Page 859

(B) Estimate how much revenue all the revenue replacement 1 alternatives recommended in the final report would have generated for 2 the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium if the state had implemented the 3 alternatives on January 1, 2003; 4 (C) Estimate the tax rates necessary to implement all recommended 5 revenue replacement alternatives in order to achieve the revenues 6 generated during the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium as reported by the 7 economic and revenue forecast council; 8 (D) Estimate the impact on taxpayers, including tax paid as a 9 share of household income for various income levels, and tax paid as 10 a share of total business revenue for various business activities, 11 for (f)(i)(B) and (C) of this subsection; and 12 (E) Estimate how much revenue would have been generated in the 13 2017-2019 fiscal biennium if the incremental revenue alternatives 14 recommended in the final report would have been implemented on 15 January 1, 2003, excluding any recommendations implemented before May 16 21, 2019; 17 (ii) With respect to the recommendations in the final report of 18 the 2018 tax structure work group: 19 (A) Conduct economic modeling or comparable analysis of replacing 20 the business and occupation tax with an alternative, such as 21 corporate income tax or margins tax, and estimate the impact on 22 taxpayers, such as tax paid as a share of total business revenue for 23 various business activities, assuming the same revenues generated by 24 business and occupation taxes during the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium as 25 reported by the economic and revenue forecast council; and 26 (B) Estimate how much revenue would have been generated for the 27 2017-2019 fiscal biennium if the one percent revenue growth limit on 28 regular property taxes was replaced with a limit based on population 29 growth and inflation if the state had implemented this policy on 30 January 1, 2003; 31 (iii) Analyze our economic competitiveness with border states: 32 (A) Estimate the revenues that would have been generated during 33 the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium, had Washington adopted the tax 34 structure of those states, assuming the economic tax base for the 35 2017-2019 fiscal biennium as reported by the economic and revenue 36 forecast council; and 37 (B) Estimate the impact on taxpayers, including tax paid as a 38 share of household income for various income levels, and tax paid as 39 p. 858 ESSB 5187.SL