loading…
loading…
loading…
results, iron supplementation and type of anemia (if indicated).
FFY2019-2021: CT-WIC MIS (Management Information System).
*Beginning with 2022 State Plan submission, we will report available complete calendar year data. In addition, in 10% of charts despite bloodwork on file staff failed to enter results in CT-WIC. The State agency performed quality assurance (QA) using child charts from four local agencies and with a range of ages. Local agencies achieved the best results on the following indicators: accurately entering H/H into CT-WIC (53%) and scheduling and completing follow-up visits (66.7%). Local agencies partially met or completely met the standards for having a complete assessment note (78.6%). Local agencies did not meet the standards for setting an action plan/goal (60%) and identifying factors for anemia (80%). 2.4 a. The prevalence of BMI > 85%ile to < 95%ile for children 2-5 years of age does not exceed 15%.
b. The prevalence of BMI > 95%ile for children 2-5 years of age does not exceed 10%.
Review of local agency LAPs and show that few local agencies have implemented the TMM About Your Child tool.
As a result, the State agency developed a required strategy for local agencies to use TMM About Your Child in FY24. All child participants at risk of overweight or obesity will have the TMM questionnaire completed at their follow-up visits to assess behaviors and monitor progress.
2024 WIC Objectives: Overweight: < 15% Obesity: < 10%
a. OVERWEIGHT: BMI ≥ 85th%ile to <95th%ile
FFY 2019 Target: ≤ 15.0% Average: 15.1% Range: 10.1% - 20.1%
FFY 2020 Target: ≤ 15.0% Average: 15.1% Range: 9.1% - 20.8%
FFY 2021 Target: ≤ 15.0% Average: 14.7% CT-WIC Quarterly & Annual Outcome, Summary & Trend Reports.
Indicators of effective use include documentation of TMM, MI, Stages of Change and/or development of a plan.
The statewide target for the overweight objective was met, however, the obesity target was not met. Both overweight and obese targets show progress in the average and range. The State agency performed quality assurance on a total of 18 charts (2) for each local agency. Local agencies achieved the best results on the following indicators: