Page 122

The following chart explains the effect of placement type and reunification on the parent or caretaker relative’s BadgerCare Plus eligibility: Type of Placement/Agreement or Service Parents (MAGA) and caretaker relatives (MAGN) with all children removed from home Parents (MAGA) and caretaker relatives (MAGN) with child(ren) removed from home, and some child(ren) remain in home Other Child Welfare Caretakers of children who have been removed from the home Out of Home Care or Kinship Care (voluntary or court-ordered) If cooperating with a reunification permanency plan, they continue to be considered a parent or caretaker relative of the temporarily absent child(ren) under the BadgerCare Plus parent category. Because there are other children in the home, eligibility is under the BadgerCare Plus parent category. May only qualify for BadgerCare Plus as a childless adult (MAGS) while the child is temporarily absent. Long-term kinship care or Subsidized Guardianship May only qualify for BadgerCare Plus as a childless adult (MAGS). Because there are other children in the home, eligibility is under the BadgerCare Plus parent category. May only qualify for BadgerCare Plus as a childless adult (MAGS). These factors and tax filing statuses impact the BadgerCare Plus group size. Example 1 Stacy’s child, Jared, was placed in out-of-home care with Laura, by the child welfare agency. Stacy files taxes but is not claiming Jared as her tax dependent. Because Laura has had Jared in her care most of the year, she is claiming Jared as her tax dependent. Stacy is cooperating with the reunification goal of Jared’s permanency plan. There are no other children, tax filers, or tax dependents in either Stacy’s or Laura’s households. If Stacy applies for BadgerCare Plus and meets all non-financial and financial requirements, she may be eligible for BadgerCare Plus as a parent with a group size of one. Example 2 Ben’s daughter, Megan, was placed in court-ordered Kinship Care with her grandfather, James (age 60). Ben does not file taxes, but James does. Because Megan was in James’s home most of the year, he claims Megan as his dependent. There are no other children, tax filers, or tax dependents in either Ben’s or James’s households. Ben is cooperating with the reunification goal of Megan’s permanency plan. If Ben applies for BadgerCare Plus and meets all non-financial and financial requirements, he may be eligible for BadgerCare Plus as a parent with a group size of two. Example 3 Jenny’s son, Simon, was placed with Jerry (age 66) in out-of-home care by the child welfare agency. Jenny is cooperating with the reunification goal of Simon’s permanency plan. Jenny files taxes and claims Simon as a dependent. If Jenny applies for health care, she may be eligible for BadgerCare Plus as a parent with a group size of two. This page last updated in Release Number: 26-02 Release Date: 04/15/2026 Effective Date: 04/15/2026