverage to children through one of the following. Please update Sections 9.10 and 10.3-DC when electing this option. Dental services provided to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2103(a)(5)):
6.2.1-DC State Specific Dental Benefit Package. The State assures dental services represented by the following categories of common dental terminology (CDT1) codes are included in the dental benefits: 1. Diagnostic (i.e., clinical exams, x-rays) (CDT codes: D0100-D0999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 2. Preventive (i.e., dental prophylaxis, topical fluoride treatments, sealants) (CDT codes: D1000-D1999) (must follow periodicity schedule) 3. Restorative (i.e., fillings, crowns) (CDT codes: D2000-D2999) 4. Endodontic (i.e., root canals) (CDT codes: D3000-D3999) 5. Periodontic (treatment of gum disease) (CDT codes: D4000-D4999) 6. Prosthodontic (dentures) (CDT codes: D5000-D5899, D5900-D5999, and D6200-D6999)
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. 39
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-46)Page 46#
7. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (i.e., extractions of teeth and other oral surgical procedures) (CDT codes: D7000-D7999) 8. Orthodontics (i.e., braces) (CDT codes: D8000-D8999) 9. Emergency Dental Services
6.2.1.1-DC Periodicity Schedule. The State has adopted the following periodicity schedule: State-developed Medicaid-specific American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Other Nationally recognized periodicity schedule Other (description attached)
6.2.2-DC Benchmark coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5), 42 CFR 457.410, and 42 CFR 457.420)
6.2.2.1-DC FEHBP-equivalent coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(i)) (If checked, attach copy of the dental supplemental plan benefits description and the applicable CDT2 codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.2-DC State employee coverage; (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(ii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2.2.3-DC HMO with largest insured commercial enrollment (Section 2103(c)(5)(C)(iii)) (If checked, identify the plan and attach a copy of the benefits description and the applicable CDT codes. If the State chooses to provide supplemental services, also attach a description of the services and applicable CDT codes)
6.2-DS Supplemental Dental Coverage- The State will provide dental coverage to children eligible for dental-only supplemental services. Children eligible for this option must receive the same dental services as provided to otherwise eligible CHIP children (Section 2110(b)(5)(C)(ii)). Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, and 9.10 when electing this option.
Guidance: Under Title XXI, pre-existing condition exclusions are not allowed, with the only exception being in relation to another law in existence (HIPAA/ERISA). Indicate that the plan adheres to this requirement by checking the applicable description.
Current Dental Terminology, © 2010 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. 40
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-47)Page 47#
In the event that the State provides benefits through a group health plan or group health coverage, or provides family coverage through a group health plan under a waiver (see Section 6.4.2.), pre-existing condition limits are allowed to the extent permitted by HIPAA/ERISA. If the State is contracting with a group health plan or provides benefits through group health coverage, describe briefly any limitations on pre-existing conditions. (Formerly 8.6.)
6.2- MHPAEA Section 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Social Security Act requires that, to the extent that it provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits, a State child health plan ensures that financial requirements and treatment limitations applicable to mental health and substance use disorder benefits comply with the mental health parity requirements of section 2705(a) of the Public Health Service Act in the same manner that such requirements apply to a group health plan. If the state child health plan provides for delivery of services through a managed care arrangement, this requirement applies to both the state and managed care plans. These requirements are also applicable to any additional benefits provided voluntarily to the child health plan population by managed care entities and will be considered as part of CMS’s contract review process at 42 CFR 457.1201(l).
6.2.1- MHPAEA Before completing a parity analysis, the State must determine whether each covered benefit is a medical/surgical, mental health, or substance use disorder benefit based on a standard that is consistent with state and federal law and generally recognized independent standards of medical practice. (42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)(i))
6.2.1.1- MHPAEA Please choose the standard(s) the state uses to determine whether a covered benefit is a medical/surgical benefit, mental health benefit, or substance use disorder benefit. The most current version of the standard elected must be used. If different standards are used for different benefit types, please specify the benefit type(s) to which each standard is applied. If “Other” is selected, please provide a description of that standard.
International Classification of Disease (ICD)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
State guidelines (Describe: The state developed a behavioral health indicator designed to flag services on the claims submission end with the behavioral health indicator prior to upload into the data warehouse based on the following criteria: • All claims submitted by a substance abuse treatment facility, behavioral health clinic, and psychologist, licensed clinical social worker, behavioral health FQHC (this is listed on the T1015 level), licensed marital and family therapist, board certified behavior analyst, and alcohol & drug counselor. With the exception of the evaluation and management procedure codes and autism services, the other services that these providers perform are limited to behavioral health/substance abuse services by nature of the code description. 41
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-48)Page 48#
• Claims submitted by a psychiatrist, pediatric & adolescent psychiatrist, and psychiatric APRN will depend on the service detail. Behavioral health services (identified via the procedure code description such as psychiatric diagnostic interview) will always be flagged with the BHI. If other services are submitted on the same claim that are not by nature of the code description behavioral health and therefore not flagged with the BHI, the primary diagnosis on the claim will determine whether or not the claim is flagged with the BHI. ICD 9 primary diagnosis of 291-316 will populate the BHI (please note effective for 10/1/2015 – the comparable ICD 10 for the ICD 9 series of 291-316 will drive the BHI). These diagnosis codes are contained in a special list in the claims system that automatically drives population of the BHI. • Medical FQHC – the claim will be flagged as BHI if the claim includes a primary ICD 9 diagnosis of 291-316 (please note effective for 10/1/2015 – the comparable ICD 10 for the ICD 9 series of 291-316 will drive the BHI). These diagnosis codes are contained in a special list in the claims system that automatically drives population of the BHI. • For services that require a registration or prior authorization (PA): the BHI will be assigned to any service that was provided a PA through the Behavioral Health ASO. • Inpatient claims – claims submitted with a BH inpatient RCC will be flagged with the BH indicator
Other (Describe: )
6.2.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State provide mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits?
Yes No
Guidance: If the State does not provide any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the mental health parity requirements do not apply ((42 CFR 457.496(f)(1)). Continue on to Section 6.3.
6.2.2- MHPAEA Section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act) provides that to the extent a State child health plan includes coverage of early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services (EPSDT) defined in section 1905(r) of the Act and provided in accordance with section 1902(a)(43) of the Act, the plan shall be deemed to satisfy the parity requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(A) of the Act.
6.2.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State child health plan provide coverage of EPSDT? The State must provide for coverage of EPSDT benefits, consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements, as indicated in section 6.2.26 of the State child health plan in order to answer “yes.”
Yes
No 42
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-49)Page 49#
Guidance: If the State child health plan does not provide EPSDT consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements at sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act, please go to Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA to complete the required parity analysis of the State child health plan.
If the state does provide EPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid requirements, please continue this section to demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirements of section 2103(c)(6)(B) of the Act and the mental health parity regulations of 42 CFR 457.496(b) related to deemed compliance. Please provide supporting documentation, such as contract language, provider manuals, and/or member handbooks describing the state’s provision of EPSDT.
6.2.2.2- MHPAEA EPSDT benefits are provided to the following:
All children covered under the State child health plan.
A subset of children covered under the State child health plan.
Please describe the different populations (if applicable) covered under the State child health plan that are provided EPSDT benefits consistent with Medicaid statutory requirements.
Guidance: If only a subset of children are provided EPSDT benefits under the State child health plan, 42 CFR 457.496(b)(3) limits deemed compliance to those children only and Section 6.2.3- MHPAEA must be completed as well as the required parity analysis for the other children.
6.2.2.3- MHPAEA To be deemed compliant with the MHPAEA parity requirements, States must provide EPSDT in accordance with sections 1902(a)(43) and 1905(r) of the Act (42 CFR 457.496(b)). The State assures each of the following for children eligible for EPSDT under the separate State child health plan:
All screening services, including screenings for mental health and substance use disorder conditions, are provided at intervals that align with a periodicity schedule that meets reasonable standards of medical or dental practice as well as when medically necessary to determine the existence of suspected illness or conditions. (Section 1905(r))
All diagnostic services described in 1905(a) of the Act are provided as needed to diagnose suspected conditions or illnesses discovered through screening services,
43
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-50)Page 50#
whether or not those services are covered under the Medicaid state plan. (Section 1905(r))
All items and services described in section 1905(a) of the Act are provided when needed to correct or ameliorate a defect or any physical or mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered under the Medicaid State plan. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Treatment limitations applied to services provided under the EPSDT benefit are not limited based on a monetary cap or budgetary constraints and may be exceeded as medically necessary to correct or ameliorate a medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
Non-quantitative treatment limitations, such as definitions of medical necessity or criteria for medical necessity, are applied in an individualized manner that does not preclude coverage of any items or services necessary to correct or ameliorate any medical or physical condition or illness. (Section 1905(r)(5))
EPSDT benefits are not excluded on the basis of any condition, disorder, or diagnosis. (Section 1905(r)(5))
The provision of all requested EPSDT screening services, as well as any corrective treatments needed based on those screening services, are provided or arranged for as necessary. (Section 1902(a)(43))
All families with children eligible for the EPSDT benefit under the separate State child health plan are provided information and informed about the full range of services available to them. (Section 1902(a)(43)(A))
Guidance: For states seeking deemed compliance for their entire State child health plan population, please continue to Section 6.3. If not all of the covered populations are offered EPSDT, the State must conduct a parity analysis of the benefit packages provided to those populations. Please continue to 6.2.3- MHPAEA.
Mental Health Parity Analysis Requirements for States Not Providing EPSDT to All Covered
44
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-51)Page 51#
Populations
Guidance: The State must complete a parity analysis for each population under the State child health plan that is not provided the EPSDT benefit consistent with the requirements 42 CFR 457.496(b). If the State provides benefits or limitations that vary within the child or pregnant woman populations, states should perform a parity analysis for each of the benefit packages. For example, if different financial requirements are applied according to a beneficiary’s income, a separate parity analysis is needed for the benefit package provided at each income level.
Please ensure that changes made to benefit limitations under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 6.2.
6.2.3- MHPAEA In order to conduct the parity analysis, the State must place all medical/surgical and mental health and substance use disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan into one of four classifications: Inpatient, outpatient, emergency care, and prescription drugs. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii); 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(B))
6.2.3.1 MHPAEA Please describe below the standard(s) used to place covered benefits into one of the four classifications.
The state used existing regulatory definitions (Medicaid) and grouped the services in such a way as to ensure that they were put into only one category. The Department conducted this process without regard to whether the service or facility at issue was a mental health/SUD service or a medical/surgical service. The resulting categorization of the benefits is below:
Inpatient and Outpatient: The state used the federal Medicaid regulatory definitions of inpatient and outpatient (42 C.F.R. § 440.2(a)) to place benefits into classifications for inpatient and outpatient. Emergency: The state used its state Medicaid definition of hospital emergency services to classify the benefit into emergency classification, specifically for health care claims billed and paid by the hospital emergency department, which is defined in section 17b-262-968(22) of the DSS operational policy for outpatient hospital services, which has the force of state regulation under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-10, which provides as follows: “‘Emergency department’ means an organized department or facility of a hospital that provides unscheduled episodic services to individuals who present to the hospital for immediate medical attention, regardless of whether it is located on or off the main hospital campus”. The criteria for hospital emergency department services are further defined in section 17b-262-970(i) of the DSS operational policy for outpatient hospital services. Pharmacy: The state included its entire pharmacy benefit (consistent with federal Medicaid regulation definition of outpatient prescription drug in 42 C.F.R. § 440.120) as the basis for including the benefit in the prescription drug classification.
Please see Appendix 6.2.3.
6.2.3.1.1 MHPAEA The State assures that:
45
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-52)Page 52#
The State has classified all benefits covered under the State plan into one of the four classifications.
The same reasonable standards are used for determining the classification for a mental health or substance use disorder benefit as are used for determining the classification of medical/surgical benefits.
6.2.3.1.2- MHPAEA Does the State use sub-classifications to distinguish between office visits and other outpatient services?
Yes
No
6.2.3.1.2.1- MHPAEA If the State uses sub-classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits and other outpatient services, the State assures the following:
The sub-classifications are only used to distinguish office visits from other outpatient items and services, and are not used to distinguish between similar services on other bases (ex: generalist vs. specialist visits).
Guidance: For purposes of this section, any reference to “classification(s)” includes sub-classification(s) in states using sub- classifications to distinguish between outpatient office visits from other outpatient services.
6.2.3.2 MHPAEA The State assures that:
Mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are provided in all classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are provided under the State child health plan.
Guidance: States are not required to cover mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(f)(2)). However if a state does provide any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, those mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be provided in all the same classifications in which medical/surgical benefits are covered under the State child health plan (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(ii).
Annual and Aggregate Lifetime Dollar Limits
6.2.4- MHPAEA A State that provides both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and/or substance use disorder benefits must comply with parity requirements related to annual and aggregate 46
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-53)Page 53#
lifetime dollar limits for benefits covered under the State child health plan. (42 CFR 457.496(c))
6.2.4.1- MHPAEA Please indicate whether the State applies an aggregate lifetime dollar limit and/or an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance abuse disorder benefits covered under the State child health plan.
Aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied
Aggregate annual dollar limit is applied
No dollar limit is applied
Guidance: A monetary coverage limit that applies to all CHIP services provided under the State child health plan is not subject to parity requirements.
If there are no aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to section 6.2.5- MHPAEA.
6.2.4.2- MHPAEA Are there any medical/surgical benefits covered under the State child health plan that have either an aggregate lifetime dollar limit or an annual dollar limit? If yes, please specify what type of limits apply.
Yes (Type(s) of limit: ) No
Guidance: If no aggregate lifetime dollar limit is applied to medical/ surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If no aggregate annual dollar limit is applied to medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(c)(1))
6.2.4.3 – MHPAEA. States applying an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits must determine whether the portion of the medical/surgical benefits to which the limit applies is less than one- third, at least one-third but less than two-thirds, or at least two-thirds of all medical/surgical benefits covered under the State plan (42 CFR 457.496(c)). The portion of medical/surgical benefits subject to the limit is based on the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical/surgical benefits under the State plan for the State plan year or portion of the plan year after a change in benefits that affects the applicability of the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limits. (42 CFR 457.496(c)(3))
47
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-54)Page 54#
The State assures that it has developed a reasonable methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit, as applicable.
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology to calculate the portion of covered medical/surgical benefits which are subject to the aggregate lifetime and/or annual dollar limit and the results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.1- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to a lifetime dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
6.2.4.3.2- MHPAEA Please indicate the portion of the total costs for medical and surgical benefits covered under the State plan which are subject to an annual dollar limit:
Less than 1/3
At least 1/3 and less than 2/3
At least 2/3
Guidance: If an aggregate lifetime limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose an aggregate lifetime limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits. If an annual dollar limit is applied to less than one-third of all medical surgical benefits, the State may not impose an annual dollar limit on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits (42 CFR 457.496(c)(1)). Skip to section 6.2.5- MHPAEA.
If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least one-third of all medical/surgical benefits, please continue below to provide the assurances related to the determination of the portion of total costs for medical/surgical benefits that are subject to either an annual or lifetime limit.
6.2.4.3.2.1- MHPAEA If the State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit to at least 1/3 and less than 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits, the State assures the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii)): 48
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-55)Page 55#
The State applies an aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on mental health or substance use disorder benefits that is no more restrictive than an average limit calculated for medical/surgical benefits.
Guidance: The state’s methodology for calculating the average limit for medical/surgical benefits must be consistent with 42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(i)(B) and 42 CFR 457.496(c)(4)(ii). Please include the state’s methodology and results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.4.3.2.2- MHPAEA If at least 2/3 of all medical/surgical benefits are subject to an annual or lifetime limit, the State assures either of the following (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(i)); (42 CFR 457.496(c)(2)(ii)):
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit is applied to both medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits in a manner that does not distinguish between medical/surgical benefits and mental health and substance use disorder benefits; or
The aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit placed on mental health and substance use disorder benefits is no more restrictive than the aggregate lifetime or annual dollar limit on medical/surgical benefits.
6.2.5- MHPAEA Does the State apply quantitative treatment limitations (QTLs) on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification of benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies one or more QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
Yes (Specify: )
No
Guidance: If the state does not apply any type of QTLs on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification, the state meets parity requirements for QTLs and should continue to Section 6.2.6 - MHPAEA. If the state does apply QTLs to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue.
6.2.5.1- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of QTL on any medical/surgical benefits? 49
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-56)Page 56#
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply QTLs on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose quantitative treatment limitations on mental health or substance use disorder benefits, please go to Section 6.2.6- MHPAEA related to non- quantitative treatment limitations.
6.2.5.2- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of QTL on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the classification which are subject to the limitation. More specifically, the State must determine the ratio of (a) the dollar amount of all payments expected to be paid under the State plan for medical and surgical benefits within a classification which are subject to the type of quantitative treatment limitation for the plan year (or portion of the plan year after a mid-year change affecting the applicability of a type of quantitative treatment limitation to any medical/surgical benefits in the class) to (b) the dollar amount expected to be paid for all medical and surgical benefits within the classification for the plan year. For purposes of this paragraph, all payments expected to be paid under the State plan includes payments expected to be made directly by the State and payments which are expected to be made by MCEs contracting with the State. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C))
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above for each classification within which the State applies QTLs to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results as an attachment to the State child health plan.
6.2.5.3- MHPAEA For each type of QTL applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification, does the State apply the same type of QTL to “substantially all” (defined as at least two-thirds) of the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of QTL to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits, the State may not impose that type of QTL on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A)) 50
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-57)Page 57#
6.2.5.3.1- MHPAEA For each type of QTL applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the predominant level of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. The “predominant level” of a type of QTL in a classification is the level (or least restrictive of a combination of levels) that applies to more than one-half of the medical/surgical benefits in that classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B). The portion of medical/surgical benefits in a classification to which a given level of a QTL type is applied is based on the dollar amount of payments expected to be paid for medical/surgical benefits subject to that level as compared to all medical/surgical benefits in the classification, as described in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(C). For each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of quantitative treatment limitation also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of quantitative treatment limitation applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
The level of each type of quantitative treatment limitation applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of QTL that exceeds the one- half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of QTL such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations
6.2.6- MHPAEA The State may utilize non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for mental health or substance use disorder benefits, but the State must ensure that those NQTLs comply with all the mental health parity requirements. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(4)); (42 CFR 457.496(d)(5)) 6.2.6.1 – MHPAEA If the State imposes any NQTLs, complete this subsection. If the State does not impose NQTLs, please go to Section 6.2.7-MHPAEA.
51
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-58)Page 58#
The State assures that the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of any NQTL to mental health or substance use disorder benefits are no more stringent than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used in the application of NQTLs to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification.
Guidance: Examples of NQTLs include medical management standards to limit or exclude benefits based on medical necessity, restrictions based on geographic location, provider specialty, or other criteria to limit the scope or duration of benefits and provider network design (ex: preferred providers vs. participating providers). Additional examples of possible NQTLs are provided in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(4)(ii). States will need to provide a summary of its NQTL analysis, as well as supporting documentation as requested.
6.2.6.2 – MHPAEA The State or MCE contracting with the State must comply with parity if they provide coverage of medical or surgical benefits furnished by out-of-network providers.
6.2.6.2.1- MHPAEA Does the State or MCE contracting with the State provide coverage of medical or surgical benefits provided by out-of-network providers?
Yes
No
Guidance: The State can answer no if the State or MCE only provides out of network services in specific circumstances, such as emergency care, or when the network is unable to provide a necessary service covered under the contract.
6.2.6.2.2- MHPAEA If yes, the State must provide access to out-of-network providers for mental health or substance use disorder benefits. Please assure the following:
The State attests that when determining access to out-of-network providers within a benefit classification, the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards, or other factors used to determine access to those providers for mental health/ substance use disorder benefits are comparable to and applied no more stringently than the processes, strategies, evidentiary standards or other factors used to determine access for out- of-network providers for medical/surgical benefits.
Availability of Plan Information 6.2.7- MHPAEA The State must provide beneficiaries, potential enrollees, and providers with information related to medical necessity criteria and denials of payment or reimbursement for mental health or substance use disorder services (42 CFR 457.496(e)) in addition to existing notice requirements at 42 CFR 457.1180. 52
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-59)Page 59#
6.2.7.1- MHPAEA Medical necessity criteria determinations must be made available to any current or potential enrollee or contracting provider, upon request. The state attests that the following entities provide this information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Other - The State uses a self-insured, managed fee-for-service approach for both Medicaid and its CHIP Program. As part of this approach, the Department has entered into contracts with Administrative Service Organizations (ASO) for major service types, including Behavioral Health. The State’s behavioral health ASO administers the Behavioral Health Partnership. The Partnership maintains a very detailed website, which includes very specific descriptions of medical necessity guidelines and criteria.
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.2.7.2- MHPAEA Reason for any denial for reimbursement or payment for mental health or substance use disorder benefits must be made available to the enrollee by the health plan or the State. The state attests that the following entities provide denial information:
State
Managed Care entities
Both
Other The State uses a self-insured, managed fee-for-service approach for both Medicaid and its CHIP Program. As part of this approach, the Department has entered into contracts with Administrative Service Organizations (ASO) for major service types, including Behavioral Health. The State’s behavioral health ASO administers the Behavioral Health Partnership. The Partnership maintains a very detailed website, which includes very specific descriptions of reasons for denial, processes to appeal denials, etc.
Guidance: If other is selected, please specify the entity.
6.3. The State assures that, with respect to pre-existing medical conditions, one of the following two statements applies to its plan: (42 CFR 457.480)
6.3.1. The State shall not permit the imposition of any pre-existing medical condition 53
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-60)Page 60#
exclusion for covered services (Section 2102(b)(1)(B)(ii)); OR 6.3.2. The State contracts with a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, or contracts with a group health plan to provide family coverage under a waiver (see Section 6.6.2. (formerly 6.4.2) of the template). Pre-existing medical conditions are permitted to the extent allowed by HIPAA/ERISA. (Formerly 8.6.) (Section 2103(f)) Describe:
Guidance: States may request two additional purchase options in Title XXI: cost effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system and for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4. Additional Purchase Options- If the State wishes to provide services under the plan through cost effective alternatives or the purchase of family coverage, it must request the appropriate option. To be approved, the State must address the following: (Section 2105(c)(2) and (3)) (42 CFR 457.1005 and 457.1010)
6.4.1. Cost Effective Coverage- Payment may be made to a State in excess of the 10 percent limitation on use of funds for payments for: 1) other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; 2) expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); 3) expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and 4) other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan, if it demonstrates the following (42CFR 457.1005(a)):
6.4.1.1. Coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures must meet the coverage requirements above; Describe the coverage provided by the alternative delivery system. The State may cross reference Section 6.2.1 - 6.2.28. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(i)) (42 CFR 457.1005(b))
6.4.1.2. The cost of such coverage must not be greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided for the coverage described above; Describe the cost of such coverage on an average per child basis. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(ii)) (42 CFR 457.1005(b))
Guidance: Check below if the State is requesting to provide cost-effective coverage through a community-based health delivery system. This allows the State to waive the 10 percent limitation on expenditures not used for Medicaid or health insurance assistance if coverage provided to targeted low-income children through such expenditures meets the requirements of Section 2103; the cost of such coverage is not greater, on an average per child basis, than the cost of coverage that would otherwise be provided under Section 2103; and such coverage is provided through the use of a 54
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-61)Page 61#
community-based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Services Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923.
If the cost-effective alternative waiver is requested, the State must demonstrate that payments in excess of the 10 percent limitation will be used for other child health assistance for targeted low-income children; expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children); expenditures for outreach activities as provided in Section 2102(c)(1) under the plan; and other reasonable costs incurred by the State to administer the plan. (42 CFR, 457.1005(a))
6.4.1.3. The coverage must be provided through the use of a community based health delivery system, such as through contracts with health centers receiving funds under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act or with hospitals such as those that receive disproportionate share payment adjustments under Section 1886(c)(5)(F) or 1923 of the Social Security Act. Describe the community-based delivery system. (Section 2105(c)(2)(B)(iii)) (42 CFR 457.1005(a))
Guidance: Check 6.4.2.if the State is requesting to purchase family coverage. Any State requesting to purchase such coverage will need to include information that establishes to the Secretary’s satisfaction that: 1) when compared to the amount of money that would have been paid to cover only the children involved with a comparable package, the purchase of family coverage is cost effective; and 2) the purchase of family coverage is not a substitution for coverage already being provided to the child. (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42 CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2. Purchase of Family Coverage- Describe the plan to purchase family coverage. Payment may be made to a State for the purpose of family coverage under a group health plan or health insurance coverage that includes coverage of targeted low- income children, if it demonstrates the following: (Section 2105(c)(3)) (42 CFR 457.1010)
6.4.2.1. Purchase of family coverage is cost-effective. The State’s cost of purchasing family coverage, including administrative expenditures, that includes coverage for the targeted low-income children involved or the family involved (as applicable) under premium assistance programs must not be greater than the cost of obtaining coverage under the State plan for all eligible targeted low-income children or families involved; and (2) The State may base its demonstration of cost effectiveness on an assessment of the cost of coverage, including administrative costs, for 55
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-62)Page 62#
children or families under premium assistance programs to the cost of other CHIP coverage for these children or families, done on a case-by-case basis, or on the cost of premium assisted coverage in the aggregate.
6.4.2.2. The State assures that the family coverage would not otherwise substitute for health insurance coverage that would be provided to such children but for the purchase of family coverage. (Section 2105(c)(3)(B)) (42 CFR 457.1010(b))
6.4.2.3. The State assures that the coverage for the family otherwise meets title XXI requirements. (42 CFR 457.1010(c))
6.4.3-PA: Additional State Options for Providing Premium Assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002 issued February, 2, 2010) A State may elect to offer a premium assistance subsidy for qualified employer-sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), to all targeted low-income children who are eligible for child health assistance under the plan and have access to such coverage. No subsidy shall be provided to a targeted low-income child (or the child’s parent) unless the child voluntarily elects to receive such a subsidy. (Section 2105(c)(10)(A)). Please remember to update section 9.10 when electing this option. Does the State provide this option to targeted low-income children? Yes No
6.4.3.1-PA Qualified Employer-Sponsored Coverage and Premium Assistance Subsidy
6.4.3.1.1-PA Provide an assurance that the qualified employer-sponsored insurance meets the definition of qualified employer-sponsored coverage as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(B), and that the premium assistance subsidy meets the definition of premium assistance subsidy as defined in 2105(c)(10)(C).
6.4.3.1.2-PA Describe whether the State is providing the premium assistance subsidy as reimbursement to an employee or for out-of-pocket expenditures or directly to the employee’s employer.
6.4.3.2-PA: Supplemental Coverage for Benefits and Cost Sharing Protections Provided under the Child Health Plan.
6.4.3.2.1-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for qualified employer- sponsored coverage, as defined in Section 2105(c)(10)(E)(i), provide an assurance that the State is providing for each targeted low-income child enrolled in such coverage, supplemental coverage consisting of all items or services that are not covered or are only partially covered, under the qualified employer-sponsored
56
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-63)Page 63#
coverage consistent with 2103(a) and cost sharing protections consistent with Section 2103(e).
6.4.3.2.2-PA Describe whether these benefits are being provided through the employer or by the State providing wraparound benefits.
6.4.3.2.3-PA If the State is providing premium assistance for benchmark or benchmark-equivalent coverage, the State ensures that such group health plans or health insurance coverage offered through an employer will be certified by an actuary as coverage that is equivalent to a benchmark benefit package described in Section 2103(b) or benchmark equivalent coverage that meets the requirements of Section 2103(a)(2).
6.4.3.3-PA: Application of Waiting Period Imposed Under State Plan: States are required to apply the same waiting period to premium assistance as is applied to direct coverage for children under their CHIP State plan, as specified in Section 2105(c)(10)(F).
6.4.3.3.1-PA Provide an assurance that the waiting period for children in premium assistance is the same as for those children in direct coverage (if State has a waiting period in place for children in direct CHIP coverage).
6.4.3.4-PA: Opt-Out and Outreach, Education, and Enrollment Assistance
6.4.3.4.1-PA Describe the State’s process for ensuring parents are permitted to disenroll their child from qualified employer-sponsored coverage and to enroll in CHIP effective on the first day of any month for which the child is eligible for such assistance and in a manner that ensures continuity of coverage for the child (Section 2105(c)(10)(G)).
6.4.3.4.2-PA Describe the State’s outreach, education, and enrollment efforts related to premium assistance programs, as required under Section 2102(c)(3). How does the State inform families of the availability of premium assistance, and assist them in obtaining such subsidies? What are the specific significant resources the State intends to apply to educate employers about the availability of premium assistance subsidies under the State child health plan? (Section 2102(c))
6.4.3.5-PA Purchasing Pool- A State may establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool and may provide a premium assistance subsidy for enrollment in coverage made available through this pool (Section 2105(c)(10)(I)). Does the State provide this option? Yes No
57
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-64)Page 64#
6.6.3.5.1-PA Describe the plan to establish an employer-family premium assistance purchasing pool.
6.6.3.5.2-PA Provide an assurance that employers who are eligible to participate: 1) have less than 250 employees; 2) have at least one employee who is a pregnant woman eligible for CHIP or a member of a family that has at least one child eligible under the State’s CHIP plan.
6.6.3.5.3-PA Provide an assurance that the State will not claim for any administrative expenditures attributable to the establishment or operation of such a pool except to the extent such payment would otherwise be permitted under this title.
6.4.3.6-PA Notice of Availability of Premium Assistance- Describe the procedures that assure that if a State provides premium assistance subsidies under this Section, it must: 1) provide as part of the application and enrollment process, information describing the availability of premium assistance and how to elect to obtain a subsidy; and 2) establish other procedures to ensure that parents are fully informed of the choices for child health assistance or through the receipt of premium assistance subsidies (Section 2105(c)(10)(K)).
6.4.3.6.1-PA Provide an assurance that the State includes information about premium assistance on the CHIP application or enrollment form.
Section 7. Quality and Appropriateness of Care
Guidance: Methods for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Methods to assure quality include the application of performance measures, quality standards consumer information strategies, and other quality improvement strategies.
Performance measurement strategies could include using measurements for external reporting either to the State or to consumers and for internal quality improvement purposes. They could be based on existing measurement sets that have undergone rigorous evaluation for their appropriateness (e.g., HEDIS). They may include the use of standardized member satisfaction surveys (e.g., CAHPS) to assess members’ experience of care along key dimensions such as access, satisfaction, and system performance.
Quality standards are often used to assure the presence of structural and process measures that promote quality and could include such approaches as: the use of external and periodic review of health plans by groups such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance; the establishment of standards related to consumer 58
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-65)Page 65#
protection and quality such as those developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; and the formation of an advisory group to the State or plan to facilitate consumer and community participation in the plan.
Information strategies could include: the disclosure of information to beneficiaries about their benefits under the plan and their rights and responsibilities; the provision of comparative information to consumers on the performance of available health plans and providers; and consumer education strategies on how to access and effectively use health insurance coverage to maximize quality of care.
Quality improvement strategies should include the establishment of quantified quality improvement goals for the plan or the State and provider education. Other strategies include specific purchasing specifications, ongoing contract monitoring mechanisms, focus groups, etc.
Where States use managed care organizations to deliver CHIP care, recent legal changes require the State to use managed care quality standards and quality strategies similar to those used in Medicaid managed care.
Tools for Evaluating and Monitoring Quality- Tools and types of information available include, HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) measures, CAHPS (Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study) measures, vital statistics data, and State health registries (e.g., immunization registries).
Quality monitoring may be done by external quality review organizations, or, if the State wishes, internally by a State board or agency independent of the State CHIP Agency. Establishing grievance measures is also an important aspect of monitoring.
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 8.
Guidance: The State must specify the qualifications of entities that will provide coverage and the conditions of participation. States should also define the quality standard they are using, for example, NCQA Standards or other professional standards. Any description of the information strategies used should be linked to Section 9. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42 CFR 457.495)
7.1. Describe the methods (including external and internal monitoring) used to assure the quality and appropriateness of care, particularly with respect to well-baby care, well-child care, and immunizations provided under the plan. (Section 2102(a)(7)(A)) (42 CFR 457.495(a)) Will the State utilize any of the following tools to assure quality? (Check all that apply and describe the activities for any categories utilized.)
59
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-66)Page 66#
The methods that are used to assure quality and appropriateness of care include contracting standards, licensing, reporting requirements, external reviews, and onsite reviews.
The HUSKY Health medical ASO contract includes specific standards for quality of care, including the provision of well-baby care, well-child care, and immunizations. The HUSKY Health medical ASO is required to arrange for immunizations and comprehensive screens (and any needed interperiodic screens) in accordance with the schedules recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. As described below, The HUSKY Health medical ASO is required to submit reports on well-baby care, childcare visits and immunizations. The Connecticut Department of Public Health has a statewide immunization registry (Connecticut Immunization Registry and Tracking System), to which providers report directly.
The behavioral health and dental ASO contracts will include specific standards for quality of care, including the provision of behavioral health and dental health intensive care management and service coordination. In addition, the behavioral health and dental ASOs will be required to submit to the Department periodic reports on utilization of dental health services and behavioral health services, including inpatient and outpatient services.
The HUSKY Health ASOs are required to meet all standards for quality of care as specified in their contracts with the State. The ASOs must be licensed by the Connecticut Insurance Department (CID) to operate as a utilization review company. CID continuously monitors quality through various mechanisms, including reporting, external reviews, and onsite reviews.
Reporting will include a report on each ASO’s quality assurance plan (QAP), complaints, prior authorization denials, utilization review (UR) denials, and all data required for HEDIS (or equivalent data for non-NCQA accredited plans). In addition, the Department requires reports on compliance with the well-child periodicity schedule and on immunization. The State conducts periodic onsite reviews to determine ongoing compliance with contract requirements.
The unborn children covered under this coverage will be included in all current methods to assure quality and appropriateness of care.
7.1.1. Quality standards
7.1.2. Performance measurement
7.1.2 (a) CHIPRA Quality Core Set
60
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-67)Page 67#
7.1.2 (b) Other
7.1.3. Information strategies The HUSKY ASOs are required to educate enrollees about their benefits, rights and responsibilities under the HUSKY B. including HUSKY Plus. The HUSKY ASOs also educate enrollees about the importance of preventive services including medical and dental services, health promotion activities, and visiting their primary care provider instead of an emergency room. The unborn population will be included under these processes. 7.1.4. Quality improvement strategies
The State includes specific standards for quality of care in the contracts with its ASOs. These standards are monitored by the State through reporting requirements, onsite reviews, and external reviews.
In particular, the HUSKY ASOs are required to establish an internal QAP, which will be in writing and available to the public. The written description shall include detailed goals and annually developed objectives; address the quality of clinical care and non-clinical aspects of services for the entire range of care provided by each ASO; specify quality of care studies and related activities; provide for continuous performance of activities, including tracking of issues over time; and provide for review and feedback by physicians and other health professionals.
Guidance: Provide a brief description of methods to be used to assure access to covered services, including a description of how the State will assure the quality and appropriateness of the care provided. The State should consider whether there are sufficient providers of care for the newly enrolled populations and whether there is reasonable access to care. (Section 2102(a)(7)(B))
7.2. Describe the methods used, including monitoring, to assure: (Section 2102(a)(7)(B)) (42 CFR 457.495)
7.2.1. Access to well-baby care, well-child care, well-adolescent care and childhood and adolescent immunizations. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42 CFR 457.495(a))
The State requires the HUSKY Health medical ASO to submit reports on immunizations, and compliance with the well-child periodicity schedule.
7.2.2. Access to covered services, including emergency services as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. (Section 2102(a)(7)) 42 CFR 457.495(b))
The State monitors access requirements through reporting and member satisfaction surveys. For medical, dental, pharmacy, and behavioral health services, the ASO will 61
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-68)Page 68#
rely on the Connecticut Medical Assistance Program (CMAP) provider network to assure access to covered services. HUSKY Health ASO is required to monitor the CMAP provider network to ensure providers who fail to reenroll do so and also to recruit additional providers to make the network more robust.
7.2.3. Appropriate and timely procedures to monitor and treat enrollees with chronic, complex, or serious medical conditions, including access to an adequate number of visits to specialists experienced in treating the specific medical condition and access to out-of- network providers when the network is not adequate for the enrollee’s medical condition. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42 CFR 457.495(c))
All HUSKY Health services (medical, behavioral health and dental) are provided through the CMAP network. HUSKY B members and members covered under the unborn coverage have access to all of the same providers as Medicaid recipients. The HUSKY Health medical, behavioral health and dental ASOs assist in managing the Department’s network, but do not contract directly with network providers. All claims are processed by the Department’s MMIS.
Pharmacy services are provided utilizing the Department’s Preferred Drug List (PDL).
For members enrolled in HUSKY Plus, the HUSKY Health medical ASO now administers that program. This allows for more streamlined and efficient coordination of services for members eligible for HUSKY Plus, allowing members to receive supplemental services to the fullest extent possible in the least restrictive setting. (See Appendix 3.1).
7.2.4. Decisions related to the prior authorization of health services are completed in accordance with State law or, in accordance with the medical needs of the patient, within 14 days after the receipt of a request for services. (Section 2102(a)(7)) (42 CFR 457.495(d)) Exigent medical circumstances may require more rapid response according to the medical needs of the patient.
Prior authorization of services covered in the HUSKY B benefit package shall be determined by the appropriate ASO based on the Department’s individual care plans, medical necessity and in accordance with State law. However, the following services in the benefit package shall not require prior authorization:
(1) Preventive care, including: (a) Periodic and well-child visits; (b) Immunizations; and (c) Prenatal care; (2) Preventive family planning services, including: (a) Reproductive health exams; (b) Member counseling; (c) Member education; 62
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-69)Page 69#
(d) Lab tests to detect the presence of conditions affecting reproductive health; and (e) Screening, testing and treatment of pre and post-test counseling for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV, and (3) Emergency ambulance services or emergency care.
63
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-70)Page 70#
Section 8. Cost-Sharing and Payment
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 9.
8.1. Is cost-sharing imposed on any of the children covered under the plan? (42 CFR 457.505) Indicate if this also applies for pregnant women. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009)
8.1.1. Yes 8.1.2. No, skip to question 8.8.
8.1.1-PW Yes 8.1.2-PW No, skip to question 8.8.
Guidance: It is important to note that for families below 150 percent of poverty, the same limitations on cost sharing that are under the Medicaid program apply. (These cost-sharing limitations have been set forth in Section 1916 of the Social Security Act, as implemented by regulations at 42 CFR 447.50 - 447.59). For families with incomes of 150 percent of poverty and above, cost sharing for all children in the family cannot exceed 5 percent of a family's income per year. Include a statement that no cost sharing will be charged for pregnancy-related services. (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2. Describe the amount of cost-sharing, any sliding scale based on income, the group or groups of enrollees that may be subject to the charge by age and income (if applicable) and the service for which the charge is imposed or time period for the charge, as appropriate. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b) and (c), 457.515(a) and (c))
8.2.1. Premiums: Effective July1, 2014, children with family income up to 249% of the FPL will not be required to pay a premium. Children with family income that exceeds 250% of the FPL but which does not exceed 318% of the FPL will be required to pay a premium of $30.00 per child per month, up to a maximum of $50.00 per family per month. Effective July 1, 2014, newborns with family income over 249% of the FPL will not be required to pay premiums for the first four months of coverage, provided they were born in a Connecticut hospital or designated border hospital. Effective August 1, 2015, pursuant to a change in state law, enrollment of children over 318% of the FPL will not be permitted. Private organizations may subsidize premiums. For unborn children with family income up to 258% FPL, no premiums are required.
8.2.2. Deductibles: 64
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-71)Page 71#
Not applicable. None.. 8.2.3. Coinsurance or copayments:
Copayments: For children in families with income over 196% of the FPL, the State has established a schedule of reasonable copayments for services other than the following: preventive care and services, inpatient physician and hospital, outpatient surgical, ambulance, skilled nursing, home health, hospice and short-term rehabilitation and physical therapy, occupational and speech therapies, lab and X-ray, preadmission testing, prosthetics, and durable medical equipment, and pregnancy related services, including medications prescribed during pregnancy. (See Appendix 6.1). Both targeted low income children and beneficiaries in the unborn child group will receive pregnancy- related services (including prescription medications) with no copayments. Due to the parity analysis under MHPAEA, the State will no longer charge copayments for outpatient behavioral health visits and outpatient substance abuse treatment. The State will implement that change as soon as practicable.
8.2.4. Other:
$725 lifetime limit on orthodontic benefit and $100 towards the purchase of eyeglass frames and lenses per two-year period.
Effective March 1, 2011, the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing (premiums, if applicable, dental co-insurance and co-payments) will be calculated using the lowest qualifying income according to income level which is based on FPL and household size. Income Level 1 includes children with family income that exceeds 196% of the FPL but does not exceed 249% of the FPL. There is no premium. Income Level 2 includes children with family income that is 250% or more of the FPL but does not exceed 318% FPL. The premium is $30 per month for one child or $50 for two or more children per month. Annual cost sharing including premiums, dental co-insurance, and co-payments cannot exceed 5% of the family’s gross income per eligibility year. Maximums will be adjusted yearly to reflect the most current FPL’s.
8.2-DS Supplemental Dental (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012 issued October 7, 2009) For children enrolled in the dental-only supplemental coverage, describe the amount of cost- sharing, specifying any sliding scale based on income. Also describe how the State will track that the cost sharing does not exceed 5 percent of gross family income. The 5 percent of income calculation shall include all cost-sharing for health insurance and dental insurance. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(a), 457.510(b), and (c), 457.515(a) and (c), and 457.560(a)) Please update Sections 1.1-DS, 4.1-DS, 4.2-DS, 6.2- DS, and 9.10 when electing this option. 65
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-72)Page 72#
8.2.1-DS Premiums:
8.2.2-DS Deductibles:
8.2.3-DS Coinsurance or copayments:
8.2.4-DS Other:
8.3. Describe how the public will be notified, including the public schedule, of this cost sharing (including the cumulative maximum) and changes to these amounts and any differences based on income. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.505(b))
Guidance: The State should be able to demonstrate upon request its rationale and justification regarding these assurances. This section also addresses limitations on payments for certain expenditures and requirements for maintenance of effort.
8.4. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the cost sharing in its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.4.1. Cost-sharing does not favor children from higher income families over lower income families. (Section 2103(e)(1)(B)) (42 CFR 457.530) 8.4.2. No cost-sharing applies to well-baby and well-child care, including age- appropriate immunizations. (Section 2103(e)(2)) (42 CFR 457.520) 8.4.3 No additional cost-sharing applies to the costs of emergency medical services delivered outside the network. (Section 2103(e)(1)(A)) (42 CFR 457.515(f))
8.4.1- MHPAEA There is no separate accumulation of cumulative financial requirements, as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(a), for mental health and substance abuse disorder benefits compared to medical/surgical benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(iii))
8.4.2- MHPAEA If applicable, any different levels of financial requirements that are applied to different tiers of prescription drugs are determined based on reasonable factors, regardless of whether a drug is generally prescribed for medical/surgical benefits or mental health/substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(ii)(A)) Not applicable.
8.4.3- MHPAEA Cost sharing applied to benefits provided under the State child health plan will remain capped at five percent of the beneficiary’s income as required by 42 CFR 457.560 (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(D)).
8.4.4- MHPAEA Does the State apply financial requirements to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits? If yes, specify the classification(s) of benefits in which the State applies financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
66
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-73)Page 73#
Yes (Specify: )
No
Guidance: For the purposes of parity, financial requirements include deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and out of pocket maximums; premiums are excluded from the definition. If the state does not apply financial requirements on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state meets parity requirements for financial requirements. If the state does apply financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the state must conduct a parity analysis. Please continue below.
Please ensure that changes made to financial requirements under the State child health plan as a result of the parity analysis are also made in Section 8.2.
8.4.5- MHPAEA Does the State apply any type of financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
8.4.6- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of financial requirement on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the class which are subject to the limitation.
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above (Section 6.2.5.2-MHPAEA) for each classification or within which the State applies financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results of the parity analysis as an attachment to the State child health plan.
8.4.7- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification, does the State apply the same type of financial requirement to at least two-thirds (“substantially all”) of all the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
67
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-74)Page 74#
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of financial requirement to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
8.4.8- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State must determine the predominant level (as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)) of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used in determining whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of financial requirement also is applied in determining the dollar amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of financial requirement applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
The level of each type of financial requirement applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of financial requirement that exceeds the one-half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of financial requirement such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
8.5. Describe how the State will ensure that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of such family’s income for the length of the child’s eligibility period in the State. Include a description of the procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the State for overpayment by an enrollee: (Section 2103(e)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.560(b) and 457.505(e))
The family share of premium payments, copayments and dental co-insurance payments were calculated to not exceed 5% of the lowest qualifying family income within each of the two income levels for subsidized benefits (e.g. 5% of 196% of FPL and 5% of 250% of the FPL) for the applicable household size. Cost sharing is tracked by the 68
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-75)Page 75#
Department’s Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) as applicable and reported to the SPES. The SPES compiles the cost sharing amounts with premiums it has collected and reports back to the Department’s MMIS vendor and the ASOs. When cost sharing maximums have been met, the ASOs will issue new member identification cards. If a family exceeds the maximum, the Department is required to reimburse the excess above the maximum amount to the family.
It is the responsibility of the SPES to review the member accounts at a minimum on a monthly basis to determine which families have reached their maximum annual cost sharing limit. The review must be completed no later than 15 days after the end of each review period. If, due to claims’ time-lag, the family has paid more than the allowed limits for cost sharing, it is the responsibility of the Department to repay the overpayment to the family within three months of the SPES’s determination that the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing limit for copayments had been met. The SPES is required to establish and maintain a system to track the copayments incurred by each family in Income Levels 1 and 2 in order to adhere to the requirements of the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing. The ASOs and the Department also must require their providers and subcontractors to verify whether a family has reached the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing limit for copayments and co-insurance before charging a copayment or co-insurance amount.
When a family reaches the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing limit, the SPES will inform the Department. The ASOs will inform the providers, subcontractors and family that the limit has been met, that the providers and subcontractors cannot charge further cost sharing within the annual eligibility period.
If the family believes it has reached the maximum annual aggregate cost sharing limit, it may request, in writing, that the Department review the cost sharing amounts paid by the family. The Department will then review the cost sharing amounts paid by the family and respond to the family, in writing, within three weeks of the date of the family’s written request. If the family disagrees with the determination, the family may request, in writing, a review by the Department. The ASOs are required to include a summary of this right and the appropriate procedures to request the review in their Member Handbooks.
There are no cost sharing requirements for covered HUSKY Plus Physical services.
8.6. Describe the procedures the State will use to ensure American Indian (as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) and Alaska Native children will be excluded from cost-sharing. (Section 2103(b)(3)(D)) (42 CFR 457.535)
Families of American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) children who are members of a federally organized tribe and who are in Income Level 1 or 2 are exempted from paying HUSKY B premiums or copayments. Income Level 1 represents those enrollees whose income falls between 196 percent and 249 percent of the federal poverty level. Income 69
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-76)Page 76#
Level 2 represents those enrollees whose income falls between 250 percent and 318 percent of the federal poverty level.
The Department of Social Services staff informed representatives of the Mashantucket Pequots and the Mohegans, the two federally recognized tribes within the State of Connecticut, that federal requirements do not permit cost sharing for AI/AN children in the HUSKY B program. Staff also consulted with them about the best way to identify AI/AN children.
Based on recommendations made by both tribes, it was decided that applicants would be asked to verify their tribal membership at time of application. The HUSKY application was modified to ask if the child for whom application is made is a member of a federally recognized tribe. If the answer is “yes”, the applicant will need to provide the name of the tribe and verification of membership. HUSKY informational materials were also revised to include information about the cost sharing exemption for AI/AN children. The SPES, under contract with the Department to determine eligibility for HUSKY B applicants, will notify the ASOs when a new enrollee is qualified for exemption from cost- sharing due to AI/AN status. The ASOs will not charge the family for any partial premium payment and will issue the enrollee a membership card that specifies “no copayments”
American Indian/Alaskan Native children enrolled in HUSKY Plus Physical will not be charged premiums or copayments as there are no cost sharing requirements.
8.7. Provide a description of the consequences for an enrollee or applicant who does not pay a charge. (42 CFR 457.570 and 457.505(c))
See CT14-0005, CS21, Non-Financial Eligibility – Substitution of Coverage). Enrollees are permitted up to 90 (days) to pay their initial premium and their premium for annual re-enrollment. Failure to do so will result preclude the enrollee from receiving initial coverage or having their coverage renewed, as applicable. Once the enrollee has coverage however, as of January 1, 2014, the Department no longer disenrolls enrollees for failure to pay the monthly premium.
Guidance: Section 8.7.1 is based on Section 2101(a) of the Act provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner that is coordinated with other sources of health benefits coverage for children.
8.7.1. Provide an assurance that the following disenrollment protections are being applied:
Guidance: Provide a description below of the State’s premium grace period process and how the State notifies families of their rights and responsibilities with respect to payment of premiums. (Section 2103(e)(3)(C)) 70
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-77)Page 77#
8.7.1.1. State has established a process that gives enrollees reasonable notice of and an opportunity to pay past due premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees prior to disenrollment. (42 CFR 457.570(a))
8.7.1.2. The disenrollment process affords the enrollee an opportunity to show that the enrollee’s family income has declined prior to disenrollment for non- payment of cost-sharing charges. (42 CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.3. In the instance mentioned above, that the State will facilitate enrolling the child in Medicaid or adjust the child’s cost-sharing category as appropriate. (42 CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.4 The State provides the enrollee with an opportunity for an impartial review to address disenrollment from the program. (42 CFR 457.570(c))
8.8. The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the payment aspects of its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.8.1. No Federal funds will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(4)) (42 CFR 457.220) 8.8.2. No cost-sharing (including premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and all other types) will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(5) (42 CFR 457.224) (Previously 8.4.5) 8.8.3. No funds under this title will be used for coverage if a private insurer would have been obligated to provide such assistance except for a provision limiting this obligation because the child is eligible under the this title. (Section 2105(c)(6)(A)) (42 CFR 457.626(a)(1)) 8.8.4. Income and resource standards and methodologies for determining Medicaid eligibility are not more restrictive than those applied as of June 1, 1997. (Section 2105(d)(1)) (42 CFR 457.622(b)(5)) 8.8.5. No funds provided under this title or coverage funded by this title will include coverage of abortion except if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Section 2105)(c)(7)(B)) (42 CFR 457.475) 8.8.6. No funds provided under this title will be used to pay for any abortion or to assist in the purchase, in whole or in part, for coverage that includes abortion (except as described above). (Section 2105)(c)(7)(A)) (42 CFR 457.475)
Section 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration
Guidance: States should consider aligning its strategic objectives with those discussed in Section II of the CHIP Annual Report.
71
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-78)Page 78#
9.1. Describe strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health coverage among targeted low-income children and other low-income children: (Section 2107(a)(2)) (42 CFR 457.710(b)) To increase the number of children in Connecticut with health insurance through the expansion of the HUSKY program.
To maximize participation in HUSKY B through outreach, a simplified application process
To promote the health of children through an improved health benefit package tailored to the health care needs of children, which includes comprehensive preventive services.
To assist those children enrolled in HUSKY B who have special physical health care needs, to receive appropriate care through a supplemental plan (HUSKY Plus Physical).
To maximize coordination between the HUSKY Health ASOs and HUSKY Plus Physical by integrating basic health care needs into the care provided for intensive health care needs, and, whenever possible, building upon existing therapeutic relationships with Title V providers.
To promote the health of children covered under the unborn option by promoting optimal pregnancy outcomes.
Guidance: Goals should be measurable, quantifiable and convey a target the State is working towards.
9.2. Specify one or more performance goals for each strategic objective identified: (Section 2107(a)(3)) (42 CFR 457.710(c)) To increase the number of children covered by health insurance within Connecticut.
To maximize participation in HUSKY B.
• Expand Medicaid (HUSKY Part A) enrollment of uninsured children 18 years old who are under 196% of the FPL.
• Increase the number of insured children 18 or under who are between 196% and 318% of the federal poverty level.
To promote the health of children through a comprehensive health benefits package.
• Match or exceed the statewide average of the percentage of children in HUSKY B who receive immunizations by age two, meet or exceed state standards for well- 72
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-79)Page 79#
child care, with a goal of at least 80% of children receiving all recommended well-child visits.
To assist children with special physical health needs through HUSKY Plus.
• Ninety percent of referrals to HUSKY Plus will have eligibility determination made within 21 days.
• Track the percentage of referrals to HUSKY Plus accepted or denied.
To maximize coordination between HUSKY B and HUSKY Plus:
• The HUSKY Health ASO is now coordinating health care for HUSKY Plus members. The ASO is also pre-authorizing all HUSKY Plus covered services. Families now have a single entity to assist them and ensure that supplemental services are authorized when the child’s medical needs surpass the regular HUSKY B package.
• 100% of HUSKY Plus children’s needs will be assess and referred for Intensive Care Management.
To assure that children with behavioral health needs receive appropriate care
• 70% of children who are discharged from inpatient care for mental health or substance abuse will receive follow-up care 30 days following discharge.
To promote the health of children covered under the unborn option by promoting optimal pregnancy outcomes. • Track and monitor the following pregnancy outcomes: o overall c-section measures, NTSV c-section measures, adverse maternal measures, vaginal delivery (39 wks. and above) measures, NICU utilization, preterm deliveries, NAS - neonatal abstinence syndrome measures.
Guidance: The State should include data sources to be used to assess each performance goal. In addition, check all appropriate measures from 9.3.1 to 9.3.8 that the State will be utilizing to measure performance, even if doing so duplicates what the State has already discussed in Section 9.
It is acceptable for the State to include performance measures for population subgroups chosen by the State for special emphasis, such as racial or ethnic minorities, particular high-risk or hard to reach populations, children with special needs, etc. 73
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-80)Page 80#
HEDIS (Health Employer Data and Information Set) 2008 contains performance measures relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. In addition, HEDIS 3.0 contains measures for the general population, for which breakouts by children’s age bands (e.g., ages < 1, 1-9, 10-19) are required. Full definitions, explanations of data sources, and other important guidance on the use of HEDIS measures can be found in the HEDIS 2008 manual published by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. So that State HEDIS results are consistent and comparable with national and regional data, states should check the HEDIS 2008 manual for detailed definitions of each measure, including definitions of the numerator and denominator to be used. For states that do not plan to offer managed care plans, HEDIS measures may also be able to be adapted to organizations of care other than managed care.
9.3. Describe how performance under the plan will be measured through objective, independently verifiable means and compared against performance goals in order to determine the State’s performance, taking into account suggested performance indicators as specified below or other indicators the State develops: (Section 2107(a)(4)(A),(B)) (42 CFR 457.710(d))
Check the applicable suggested performance measurements listed below that the State plans to use: (Section 2107(a)(4)) 9.3.1. The increase in the percentage of Medicaid-eligible children enrolled in Medicaid. 9.3.2. The reduction in the percentage of uninsured children. 9.3.3. The increase in the percentage of children with a usual source of care. 9.3.4. The extent to which outcome measures show progress on one or more of the health problems identified by the state. 9.3.5. HEDIS Measurement Set relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. 9.3.6. Other child appropriate measurement set. List or describe the set used.
9.3.7. If not utilizing the entire HEDIS Measurement Set, specify which measures will be collected, such as: 9.3.7.1. Immunizations 9.3.7.2. Well childcare 9.3.7.3. Adolescent well visits 9.3.7.4. Satisfaction with care 9.3.7.5. Mental health 9.3.7.6. Dental care 9.3.7.7. Other, list: • Ambulatory Services • Follow-up After Mental Health Hospitalization • Follow-up After Chemical Dependency Hospitalization
See Appendix 9.3 for complete listing of reporting measures. 9.3.8. Performance measures for special targeted populations. 74
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-81)Page 81#
See Appendix 9.3 for complete listing of reporting measures
9.4. The State assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires. (Section 2107(b)(1)) (42 CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should include an assurance of compliance with the annual reporting requirements, including an assessment of reducing the number of low-income uninsured children. The State should also discuss any annual activities to be undertaken that relate to assessment and evaluation of the program.
9.5. The State assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. Briefly describe the State’s plan for these annual assessments and reports. (Section 2107(b)(2)) (42 CFR 457.750)
9.6. The State assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review or audit. (Section 2107(b)(3)) (42 CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should verify that they will participate in the collection and evaluation of data as new measures are developed or existing measures are revised as deemed necessary by CMS, the states, advocates, and other interested parties.
9.7. The State assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed. (42 CFR 457.710(e))
9.8. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42 CFR 457.135)
9.8.1. Section 1902(a)(4)(C) (relating to conflict of interest standards) 9.8.2. Paragraphs (2), (16) and (17) of Section 1903(i) (relating to limitations on payment) 9.8.3. Section 1903(w) (relating to limitations on provider donations and taxes) 9.8.4. Section 1132 (relating to periods within which claims must be filed)
Guidance: Section 9.9 can include discussion of community-based providers and consumer representatives in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. Issues to address include a listing of public meetings or announcements made to the public concerning the development of the children's health insurance program or public forums used to discuss changes to the State plan. 75
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-82)Page 82#
9.9. Describe the process used by the State to accomplish involvement of the public in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. (Section 2107(c)) (42 CFR 457.120(a) and (b))
The Medical Assistance Oversight Council (MAPOC) and the Behavioral Health Partnership Oversight Council (BHPOC) serves in an advisory role to the Department for the behavioral health services as managed by the medical and behavioral health ASOs. The MAPOC and BHPOC are comprised of legislators, clients, advocacy groups, DSS, and other state agencies such as the Department of Children and Families and the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. The MAPOC and BHPOC meet once a month during which time the Department provides program updates. The MAPOC and BHPOC also have several subcommittees that provide a forum for important issues to assure the viability of the medical and behavioral health service delivery system. The subcommittees include: Transition, Provider Advisory, Quality Management, Consumer Access, and the Department of Children and Families Subcommittee.
9.9.1. Describe the process used by the State to ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the State on the development and implementation of the procedures required in 42 CFR 457.125. States should provide notice and consultation with Tribes on proposed pregnant women expansions. (Section 2107(c)) (42 CFR 457.120(c)) In accordance with 42 CFR 457.125, Section 2107 (c) and 42 CFR 457.120 (c) The Department met with representatives from both of Connecticut’s federally recognized Indian tribes, during the design phase of the HUSKY plan. The program design was discussed with the tribal representatives and their comments and suggestions were considered in the final design and ongoing operations of the program. The Department met with both tribes again in 2000 to discuss American Indian’s being exempt from cost sharing. The tribal members provided the Department with the information needed to request of American Indians in order to exempt them from cost sharing.
The Department continues to consult with both tribes on an annual basis to discuss any changes to the HUSKY Plan as well as address any concerns or questions the tribal representatives may have. The consultation will either be conducted by phone or in person depending on the issues to be discussed.
9.9.2. For an amendment relating to eligibility or benefits (including cost sharing and enrollment procedures), describe how and when prior public notice was provided as required in 42 CFR 457.65(b) through (d).
Amendments relating to either eligibility, such as the reduction of the crowd-out period from six to two months, or benefits, such as mental health parity or the carve-out of behavioral health services to the ASO, have been the result of legislative changes; therefore the prior public notice requirement was provided through the legislative 76
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-83)Page 83#
process. Based on additional comments received subsequent to the 2/1/04 implementation from clients, advocates and other stakeholders, it was decided to repeal the premium increases, retroactive to the 2/1/04 implementation. The copayment maximum remained at $760.00.
The amendment relating to the change from at-risk MCO contracts to non-risk PIHPs was due to a directive from the Governor. The amendment relating to expediting eligibility processing and waiving premium payments for the first four months of managed care enrollment for a newborn child born in a Connecticut or designated border hospital with family income greater than 235% FPL was a result of a legislative change. In addition, the amendments relating to the carve-out of dental and pharmacy services as well as the return to at-risk MCO contracts were also a result of legislative changes. The prior public notice requirement was provided through the legislative process.
The amendment relating to the increase in cost sharing including copayments and co- insurance effective 3/1/11 were the result of legislative change. Prior public notice was provided in the Connecticut Law Journal and on the Department’s website.
The amendment relating to the elimination of the managed care delivery service model for HUSKY B benefits effective 1/1/12 was the result of legislative change.
9.9.3. Describe the State’s interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
9.10. Provide a 1-year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is below. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42 CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. 77
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-84)Page 84#
• Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1 700
CHIP Budget STATE: CT FFY Budget Federal Fiscal Year 2023 State’s enhanced FMAP rate 65%
Benefit Costs Insurance payments Managed care per member/per month rate Fee for Service $5,136,975 Total Benefit Costs (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) (205,479 ) Net Benefit Costs $4,931,496 $4,931,496 Cost of Proposed SPA Changes – Benefit
Administration Costs Personnel $32,193 General administration Contractors/Brokers Claims Processing $72,807 Outreach/marketing costs Health Services Initiatives Other Total Administration Costs 105,000 10% Administrative Cap $493,150
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes $5,036,496
78
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-85)Page 85#
STATE: CT FFY Budget Federal Share $3,278,280 State Share $1,758,217 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan $49,324,166
NOTE: Include the costs associated with the current SPA. $4,931,496 The Source of State Share Funds: The CT General Fund plus beneficiary cost-sharing
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP’s website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(1),(2)) (42 CFR 457.750)
10.1.1. The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
10.2. The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42 CFR 457.710(e))
10.3. The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity (Section 2101(a))
79
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-86)Page 86#
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1. The State assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42 CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42 CFR 457.935(b)) (The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1. 42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2. Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3. Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4. Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5. Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6. Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program)
Section 12. Applicant and Enrollee Protections (Sections 2101(a))
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan.
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes and procedures that are unique to the applicant’s rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility.
Eligibility decisions, which can be appealed, include denials, failure to make a timely determination of eligibility, discontinuances and income level assignment changes. When HUSKY B eligibility is denied, terminated, transferred to a higher premium level, or the State fails to make a timely determination of eligibility, a notice, described above, is sent to the applicant informing him of this decision. The notice also informs the applicant of his right to request an administrative review of this decision within ten business days from the date the notice was sent to the applicant. A supervisory level employee, who was not involved in the original decision, conducts the level one administrative review of the initial eligibility decision.
80
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-87)Page 87#
The SPES notifies the applicant in writing of its level one review decision not more than ten business days from receipt of a request for administrative level one review. Decisions related to expedited requests shall be made within five business days.
If the applicant is not satisfied with the SPES’s level one review decision, the applicant may request a level two administrative review within ten business days following the date on the notice of the level one decision. The level one decision notice contains information on how to request a second level review and information related to expedited review.
At the second level review, the DSS administrative reviewer, who was not involved in the prior decisions, evaluates all factors related to the SPES’s eligibility decision or failure to make a timely decision of eligibility. The level two review is a desk review unless the applicant requests a personal conference with the administrative reviewer as part of the review process. The personal conference may be conducted in person, by telephone or video conferencing.
The DSS administrative reviewer renders a decision in writing to the applicant not more than 45 calendar days following the date of receipt of the applicant’s written request for the level two administrative review. Decisions related to expedited requests shall be made within 20 days.
The Commissioner may waive any of the time limits as provided for above as may become necessary.
To the extent that an applicant has coverage, coverage continues pending both levels of review and final decision from the level two appeal.
Guidance: “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
In accordance with 42 CFR Sections 457, 1120, 1130(a), 1130(c), 1140, 1150(a), 1160(a), 1170 and 1180, an applicant has the right to request an administrative review of eligibility and enrollment decisions described below. However, the State will not provide an opportunity for review of a matter if the sole basis for the decision is a provision in this plan or in federal or state law requiring automatic change in eligibility or enrollment that affects all applicants or enrollees or a group of applicants or enrollees without regard to their individual circumstances. The Department has a two level process to 81
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-88)Page 88#
review appeals related to HUSKY B eligibility and enrollment. The Department’s agent (SPES) conducts the level one review and the Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, Regulations and Administrative Hearings conducts the level two review.
The State ensures that all enrollees and applicants receive timely written notice of any eligibility or enrollment decisions subject to review, as outlined below. All notices issued during the appeals process include the reasons for the determination, an explanation of applicable rights to review of that determination, the standard and expedited time frames (if any) for review, the manner in which a review can be requested, and the circumstances under which enrollment may continue pending review. Additionally, the State will ensure that applicants and enrollees have opportunities to represent themselves or have representatives of their choosing in the review process, to timely review their files and other applicable information relevant to the review of the decision, and to fully participate in the review process.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs- If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility. N?A
82
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-89)Page 89#
Key for Newly Incorporated Templates The newly incorporated templates are indicated with the following letters after the numerical section throughout the template.
• PC- Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • PW- Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • TC- Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • DC- Dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • DS- Supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • PA- Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • EL- Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • LR- Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010)
83
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-90)Page 90#
CMS Regional Offices CMS Associate Regional Regional States Regional Office Address Administrator Offices Region 1- Connecticut New Hampshire Richard R. McGreal John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg. Boston Massachuset Rhode Island richard.mcgreal@cms.hhs.gov Room 2275 ts Vermont Boston, MA 02203-0003 Maine Region 2- New York New Jersey Michael Melendez 26 Federal Plaza New York Virgin Puerto Rico michael.melendez@cms.hhs.gov Room 3811 Islands New York, NY 10278-0063 Region 3- Delaware Pennsylvania Ted Gallagher The Public Ledger Building Philadelphia District of Virginia ted.gallagher@cms.hhs.gov 150 South Independence Mall Columbia West Virginia West Maryland Suite 216 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Region 4- Alabama Mississippi Jackie Glaze Atlanta Federal Center Atlanta Florida North Carolina jackie.glaze@cms.hhs.gov 4th Floor Georgia South Carolina 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Kentucky Tennessee Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909 Region 5- Illinois Minnesota Verlon Johnson 233 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago Indiana Ohio verlon.johnson@cms.hhs.gov Suite 600 Michigan Wisconsin Chicago, IL 60601 Region 6- Arkansas Oklahoma Bill Brooks 1301 Young Street, 8th Floor Dallas Louisiana Texas bill.brooks@cms.hhs.gov Dallas, TX 75202 New Mexico Region 7- Iowa Missouri James G. Scott Richard Bulling Federal Bldg. Kansas City Kansas Nebraska james.scott1@cms.hhs.gov 601 East 12 Street, Room 235 Kansas City, MO 64106-2808 Region 8- Colorado South Dakota Richard Allen Federal Office Building, Room Denver Montana Utah richard.allen@cms.hhs.gov 522 1961 Stout Street North Wyoming Denver, CO 80294-3538 Dakota Region 9- Arizona American Gloria Nagle 90 Seventh Street Suite 5-300 San California Samoa gloria.nagle@cms.hhs.gov San Francisco Federal Building Francisco Hawaii Guam San Francisco, CA 94103 Nevada Northern Mariana Islands Region 10- Idaho Alaska Carol Peverly 2001 Sixth Avenue Seattle Washington Oregon carol.peverly@cms.hhs.gov MS RX-43 Seattle, WA 98121
84
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-91)Page 91#
GLOSSARY Adapted directly from Sec. 2110. DEFINITIONS. CHILD HEALTH ASSISTANCE- For purposes of this title, the term ‘child health assistance’ means payment for part or all of the cost of health benefits coverage for targeted low-income children that includes any of the following (and includes, in the case described in Section 2105(a)(2)(A), payment for part or all of the cost of providing any of the following), as specified under the State plan: 1. Inpatient hospital services. 2. Outpatient hospital services. 3. Physician services. 4. Surgical services. 5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. 6. Prescription drugs and biologicals and the administration of such drugs and biologicals, only if such drugs and biologicals are not furnished for the purpose of causing, or assisting in causing, the death, suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person. 7. Over-the-counter medications. 8. Laboratory and radiological services. 9. Prenatal care and prepregnancy family planning services and supplies. 10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (18) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structured services. 11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (19) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including community-based services. 12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices). 13. Disposable medical supplies. 14. Home and community-based health care services and related supportive services (such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home). 15. Nursing care services (such as nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services) in a home, school, or other setting. 16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 17. Dental services. 18. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services. 19. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services. 20. Case management services. 21. Care coordination services. 22. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders. 23. Hospice care. 85
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-92)Page 92#
24. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services (whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting) if recognized by State law and only if the service is-- a. prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as defined by State law, b. performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician, or c. furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license. 25. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage. 26. Medical transportation. 27. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals. 28. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not excluded under this section.
TARGETED LOW-INCOME CHILD DEFINED- For purposes of this title-- 1. IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), the term ‘targeted low-income child’ means a child-- a. who has been determined eligible by the State for child health assistance under the State plan; b. (i) who is a low-income child, or (ii) is a child whose family income (as determined under the State child health plan) exceeds the Medicaid applicable income level (as defined in paragraph (4)), but does not exceed 50 percentage points above the Medicaid applicable income level; and c. who is not found to be eligible for medical assistance under title XIX or covered under a group health plan or under health insurance coverage (as such terms are defined in Section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act). 2. CHILDREN EXCLUDED- Such term does not include-- a. a child who is a resident of a public institution or a patient in an institution for mental diseases; or b. a child who is a member of a family that is eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits plan on the basis of a family member's employment with a public agency in the State. 3. SPECIAL RULE- A child shall not be considered to be described in paragraph (1)(C) notwithstanding that the child is covered under a health insurance coverage program that has been in operation since before July 1, 1997, and that is offered by a State which receives no Federal funds for the program's operation. 4. MEDICAID APPLICABLE INCOME LEVEL- The term ‘Medicaid applicable income level’ means, with respect to a child, the effective income level (expressed as a percent of the poverty line) that has been specified under the State plan under title XIX (including under a waiver authorized by the Secretary or under Section 1902(r)(2)), as of June 1, 1997, for the child to be eligible for medical assistance under Section 1902(l)(2) for the age of such child. 5. TARGETED LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMAN.—The term ‘targeted low-income pregnant 86
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(pdf)(page-93)Page 93#
woman’ means an individual— (A) during pregnancy and through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of her pregnancy) ends; (B) whose family income exceeds 185 percent (or, if higher, the percent applied under subsection (b)(1)(A)) of the poverty line applicable to a family of the size involved, but does not exceed the income eligibility level established under the State child health plan under this title for a targeted low-income child; and (C) who satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(C), (2), and (3) of Section 2110(b) in the same manner as a child applying for child health assistance would have to satisfy such requirements.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this title: 1. CHILD- The term ‘child’ means an individual under 19 years of age. 2. CREDITABLE HEALTH COVERAGE- The term ‘creditable health coverage’ has the meaning given the term ‘creditable coverage’ under Section 2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(c)) and includes coverage that meets the requirements of section 2103 provided to a targeted low-income child under this title or under a waiver approved under section 2105(c)(2)(B) (relating to a direct service waiver). 3. GROUP HEALTH PLAN; HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ETC- The terms ‘group health plan’, ‘group health insurance coverage’, and ‘health insurance coverage’ have the meanings given such terms in Section 2191 of the Public Health Service Act. 4. LOW-INCOME CHILD - The term ‘low-income child’ means a child whose family income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved. 5. POVERTY LINE DEFINED- The term ‘poverty line’ has the meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by such section. 6. PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSION- The term ‘preexisting condition exclusion’ has the meaning given such term in section 2701(b)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(1)(A)). 7. STATE CHILD HEALTH PLAN; PLAN- Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms ‘State child health plan’ and ‘plan’ mean a State child health plan approved under Section 2106. 8. UNINSURED CHILD- The term ‘uninsured child’ means a child that does not have creditable health coverage.
87
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(summary)CMS CHIP SPA CT-22-0001 & CT-22-0001-CHIP Summary#
(ct)(ct-22-0001-and-ct-22-0001-chip)(summary)(block-1)CHIP State Plan Amendments#
Approval Package
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)CMS CHIP SPA IL-21-0006-CHIP PDF#
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-1)Page 1#
_____________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
State/Territory Name: Illinois
State Plan Amendment (SPA) #: IL-21-0006-CHIP
This file contains the following documents in the order listed:
1) Approval Letter 2) State Plan Pages
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-2)Page 2#
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-01-16 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Children and Adults Health Programs Group
June 30, 2022
Kelly Cunningham, Medicaid Director State of Illinois, Division of Medical Programs Department of Healthcare and Family Services 201 South Grand Ave. East, 3rd Floor Springfield, IL 62763-0001
Dear Ms. Cunningham:
Your title XXI Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) state plan amendments (SPAs), IL- 21-0006-CHIP, submitted on September 10, 2021, and IL-21-0007-CHIP, submitted on September 27, 2021, with additional information submitted on June 13, 2022, have been approved. Through these SPAs, the state transitions all children, with the exception of the conception to birth population, from the state’s separate CHIP to a Medicaid expansion CHIP effective July 1, 2022. This letter is being sent as a companion to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services approval of Medicaid SPA IL-21-0006.
Your title XXI project officer is Ms. Kathleen Connors de Laguna. She is available to answer questions concerning this amendment and other CHIP-related issues. Ms. Connors de Laguna’s contact information is as follows:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Mail Stop: S2-01-16 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Telephone: (410) 786-2256 E-mail: Kathleen.Connorsdelaguna@cms.hhs.gov
If you have additional questions, please contact Meg Barry, Director, Division of State Coverage Programs at (410) 786-1536. We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff.
Sincerely,
/Signed by Amy Lutzky/
Amy Lutzky Deputy Director
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-10)Page 10#
State Plan Effective Implementation ApprovalSubmission/ Purpose Date Date DateAmendments Phase 1 Original Submission of the Title XXI Plan 1/5/98 1/5/98 4/1/98 Phase 2 1st Amendment: Implementation of KidCare 8/12/98 10/1/98 3/30/00 Share and Premium Coverage #2 Elimination of 3 Month Waiting Period 7/1/02 7/1/02 9/19/02 #3 Coverage of Unborn Children 1/1/03 1/1/103 6/11/03 #4 Eligibility to 200% FPL 7/1/03 7/1/03 8/28/03 #5 Presumptive Eligibility for children 4/19/04 4/19/04 5/21/04 #6 Fluoride Dental Varnish Withdrawn --- --- #7 Rescind Amendment 3 Withdrawn --- --- #8 Eligibility to 300% FPL 7/1/08 7/1/08 6/4/13 CHIPRA Section 214 Option for Children 4/1/09 4/1/09 6/4/13 Post-partum Coverage 4/1/09 4/1/09 6/4/13 #9 Increased Cost Sharing 7/1/12 7/1/12 1/27/16 #10 Increased Cost Sharing 4/1/13 4/1/13 3/25/16 IL 14-0006 CHIP MAGI Eligibility & Methods 1/1/14 1/1/14 8/5/15 IL 14-0007 CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Medicaid 1/1/14 1/1/14 6/6/16 Expansion IL14-0008 CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Eligibility 1/1/14 1/1/14 9/8/15 Processing IL 14-0009 CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Non-Financial 1/1/14 1/1/14 8/10/16 Eligibility IL 14-0024 CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Establish 2101(f) 1/1/14 1/1/14 8/21/14 Group IL 15-0012 Cost Sharing by Income Band 7/1/14 7/1/14 10/7/16 IL 18-0002 Mental Health Parity 6/1/18 IL 19-006 Compliance with Medicaid managed care 7/1/18 7/1/18 8/15/19 final rule IL 20-0006 Disaster Relief – cost sharing and premiums 1/31/20 3/18/20 7/10/20 IL 21-0006 CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Medicaid 7/1/22 CHIP Expansion IL 21-0007- CHIP MAGI Eligibility: Medicaid 7/1/22 CHIP Expansion IL 21-0014 Postpartum Health Services Initiative 3/1/20 3/1/20 9/15/21 Amendment
Through SPA 15-0012 Cost Sharing by Income Band, Illinois updates the federal poverty levels (FPLs) of the premium and copayment bands to the equivalent Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) eligibility standards. This SPA is consistent with the state’s approved MAGI Conversion Plan and the state’s implementation of MAGI effective January 1, 2014 through Illinois CHIP SPA IL-14-0006.
8 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-11)Page 11#
Superseding Pages of MAGI CHIP State Plan Material State: Illinois Transmittal SPA Description Superseded Plan Section(s) Number Group IL-14-0006 MAGI CS7 Eligibility – Targeted Supersedes the current Geographic Eligibility Low Income Children Area, Age and Income sections & 4.1.1, 4.1.2, and 4.1.3 Methods Effective/ CS9 Eligibility – Coverage Supersedes the current sections Implementation From Conception to Birth Geographic Area, Age and Income Date: January 1, sections 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3 2014 New subsection 4.3.3 CS13 Eligibility – Deemed Newborns New subsection 4.3.4 CS15 MAGI-Based Income Methodologies IL-14-0007 XXI CS3 Eligibility for Supersedes the current Medicaid Medicaid Medicaid Expansion expansion section 4.0 Expansion Program Effective/ NO LONGER IN EFFECT WITH Implementation THE APPROVAL OF THIS SPA Date: January 1, 21-0006 2014 IL-14-0024 Establish CS14 Children Ineligible New subsection 4.1.11 2101(f) for Medicaid as a Result of Group the Elimination of Income NO LONGER NEEDED AFTER Effective/ Disregards INITIAL REDETERMINATION Implementation Date: January 1, 2014 IL-14-0008 Eligibility CS 24 Eligibility Process Supersedes the current sections 4.3 Processing and 4.4 Effective/ Implementation Date: October 1, 2013 IL-14-0009 Non- CS17 Non-Financial Supersedes the current section Financial Eligibility – Residency 4.1.5 Eligibility Supersedes the current sections Effective/ CS18 Non-Financial 4.1.10 Implementation Eligibility – Citizenship Date: January 1,
9 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-12)Page 12#
Transmittal SPA Description Superseded Plan Section(s) Number Group 2014 CS19 Non-Financial Supersedes the current section Eligibility – 4.1.9 Social Security Number
CS20 Non-Financial Supersedes the current section Eligibility - Substitution of 4.4.4 Coverage
CS21 Non-Financial Eligibility – Supersedes the current section 8.7 Non-Payment of Premiums
CS27 General Eligibility – Continuous Eligibility Supersedes the current section 4.1.8 CS28 General Eligibility – Presumptive Eligibility for Children Supersedes the current section 4.3.2
10 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-13)Page 13#
Section 2. General Background and Description of Approach to Children’s Health Insurance Coverage and Coordination
Guidance: The demographic information requested in 2.1. can be used for State planning and will be used strictly for informational purposes. THESE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR THE ALLOTMENT.
Factors that the State may consider in the provision of this information are age breakouts, income brackets, definitions of insurability, and geographic location, as well as race and ethnicity. The State should describe its information sources and the assumptions it uses for the development of its description. • Population • Number of uninsured • Race demographics • Age Demographics • Info per region/Geographic information
2.1. Describe the extent to which, and manner in which, children in the State (including targeted low-income children and other groups of children specified) identified, by income level and other relevant factors, such as race, ethnicity and geographic location, currently have creditable health coverage (as defined in 42 CFR 457.10). To the extent feasible, distinguish between creditable coverage under public health insurance programs and public-private partnerships (See Section 10 for annual report requirements). (Section 2102(a)(1)); (42 CFR 457.80(a))
Illinois has chosen to target the unborn children (conception to birth) of mothers who do not meet legal immigration status with incomes to 208% FPL throughout the state. (Illinois SPA 14.0006, CS 9). The approximate number served is 15,000 (subject to change). Additionally, Illinois has chosen to cover the costs of uncompensated postpartum care for providers who provided services for mothers of newborns deemed eligible for Medicaid during the 12-month postpartum period using the allotted amount of funds from the Health Services Initiative.
11 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-14)Page 14#
2.2. Health Services Initiatives- Describe if the State will use the health services initiative option as allowed at 42 CFR 457.10. If so, describe what services or programs the State is proposing to cover with administrative funds, including the cost of each program, and how it is currently funded (if applicable), also update the budget accordingly. (Section 2105(a)(1)(D)(ii)); (42 CFR 457.10)
Any child who appears to qualify for Family Health Plans coverage under Title XIX and Title XXI up to 209% FPL is determined presumptively eligible for the respective Title XIX and Title XXI program. Presumptively eligible children will receive services through the same delivery system under the applicable state plan and receive the same benefit package as described under the state plan. Services provided after an application is submitted but prior to the determination of presumptive eligibility will be covered as a Health Services Initiative for children determined presumptively eligible under both Title XIX and Title XXI. This Health Services Initiative will be funded under the State’s ten percent Title XXI administration cap and will assist in improving the health of children by ensuring that they have access to healthcare services.
Illinois will use additional CHIP funds, up to 10 percent of the Federal CHIP expenditures (after administrative costs for the CHIP population for other child health assistance as authorized under 2105(a)(2) of the Act). Such assistance will cover the costs of uncompensated postpartum care for providers who provided services for mothers of newborns deemed eligible for Medicaid during the 12-month postpartum period. The postpartum services covered are consistent with the comprehensive benefit package provided under Illinois’ Medicaid program under Title XIX in terms of the amount, duration and scope of services. This will directly benefit children’s health. Research shows that when mothers do not have access to care for mental health, substance use disorder, or other medical conditions, they have limited resources to fully respond to their child’s health needs. Untreated postpartum depression or substance use disorder can lead to child abuse and neglect, disruption in parental attachment, and adversely impact the child’s development. Children are less likely to access preventive care, attend well-child visits, complete immunization schedules, and more likely to experience avoidable hospitalizations when their parent does not have access to coverage. The state will report on performance metrics for this Health Services Initiative through CARTS. The state assures that funding under this HSI will not supplant or match CHIP federal funds with other federal funds, nor will it allow other federal funds to supplant or match CHIP federal funds.
2.3-TC Tribal Consultation Requirements- (Sections 1902(a)(73) and 2107(e)(1)(C)); 12 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-15)Page 15#
(ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) Section 1902(a)(73) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires a state in which one or more Indian Health Programs or Urban Indian Organizations furnish health care services to establish a process for the State Medicaid agency to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from designees of Indian health programs, whether operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS), Tribes or Tribal organizations under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), or Urban Indian Organizations under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA). Section 2107(e)(1)(C) of the Act was also amended to apply these requirements to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Consultation is required concerning Medicaid and CHIP matters having a direct impact on Indian health programs and Urban Indian organizations.
Describe the process the State uses to seek advice on a regular, ongoing basis from federally-recognized tribes, Indian Health Programs and Urban Indian Organizations on matters related to Medicaid and CHIP programs and for consultation on State Plan Amendments, waiver proposals, waiver extensions, waiver amendments, waiver renewals and proposals for demonstration projects prior to submission to CMS. Include information about the frequency, inclusiveness and process for seeking such advice.
Prior to submission of the state plan amendment, the State notifies the Director of American Indian Health Services of Chicago (AIHSC) by email. The email contains a description of the change sought by the state plan amendment and the anticipated impact the change may have on the population served by the AIHSC. The AIHSC is encouraged to respond with any questions or concerns.
Section 3. Methods of Delivery and Utilization Controls
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue on to Section 4 (Eligibility Standards and Methodology).
Guidance: In Section 3.1, describe all delivery methods the State will use to provide services to enrollees, including: (1) contracts with managed care organizations (MCO), prepaid inpatient health plans (PIHP), prepaid ambulatory health plans (PAHP), primary care case management entities (PCCM entities), and primary care case managers (PCCM); (2) contracts with indemnity health insurance plans; (3) fee-for-service (FFS) paid by the State to health care providers; and (4) any other arrangements for health care delivery. The State should describe any variations based upon geography and by population (including the conception to birth population). States must submit the managed care contract(s) to CMS’ Regional Office for review.
3.1. Delivery Systems (Section 2102(a)(4)) (42 CFR 457.490; Part 457, Subpart L)
3.1.1 Choice of Delivery System
13 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-16)Page 16#
3.1.1.1 Does the State use a managed care delivery system for its CHIP populations? Managed care entities include MCOs, PIHPs, PAHPs, PCCM entities and PCCMs as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. Please check the box and answer the questions below that apply to your State.
No, the State does not use a managed care delivery system for any CHIP populations.
X Yes, the State uses a managed care delivery system for all CHIP populations.
Yes, the State uses a managed care delivery system; however, only some of the CHIP population is included in the managed care delivery system and some of the CHIP population is included in a fee- for-service system.
If the State uses a managed care delivery system for only some of its CHIP populations and a fee-for-service system for some of its CHIP populations, please describe which populations are, and which are not, included in the State’s managed care delivery system for CHIP. States will be asked to specify which managed care entities are used by the State in its managed care delivery system below in Section 3.1.2. Upon approval of this Title XXI SPA 21-0006, there will be no cost sharing for the CHIP populations.
When individuals are first determined eligible for coverage, they are covered under the fee-for-service delivery system until they are enrolled into a managed care plan. Individuals who receive 90 days of retroactive coverage are covered under the fee-for service delivery system during the period of retroactive coverage. This also applies to the unborn/pregnant women covered under this Title XXI SPA.
Guidance: Utilization control systems are those administrative mechanisms that are designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package.
Examples of utilization control systems include, but are not limited to: requirements for referrals to specialty care; requirements that clinicians use clinical practice guidelines; or demand management systems (e.g., use of an 800 number for after-hours and urgent care). In addition, the State should describe its plans for review, coordination, and implementation of utilization controls, addressing both procedures and State developed standards for review, in order to assure that necessary care is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. (42 CFR 457.490(b))
14 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-17)Page 17#
If the State does not use a managed care delivery system for any or some of its CHIP populations, describe the methods of delivery of the child health assistance using Title XXI funds to targeted low-income children. Include a description of: • The methods for assuring delivery of the insurance products and delivery of health care services covered by such products to the enrollees, including any variations. (Section 2102(a)(4); 42 CFR 457.490(a)) • The utilization control systems designed to ensure that enrollees receiving health care services under the State plan receive only appropriate and medically necessary health care consistent with the benefit package described in the approved State plan. (Section 2102(a)(4); 42 CFR 457.490(b))
The state uses a managed care delivery system. Additionally, a variety of utilization controls are in place to ensure services are appropriate, including: ongoing Department monitoring for provider abuses; Office of Inspector General activities – clients surveys, investigations off referred concerns; Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) edits designed to prevent excessive billings; audits of providers with atypical claims activity; toll-free hotline to report problems/concerns; contracted quality improvement organization used for pre- and post-payment medical records reviews and quality reviews; prior approval for certain pharmaceuticals; routine evaluation to determine which pharmaceuticals should be subject to prior approval based upon safety, efficacy, and cost; and prior approval for certain services/supplies.
Guidance: Only States that use a managed care delivery system for all or some CHIP populations need to answer the remaining questions under Section 3 (starting with 3.1.1.2). If the State uses a managed care delivery system for only some of its CHIP population, the State’s responses to the following questions will only apply to those populations.
3.1.1.2 Do any of your CHIP populations that receive services through a managed care delivery system receive any services outside of a managed care delivery system? No X Yes
If yes, please describe which services are carved out of your managed care delivery system and how the State provides these services to an enrollee, such as through fee-for-service. Examples of carved out services may include transportation and dental, among others.
15 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-18)Page 18#
Emergency ground ambulance, services provided through a local education agency (LEA), and early intervention (EI) services are carved out of managed care.
3.1.2 Use of a Managed Care Delivery System for All or Some of the State’s CHIP Populations
3.1.2.1 Check each of the types of entities below that the State will contract with under its managed care delivery system, and select and/or explain the method(s) of payment that the State will use:
X Managed care organization (MCO) (42 CFR 457.10) X Capitation payment Describe population served: Populations described in 3.1.1.1
Prepaid inpatient health plan (PIHP) (42 CFR 457.10) Capitation payment Other (please explain) Describe population served:
Guidance: If the State uses prepaid ambulatory health plan(s) (PAHP) to exclusively provide non-emergency medical transportation (a NEMT PAHP), the State should not check the following box for that plan. Instead, complete section 3.1.3 for the NEMT PAHP.
Prepaid ambulatory health plan (PAHP) (42 CFR 457.10) Capitation payment Other (please explain) Describe population served:
Primary care case manager (PCCM) (individual practitioners) (42 CFR 457.10) Case management fee Other (please explain)
Primary care case management entity (PCCM Entity) (42 CFR 457.10) Case management fee Shared savings, incentive payments, and/or other financial rewards for improved quality outcomes (see 42 CFR 457.1240(f)) Other (please explain)
If PCCM entity is selected, please indicate which of the following function(s) the entity will provide (as described in 42 CFR 457.10), in addition to PCCM services:
16 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-19)Page 19#
Provision of intensive telephonic case management Provision of face-to-face case management Operation of a nurse triage advice line Development of enrollee care plans Execution of contracts with fee-for-service (FFS) providers in the FFS program Oversight responsibilities for the activities of FFS providers in the FFS program Provision of payments to FFS providers on behalf of the State Provision of enrollee outreach and education activities Operation of a customer service call center Review of provider claims, utilization and/or practice patterns to conduct provider profiling and/or practice improvement Implementation of quality improvement activities including administering enrollee satisfaction surveys or collecting data necessary for performance measurement of providers Coordination with behavioral health systems/providers Other (please describe)
3.1.2.2 X The State assures that if its contract with an MCO, PAHP, or PIHP allows the entity to use a physician incentive plan, the contract stipulates that the entity must comply with the requirements set forth in 42 CFR 422.208 and 422.210. (42 CFR 457.1201(h), cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.3(i))
3.1.3 Nonemergency Medical Transportation PAHPs
Guidance: Only complete Section 3.1.3 if the State uses a PAHP to exclusively provide non- emergency medical transportation (a NEMT PAHP). If a NEMT PAHP is the only managed care entity for CHIP in the State, please continue to Section 4 after checking the assurance below. If the State uses a PAHP that does not exclusively provide NEMT and/or uses other managed care entities beyond a NEMT PAHP, the State will need to complete the remaining sections within Section 3.
The State assures that it complies with all requirements applicable to NEMT PAHPs, and through its contracts with such entities, requires NEMT PAHPs to comply with all applicable requirements, including the following (from 42 CFR 457.1206(b)): • All contract provisions in 42 CFR 457.1201 except those set forth in 42 CFR 457.1201(h) (related to physician incentive plans) and 42 CFR 457.1201(l) (related to mental health parity). • The information requirements in 42 CFR 457.1207 (see Section 3.5 below for more details). • The provision against provider discrimination in 42 CFR 457.1208. • The State responsibility provisions in 42 CFR 457.1212 (about disenrollment), 42 CFR 457.1214 (about conflict of interest safeguards), and 42 CFR 438.62(a), as cross-referenced in 42 CFR 457.1216 (about continued services 17 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-20)Page 20#
to enrollees). • The provisions on enrollee rights and protections in 42 CFR 457.1220, 457.1222, 457.1224, and 457.1226. • The PAHP standards in 42 CFR 438.206(b)(1), as cross-referenced by 42 CFR 457.1230(a) (about availability of services), 42 CFR 457.1230(d) (about coverage and authorization of services), and 42 CFR 457.1233(a), (b) and (d) (about structure and operation standards). • An enrollee's right to a State review under subpart K of 42 CFR 457. • Prohibitions against affiliations with individuals debarred or excluded by Federal agencies in 42 CFR 438.610, as cross referenced by 42 CFR 457.1285. • Requirements relating to contracts involving Indians, Indian Health Care Providers, and Indian managed care entities in 42 CFR 457.1209.
3.2. General Managed Care Contract Provisions
3.2.1 X The State assures that it provides for free and open competition, to the maximum extent practical, in the bidding of all procurement contracts for coverage or other services, including external quality review organizations, in accordance with the procurement requirements of 45 CFR part 75, as applicable. (42 CFR 457.940(b); 42 CFR 457.1250(a), cross referencing to 42 CFR 438.356(e))
3.2.2 X The State assures that it will include provisions in all managed care contracts that define a sound and complete procurement contract, as required by 45 CFR part 75, as applicable. (42 CFR 457.940(c))
3.2.3 X The State assures that each MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, and PCCM entity complies with any applicable Federal and State laws that pertain to enrollee rights, and ensures that its employees and contract providers observe and protect those rights (42 CFR 457.1220, cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.100). These Federal and State laws include: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (45 CFR part 80), Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (45 CFR part 91), Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
3.2.4 X The State assures that it operates a Web site that provides the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, and PCCM entity contracts. (42 CFR 457.1207, cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.10(c)(3))
3.3 Rate Development Standards and Medical Loss Ratio
3.3.1 The State assures that its payment rates are: X Based on public or private payment rates for comparable services for comparable populations; and
18 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-21)Page 21#
X Consistent with actuarially sound principles as defined in 42 CFR 457.10. (42 CFR 457.1203(a))
Guidance: States that checked both boxes under 3.3.1 above do not need to make the next assurance. If the state is unable to check both boxes under 3.1.1 above, the state must check the next assurance.
If the State is unable to meet the requirements under 42 CFR 457.1203(a), the State attests that it must establish higher rates because such rates are necessary to ensure sufficient provider participation or provider access or to enroll providers who demonstrate exceptional efficiency or quality in the provision of services. (42 CFR 457.1203(b)) 3.3.2 X The State assures that its rates are designed to reasonably achieve a medical loss ratio standard equal to at least 85 percent for the rate year and provide for reasonable administrative costs. (42 CFR 457.1203(c))
3.3.3 X The State assures that it will provide to CMS, if requested by CMS, a description of the manner in which rates were developed in accordance with the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1203(a) through (c). (42 CFR 457.1203(d))
3.3.4 X The State assures that it annually submits to CMS a summary description of the reports pertaining to the medical loss ratio received from the MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs. (42 CFR 457.1203(e), cross referencing to 42 CFR 438.74(a))
3.3.5 Does the State require an MCO, PIHP, or PAHP to pay remittances through the contract for not meeting the minimum MLR required by the State? (42 CFR 457.1203(e), cross referencing to 42 CFR 438.74(b)(1)) No, the State does not require any MCO, PIHP, or PAHP to pay remittances. X Yes, the State requires all MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs to pay remittances. Yes, the State requires some, but not all, MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs to pay remittances.
If the State requests some, but not all, MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs to pay remittances through the contract for not meeting the minimum MLR required by the State, please describe which types of managed care entities are and are not required to pay remittances. For example, if a state requires a medical MCO to pay a remittances but not a dental PAHP, please include this information.
If the answer to the assurance above is yes for any or all managed care entities, please answer the next assurance: X The State assures that it if a remittance is owed by an MCO, PIHP, or PAHP to the State, the State: • Reimburses CMS for an amount equal to the Federal share of the remittance, taking into account applicable differences in the Federal
19 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-22)Page 22#
matching rate; and • Submits a separate report describing the methodology used to determine the State and Federal share of the remittance with the annual report provided to CMS that summarizes the reports received from the MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs. (42 CFR 457.1203(e), cross referencing to 42 CFR 438.74(b))
3.3.6 X The State assures that each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP calculates and reports the medical loss ratio in accordance with 42 CFR 438.8. (42 CFR 457.1203(f))
3.4 Enrollment
X The State assures that its contracts with MCOs, PIHPs, PAHPs, PCCMs, and PCCM entities provide that the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity: • Accepts individuals eligible for enrollment in the order in which they apply without restriction (unless authorized by CMS), up to the limits set under the contract (42 CFR 457.1201(d), cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.3(d)(1)); • Will not, on the basis of health status or need for health care services, discriminate against individuals eligible to enroll (42 CFR 457.1201(d), cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.3(d)(3)); and • Will not discriminate against individuals eligible to enroll on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability and will not use any policy or practice that has the effect of discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. (42 CFR 457.1201(d), cross-referencing to 438.3(d)(4))
3.4.1 Enrollment Process
3.4.1.1 X The State assures that it provides informational notices to potential enrollees in an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity that includes the available managed care entities, explains how to select an entity, explains the implications of making or not making an active choice of an entity, explains the length of the enrollment period as well as the disenrollment policies, and complies with the information requirements in 42 CFR 457.1207 and accessibility standards established under 42 CFR 457.340. (42 CFR 457.1210(c))
3.4.1.2 X The State assures that its enrollment system gives beneficiaries already enrolled in an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity priority to continue that enrollment if the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity does not have the capacity to accept all those seeking enrollment under the program. (42 CFR 457.1210(b))
3.4.1.3 Does the State use a default enrollment process to assign beneficiaries to an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity? (42 CFR 457.1210(a)) X Yes 20 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-23)Page 23#
No
If the State uses a default enrollment process, please make the following assurances: X The State assigns beneficiaries only to qualified MCOs, PIHPs, PAHPs, PCCMs, and PCCM entities that are not subject to the intermediate sanction of having suspension of all new enrollment (including default enrollment) under 42 CFR 438.702 and have capacity to enroll beneficiaries. (42 CFR 457.1210(a)(1)(i)) X The State maximizes continuation of existing provider-beneficiary relationships under 42 CFR 457.1210(a)(1)(ii) or if that is not possible, distributes the beneficiaries equitably and does not arbitrarily exclude any MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity from being considered. (42 CFR 457.1210(a)(1)(ii), 42 CFR 457.1210(a)(1)(iii)) 3.4.2 Disenrollment
3.4.2.1 X The State assures that the State will notify enrollees of their right to disenroll consistent with the requirements of 42 CFR 438.56 at least annually. (42 CFR 457.1207, cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.10(f)(2))
3.4.2.2 X The State assures that the effective date of an approved disenrollment, regardless of the procedure followed to request the disenrollment, will be no later than the first day of the second month following the month in which the enrollee requests disenrollment or the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM or PCCM entity refers the request to the State. (42 CFR 457.1212, cross-referencing to 438.56(e)(1))
3.4.2.3 X If a beneficiary disenrolls from an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, or PCCM entity, the State assures that the beneficiary is provided the option to enroll in another plan or receive benefits from an alternative delivery system. (Section 2103(f)(3) of the Social Security Act, incorporating section 1932(a)(4); 42 CFR 457.1212, cross referencing to 42 CFR 438.56; State Health Official Letter #09-008)
3.4.2.4 MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM and PCCM Entity Requests for Disenrollment.
X The State assures that contracts with MCOs, PIHPs, PAHPs, PCCMs and PCCM entities describe the reasons for which an MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM and PCCM entity may request disenrollment of an enrollee, if any. (42 CFR 457.1212, cross-referencing to 42 CFR 438.56(b))
Guidance: Reasons for disenrollment by the MCO, PIHP, PAHP, PCCM, and PCCM entity must be specified in the contract with the State. Reasons
21 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-100)Page 100#
medical/surgical benefits?
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply financial requirements on any medical/surgical benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits.
8.4.6- MHPAEA Within each classification of benefits in which the State applies a type of financial requirement on any mental health or substance use disorder benefits, the State must determine the portion of medical and surgical benefits in the class which are subject to the limitation.
The State assures it has applied a reasonable methodology to determine the dollar amounts used in the ratio described above (Section 6.2.5.2-MHPAEA) for each classification or within which the State applies financial requirements to mental health or substance use disorder benefits. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
Guidance: Please include the state’s methodology and results of the parity analysis as an attachment to the State child health plan.
8.4.7- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to any mental health or substance use disorder benefits within a given classification, does the State apply the same type of financial requirement to at least two-thirds (“substantially all”) of all the medical/surgical benefits within the same classification? (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
Yes
No
Guidance: If the State does not apply a type of financial requirement to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a given classification of benefits, the State may not impose financial requirements on mental health or substance use disorder benefits in that classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(A))
8.4.8- MHPAEA For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State must determine the predominant level (as defined in 42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)) of that type which is applied to medical/surgical benefits in the classification. For each type of financial requirement applied to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification, the State assures:
The same reasonable methodology applied in determining the dollar amounts used in determining whether substantially all medical/surgical benefits within a classification are subject to a type of financial requirement also is applied in determining the dollar 98 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-101)Page 101#
amounts used to determine the predominant level of a type of financial requirement applied to medical/surgical benefits within a classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(E))
The level of each type of financial requirement applied by the State to mental health or substance use disorder benefits in any classification is no more restrictive than the predominant level of that type which is applied by the State to medical/surgical benefits within the same classification. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(2)(i))
Guidance: If there is no single level of a type of financial requirement that exceeds the one-half threshold, the State may combine levels within a type of financial requirement such that the combined levels are applied to at least half of all medical/surgical benefits within a classification; the predominant level is the least restrictive level of the levels combined to meet the one-half threshold. (42 CFR 457.496(d)(3)(i)(B)(2))
8.5. Describe how the state will ensure that the annual aggregate cost-sharing for a family does not exceed 5 percent of such family’s income for the length of the child’s eligibility period in the State. Include a description of the procedures that do not primarily rely on a refund given by the state for overpayment by an enrollee: (Section 2103(e)(3)(B)) (42CFR 457.560(b) and 457.505(e))
8.6 Describe the procedures the state will use to ensure American Indian (as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976) and Alaska Native children will be excluded from cost-sharing. (Section 2103(b)(3)(D)) (42CFR 457.535)
8.7 Please provide a description of the consequences for an enrollee or applicant who does not pay a charge. (42CFR 457.570 and 457.505(c)) As described in Appendix 1, p. 22.
Guidance: Section 8.7.1 is based on Section 2101(a) of the Act provides that the purpose of title XXI is to provide funds to States to enable them to initiate and expand the provision of child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children in an effective and efficient manner that is coordinated with other sources of health benefits coverage for children.
8.7.1 Please provide an assurance that the following disenrollment protections are being applied:
Guidance: Provide a description below of the State’s premium grace period process and how the State notifies families of their rights and responsibilities with respect to payment of premiums. (Section 2103(e)(3)(C))
8.7.1.1. State has established a process that gives enrollees reasonable notice of and an opportunity to pay past due premiums, copayments, coinsurance, deductibles or similar fees prior to disenrollment. (42 CFR 457.570(a))
99 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-102)Page 102#
During the Federal COVID-19 PHE, premiums and premium balances will be waived for CHIP applicants and/or beneficiaries who meet income and other eligibility requirements.
8.7.1.2. The disenrollment process affords the enrollee an opportunity to show that the enrollee’s family income has declined prior to disenrollment for non-payment of cost-sharing charges. (42 CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.3. In the instance mentioned above, that the State will facilitate enrolling the child in Medicaid or adjust the child’s cost-sharing category as appropriate. (42 CFR 457.570(b))
8.7.1.4 The State provides the enrollee with an opportunity for an impartial review to address disenrollment from the program. (42 CFR 457.570(c)) As described in Section 12.1, enrollees are afforded the opportunity for an impartial review on eligibility and enrollment matters.
8.8 The State assures that it has made the following findings with respect to the payment aspects of its plan: (Section 2103(e))
8.8.1. No Federal funds will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(4)) (42 CFR 457.220) 8.8.2. No cost-sharing (including premiums, deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and all other types) will be used toward State matching requirements. (Section 2105(c)(5) (42 CFR 457.224) (Previously 8.4.5) 8.8.3. No funds under this title will be used for coverage if a private insurer would have been obligated to provide such assistance except for a provision limiting this obligation because the child is eligible under the this title. (Section 2105(c)(6)(A)) (42 CFR 457.626(a)(1)) 8.8.4. Income and resource standards and methodologies for determining Medicaid eligibility are not more restrictive than those applied as of June 1, 1997. (Section 2105(d)(1)) (42 CFR 457.622(b)(5)) 8.8.5. No funds provided under this title or coverage funded by this title will include coverage of abortion except if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (Section 2105)(c)(7)(B)) (42 CFR 457.475) 8.8.6. No funds provided under this title will be used to pay for any abortion or to assist in the purchase, in whole or in part, for coverage that includes abortion (except as described above). (Section 2105)(c)(7)(A)) (42 CFR 100 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-103)Page 103#
457.475)
Section 9. Strategic Objectives and Performance Goals and Plan Administration
Guidance: States should consider aligning its strategic objectives with those discussed in Section II of the CHIP Annual Report.
9.1. Describe strategic objectives for increasing the extent of creditable health coverage among targeted low-income children and other low-income children: (Section 2107(a)(2)) (42CFR 457.710(b))
The goals for the population served in the Title XXI State Plan concur with Illinois CARTS Goals as reflected here.
Illinois CARTS 2020 Objectives
Objective 1: Reduce the number of uninsured children Objective 2: Increase access to care Goal 1 - Our goal is to reduce the Infant Mortality rate by 2%. Goal 3 – New starting 2020. Reduce the number/percent of children with elevated blood lead levels that meet or exceed 5 mcg/dL. (goal 10% improvement annually) Goal 4 - In an effort to increase access to care, our goal is to increase the number of children who have received at least one capillary or venous blood lead screening test on or before their second birthday by 10%. Objective 3: Increase the use of preventative care
Guidance: Goals should be measurable, quantifiable and convey a target the State is working towards.
9.2. Specify one or more performance goals for each strategic objective identified: (Section 2107(a)(3)) (42CFR 457.710(c))
Objective 1: Reduce the number of uninsured children Goal 1 - Reduce the number of uninsured children in Illinois. (target an ACS state-level uninsured rate of 2.8) Objective 2: Increase access to care Goal 1 - Our goal is to reduce the Infant Mortality rate by 2%. Goal 2 – Discontinued starting 2020, EBLL exceeding 10mcg/dL measure Goal 3 – New starting 2020. Reduce the number/percent of children with elevated blood lead levels that meet or exceed 5 mcg/dL. (goal 10% improvement annually) Goal 4 - In an effort to increase access to care, our goal is to increase the number of children who have received at least one capillary or venous blood lead screening test on or before their second birthday by 10%. Objective 3: Increase the use of preventative care Goal 1 - Eighty percent of children as measured by the CMS-416 guidance will participate in well child
101 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-104)Page 104#
screenings. (goal 10% improvement annually) Goal 2 - Eighty percent (80%) of enrolled children will be appropriately immunized at age two (less than 36 months of age at the end of the calendar year). (goal 5% improvement annually)
Guidance: The State should include data sources to be used to assess each performance goal. In addition, check all appropriate measures from 9.3.1 to 9.3.8 that the State will be utilizing to measure performance, even if doing so duplicates what the State has already discussed in Section 9.
It is acceptable for the State to include performance measures for population subgroups chosen by the State for special emphasis, such as racial or ethnic minorities, particular high-risk or hard to reach populations, children with special needs, etc.
HEDIS (Health Employer Data and Information Set) 2008 contains performance measures relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. In addition, HEDIS 3.0 contains measures for the general population, for which breakouts by children’s age bands (e.g., ages < 1, 1-9, 10-19) are required. Full definitions, explanations of data sources, and other important guidance on the use of HEDIS measures can be found in the HEDIS 2008 manual published by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. So that State HEDIS results are consistent and comparable with national and regional data, states should check the HEDIS 2008 manual for detailed definitions of each measure, including definitions of the numerator and denominator to be used. For states that do not plan to offer managed care plans, HEDIS measures may also be able to be adapted to organizations of care other than managed care.
9.3. Describe how performance under the plan will be measured through objective, independently verifiable means and compared against performance goals in order to determine the state’s performance, taking into account suggested performance indicators as specified below or other indicators the state develops: (Section 2107(a)(4)(A),(B)) (42CFR 457.710(d))
Yes, Illinois has several strategies in place to help us attain our goals and objectives and intends to continue adding to these strategies. HFS is currently reviewing the measure set reported on by the MCO’s and adjusting which measures will be withhold measures. The bonus payment methodology and benchmarks are also being reviewed and updated. HFS is just starting the 2021 CAHPS® 5.0H with CCC supplemental questions for the statewide population of children including over samples for Medicaid and CHIP populations. This oversampling allows separate reports to be generated for the aggregate, Medicaid-specific and CHIP-specific groupsThe results are analyzed and used to inform our MCO’s on area’s that need improvement.
102 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-105)Page 105#
103 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-106)Page 106#
104 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-107)Page 107#
Check the applicable suggested performance measurements listed below that the state plans to use: (Section 2107(a)(4
9.3.1. The increase in the percentage of Medicaid-eligible children enrolled in Medicaid. 9.3.2. The reduction in the percentage of uninsured children. 9.3.3 . The increase in the percentage of children with a usual source of care. 9.3.4. The extent to which outcome measures show progress on one or more of the health problems identified by the state. 9.3.5. HEDIS Measurement Set relevant to children and adolescents younger than 19. 9.3.6. Other child appropriate measurement set. List or describe the set used.
9.3.7. If not utilizing the entire HEDIS Measurement Set, specify which measures will be collected, such as: 9.3.7.1. Immunizations 9.3.7.2. Well childcare 9.3.7.3. Adolescent well visits 9.3.7.4. Satisfaction with care 9.3.7.5. Mental health 9.3.7.6. Dental care 9.3.7.7. Other, list: Infant mortality Childhood lead poisoning School absenteeism Hospitalization of enrolled children for ambulatory sensitive conditions of gastroenteritis/dehydration and asthma Very low birth-weight babies born to adolescents
9.3.8. Performance measures for special targeted populations.
105 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-108)Page 108#
9.4. The state assures it will collect all data, maintain records and furnish reports to the Secretary at the times and in the standardized format that the Secretary requires. (Section 2107(b)(1)) (42CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should include an assurance of compliance with the annual reporting requirements, including an assessment of reducing the number of low-income uninsured children. The State should also discuss any annual activities to be undertaken that relate to assessment and evaluation of the program.
9.5. The State assures it will comply with the annual assessment and evaluation required under Section 10. Briefly describe the State’s plan for these annual assessments and reports. (Section 2107(b)(2)) (42 CFR 457.750)
9.6. The State assures it will provide the Secretary with access to any records or information relating to the plan for purposes of review or audit. (Section 2107(b)(3)) (42 CFR 457.720)
Guidance: The State should verify that they will participate in the collection and evaluation of data as new measures are developed or existing measures are revised as deemed necessary by CMS, the states, advocates, and other interested parties.
9.7. The State assures that, in developing performance measures, it will modify those measures to meet national requirements when such requirements are developed. (42 CFR 457.710(e))
9.8. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42CFR 457.135)
9.8.1. Section 1902(a)(4)(C) (relating to conflict of interest standards) 9.8.2. Paragraphs (2), (16) and (17) of Section 1903(i) (relating to limitations on payment) 9.8.3. Section 1903(w) (relating to limitations on provider donations and taxes) 9.8.4. Section 1132 (relating to periods within which claims must be filed)
Guidance: Section 9.9 can include discussion of community-based providers and consumer representatives in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for ensuring ongoing public involvement. Issues to address include a listing of public meetings or announcements made to the public concerning the development of the children's health insurance program or public forums used to discuss changes to the State plan.
9.9 Describe the process used by the State to accomplish involvement of the public in the design and implementation of the plan and the method for insuring ongoing public involvement. (Section 2107(c)) (42CFR 457.120(a) and (b))
106 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-109)Page 109#
Listed below are the organizations that comprise the membership of the Illinois Medicaid Advisory Committee as of March 2021.
Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) The Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC) advises the Department of Healthcare and Family Services with respect to policy and planning related to the health and medical services provided under the department's Medical Programs including Medical Assistance, All Kids and FamilyCare pursuant to federal Medicaid requirements established at 42 CFR 431.12.
Organization The Loretto Hospital VIDA Pediatrics N/A Lawndale Christian Health Center Barton Healthcare Community Behaviorial Healthcare Association Access Community Health Network HAP, Inc. Access Living Alliance Chicago A Safe Haven SIU Springfield NextLevel Health (Need New Co Name Here)
Safer Foundation Cook County Health & Hospitals System AIDS Foundation of Chicago Health & Disability Advocates Chicago Public Schools HSTP Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law Alivio Medical Center Chicago Public Schools Mathematical Policy Research Luriies Childrens's Hospital Cook County Health & Hospitals System Chicago Family Health Center
Consumer Sonrisa Family Dental 107 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-110)Page 110#
US General Accounting Office
Cook County Health & Hospitals System Harmony Health Plan
The Public Education Subcommittee under the MAC advises the department specifically on strategies for effective outreach and community education. Cook County Health & Hospitals System Alivio Medical Center Safer Foundation AIDS Foundation of Chicago Mathematica Policy Research Lurie Children’s Health Partners Chicago Public Schools
Medicaid Advisory Committee
9.9.1 Describe the process used by the state to ensure interaction with Indian Tribes and organizations in the state on the development and implementation of the procedures required in 42 CFR '457.125. States should provide notice and consultation with Tribes on proposed pregnant women expansions. (Section 2107(c)) (42 CFR 457.120(c))
Only one Indian Health Care facility currently operates in Illinois. Pursuant to Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, this facility is recognized as a FQHC under the Department’s Title XIX program. This facility will continue to operate as a fully integrated FQHC, providing primary care services itself and referrals for other services. The Department has consulted with this facility concerning outreach and enrollment strategies that are appropriate for reaching American Indian children.
9.9.2 For an amendment relating to eligibility or benefits (including cost sharing and enrollment procedures), please describe how and when prior public notice was provided as required in '457.65(b) through (d).
9.9.3. Describe the State’s interaction, consultation, and coordination with any Indian tribes and organizations in the State regarding implementation of the Express Lane eligibility option.
108 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-111)Page 111#
9.10. Provide a one year projected budget. A suggested financial form for the budget is attached. The budget must describe: (Section 2107(d)) (42CFR 457.140)
• Planned use of funds, including: • Projected amount to be spent on health services; • Projected amount to be spent on administrative costs, such as outreach, child health initiatives, and evaluation; and • Assumptions on which the budget is based, including cost per child and expected enrollment. • Projected expenditures for the separate child health plan, including but not limited to expenditures for targeted low income children, the optional coverage of the unborn, lawfully residing eligibles, dental services, etc. • All cost sharing, benefit, payment, eligibility need to be reflected in the budget.
• Projected sources of non-Federal plan expenditures, including any requirements for cost-sharing by enrollees. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing coverage to pregnant women. • States must include a separate budget line item to indicate the cost of providing coverage to premium assistance children. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of providing dental-only supplemental coverage. • Include a separate budget line to indicate the cost of implementing Express Lane Eligibility. • Provide a 1-year projected budget for all targeted low-income children covered under the state plan using the attached form. Additionally, provide the following: - Total 1-year cost of adding prenatal coverage - Estimate of unborn children covered in year 1 -
CHIP Budget
STATE: Illinois FFY 22 Budget Federal Fiscal Year State's enhanced FMAP rate 67.88%
109 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-112)Page 112#
Benefit Costs Insurance payments - Managed care 377,177,400 per member/per month rate - Fee for Service 101,683,800 Total Benefit Costs 478,861,200 (Offsetting beneficiary cost sharing payments) 1,200,000 Net Benefit Costs 477,661,200 Cost of Proposed SPA Changes - Benefit (2,933,800)
Administration Costs Personnel 6,040,000 General Administration 7,243,000 Contractors/Brokers - Claims Processing - Outreach/Marketing costs - Health Services Initiatives 4,568,000 Other 614,000 Total Administration Costs 18,465,000 10% Administrative Cap (Net Benefit Costs / 9) 53,073,500
Cost of Proposed SPA Changes (326,000)
Federal Share 336,751,700 State Share 159,374,600 Total Costs of Approved CHIP Plan 496,126,200
NOTE: The costs associated with the current SPA are included.
The Source of State Share Funds: General Revenue Funds (GRF)
Section 10. Annual Reports and Evaluations
Guidance: The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), CMS and the states developed framework for the annual report that states have the option to use to complete the required evaluation report. The framework recognizes the diversity in State approaches to implementing CHIP and provides consistency across states in the structure, content, and format of the evaluation report. Use of the framework and submission of this information will allow comparisons to be made between states and on a nationwide basis. The framework for the annual report can be obtained from NASHP’s website at http://www.nashp.org. Per the title XXI statute at Section 2108(a), states must submit reports by January 1st to be compliant with requirements.
110 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-113)Page 113#
10.1. Annual Reports. The State assures that it will assess the operation of the State plan under this Title in each fiscal year, including: (Section 2108(a)(1),(2)) (42 CFR 457.750)
10.1.1. The progress made in reducing the number of uninsured low-income children and report to the Secretary by January 1 following the end of the fiscal year on the result of the assessment, and
10.2. The State assures it will comply with future reporting requirements as they are developed. (42 CFR 457.710(e))
10.3. The State assures that it will comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to Federal grant requirements and Federal reporting requirements.
10.3-DC The State agrees to submit yearly the approved dental benefit package and to submit quarterly current and accurate information on enrolled dental providers in the State to the Health Resources and Services Administration for posting on the Insure Kids Now! Website. Please update Sections 6.2-DC and 9.10 when electing this option.
Section 11. Program Integrity
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan, and continue to Section 12.
11.1. The state assures that services are provided in an effective and efficient manner through free and open competition or through basing rates on other public and private rates that are actuarially sound. (Section 2101(a)) (42CFR 457.940(b))
11.2. The State assures, to the extent they apply, that the following provisions of the Social Security Act will apply under Title XXI, to the same extent they apply to a State under Title XIX: (Section 2107(e)) (42 CFR 457.935(b)) (The items below were moved from section 9.8. Previously 9.8.6. - 9.8.9.)
11.2.1. 42 CFR Part 455 Subpart B (relating to disclosure of information by providers and fiscal agents) 11.2.2. Section 1124 (relating to disclosure of ownership and related information) 11.2.3. Section 1126 (relating to disclosure of information about certain convicted individuals) 11.2.4. Section 1128A (relating to civil monetary penalties) 11.2.5. Section 1128B (relating to criminal penalties for certain additional charges) 11.2.6. Section 1128E (relating to the National health care fraud and abuse data collection program)
Section 12. Applicant and enrollee protections
Check here if the State elects to use funds provided under Title XXI only to provide expanded 111 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-114)Page 114#
eligibility under the State’s Medicaid plan.
12.1. Eligibility and Enrollment Matters- Describe the review process for eligibility and enrollment matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120. Describe any special processes and procedures that are unique to the applicant’s rights when the State is using the Express Lane option when determining eligibility.
The Medicaid fair hearing process is used for Title XXI participants. Appeals may be filed regarding any eligibility and enrollment matter, including denial of eligibility, failure to make a timely determination of eligibility and suspension or termination of . Appeals can be filed in writing, by fax or in person or by calling a toll-free telephone number. Appeals must be filed within 60 calendar days after the decision (action) being appealed. Benefits are continued if the enrollee requests that benefits be continued and files the appeal by the date of change or the 10th calendar day after the decision being appealed, whichever is later. A pre-hearing review must be held within 7 days after the appeal is filed. If the decision is not changed during the pre-hearing review, a pre-hearing meeting, an informal meeting with the enrollee, must take place within 10 days after the appeal is received. If the decision is not changed or the enrollee does not withdraw the appeal, an appeal hearing is held with a neutral hearing officer presiding. The enrollee or their representative must attend the hearing and has the opportunity to review documents to be used at the hearing, both before and during the hearing. During the hearing, the enrollee has the opportunity to present the case or have it presented by their representative, bring witnesses, present arguments without interference, question or prove wrong any testimony or evidence, confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and submit evidence. The final hearing decision must be approved by the HFS Director and sometimes also by the DHS Secretary, and must be put into effect within 90 days of the date the appeal is filed, barring any approved hearing delays. The enrollee is notified of the final hearing decision in writing.
Denial and cancellation notices include the reason for denial or cancellation, and an explanation of appeal rights including time frames for review, and how to request a review. Notices are automatically centrally generated the day after the determination is made and are mailed within 1-3 days of being generated. Cancellation notices include information on how to request continuation of benefits during appeal. The application includes an explanation of appeal rights and how to request a review. The Member Handbook also provides an explanation of the appeals process.
There is not an expedited review process for health service matters under the fee-for- service delivery system. If an appeal is filed on a decision, and there is an immediate need for health services, the services will be provided during the appeal process. Under the managed care delivery system, the appeal process includes expedited review for health service matters. The managed care plan must make a decision or request additional information needed to make a decision within twenty-four hours of receipt of the appeal. If additional information is requested, the managed care plan must make a decision within twenty-four hours after receipt of the information.
112 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-115)Page 115#
Guidance: “Health services matters” refers to grievances relating to the provision of health care.
12.2. Health Services Matters- Describe the review process for health services matters that complies with 42 CFR 457.1120.
The Medicaid fair hearing process is used for Title XXI participants under fee-for- service. Appeals may be filed regarding health services matters using the process described in Section 12.1 above.
The managed care delivery system complies with the fair hearing process in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and State law (Section 45 of the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act) and meets the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1130(b). Appeals may be filed regarding health services matters and final decisions may be appealed by the enrollee to the State under its appeals process described in Section 12.1 above.
12.3. Premium Assistance Programs- If providing coverage through a group health plan that does not meet the requirements of 42 CFR 457.1120, describe how the State will assure that applicants and enrollees have the option to obtain health benefits coverage other than through the group health plan at initial enrollment and at each redetermination of eligibility.
Not applicable.
113 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-116)Page 116#
Key for Newly Incorporated Templates The newly incorporated templates are indicated with the following letters after the numerical section throughout the template.
• PC- Prenatal care and associated health care services (SHO #02-004, issued November 12, 2002) • PW- Coverage of pregnant women (CHIPRA #2, SHO # 09-006, issued May 11, 2009) • TC- Tribal consultation requirements (ARRA #2, CHIPRA #3, issued May 28, 2009) • DC- Dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • DS- Supplemental dental benefits (CHIPRA # 7, SHO # #09-012, issued October 7, 2009) • PA- Premium assistance (CHIPRA # 13, SHO # 10-002, issued February 2, 2010) • EL- Express lane eligibility (CHIPRA # 14, SHO # 10-003, issued February 4, 2010) • LR- Lawfully Residing requirements (CHIPRA # 17, SHO # 10-006, issued July 1, 2010)
114 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-117)Page 117#
CMS Regional Offices CMS Associate Regional Regional States Regional Office Address Administrator Offices Region 1- Connecticut New Hampshire Richard R. McGreal John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg. Boston Massachuset Rhode Island richard.mcgreal@cms.hhs.gov Room 2275 ts Vermont Boston, MA 02203-0003 Maine Region 2- New York New Jersey Michael Melendez 26 Federal Plaza New York Virgin Puerto Rico michael.melendez@cms.hhs.gov Room 3811 Islands New York, NY 10278-0063 Region 3- Delaware Pennsylvania Ted Gallagher The Public Ledger Building Philadelphia District of Virginia ted.gallagher@cms.hhs.gov 150 South Independence Mall Columbia West Virginia West Maryland Suite 216 Philadelphia, PA 19106 Region 4- Alabama Mississippi Jackie Glaze Atlanta Federal Center Atlanta Florida North Carolina jackie.glaze@cms.hhs.gov 4th Floor Georgia South Carolina 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Kentucky Tennessee Suite 4T20 Atlanta, GA 30303-8909 Region 5- Illinois Minnesota Verlon Johnson 233 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago Indiana Ohio verlon.johnson@cms.hhs.gov Suite 600 Michigan Wisconsin Chicago, IL 60601 Region 6- Arkansas Oklahoma Bill Brooks 1301 Young Street, 8th Floor Dallas Louisiana Texas bill.brooks@cms.hhs.gov Dallas, TX 75202 New Mexico Region 7- Iowa Missouri James G. Scott Richard Bulling Federal Bldg. Kansas City Kansas Nebraska james.scott1@cms.hhs.gov 601 East 12 Street, Room 235 Kansas City, MO 64106-2808 Region 8- Colorado South Dakota Richard Allen Federal Office Building, Room Denver Montana Utah richard.allen@cms.hhs.gov 522 1961 Stout Street North Wyoming Denver, CO 80294-3538 Dakota Region 9- Arizona American Gloria Nagle 90 Seventh Street Suite 5-300 San California Samoa gloria.nagle@cms.hhs.gov San Francisco Federal Building Francisco Hawaii Guam San Francisco, CA 94103 Nevada Northern Mariana Islands Region 10- Idaho Alaska Carol Peverly 2001 Sixth Avenue Seattle Washington Oregon carol.peverly@cms.hhs.gov MS RX-43 Seattle, WA 98121
115 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-118)Page 118#
GLOSSARY Adapted directly from Sec. 2110. DEFINITIONS. CHILD HEALTH ASSISTANCE- For purposes of this title, the term ‘child health assistance’ means payment for part or all of the cost of health benefits coverage for targeted low-income children that includes any of the following (and includes, in the case described in Section 2105(a)(2)(A), payment for part or all of the cost of providing any of the following), as specified under the State plan: 1. Inpatient hospital services. 2. Outpatient hospital services. 3. Physician services. 4. Surgical services. 5. Clinic services (including health center services) and other ambulatory health care services. 6. Prescription drugs and biologicals and the administration of such drugs and biologicals, only if such drugs and biologicals are not furnished for the purpose of causing, or assisting in causing, the death, suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of a person. 7. Over-the-counter medications. 8. Laboratory and radiological services. 9. Prenatal care and pre-pregnancy family planning services and supplies. 10. Inpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (18) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including residential or other 24-hour therapeutically planned structured services. 11. Outpatient mental health services, other than services described in paragraph (19) but including services furnished in a State-operated mental hospital and including community-based services. 12. Durable medical equipment and other medically-related or remedial devices (such as prosthetic devices, implants, eyeglasses, hearing aids, dental devices, and adaptive devices). 13. Disposable medical supplies. 14. Home and community-based health care services and related supportive services (such as home health nursing services, home health aide services, personal care, assistance with activities of daily living, chore services, day care services, respite care services, training for family members, and minor modifications to the home). 15. Nursing care services (such as nurse practitioner services, nurse midwife services, advanced practice nurse services, private duty nursing care, pediatric nurse services, and respiratory care services) in a home, school, or other setting. 16. Abortion only if necessary to save the life of the mother or if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. 17. Dental services. 18. Inpatient substance abuse treatment services and residential substance abuse treatment services. 19. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services. 20. Case management services. 21. Care coordination services. 22. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and services for individuals with speech, hearing, and language disorders. 23. Hospice care. 24. Any other medical, diagnostic, screening, preventive, restorative, remedial, therapeutic, or rehabilitative services (whether in a facility, home, school, or other setting) if recognized by State law and only if the service is-- 116 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-119)Page 119#
a. prescribed by or furnished by a physician or other licensed or registered practitioner within the scope of practice as defined by State law, b. performed under the general supervision or at the direction of a physician, or c. furnished by a health care facility that is operated by a State or local government or is licensed under State law and operating within the scope of the license. 25. Premiums for private health care insurance coverage. 26. Medical transportation. 27. Enabling services (such as transportation, translation, and outreach services) only if designed to increase the accessibility of primary and preventive health care services for eligible low-income individuals. 28. Any other health care services or items specified by the Secretary and not excluded under this section.
TARGETED LOW-INCOME CHILD DEFINED- For purposes of this title-- 1. IN GENERAL- Subject to paragraph (2), the term ‘targeted low-income child’ means a child-- a. who has been determined eligible by the State for child health assistance under the State plan; b. (i) who is a low-income child, or (ii) is a child whose family income (as determined under the State child health plan) exceeds the Medicaid applicable income level (as defined in paragraph (4)), but does not exceed 50 percentage points above the Medicaid applicable income level; and c. who is not found to be eligible for medical assistance under title XIX or covered under a group health plan or under health insurance coverage (as such terms are defined in Section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act). 2. CHILDREN EXCLUDED- Such term does not include-- a. a child who is a resident of a public institution or a patient in an institution for mental diseases; or b. a child who is a member of a family that is eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits plan on the basis of a family member's employment with a public agency in the State. 3. SPECIAL RULE- A child shall not be considered to be described in paragraph (1)(C) notwithstanding that the child is covered under a health insurance coverage program that has been in operation since before July 1, 1997, and that is offered by a State which receives no Federal funds for the program's operation. 4. MEDICAID APPLICABLE INCOME LEVEL- The term ‘Medicaid applicable income level’ means, with respect to a child, the effective income level (expressed as a percent of the poverty line) that has been specified under the State plan under title XIX (including under a waiver authorized by the Secretary or under Section 1902(r)(2)), as of June 1, 1997, for the child to be eligible for medical assistance under Section 1902(l)(2) for the age of such child. 5. TARGETED LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMAN.—The term ‘targeted low-income pregnant woman’ means an individual— (A) during pregnancy and through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of her pregnancy) ends; (B) whose family income exceeds 185 percent (or, if higher, the percent applied under subsection (b)(1)(A)) of the poverty line applicable to a family of the size involved, but does not exceed the income eligibility level established under the State child health plan under this title for a targeted low-income child; and (C) who satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(C), (2), and (3) of Section 2110(b) in the 117 -
(il)(il-21-0006-chip)(pdf)(page-120)Page 120#
same manner as a child applying for child health assistance would have to satisfy such requirements.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this title: 1. CHILD- The term ‘child’ means an individual under 19 years of age. 2. CREDITABLE HEALTH COVERAGE- The term ‘creditable health coverage’ has the meaning given the term ‘creditable coverage’ under Section 2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(c)) and includes coverage that meets the requirements of section 2103 provided to a targeted low-income child under this title or under a waiver approved under section 2105(c)(2)(B) (relating to a direct service waiver). 3. GROUP HEALTH PLAN; HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE; ETC- The terms ‘group health plan’, ‘group health insurance coverage’, and ‘health insurance coverage’ have the meanings given such terms in Section 2191 of the Public Health Service Act. 4. LOW-INCOME CHILD - The term ‘low-income child’ means a child whose family income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved. 5. POVERTY LINE DEFINED- The term ‘poverty line’ has the meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any revision required by such section. 6. PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSION- The term ‘preexisting condition exclusion’ has the meaning given such term in section 2701(b)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg(b)(1)(A)). 7. STATE CHILD HEALTH PLAN; PLAN- Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms ‘State child health plan’ and ‘plan’ mean a State child health plan approved under Section 2106. 8. UNINSURED CHILD- The term ‘uninsured child’ means a child that does not have creditable health coverage.
118 -
This section is unusually large; deeper subsections were cut off. Open a subsection via its designator link — for example (ca)(ca-chipspa-20) — to read its full text.